similar to: Are all RC3 implementations identical?

Here are some minor things I noticed when updating the vorbis module for GoldWave: Bitwise.c, line 175 and 207 Warning: Negative unsigned value ret=-1UL; Info.c, line 385 Warning: Unreachable code break; vorbisfile.c, line 1407 Warning: Call to function with no prototype int host_endian = host_is_big_endian(); fix: add 'void' to line 1339: static int host_is_big_endian( void )

While I am waiting for a 1.0 release of Ogg Vorbis, I made a "WAV" folder on my computer and have been regularly ripping CDs into that folder using Exact Audio Copy. Right now that folder has 3.4 GB of wave files in different subfolders. Is there a program in which I could specify this "WAV" folder, and it would go and recursively convert all WAVs into oggs of the same filename

Hello, Do you know of any Windows software that is able to record in mono from the sound card's line input and at the same time convert to *.ogg? Ultimately, one without ogg conversion would be OK too provided it can record mono wave files. Important: the software should be able to record WITHOUT first creating an empty wave file with a set length (Adaptec's Spin Doctor versus Goldwave).

> You can ask. A bug report with priority 'enhancement' is probably the > best way to do that. I'd consider it. Thanks for your help, Michael. I have entered this as an enhancement request. <p>Also, for the record, I originally made this comment: > I am actually trying to get OggEnc up and running nicely with > AudioGrabber, but so far I no joy I

I ripped an entire CD into WAV format using "Exact Audio Copy" software, and now I want to convert those 17 wave files into Ogg format. I have a DOS batch file that I've used before for CD conversion, but I want to add a comment saying that the sound file was ripped using "Exact Audio Copy". I don't see an option to add a regular comment to an Ogg file via

I've learned that I can make a tag with vorbisgain that tells the player at what volume a track is to be played to achieve a certain level of loudness. Is it possible that there will be a tag that tells the player for instance to add more bass when it plays a track? Ore more treble? With such tags it would be possible to customize the sound of a track according to my wishes - without

First of all, I'm using WinXP and love vorbis! :-) Since I just joined the mailing list, I figured I would answer the Winamp question. Winamp has different EQ algorithms - they have a "fast layer 2/3 EQ" option for mp3s, and they have a PCM EQ for all other formats (wma, ogg, etc.). While the mp3 EQ sounds ok, the PCM EQ (which gets applied to ogg files) is absolutely horrible. I

Hi all! I ran across another song that oggenc seems to have trouble to encode. The intro of U2:s "Grace" gets its right channel messed up by oggenc, even at the highest bitrate. Why is the bitrate only 218? Isn't that awfully little when asking for 320? Qualityflaws like these is the reason i prefer mp3 and mpplus today. But vorbis is getting better for every beta, so keep up the

Hello... I was very surprised when I found, that oggfiles created with RC3 are much worse than files made with RC2. I have some example sound file set up for you on the net. The difference is *obvious*. While RC2 made ogg-files, which I would say are perfect (at least I cannot hear a difference to the original), the quality of RC3 is *bad*. Let me first say, that I used libvorbis0, libogg0

I'm currently trying to figure out why RC3 oggenc with iconv support will - work, but enter replacement characters into tags instead of converting to UTF-8; - dump core; or - catch an assert(); depending on the locale settings. (On FreeBSD, with Chuguev iconv.) I think I'm getting a handle on the assert(). It's this one: assertion "(!k && !ibl) || (k == (size_t)(-1)

Since 1.0rc2 was released i have found that ogg@64k sounds almost like mp3@128k (in 95% of the 3000 files i encoded...) I tested 1.0rc3 and 64k bitrate (quality=0.0) gives less good quality than before. And bad : it takes longer to encode ! (1.7x vs. 2.0x on a P2/500MHz) Effectively 64k ogg files encoded with rc3 are smaller than files encoded with rc2. I hear people debatting on how satisfied

My machine is running RedHat Linux 7.3, and I believe it came with vorbis 1.0rc3 by default. To my knowledge, I upgraded all libraries, documentation, and binaries with 1.0 versions. it placed everything in /usr/local whereas the old stuff was in /usr, so I manually deleted the old stuff from /usr. When I run 'oggenc', it does say: "OggEnc v1.0 (libvorbis 1.0)"

Hi. Joined the list since this seems to be the only point of communication. Just have two comments/questions. 1) I looked all around the developer's site and vorbis.com and don't see any mention of where to send bug reports for 1.0 beta. I'd think it would be a FAQ. 2) My bug for the new beta. (I'm hoping someone of the PTB is reading ... I definitely don't belong on the

Hi. Joined the list since this seems to be the only point of communication. Just have two comments/questions. 1) I looked all around the developer's site and vorbis.com and don't see any mention of where to send bug reports for 1.0 beta. I'd think it would be a FAQ. 2) My bug for the new beta. (I'm hoping someone of the PTB is reading ... I definitely don't belong on the

I just tried this with Goldwave.. it decoded the file, i edited out some stuff, and saved the file (flac format) and the tags appear to be intact. Greg M. --- Tomas Valusek <tvalusek@seznam.cz> wrote: > Hello, > > and what if I want to preserve FLAC tags while I'm > editing its contents? > Is there a way e.g. to cut silent block from FLAC > and preserve tags? By

Happy New Year from the Xiphophorus Team. It took longer than we thought, but I think everyone will agree this is our best release yet. With drastic quality improvements and new bitrate management features, this release brings us one step closer to 1.0. Along with all the lovely VBR modes you are used to, you now have millions more. oggenc's quality settings are 0-10 in increments of

I've just done some rudimentary testing to see how Vorbis degrades at absurdly low bitrates without downsampling. In summary, don't hope for anything decent below -q 0 for now. I tried oggenc -b <bitrate> -M <bitrate> for the below and a few in between: 24k - spectral energy "floor" captured decently, but many pure-tone blips (think old computer movie sound effects)

can someone email me a list of special spots in quality settings, or point me to a website that tells these settings? i know i may be confusing, i'm talking about like the jump between -q4.99 and -q5 because of the whole lossy/lossless channel coupling, and filesize jump...i also know somewhere above there there is different high and low frequency cutoffs, and a point where there IS NO

Hey folks. I know tags aren't anyone's favorite subject, but I'd like to make a suggestion for a tag that I think is quite important -- a quality tag. So important, I think, that oggenc really ought to automatically create one when the -q option is used. As all of us know, in the Vorbis codec the quality of the stream is often a more important (and more informative) value than the

Hi all, I am relatively new to Linux and wine and I am trying to run an audio editing software called Goldwave 5.06 (version 4.26 works relatively well). 5.06 installs ok but when I go to run it I get the following error: "Driver does not support 16 bit colour depth or visual buffer could not be created. Visual disabled." And the meter displays do not work. I have tried adjusting