similar to: directory servers

I never said that the information would be deleted. Rather, the new page will concentrate on icecast2 and related vorbis projects. The information for the older releases (as well as all the content from the Icecast1 page) will just be a click away. I'm not justifying anything. Read back to a few days ago, maybe a week or so. I asked for help documenting Icecast2 and Ices2. You just not

Id definatly be interested in helping with the ices2 icecast2 directory protocol. Just take a look at wp.casterclub.com. Is there a list of TODO pages anywhere??? Best Regards Dave St John Mediacast1 Administration (720) 641-7586 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Manuel Lora" <vanguardist@cox.net> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:29 AM Subject: Re:

> www.icecast.org contains information regarding the icecast=20 > 1.x releases.=20 > Development on that series has stopped in favor of Icecast2=20 > and Ices2, for=20 Are you serious??? The development state of "Icecast 1" vs. Icecast2 has *nothing* to do = with the web site. Not from a user perspective anyways. What's infuriating is you're not even ASKING for

> www.icecast.org contains information regarding the icecast > 1.x releases. > Development on that series has stopped in favor of Icecast2 > and Ices2, for Are you serious??? The development state of "Icecast 1" vs. Icecast2 has *nothing* to do with the web site. Not from a user perspective anyways. What's infuriating is you're not even ASKING for help..

On 22 Nov 2002 07:41 MYT you wrote: > > > Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. > We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of > "RE: [icecast] directory servers". > > Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your > mailer's "Reply" feature. > > icecast confirm

> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Smith [mailto:msmith@xiph.org] > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 4:02 AM > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Please confirm your message > > > > >Are you serious??? > > > >The development state of "Icecast 1" vs. Icecast2 has > *nothing* to do with the > >web site. Not from a

Thanks but I can't figure out how to use it! I presume I put it in the winamp plugins directory then what? Winamp didn't even have a plugin directory! Hmm now I know why I use linux! R <p><p><p><p>On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:03:35 -0500 Manuel Lora <vanguardist@cox.net> wrote: > > You can use oddcast DSP (www.oddsock.org) > > ml > > On

Hi wow for a person just starting this is all exciting - do people here think its better to install icecast2 if it's as stable as you say and start to learn on this and not bother with 1.xxx All we want to do is live broadcast ( icecast on red hat box but we use winamp to get the data too this ) AJB -----Original Message----- From: owner-icecast@xiph.org [mailto:owner-icecast@xiph.org]On

> You can get an October 10 alpha release from www.xiph.org/~msmith/ or you > can get the latest code from the xiph.org CVS repository (visit > http://www.xiph.org/cvs.html (module icecast). documentation is almost > non-existant for icecast2 so if you hit any trouble, ask here. > > Geoff. This is true. There is no solid documentation for icecast2, yet. However, there are some

Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of "RE: [icecast] directory servers". Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your mailer's "Reply" feature. icecast+confirm+1037921402.17606.bab310@xiph.org Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org

> Hi > > wow for a person just starting this is all exciting - do people here think its better to install icecast2 if it's as stable as you > say and start to learn on this and not bother with 1.xxx > > All we want to do is live broadcast ( icecast on red hat box but we use winamp to get the data too this ) > > AJB <p> i use icecast2/ices2 for live OGG

Raymond wrote: > I guess as a mercy plee for help I'll mention why I need to have the > static ogg files play as the mp3 static files play with icecast1. I'm I don't know how Icecast1 did it (I never used it other than trying for a day years ago). Anyways, Icecast2's file serving is pretty self-explanatory. Have <fileserve>1</fileserve> somwhere within your

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > If icecast.org is so broken, then someone ought to do what was > > suggested on the list in November (looking through the archives): > > put it out of its misery. Why are there no "official" releases? > > I already told you, there *are* official releases (or, to be exact, one > release), but

Hi there. I just switched from icecast1 to icecast2. Right now I'm not sure if that was a very good idea. I do like the ogg-support, but I lack a good amount of documentation (Hey, I'd be glad to help you out, but how can there be consistent documentation for a software that is only available through cvs(-snapshots)?) and good linux source clients. I used xmms-liveice or muse before, but

KJ, Would you like to help Mike document ices2 and icecast2? We can use help in that department. Specifically, documenting every feature available, and what and how combinations of settings work, as well as keeping track of what's being implemented in CVS as it happens. We're working toward an update of the icecast page and documentation will be a part of that. Manuel

You can use oddcast DSP (www.oddsock.org) ml On Friday 11 October 2002 06:56 pm, Richard wrote: > Help! > we're trying to set up an online radio station for Columbus day here > in Denver and can't seem to find a good working streamer for a windows > machine! Icecast2 works fine when I use the ices2 streamer on the same > linux box. What do you recommend - winamp plugin

Jim Bailey wrote: > were found the list seems to of quietened down a lot. Maybe the big > boys are busy working on a new version or prahaps the rumours are true > and they have gone to work on shoutcast. I am not sure where I picked > up the later if it not true please feel free to flame me. *flame* :) Courious, how rumors like this can come up. Icecast1 doesn't get much

Hello, I'm trying to set up an internal broadcasting center for a company. They've got a great many mp3's they'd like to do. I'd like to use either icecast or icecast2 for this and darkice or ices2 as a streamer. This will be on a FreeBSD 5.0 machine. As of now i have not had great success with this setup primarily in the streamer area. I can get either icecast1 or 2 going

Akos Maroy wrote: > > http://www.xiph.org/~msmith/ > > This has been said before. > This is no good. This is by far not the first time someone has pointed > out, that icecast2 is not mentioned _anywhere_ where one would expect to > find it. By this I mean locations like icecast.org, freshmeat.net, etc. > I wonder how people start to hear about icecast2. But when they do,

That's a little odd, there are streams listed at yp.icecast.org... What's up with that? And of course my question on other directory servers still stands. --thanks Michael Edwards http://www.walledcity.ca >===== Original Message From Manuel Lora <vanguardist@cox.net> ===== >Icecast.org no longer hosts the yp directory. > >ml > > >On Saturday 05 April 2003