Dear list,
I have noticed surprisingly big performance differences of runif()
between Windows XP and (Debian) linux on similar CPUs (Pentium D 3.0GHz
(WinXP)/3.2GHz (Linux)) and I wonder if there is a simple explanation
for the difference.
On a linux system (with a slightly better CPU and 1GB more RAM),
execution of runif() seems to consume about 80% more CPU time than on a
Windows XP system.
On a Xeon 2.7GHz (Debian) linux I have checked, that using the .deb -
i386 - Version of R instead of a self-build i686 - version has no
noticeable effect on speed.
Measuring CPU time with Rprof() instead of Sys.time()-differences yields
similar results.
Any hint is appreciated, please let me know, if the given information on
system/OS or the R output below is not sufficient.
Regards,
Martin Becker
------------------------ R - Output below ------------------------
Windows XP: (Pentium D, 3.0 GHz)
> version
_
platform i386-pc-mingw32
arch i386
os mingw32
system i386, mingw32
status
major 2
minor 3.1
year 2006
month 06
day 01
svn rev 38247
language R
version.string Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01)
> RNGkind()
[1] "Mersenne-Twister" "Inversion"
> t1<-Sys.time();for (i in 1:500)
ttt<-runif(1000000);print(Sys.time()-t1);
Time difference of 57.969 secs
>
Debian Linux: (Pentium D, 3.2GHz)
> version
_
platform i686-pc-linux-gnu
arch i686
os linux-gnu
system i686, linux-gnu
status
major 2
minor 3.1
year 2006
month 06
day 01
svn rev 38247
language R
version.string Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01)
> RNGkind()
[1] "Mersenne-Twister" "Inversion"
> t1<-Sys.time();for (i in 1:500)
ttt<-runif(1000000);print(Sys.time()-t1);
Time difference of 1.752916 mins
>
Prof Brian Ripley
2006-Aug-29 19:29 UTC
[Rd] Speed of runif() on different Operating Systems
No one else seems to have responded to this. Please see `Writing R Extensions' for how to time things in R. For things like this, the fine details of how well the compiler keeps the pipelines and cache filled are important, as is the cache size and memory speed. Using system.time(for (i in 1:500) ttt <- runif(1000000)) your Linux time looks slow, indeed slower than the only 32-bit Linux box I have left (a 2GHz 512Kb cache Xeon) and 2.5x slower than a 64-bit R on an 2.2GHz Opteron (which is doing a lot of other work and so only giving about 30% of one of its processors to R: the elapsed time was much longer). The binary distribution of R for Windows is compiled with -O3: for some tasks it makes a lot of difference and this might just be one. However, what can you usefully do in R with 5e8 random uniforms in anything like a minute, let alone the aggregate time this list will spend reading your question? If it matters to you, investigate the code your compiler creates. (The ATLAS developers report very poor performance on certain Pentiums for certain versions of gcc4.) On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Martin Becker wrote:> Dear list, > > I have noticed surprisingly big performance differences of runif() > between Windows XP and (Debian) linux on similar CPUs (Pentium D 3.0GHz > (WinXP)/3.2GHz (Linux)) and I wonder if there is a simple explanation > for the difference. > On a linux system (with a slightly better CPU and 1GB more RAM), > execution of runif() seems to consume about 80% more CPU time than on a > Windows XP system. > On a Xeon 2.7GHz (Debian) linux I have checked, that using the .deb - > i386 - Version of R instead of a self-build i686 - version has no > noticeable effect on speed. > Measuring CPU time with Rprof() instead of Sys.time()-differences yields > similar results.You are not measuring CPU time at all with Sys.time.> Any hint is appreciated, please let me know, if the given information on > system/OS or the R output below is not sufficient. > > Regards, > > Martin Becker > > ------------------------ R - Output below ------------------------ > > Windows XP: (Pentium D, 3.0 GHz) > > > version > _ > platform i386-pc-mingw32 > arch i386 > os mingw32 > system i386, mingw32 > status > major 2 > minor 3.1 > year 2006 > month 06 > day 01 > svn rev 38247 > language R > version.string Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01) > > RNGkind() > [1] "Mersenne-Twister" "Inversion" > > t1<-Sys.time();for (i in 1:500) ttt<-runif(1000000);print(Sys.time()-t1); > Time difference of 57.969 secs > > > > Debian Linux: (Pentium D, 3.2GHz) > > > version > _ > platform i686-pc-linux-gnu > arch i686 > os linux-gnu > system i686, linux-gnu > status > major 2 > minor 3.1 > year 2006 > month 06 > day 01 > svn rev 38247 > language R > version.string Version 2.3.1 (2006-06-01) > > RNGkind() > [1] "Mersenne-Twister" "Inversion" > > t1<-Sys.time();for (i in 1:500) > ttt<-runif(1000000);print(Sys.time()-t1); > Time difference of 1.752916 mins > > > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >-- Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595