similar to: burning file to cd

Hullo, folks. As the wiki is *still* down, I'm sending this to the list again. The EZAV EMP-400 is a small flash-based portable player with an OLED screen. I think it's still in development, because I can't find information on its pricing anywhere. The memory capacity isn't visible anywhere either, but the previous device from EZAV had 256 megs of memory.

hello all! After having read http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/listen.html and listened to the examples on that very educational page, I decided to augment the info. This example is more simple, it involves the comparision between two streams of the same radio station, FranceInter (a station of Radio France in Paris). The ogg stream is running at around 30 kbps/11 kHz in stereo. The WMA stream

Monty wanted some samples with which to compare Vorbis and WMA, and he doesn't have a Win32 machine, so I made some. Microsoft has made their own demo samples available at: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/en/WM8/audio.asp I took their original .wav's, and encoded them with their wma8 encoder utility (WM8EUTIL.EXE), using all of the available stereo modes at 44.1kHz. This

I thought this might be interesting to you, it's an extract from the latest streaming media newsletter, I was intrested to note that MS are claiming cd quality audio at 48kbps whichi is obviously very low, I didn't think much of it at first because nobody uses MS codecs for audio anyway! However (a bit I missed off this quote by the look of it) I then read mention of portable audio players

I am writing a long-run sound recording application using OggVorbis. The user can adjust sound quality parameter to make balance between storage space and sound quality. The input sound is 22050Hz, mono. To maximize the recording capability on a given storage volume, we want the result bitrate as low as possible. I use -q0 parameter and it produces a 32.0kbps stream. It is too high (our

Hello -- I desperately want to start using Ogg compression on music I release on the internet, but I am encountering a fair amount of artifacts. I noticed some in beta4 and was hoping they would disappear with RC1. However, I've been playing with RC2 and I've still been banging my head into a number of problems. A majority of the music I make has long drones with a fair amount of spectral

Vorbis, using the AoTuV beta4.51 encoder, come first in a "Public, Multiformat Listening Test @ 128 kbps" organized on Hydrogenaudio forum. Hydrogenaudio thread: http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=40607 Presentation: http://www.maresweb.de/listening-tests/mf-128-1/ Results: http://www.maresweb.de/listening-tests/mf-128-1/results.htm

Hi All, I have two questions. I have an icecast2 server installed, and I need to set up a Linux-based computer that sends a church's programs to the icecast server. (Both worship and teaching.) What application do you suggest? It would be really pleasing if I wouldn't need X11 to use the software, and it would display (with charactergraphics) the current signal level. The signal

Hello. I am new to this forum and relatively new to Icecast. I have set up and Icecast broadcast from my computer using Winamp as the playlist and the SAM Encoders to encode to WMA. The broadcast is running perfectly. The only issue is when I create an ASX file that links to my broadcast, it shows my IP address as the title of the broadcast. What do I need to do to change this to a name of my

_+icecast@sucs.org wrote: > Ices, Darkice, most of the normal stream creation bits don't need X11 > Do you mean normalisation? I mean dynamic compression. > WMA is Microsoft only so you will probably need to use Microsoft > software to do this. > > But if you already have MP3 I realy don't see the reason for WMA, as > anything that plays WMA is likely to also

Some CDs will include all the songs encoded with Windows Media, removing the the need for ripping. Sounds like it has the potential to stomp out competition from other formats such as MP3 & OGG. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-201-7320279-0.html --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a

hi folks, in my (unlucky) first test of ogg vs other encoders, i found a case where wma and mp3pro sound much better than ogg at 64k. can anyone suggest a setting that i haven't tried yet that can rival the wma and mp3pro samples at 64k? it's the "gravel effect" that is troublesome. the part in question is the first 15 seconds of this wave file:

> From: Jack Moffitt [mailto:jack@icecast.org] > > So in the very near future, I don't think that there will be any > non-vorbis capable players. And for the most part, I think Vorbis will > be included in most players, though I have little hope that Microsoft > will allow Vorbis to stand side-by-side with WMA. There is a big difference between having a codec available for

I'm shopping for a small/tiny audio recorder, the kind for recording in a class, interviews, etc... not really music, just voice. Per usual, a lot of these write their audio files in some Windows format, e.g., WMA. As a confirmed Linux guy, I'd want to offload the audio files in some format that Linux can read/play natively. I've read a sketchy suggestion that there's a Linux

thanks for getting back to me, i have uploaded a zip file containing some sound files that demonstrates the issue. http://www.bogus.net/~olav/ess.zip this contains s.mp3 original wav file (mono) converted to top-quality mp3 (370K) s.wma windows media encoder with 19khz voice compression ( 62K) s-2.spx speexenc --vbr --quality 2 on the wav file ( 63K) s-9.spx

Hello all I have been encoding to OGG as a default for well over a year, but I recently thought I ought to test how it sounds compared to other codecs. I got the Windows Media 9 encoder and I was quite surprised at how bad a job OGG did at quality 0 with a simple piano clip, and how well WMA9 was - I've always considered WMA as being a bit naff, but WMA9 has forced me to re-access this view

I am very happy to announce that the aoTuV tuning of Ogg Vorbis has tied with Musepack at first place in the 128 kbps listening test. It has beat iTunes AAC, Lame MP3, ATRAC3, and WMA standard. :) http://www.rjamorim.com/test/multiformat128/results.html -- ------------------------------------------------- Stephen So PhD Student Signal Processing Laboratory School of Microelectronic

dear vorbis developers, it would be very useful, if oggenc would support constant low-bandwith bitrates for testing. something from 20kbps to 44kbps, so anyone could test streaming over modem and isdn. audio quality doesn't matter. mörk --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

> From: "JD Conley" <jdc@malibuboats.com> > To: "'vorbis@xiph.org'" <vorbis@xiph.org> > Subject: RE: [vorbis] new MS codecs > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:49:58 -0800 > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) > Reply-To: vorbis@xiph.org > > Oh yeah, they have some samples on their site. Interestingly enough, they > don't

hi i have switch to using oddcast under window platform and now using icecastwin32 as server in this case is there any possible way to let icecastwin32 to stream Wma? pls advise thanks you -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Shang [mailto:geoff@hitsandpieces.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 1:06 PM To: Neo Jiun Siang - R&D Cc: icecast@xiph.org; njsalan@hotmail.com Subject: RE: