similar to: Update failure: Mate requires libgtop-2.0.so.10

> Date: Monday, December 03, 2018 20:41:20 -0600 > From: Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net> > > I just tried updating this laptop to the shiny new Centos version > and it appears that Mate doesn't like the new version of libgtop, > as you can see here: > > Error: Package: marco-1.16.1-3.el7.x86_64 (@epel) > Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) >

In addition, there is a bugzilla report for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644519 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jason Edgecombe | Linux Administrator UNC Charlotte | The William States Lee College of Engineering 9201 University City Blvd. | Charlotte, NC 28223-0001 Phone: 704-687-1943 jwedgeco at uncc.edu | http://engr.uncc.edu |

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > > > ------------ Original Message ------------ >> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 >> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> >> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > >> >> Does anyone know what's up with: >> >> Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >> Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) >> >> Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? > > > Check epel-testing, that's

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 > From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Cc: > Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency? > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard > <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: >>

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:32:12 -0500 > From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard > <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: >> >> >> ------------ Original Message ------------ >>> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500

> Date: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 17:08:52 +0000 > From: Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> > > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 07:44 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 06:00, isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > OT for this list, but maybe I can get some pointers - how hard is >> >

On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 07:44 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 06:00, isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > OT for this list, but maybe I can get some pointers - how hard is > > it to get some packages updated in EPEL? The project web site sends > > you from link to link, and the ML web interface is horrible.

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 12:18, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > > > > > Date: Tuesday, December 04, 2018 17:08:52 +0000 > > From: Tony Molloy <tony.molloy at ul.ie> > > > > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 07:44 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 06:00, isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: >

Does anyone know what's up with: Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-01:65 Security Advisory FreeBSD, Inc. Topic: Buffer overflow in libgtop_server Category: ports Module: libgtop Announced: 2001-12-11

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > >>>> Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The >>>> libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. >>> >>> Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr". >> >> So... the right thing to do for someone who

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:05:16 -0500 > From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > To: CentOS <centos at centos.org> > Subject: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency? > > Does anyone know what's up with: > > Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) > Requires:

On 12/21/18 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:27:45PM +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote: >> On 2018-12-19, Fred Smith >> <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> Result: Boots to GDM just fine, but Mate is a black screen. Switching >>> to Gnome, works fine, but I can't stand Gnome. Not knowing what

On 03/26/2015 04:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Richard > <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: >> >>>>> Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The >>>>> libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. >>>> >>>> Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 04:33:59PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:06:14PM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > > On 12/21/18 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > >On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:27:45PM +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote: > > >>On 2018-12-19, Fred Smith > > >><fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > >> > >

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:06:14PM -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 12/21/18 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:27:45PM +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote: > >>On 2018-12-19, Fred Smith > >><fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > >> > >>[...] > >> > >>>Result: Boots to GDM just fine, but Mate is a black

On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:27:45PM +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2018-12-19, Fred Smith > <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > [...] > > > Result: Boots to GDM just fine, but Mate is a black screen. Switching > > to Gnome, works fine, but I can't stand Gnome. Not knowing what else > > to try I restored the dd backup. > > This is

According to Twitter: https://mobile.twitter.com/CentOSProject/status/1173652996305170432 "The next version of #CentOS is being released September 24 and will be announced in all the usual places." I'm wondering about the status of the Mate Desktop. Looking under M here: https://mirror.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/fedora/epel/8/Everything/x86_64/Packages/m/ I don't see anything

On 9/24/19 10:55 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 15:41, Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net> wrote: >> >> Without wanting to sound too pushy, I'm wondering if there is any update on the status of Mate now that Centos 8 has been released? >> >> I would love to jump on C8 and start playing with it, but the lack of Mate is kind of a