On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote:> >> >> Does anyone know what's up with: >> >> Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >> Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) >> >> Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? > > > Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I > believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things > quickly.] >Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
------------ Original Message ------------> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 > From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Cc: > Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency? > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard > <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> Does anyone know what's up with: >>> >>> Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >>> Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) >>> >>> Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? >> >> >> Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I >> believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things >> quickly.] >> > > Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The > libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway.Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr".
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote:> > > ------------ Original Message ------------ >> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 >> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> >> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency? >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard >> <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Does anyone know what's up with: >>>> >>>> Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >>>> Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) >>>> >>>> Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos? >>> >>> >>> Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I >>> believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things >>> quickly.] >>> >> >> Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The >> libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway. > > Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr".So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a system today would be??? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com