On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote:> > > ------------ Original Message ------------ >> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 >> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> >> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency? >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard >> <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Does anyone know what's up with: >>>> >>>> Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >>>> Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) >>>> >>>> Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? >>> >>> >>> Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I >>> believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things >>> quickly.] >>> >> >> Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The >> libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. > > Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr".So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a system today would be??? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
------------ Original Message ------------> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:32:12 -0500 > From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard > <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: >> >> >> ------------ Original Message ------------ >>> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 >>> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard >>> <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone know what's up with: >>>>> >>>>> Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >>>>> Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) >>>>> >>>>> Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? >>>> >>>> >>>> Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I >>>> believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things >>>> quickly.] >>>> >>> >>> Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The >>> libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. >> >> Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr". > > So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a > system today would be???Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it the other day: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html> I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine, though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in -testing may have moved to epel base by now.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote:> >>>> Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The >>>> libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. >>> >>> Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr". >> >> So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a >> system today would be??? > > Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it > the other day: > > <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html> > > I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and > epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine, > though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in > -testing may have moved to epel base by now. >It's not so much a matter of having a "view" of CR as that I didn't expect things to appear in EPEL that depend on base versions that aren't in general release yet. Is that intentional, and don't some number of people have to approve something before it gets out of epel-testing? Does everyone else have cr enabled? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com