similar to: minimum processor/ram follow up

Assuming Linux as the operating system, what would be the minimum processor/ram requirements to decode ogg vorbis files? I'm looking at building a vorbis player for my car, but I need to know what speed and how much ram I'll need. Thanks for the help. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list,

I'm trying to install centos 5 on an old machine, a Micron with a pentium III and 250 megs of ram. I'm using the DVD image. The media check said the DVD was OK. Everything starts fine (both in graphics and text modes), untl I get to the custom partition table. The new system will go on hda, with the boot and root partition reformatted (see below). I laid it out to preserve the data on

The vorbis FAQ mentions that decoding vorbis should use roughly the same resources as decoding MP3's, but that the current source is not optimized. So what is the current requirement? I have a Pentium 133 with 64 megs and I cannot get .ogg files to play without skipping. I've tried encoding .wav files and downloading .ogg files from www.vorbis.com and playing them on Winamp with

Hello all, I am using a headset and the X-lite softphone (sometimes I use IAXComm, but I'm having difficulties using OSS emulation with it) to connect via uLaw to my internal Asterisk server, which is a Pentium II 400 with 128 megs of RAM. After getting this headset, most or all of the echo people on the other line were complaining about is now gone, according to them. However, every

On Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:39:01 +1000 Michael Smith <msmith@labyrinth.net.au> wrote: > It should take little to no cpu (I haven't yet tested it with enough users > to take it above... 0.1% cpu?), so there's a serious problem here. > > Michael Ok, That's not good then.. Hmm.. Here's my setup currently. libogg-1.0rc2, libvorbis-1.0rc2, (both from the vorbis.com unix

Dear list, I have noticed surprisingly big performance differences of runif() between Windows XP and (Debian) linux on similar CPUs (Pentium D 3.0GHz (WinXP)/3.2GHz (Linux)) and I wonder if there is a simple explanation for the difference. On a linux system (with a slightly better CPU and 1GB more RAM), execution of runif() seems to consume about 80% more CPU time than on a Windows XP

I was installing centos 5.3 x86_64 on a sempron 2.7G machine with 512M ram. The install started off fine then REALLY SLOWED down about 70% into install. I did have a swap space. after that it just crawled. I tried restart the install a couple times at 512M. Same thing around 70% the slow down. I then put in 1G of RAM and everything zipped on past and finished fine. Does 5.3 have minimum

Hi All I been using whitebox 3 for a bit and am take a look at cent 3.3 and 3.1 so far like it, but i seeing with older system 200 to 800 not Intel system (amd k6/2) ( not all of them ) cent comes back in install and till me that its not made for system like this ... whitebox 3 works OK so I'm not sure why and if a can get around this .... See BUG. "That's not a bug,

Hello: I have a Supermicro SuperServer 5015P-TR. It has a Pentium D and is running CentOS x86_64. Can this machine use 8GB RAM? I think it should because it is running a 64 bit OS, but I am concerned because it is fundamentally 32 bit hardware. Anyone have any experience in this area? Thanks, Neil -- Neil Aggarwal, (832)245-7314, www.JAMMConsulting.com Eliminate junk email and reclaim your

Greetings, We recently obtained a new computer in our lab with a Pentium 4 3.86 GHz processor and 4 gb of ram running windows xp with service pack 2. After installing R on this machine, I ran a bit of code and found that the execution time was actually significantly slower than a machine running windows xp with an older Pentium chip 1.73 GHz and 1 gb of ram. After speaking with the

Hello all, Saturday night, after a couple of shots of bourbon, I realized that I had an old PC sitting in the garage that I could use as an Asterisk gateway if I just blew the dust off it and reloaded it with a modern Linux distribution. In my characteristically impulsive manner, I grabbed it and started cleaning it up so that I could put it in my office without my wife having a fit. The

A friend has an old Pentium-133 laptop with 32MB of memory and a 1.3 GB hard disk that he wants to use as a web server for a very small community. Will CentOS (or any other RHEL derived distribution for that matter) install and run with acceptable performance on such a system, or will a specialized distribution like Damn Small Linux be a better choice? In this case, disk space is not a big

Hi again, On a related not, I think I read in the mailing-list archives that the Pentium III wasn't "ideal" for .ogg operations; are AMD's processors more appropriate/do they perform better? Thanks, Joane _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. --- >8 ---- List

Is there any way to disable the checksum block search in rsync, or to somehow optimize it for systems that are processor-bound in addition to being network bound? I'm using rsync on very low power embedded systems to rsync files that are sometimes comparatively large (sometimes a few hundred megs in size or larger), and am finding that just the operation of the checksumming one such file on

When I initially start up my server I have two thin processes running that are only about 200M in size. They slowly creep up a few megs an hour until now a week later they are at 400M and 300M respectively. I realize that my site (http://wlodb.com) has some intensive pages that take a couple seconds to render (most notably http://wlodb.com/compounds ) but I''m wondering if this is

Hi Everyone, My first posting to the list. Longtime Ogg fan, have created many .oggs, but this is the first time needing help. I've been transferring CDs to Ogg files using crip. I've been in the process of setting up a bunch of mules to transfer my music collection to electronic format, but I've found an oddity: >bash$ oggenc -q 5 oddity.wav >Opening with wav

Hey all, I was planning on getting a new computer for the new year to help with my dissertation research, and recently had an opportunity to compare the performance of my 1.6 GHz Pentium M laptop, and a 2.8 GHz dual-core Pentium processor (both running WinXP professional 32-bit). I run a lot of long simulations, so I was hoping to get something that would speed them up. I ran a few quick

Hello, Can someone give me an idea of the memory requirements for using libFLAC? I'm trying to incorporate FLAC support into a player application for the Rio Receiver (see http://rioreceiver.comms.net for details), but I'm having trouble because FLAC__stream_decoder_new() is attempting to allocate 2099828 bytes for an instance of the FLAC__StreamDecoderPrivate struct. Is this accurate,

Ok heres the deal..... Im not a gamer, this is the first game Ive bought in 4 years so please bear with me. Ive been playing RTCW MP2 Test since it came out , I loved it. Sooo...when it hit the shelves I bought it, now, heres the hook, I run only linux...but Im a completley impatient person so....I bought the windows version assuming I could run it under linux, I can, it rocks, all except one

I took 5 albums (Classical music) and converted them to Ogg Vorbis at "Full Bitrate" (-q10) and all 5 directories take up about 775 Megs which won't fit on a CD. So I ripped them again in WAV first (And give my friend back his CDs) but now I wanna know what quality setting should I use to fit them on 1 CD (The highest possible with total space used just under 700 Megs)