Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Can't compile CVS with non-gcc compilers"
2000 Nov 22
1
Non-gcc build problems
I sent a message about 2 weeks ago about build problems at the head of the
CVS tree with non-gcc compilers on POSIX systems, although I didn't
correctly identify the link problems as being static-library only (see my
previous mail about "static link broken"). Some problems have been fixed,
but some still seem to be there.
I have edited my original mail to list the problems that
2000 Dec 15
2
Makefile patches
I have sent some patches to some Makefile.am's as well as to some
configure.in's, particularly for building without gcc and gmake.
Can someone review those patches, and/or commit them?
(we are working at the CVS head these days, no?)
I cannot build in Solaris without gcc/gmake, for example -- running
"autogen.sh" in the ao project with the native Solaris compilers causes
2000 Dec 20
7
CFLAGS / LDFLAGS
I notice that the user is not able to set their own CFLAGS or LDFLAGS in
the ao, ogg, vorbis, and voribs-tools projects.
Is there a reason for this?
I understand the fact that these modules want to set extremely high
optimization flags, and that most users won't know what these are offhand,
but there are times when it is useful for the user to specify their own
CFLAGS/LDFLAGS. For example,
2001 Jan 11
2
MP3pro
So it looks like the Frauenhoffer boys are issuing an updated format --
MP3pro. They claim that it will give 128kbps/MP3 quality in 64kbps.
I'm interested to see what others think of this.
I'm also curious: I've seen others on the list say that Ogg/Vorbis' sound
quality is "better" than MP3. Can this be quantified (or is this already
on a web page somewhere)? I kinda
2001 Jan 01
1
By design or a bug?
Happy new millenium!
Summary: I'm having a problem queueing up the ogg_packet results of
vorbis_analyze() for later writing to an .ogg stream. The docs don't seem
to say if this is permissable or not. Hence, I don't know if I'm using
the API incorrectly, or if this is an actual bug.
-----
Attached is a short patch to vorbis-tools/oggenc/encode.c (from CVS head,
01/01/01... I
2000 Dec 29
5
build process patches
Here's an updated set of patches to fix some problems with the build
process. These patches are relevant to the CVS head as of 30 Dec 2000.
Overview:
- Patch 1: Allowing the user to set CFLAGS/LDFLAGS before running
configure in all four modules. All these patches do is essentially:
cflags_save="$CFLAGS"
ldflags_save="$LDFLAGS"
# ... stuff to
2001 Jan 11
1
Oops -- forgot URL
>From /., here's the URL with the announcement of mp3PRO
http://www.twice.com/html/pagebeta.cfm?InputKey=2853
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} squyres@cse.nd.edu
{+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness
{+} "I came to ND for 4 years and ended up staying for a decade"
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage:
2001 Aug 20
1
Another // comment
vorbis/lib/vorbisenc.c:138 and 157 have "//" comments.
Patch included for the lazy (like me!).
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} squyres@cse.nd.edu
{+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness
{+} "I came to ND for 4 years and ended up staying for a decade"
Index: vorbis/lib/vorbisenc.c
===================================================================
RCS file:
2001 Mar 11
1
vorbis_analysis() dependencies?
Per Monty's suggestions from a while ago, I have [finally] gotten around
to playing with different schemes for parallel oggenc. Monty's main
suggestion was to have a single thread loop over reading samples and
calling vorbis_analysis_blockout(), and then queueing up the resulting
blocks to be processed through vorbis_analysis() in other threads (in
parallel).
To verify that this works, I
2001 Aug 19
1
C++ style comment in vorbis-tools/oggenc/utf.8
vorbis-tools/oggenc/utf8.c:164 has a //-style comment; it should be /* ...
*/ so that non-gcc compilers won't barf (e.g., solaris Forte 6.1 cc).
Patch included, if you're really lazy. :-)
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} squyres@cse.nd.edu
{+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness
{+} "I came to ND for 4 years and ended up staying for a decade"
Index: oggenc/utf8.c
2000 Aug 22
1
vorbis' configure
It seems that the configure script in CVS does not check the CFLAGS
environment variable at all. Indeed, on line 121 of configure.in, CFLAGS
is explicitly set to be blank.
Is this done for a reason? I see that several sets of CFLAGS are passed
into the Makefiles by configure based upon specific architecture/compiler
combinations -- perhaps this is the reason...?
I ask because users may wish to
2000 Nov 22
0
Static linking broken
It seems that configuring/building with "--enable-static --disable-shared"
causes some problems with building vorbis-tools -- the Makefile.am's in
oggenc and ogg123 do not appear to be correct.
That is, if you build ao, ogg, and vorbis statically and try to compile
oggenc or ogg123, you'll get unresolved symbol linker errors. This
happens on all POSIX architectures and
2000 Dec 29
2
ogg123 / Solaris
Speaking of ogg123 fixes and Solaris... <getopt.h> doesn't appear to
exist in Solaris. Hence, ogg123 won't compile on Solaris at all (even
with gcc).
I originally mentioned this back in November
(http://www.xiph.org/archives/vorbis-dev/200011/0291.html).
Can this be fixed?
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} squyres@cse.nd.edu
{+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness
2001 Jan 20
2
Makefile.am patch
Since vorbiscomment is being resurrected in a new form, can someone please
fix the vorbis-tools/vorbiscomment/Makefile.am?
There's two things wrong:
1. Using _LDFLAGS doesn't allow the user to specify their own LDFLAGS.
_LDADD or _LIBS should be used instead.
2. The order of libraries is wrong such that it won't link properly when
compiled statically.
Here's a trivial
2001 Feb 11
3
Parallel encoding
I'm afraid this e-mail is me being lazy. I'm interested in adapting the
encoder to farm out work to various machines on a network. I'm just
trying to find out if this is going to be trivial. I don't know how the
encoder works but from my very brief glance through the code it would
appear that a state is maintained 'vorbis_dsp_state' that's going to
make my distributed
2000 Jun 12
5
Compile Problems
Hello,
I've been trying to compile some things but have run into some
problems. I've have the vorbis directory inside of /usr/src. I have compiled
vorbis itself with no problems. I've also copied the results to their
respective directories as per the README file.
I've also compiled the XMMS plugin with no problem. However when it
is installed in the
2000 Dec 22
1
vorbis/ltconfig
The file vorbis/ltconfig appears to be checked into CVS. This is an
automatically generated file -- it should not be under CVS control.
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} squyres@cse.nd.edu
{+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness
{+} "I came to ND for 4 years and ended up staying for a decade"
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project
2001 Aug 20
1
Still more // comments
This time in vcut:
vorbis-tools/vcut/vcut.h:23 and 24.
No, I'm not spending quality time with grep; I'm trying to compile vorbis
with the native Sun Forte compilers. Much badness, of which these //
issues are only part. :-( More details to follow...
Patch/inc/lazy.
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} squyres@cse.nd.edu
{+} Perpetual Obsessive Notre Dame Student Craving Utter Madness
{+} "I
2001 Feb 11
1
Please gix getopt
I don't think that the getopt_long() situation is handled correctly in the
vorbis-tools module. Here's my take (comments welcome!).
-----
This applies to oggenc, ogg123, and vorbiscomment. See
http://www.xiph.org/archives/vorbis-dev/200012/0359.html for background
and prior discussion on this issue.
There are 2 issues:
1. Summary: getopt() is a POSIX function. It will already be on
2000 Sep 15
0
More on parallelism
Many of you probably remember the flurry of posts that I created a few
weeks ago about writing a parallel vorbis encoder. Here's what I have
been doing since...
Someone (I can't remember who offhand -- might have been Greg) mentioned
using threads instead of MPI for parallelism on the argument that more
people have SMPs than who have (and know how to use) an MPI
implementation.
Good