similar to: directory servers

I never said that the information would be deleted. Rather, the new page will concentrate on icecast2 and related vorbis projects. The information for the older releases (as well as all the content from the Icecast1 page) will just be a click away. I'm not justifying anything. Read back to a few days ago, maybe a week or so. I asked for help documenting Icecast2 and Ices2. You just not

> www.icecast.org contains information regarding the icecast=20 > 1.x releases.=20 > Development on that series has stopped in favor of Icecast2=20 > and Ices2, for=20 Are you serious??? The development state of "Icecast 1" vs. Icecast2 has *nothing* to do = with the web site. Not from a user perspective anyways. What's infuriating is you're not even ASKING for

> -----Original Message----- > From: Manuel Lora [mailto:vanguardist@cox.net] > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:29 AM > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] directory servers > > > I never said that the information would be deleted. Rather, > the new page will > concentrate on icecast2 and related vorbis projects. The > information for the >

> www.icecast.org contains information regarding the icecast > 1.x releases. > Development on that series has stopped in favor of Icecast2 > and Ices2, for Are you serious??? The development state of "Icecast 1" vs. Icecast2 has *nothing* to do with the web site. Not from a user perspective anyways. What's infuriating is you're not even ASKING for help..

Id definatly be interested in helping with the ices2 icecast2 directory protocol. Just take a look at wp.casterclub.com. Is there a list of TODO pages anywhere??? Best Regards Dave St John Mediacast1 Administration (720) 641-7586 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Manuel Lora" <vanguardist@cox.net> To: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:29 AM Subject: Re:

On 22 Nov 2002 07:41 MYT you wrote: > > > Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. > We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of > "RE: [icecast] directory servers". > > Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your > mailer's "Reply" feature. > > icecast confirm

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > > the current stable version. Those who are willing to give up the > > features not yet implemented in icecast2 in order to stream vorbis, can > > use the devel version. Those who don't need to stream vorbis can > > continue using the stable version. There is not a good rationality for > > Icecast2 is

Behold, Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org> hath decreed: > > > It's icecast. It's part of xiph. It's the same project. Presumably it's > > the same developers. I don't care about the similarity of the code > > bases. One is released, the other one is not (alpha versions are not > > releases). > > No. Whilst it originally shared one

Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of "RE: [icecast] directory servers". Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your mailer's "Reply" feature. icecast+confirm+1037921402.17606.bab310@xiph.org Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org

> The current homepage is http://www.xiph.org/cvs.html ... this is > supposed to change eventually, but there are some weird problems with > icecast.org that i don't quite understand. :) > > Anyways, do NOT check out icecast2 from icecast.org CVS, it is very > outdated. Instead, check out the 'icecast' module from anoncvs@xiph.org. > > Moritz Sorry...

Aaron Gaudio wrote: > Where is it released? Telling me I have to set up cvs to download http://www.xiph.org/~msmith/ This has been said before. > > I never said that it's a final release, I said "alpha release". It's not > Then how is it a replacement for icecast1? How is a fully released > icecast1 obsoleted by an alpha release? Who said Icecast2 is a

Behold, Adon Irani <adon@YorkU.CA> hath decreed: > > the icecast2 developers be guilt-tripped into repeating icecast's > performance ? > _ is it not enough that OGG can have a streaming server that supports it ? Perhaps, if that is the only requirement to have a fully-functional streamer. Unfortunately, I believe this is not sufficient for the user base. So, if the

On 12/30/02 10:59 AM, "Aaron Gaudio" <prothonotar@tarnation.dyndns.org> wrote: > Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: >> >> http://www.xiph.org/about.html > > Note also the paragraph at http://www.xiph.org/ : > > "Xiph.Org Foundation is a non-profit corporation dedicated to protecting the > foundations of Internet multimedia from control by

Hi Geoff, I'm a bit confused... After reading the docs, I was under the impression that icecast2 does not do on demand relaying? I did a google search, found this (well, it's a year ago) http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/2004-February/006555.html Also, in the relaying section of the icecast documentation: http://www.icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.2.0/icecast2_relay.html There was no

Hi guys, Can anyone point me to some good icecast1 documentation? I looked on the icecast.org website, but the /docs link only list the icecast2 documentation now and the whole site is void of icecast1 documentation... Using icecast1 instead of icecast2 because I need on-demand-streaming... Thanks, Kelv

gtgbr@gmx.net wrote: > Aaron Gaudio wrote: > >>Where is it released? Telling me I have to set up cvs to download > > > http://www.xiph.org/~msmith/ > > This has been said before. This is no good. This is by far not the first time someone has pointed out, that icecast2 is not mentioned _anywhere_ where one would expect to find it. By this I mean locations like

Akos Maroy wrote: > > http://www.xiph.org/~msmith/ > > This has been said before. > This is no good. This is by far not the first time someone has pointed > out, that icecast2 is not mentioned _anywhere_ where one would expect to > find it. By this I mean locations like icecast.org, freshmeat.net, etc. > I wonder how people start to hear about icecast2. But when they do,

Behold, gtgbr@gmx.net hath decreed: > > Well, I think saying that Xiph.org doesn't care about its users at all > is too harsh. On the other hand, there's some truth in this, and I > highly appreciate it. If you want to stick to MP3, Icecast1 is for you - > nobody forces you to use it (or not), and you're also free to use > something else. Xiph.org, i.e. Jack

KJ, Would you like to help Mike document ices2 and icecast2? We can use help in that department. Specifically, documenting every feature available, and what and how combinations of settings work, as well as keeping track of what's being implemented in CVS as it happens. We're working toward an update of the icecast page and documentation will be a part of that. Manuel

Aaron Gaudio wrote: > or developing for it. The fact that no release packages are available > signifies to me that icecast2 is not yet ready for prime time. This Well, there are, see Geoff's mail ... those are official. Multiple problems of pretty much any kind prevented Xiph.org from getting icecast.org in order; I don't know much about them, but the fact that icecast.org is