similar to: facilities to output to monitoring interfaces

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "facilities to output to monitoring interfaces"

2004 Apr 04
1
Routing through dummy interfaces?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a linux system with 4 ethernet interfaces, eth0 goes to the internet, eth1, eth2, and eth3 are NAT''d LANs. I want to use an ingress filter to prioritize bandwidth (downstream from internet) to various IPs. I want to sett it up something like this.... eth0 <--[NAT]--> dummy0 <---> dummy1 <---> eth1,eth2,eth3 dummy1
2007 Sep 11
2
one server with 4 port ethernet interfaces to four clients.
Dear all, I have a server with 4 ethernet port interfaces. Also, I have four clients that will connected directly (cross-cable) to one-by-one of each port ethernet interfaces of my server. |--SERVER--\ | eth0-- ------------------ client A | eth1-- ------------------ client B | eth2-- ------------------ client C | eth3--
2007 May 15
0
Re: Using multiple network interfaces (internetconnections) separately
Hi , I want to use the " * random selection of gateway, per TCP connection?" ,i can do it right now but my if same remote site( ip ) always goto the same gateway,i think that is ip_route_cache problem or something like this how can I do ?? Kuolung ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Wallace" <randywallacejr@gmail.com> To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl> Sent:
2007 Apr 18
0
The "ip route get" returns wrong interface and gateway in an multipath routing environment
Hi, I think I found a problem in iproute or ubuntu kernel. I think that the "ip route get" returns wrong interface and gateway in an multipath routing environment on Ubuntu 6.06 LTS. I reported it also to launchpad as a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/105521 The easiest way to reproduce it is to start an Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Live on a system with three
2007 May 06
2
Using multiple network interfaces (internet connections) separately
Hi, I need a solution for this case: I have a PC(as server) with 3 (or more) Ethernet ports and 3 (or more) Internet access through each Ethernet interface. (from different ISP''s and with different IP''s of course) I need to download files (using wget or whatever else) through each interface (internet line) separately. For example i need to download "file1" through
2006 Apr 27
1
Unsubscribe
> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to > lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to > lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl > > You can reach the person managing the list at >
2005 Jan 16
0
Identification of TC Queueing Discipline
Hi all, I previously mailed this list explaining that I been given the task of implementing a dynamic traffic shaping scheme on an existing network. I was looking for guidance on how I should approach this but unfortunately I was unable to provide much information about the existing traffic shaping system. I have recently obtained the existing tc scripts though and was hoping someone could help
2007 Aug 21
0
again the same prob that is ::two providers (heres full description )
many many thanks for ur help ok i m making my problem more clear... my LAN ip is :172.16.100.0/24 ip of eth1 is :202.51.78.122 and this is fixed and permanent address and it has no netmask and gateway(so, to provide internet to my LAN i have used the ppp0 for this connection ) ip of eth2 : 203.78.165.154; netmask:255.255.255.248; gateway:203.78.165.153 for eth0 my
2002 Oct 22
0
a little program with split access?
(I am resending this message because my previous mail seems corrupted) Hi. I am having a little problem with IP MASQ and IPROUTE2. I am using RedHat 8.0 with IPTABLES. I have a linux gateway server with 3 NICs. I set up the linux server as the below. As the result, it works fine( 192.168.0.x can access the internet by masquerading via eth2 and external internet can access the eth1 and eth2).
2004 May 15
0
Trouble with Mutli Link Redundancy
I am running kernel 2.6.5, gentoo linux...julian''s routes-2.6.4-10 installed eth0 = local eth1 = cable modem eth2 = T1 I am having issues with the machine actually sending packets out over each hop, it tends to default to eth2, almost never will it use eth1- I can make a rule to send traffic through the eth1 from certain hosts, and it will force the IP through that interface, but
2004 Sep 29
0
Netfilter NAT and IP rule
Hi all, I have a network like this : Provider 1 Provider 2 \ / \ / \ / eth1 \ / eth2 ------------- | | | | | | | | | | | eth0 | ------------- | | | | 2 networks : -
2007 Sep 13
0
Routing for Dual ISP connections
I''m trying to connect to two ISPs the connections are as follows: Eth0 IP: 192.168.1.1 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth1 IP: 216.167.217.241 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth2 IP: 216.167.208.40 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Here are the commands to set things up: #Load modules insmod /lib/modules/2.6.19.2- pyramid.metrix.net/kernel/net/ipv4/multipath_drr.ko insmod /lib/modules/2.6.19.2-
2007 Sep 16
0
Dual Connections with Soekris net4801and Pyramid Linux
I''m trying to connect to two ISPs the connections are as follows: Eth0 IP: 192.168.1.1 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth1 IP: 216.167.217.241 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Eth2 IP: 216.167.208.40 Mask: 255.255.255.0 Here are the commands to set things up: #Load modules insmod /lib/modules/2.6.19.2- pyramid.metrix.net/kernel/net/ipv4/multipath_drr.ko insmod
2005 Jan 30
0
problem - multiple links to a network
Hi, I have a Linux machine with kernel 2.6 and 3 network cards. I would like to ask what rules should I have in the routing table so that: 192.168.254.0/25 is routed through eth1 192.168.254.128/25 is routed through eth2 eth0 is my internal interface and eth1/eth2 are the external interfaces. * What is particulary specific for this case is that ipaddr_eth1 is in the same network as ipaddr_eth2
2003 Sep 03
0
filtering on destination MAC address
hi- i''ve been trying to setup an outgoing queue that prioritizes traffic depending on whether it recognizes the MAC address the packet is destined to -- and i''ve not been having any luck. i think my ebtables rule is correct as the packet count when i do an --Lc is increasing in an expected way, but when i look at the tc statistics, i don''t think the packets are
2004 Jan 19
0
Two ISP load balancing + One ISP'' subnet explicit routing
Hello! I have a problem. May be here exist anyone who has encountered with the following problem. I have a router which is connected to 2 ISP from external side and one LAN internal interface. The feature is that the one ISP allocates a subnet xxx.xxx.xxx.160/28 for me but I split it into two subnets xxx.xxx.xxx.160/29 and xxx.xxx.xxx.168/29 and assign the latter to the internal interface. Also
2002 Apr 22
2
RE: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Hi All, concerning the problem when running the "ip ru ls" command. I faced with the same problem, and I solved it by making sure to include the following settings into the kernel configuration (2.4.18): CONFIG_IP_ADVANCED_ROUTER=y <=== CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y <=== CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_NAT=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_TOS=y
2004 Aug 17
0
TCP load balance
Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | | x eth1 (63.43.x.x)
2004 Aug 18
0
outgoing TCP load balance
Hello, LARTC mailing readers, I hope u can help with this mysterious issue i''m having with my linux box acting as a router. Scenario: Linux running 2.6.8.1 /w julians patches /w support for multipath routing Latest iproute (iproute2-ss040702) 4 NICS ----------------- | x eth0 (63.43.x.x) network mask (255.255.240.0) | |
2005 Jun 22
1
Problem with HTB and IPTABLES
Dear All, I’m working with Fedora Core 3, kernel 2.9.1, MPLS-for-Linux-4.193, and having some problems when create a HTB queue. ALL packets goes to the default queue, they don’t care about any mark or ip field I use to enqueue them. : -/ That’s the deal, all packets that incoming the interface eth2 are classified and have theirs TOS field changed following some qos policy at the PREROUTING