similar to: RC2 on slashdot.org

After doing an informal (128k) listening test, I have concluded that I prefer Beta4 over RC2. The 16kHz low-pass on the RC2 encoder makes it sound like FM radio. Both encoders SEEM to have a couple of dB bump at 10kHz. JT --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

I would very much like a lowpass option because for FM radio broadcasting I don't want to encode frequencies above 15khz. I'm waiting for this option before switching to ogg from mp3(lame). Ross. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vorbis@xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis@xiph.org]On Behalf Of > Gian-Carlo Pascutto > Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2001 01:46 > To:

Hi! I am very pleased with the progress that Ogg is making, expecially after I read the latest comparision tests on http://ff123.net/128test/instruct.html that put OGG on top aside with MPC. BUT the APPLAUD.WAV test case ( http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/applaud.wav ) still produces **VERY** easily audible high-frequency artifacts when encoded with OGG RC3 up to q4.9 (!!!). Things

Hello -- I desperately want to start using Ogg compression on music I release on the internet, but I am encountering a fair amount of artifacts. I noticed some in beta4 and was hoping they would disappear with RC1. However, I've been playing with RC2 and I've still been banging my head into a number of problems. A majority of the music I make has long drones with a fair amount of spectral

And thats only a player. What about an (Open Source) encoder? Nah, I'll stick with OGG for the time being. Regards, Mark -- Mark de Bokx Internet Service Engineer ICT Communication and Media Services PlanetMediaGroup the Netherlands "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty not safety." --Benjamin Franklin

Part 2 of my Rails article on ONLamp.com just made the slashdot front page! The entry, itself, is here: http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/04/1319242&tid=156 Curt

Hi! I would like to share with you an interesting test result. I re-encoded a song 10 times (the 2. made from the 1., the 3. made from the 2.,... the 10. made from the 9.), with a beta4 (CVS 20010620) and with an RC2 (CVS 20010817) library version, 256 kbit/s mode, channel coupling disabled at RC2. The beta4 is very good at the 10. encoding too, but the RC2 has some interesting quality bugs. So,

Ask Slashdot: Is Ruby on Rails Maintainable? Posted by Cliff on Wednesday December 21, @12:51PM from the would-you-want-to-edit-the-code-later dept. kale77in asks: "I''ve become a big fan of Ruby over the past few months, but I''m not at all sure about Ruby On Rails. Automatic code generation sets of alarm bells in my mind; so that, to RoR''s promise of

Hello all, I'm glad to announce to you that Vorbis now has full ReplayGain support. If you're not familiar with ReplayGain, take a look at www.replaygain.org. The main features are: a) all songs play back with equal loudness b) removes the need for normalization c) allows for clipping prevention Using it is very simple. Get a compatible decoder (ogg123, XMMS and WinAmp all support it

Hey, http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/13/1343236&mode=thread If anyone's interested. -- / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller <peter.schuller@infidyne.com>' Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey@scode.org E-Mail: peter.schuller@infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org --- >8 ---- List archives:

Hi all, I started testing the RC1 encoder at ftp://sjeng.sourceforge.net/pub/sjeng/oggdrop.exe (based on branch_monty_20010708) On the songs I have tested so far (not much :) I did not hear any stereo issues, but there are some very noticeable problems with the produced files. Songs without much high-end will suddenly have one when encoded. (you'd expect it the other way around) It

Just in case anyone missed it. Ugh. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/13/1343236&mode=nested --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages

I may not agree with everything they say, such as ISPConfig (I prefer webmin) but this tutorial offers a "step by step opportunity for newbies". Does this indicate that CentOS is now a "mainstream" distro? (Technically speaking its not CentOS 4.3 but CentOS 4 Update 3 but we are not into semantics). Article on Slash :- http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/05/01/1049254.shtml

How ISPs May Quietly Kill VoIP Communications Posted by Zonk on Friday March 18, @10:59PM from the poor-kids-never-had-a-chance dept. ravenII writes "PBS's i'Cringley's informative piece gives an eye-opening look at the anticompetitive behavior of some ISPs who are showing up late to the VoIP game. This is not something that could be easily mandated, and the beauty of this

> Date: Saturday, March 03, 2018 20:54:56 -0500 > From: Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> > > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:55:04PM -0600, dsavage at peaknet.net wrote: >> I don't know if this is a CentOS7/Firefox problem or one with the >> distant web site slashdot.org. I can connect to it just fine with >> the latest Firefox on my Windows 10

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc at gmail.com> wrote: > As much as I like killing support for Python 2.6 and below, RHEL is > usually the blocker. They still have 2.4 under support. Only the RHEL that > was released a few weeks ago finally has 2.7. > Given the amount of complexity required to build LLVM & Clang (having the right compiler &

Did anyone see the article? It''s the first time I really noticed that these little Linksys routers are such a fully fledged linux machine with a decent processor and a replacable firmware. I am now itching to get one to replace the multipurpose firewall desktop machine. Has anyone experimented with the current state of the firmware and how advanced you can get with tc rules? For

For those that may have run across the story on Slashdot about this NIC, here is our statement: Recently there were a few stories published, based on a blog post by an end-user, suggesting specific network packets may cause the Intel? 82574L Gigabit Ethernet Controller to become unresponsive until corrected by a full platform power cycle. Intel was made aware of this issue in September 2012 by

i'm sure most of us are avid slashdot readers, but... http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/07/13/1558239&mode=nested have fun dongoodman %--------------------------------------------deg3@ra.msstate.edu| |bleu| |`I invented the term 'object oriented', pobox 2516| |----| |and I can tell you mississippi state ms| | () | /. |I did

Hi all, ome people asked if it was possible to make an even higher quality mode by incorporating some of the changes from the first tuned version into the 350kbps mode. I did so and made a new version with this new mode. It gives bitrates from roughly 300-350kbps. That's a lot, but it also gets very hard to find something it artifacts on :) Should be sufficient for archival quality. In