similar to: Ask for help

Dear samba team: This is the first time I use samba. I want to install it on Solaris but I don=A1=AFt know which release of samba is fit for our workstation. So I hope I can get more and fast information from you. The details of our workstation is following: Workstation Type: SUNW, Ultra-5_10; sparc; sun4u OS: SunOS release 5.8 Generic_108528-01 =20 I

NEW message w/ URL to zip archive containing debug output. Hi I'm having huge problems with OpenSSH 3.0.1p1, compiled with OpenSSL 0.9.6b 9 Jul 2001 and running with prngd_0.9.23, it disconnects unexpectedly during client session due to bad packet length and corruped MAC on input, according to debug anyway. What can cause this kinds of errors? I've verified that both se9104/server and

Full_Name: Gregory R. Warnes Version: 1.2.0, 1.2.3 OS: SunOS gsun124 5.8 Generic_108528-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 Submission from: (NULL) (12.18.36.49) When using expand.model.frame on a model that specifies a subset selection, an error is generated on the variable used for the subset selection. Example: > data <- data.frame(x=1:10,y=1:10,z=1:10,m=1:10) > model <- lm( y ~

Hello, We are having issues with a NEW Sangoma A108D: -- Executing [691918892 at pbx1:1] Dial("SIP/xtravoip200-009d24b0", "DAHDI/g0/691918892|30|m") in new stack [Oct 1 10:04:43] WARNING[14171]: channel.c:3170 ast_request: No translator path exists for channel type DAHDI (native 76) to 256 [Oct 1 10:04:43] WARNING[14171]: app_dial.c:1237 dial_exec_full: Unable to create

Hello, I am apparently confused about the use of an id parameter for an event history/survival model, and why the EHA documentation for aftreg does not specify one. All assistance and insights are appreciated. Attempting to specifiy an id variable with the documentation example generates an "overlapping intervals" error, so I sorted the original mort dataframe and set subsequent entry

Hi, I'm using Sangoma's wanpipe together with dahdi, all software downloaded today at most recent version. Hardware is Sangoma A104, a 4xE1 card. Installation went well. Anyway, wanrouter status shows a different result than dahdi_tool or dahdi_scan. I've just put a hardware loop on port 1. All the other ports are open. wanrouter status shows the expected result: Device name |

Hello, I have following problem with Sangoma A104 card: CLI> pri show span 1 Primary D-channel: 16 Status: Provisioned, Down, Active Switchtype: EuroISDN Type: CPE Window Length: 0/7 Sentrej: 0 SolicitFbit: 0 Retrans: 0 Busy: 0 Overlap Dial: 0 T200 Timer: 1000 T203 Timer: 10000 T305 Timer: 30000 T308 Timer: 4000 T313 Timer: 4000 N200 Counter: 3 NOTICE[16509]: chan_zap.c:7494 pri_dchannel: PRI

Hi to all, I am working on design package using survival function. First using PSM and adopting a weibull specification for the baseline hazard , I have got the following results(since weibull has both PH and AFT propreties ,in addition I have used the PPHSm command): Value Std. Error z p (Intercept) 1.768 1.0007 1.77 7.73e-02 SIZE -0.707 0.0895 -7.90 2.80e-15

Hi, I have A101DE Sangoma Card( http://www.sangoma.com/products/hardware_products/digital_voice_and_data_networking/a101.html ) lspci shows as 03:04.0 Network controller: Sangoma Technologies Corp. A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card [root at asterisk ~]# lspci -vvv -s 03:04.0 03:04.0 Network controller: Sangoma Technologies Corp. A200/Remora FXO/FXS Analog AFT card Subsystem: Unknown device

Hi all, I am trying to run Weibull PH model in R. Assume in the data set I have x1 a continuous variable and x2 a categorical variable with two classes (0= sick and 1= healthy). I fit the model in the following way. Test=survreg(Surv(time,cens)~ x1+x2,dist="weibull") My questions are 1. Is it Weibull PH model or Weibull AFT model? Call: survreg(formula = Surv(time, delta) ~ x1

Hi, In the package survival, using the function survreg for AFT model, I only see 4 distributions for the response y: weibull, gaussian, logistic, lognormal and log-logistic, which correspond to certain distributions for the error terms. I'm wondering if there is a package or how to obtain the parameter estimates (the beta's are of great interest) from the AFT model (maximizing

Hello, I'm working with some left censored survival data using accelerated failure time models. I am interested in fitting different distributions to the data but seem to be getting the same results from the model fit using survreg regardless of the assumed distribution. These two codes seem to provide the same results: aft.gaussian <-

I have probably trivial problem in OpenSSH installation, but do not see it - could you help, please ? The libcrypto has been installed. caroubier% ls -l /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root other 2778744 Nov 19 17:53 /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.a But the openssh stops with Can't find recent OpenSSL libcrypto. Thank you very much in advance, Elisabeth Porteneuve --

Hi I have been having a rough time getting a Sangoma A200/Remora FXO/ FXS Analog AFT card set up properly. The main issue is that the card has four ports and as far as I can tell Asterisk is only seeing two. On the two that it recognizes the "Green" FXS ports are not green, they just are not lit. The "RED" FXO ports are indeed red, but from what I have read your not

Dear R-community, Dear Prof. Therneau, I would like to fit an AFT-model with time-dependent covariates and right-censored data. Searching the mailing list for information on the subject, I found some old posts which said it didn't work back then. My questions: (1) Has this kind of fitting already been implemented in the survival library in R? (2) If not: Are there any alternatives/

Hi, I think I have discovered a bug in FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE's system C++ compiler: % gcc -v % Using builtin specs. % gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD] Here is a stripped down example that can be used to reproduce the bug: // ----------- begin bug.cpp ----------- #include <iostream> class Class { public: void M1 (void) { cout << "M1" << endl; }; void M2

Dear Prof. Brostr?m, Dear R-mailinglist, first of all thanks a lot for your great effort to incorporate time-varying covariates into aftreg. It works like a charm so far and I'll update you with detailled benchmarks as soon as I have them. I have one more questions regarding Accelerated Failure Time models (with aftreg): You mention that left truncation in combination with time-varying

Hi, I'm estimating a loglogistic aft (accelerated failure time) model, just a simple plain vanilla one (without time dependent covariates), I'm comparing the results that I obtain between aftreg (eha package) and survreg(surv package). If I don't use any covariate the results are identical , if I add covariates all the coefficients are the same until a precision of 10^4 or 10^-5 except

Dear all, I am having trouble trying to install R-1.8.1 on a Sun Solaris 8 (Generic_108528-23 version) machine. The configuration was successful but make check fails. I traced the the problem to the plot() function. > 1 + 1 [1] 2 > capabilities() jpeg png tcltk X11 GNOME libz http/ftp sockets TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE

I have used asterisk-1.4.14, zaptel-1.4.7, chan_ss7-1.0.0 on FC7 all went okay. using sangoma a104dx on both machine. I followed the write up on http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+ss7+setup I have the cross over cable between them. however, wanpipe shows connected but the signaling link does not align. i have my configs for host A ##wanpipe1.conf [devices] wanpipe1 =