similar to: legalities of streaming

Hmmm, so in summary, anyone wanting to put together a station for a couple of hundred listeners with out a massive bank account, it can not be done legally. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris G (Moguta)" <chrisg1@umbc.edu> To: "icecast" <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:33 AM Subject: RE: [icecast] legalities of streaming <p>>

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Joshua Vickery wrote: > Great, so should we file with SoundExchange or wait for the RIAA to pick > a rate? Yes, you are supposed to file with the RIAA (SE as you suggest?). Period, end of story. Jwz covers this on his site IIRC. > Even if they insisted on collecting $0.004 per performance I don't think > we have even 100000 "performances" a

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Jack Moffitt wrote: > > ================================================================== > > hey josh, > > i talked to [faculty advisor] today and was told we must stop our online > > streaming. reasons for this rash decision involve around a new law that > > was put in place over the summer saying that stations who broadcast online > >

> Everything that I've come across and it is my understanding is that > traditional radio stations are not exempt if they broadcast via the > web. In short, the RIAA and the labels it represents are greedy > individuals and will take their money whereever they can get it. If the > money is green they want it. Great, so should we file with SoundExchange or wait for the RIAA to

Oh, I almost forgot... If you're going under compulsory licensing: 1) Listener requests cannot be honored, otherwise you will end up labeled an "interactive service" along with Audiogalaxy Rhapsody & the like. Which means more & more expensive royalties. 2) You cannot play more than 3 songs of the same album in any 3 hour period (no more than 2 in a row). Nor can you

Hi list, This might not be the right list to bring this subject up on, however I thought it might be a good place to start. What are the current legalities in relation to non commercial music streams, or more accurately put non profit streams, and is this currently being seriously policed? Basically I am wanting to start up my own online station, but I don't really want to get my butt

Forewarning... this is my understanding and advice. I am not a lawyer. First off, Jamie Zawinski has an article about this here: http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/webcasting.html > ================================================================== > hey josh, > i talked to [faculty advisor] today and was told we must stop our online > streaming. reasons for this rash decision

Last year I arranged with my college radio station and ITS department to webcast the radiostation using icecast. The webcast has been a wonderful success so far. My problem now is not technical, but political. A few days ago I recieved the following message from the station director: ================================================================== hey josh, i talked to [faculty advisor]

> On Sat, 2005-03-05 at 23:52, Mihail Egorov wrote: > > 1. How can I identify disconnect due to low <queue-size>. Suppose, I have > > enabled loglevel=4 (debug). Suppose, I have network jam. What shall I see at > > error.log? > > There is a log message that signifies the removal of a listener for > being too slow and that is > "Client has fallen too far

> performances. That's ~125,000 performances a year, which equates to about > $180,000. > > Significantly higher than the Frauhofer license, unless you generate > $9Mil/yr or more in revenue from your stream. The rates are in arbitration, and I doubt they will come out anywhere near that amount. It just isn't feasible, even for large companies. Reember, tradidional

> >So uh, you think it's worth more for mp3, than the actual music > >involved? > > > >Come on. > > Hmm.. so what you're saying is that for under $2K I can get an unlimited > distribution license from the recording industry? To burn, distribute, > sell and market as much of their material as I like? Wow. Sign me up. Streaming music is $250

At 16:30 6/9/2001 -0600, you wrote: >broadcasting online. Nor are they subject to the compulsory license. Right.. it would be nice to see online broadcasters treated the same way. >There's still a possibility that the DMCA will be dismantled before the >arbitration is even finished. You shouldn't have to pay the RIAA >anyway, and the fact that they are even involved is

> I found this article: > > <http://www.copyright.gov/carp/webcasting_rates_final.html> > > but I still don't know what to make of it. Would we > have to pay $0.07 per song the DJ played? How about a > live performance with all original material? Also see: http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/webcasting.html I'm not sure what the rates are, but essentially

Hi gang, In 500 words or less (if possible), please explain what is a legal music-on-hold file? My boss hates the stuff provided with the distribution and I figure that I'm asking for trouble if I take my Les Mis tracks and run them through Audacity and SOX to make new files. Thanks in advance Danny Nicholas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi, I've installed the igraph package and have been otherwise using it successfully, but when I try to use graph.bfs I get the error: could not find function "graph.bfs" Moreover, I don't seem to have the documentation installed either. (per ?graph.bfs and ??graph.bfs). I'm using RStudio v0.95.262 on windows 7. Below is the info for my R build: R version 2.14.0

Is the new NIN Ghosts music (free download) safe for MOH? Justin ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Greetings! I've been asked to set-up an Icecast stream / live webcam for a small club, and I'm worried about what kind of payments the owner would have to make to stream the club's music over the internet. I found this article: <http://www.copyright.gov/carp/webcasting_rates_final.html> but I still don't know what to make of it. Would we have to pay $0.07 per song the DJ

Ditto Scott - you nailed it !! But the DMCA actually sets rules on requests and processing them without being considered "interactive" - for instance the time frame allowed from when requests are made and then processed and actually air (minimum 60 minutes), to displaying your playlist - (can not be displayed public in the order of actual performance) basically as long as you never

Consider this a Ticket for Icecast 2.4 ******************************************************************************** If you look at {{{ admin/stats.xml }}} on a Icecast-KH server (default setup) and an Icecast 2.4 server (default setup) the following is one of the things that the KH branch has as extra info. {{{ <listener id="3581"> <ID>3581</ID>

Chris G (Moguta) wrote: > Oh, I almost forgot... > > If you're going under compulsory licensing: > > 1) Listener requests cannot be honored, otherwise you will end up labeled an > "interactive service" along with Audiogalaxy Rhapsody & the like. Which means > more & more expensive royalties. > > 2) You cannot play more than 3 songs of the same