Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "No subject"
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and
log.nmbd are empty.
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865)
Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[]
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876)
sesssetupX:name=[administrator]
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
cheers, jerry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com
www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org
www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org
--"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
Return-Path:
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and
log.nmbd are empty.
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865)
Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08
13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876)
sesssetupX:name=[administrator]
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and
log.nmbd are empty.
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865)
Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08
13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876)
sesssetupX:name=[administrator]
[2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
However....
When I try the command
nmblookup -M TESTGROUP
querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255
name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d
My /etc/hosts file is
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
192.168.100.101 testpc
192.168.100.100 linuxserver
/etc/samba/lmhosts is
127.0.0.1
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
and that access to the client should be denied.
> James
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alexander Lobodzinski" <lobo@mental.com>
> To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 10:17 AM
> Subject: Can I have only certain users log in to a Samba DC client?
>
>
> > A machine should be member of a domain controlled by
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
When I try the command
nmblookup -M TESTGROUP
querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255
name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d
My /etc/hosts file is
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
192.168.100.101 testpc
192.168.100.100 linuxserver
/etc/samba/lmhosts is
127.0.0.1 localhost
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't
want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts
lines in your smb.conf file.
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn]
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: dns and samba
Hi,
I find that my samba server always does
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
copy d:\bugs.ps \\ouessant\lexmark
after having deleted all the samba log files and restarted the SMBd daemon from the SWAT Web interface.
This leads to the INTERNAL ERROR, see samba.oulx
Now, to locate the problem, I tried the same kind of command on the same file, bugs.ps, but using the SMBCLIENT application from the Linux server itself, without changing anything, nor restarting the SMBd
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
it were a Microsoft box... (Windoze is so stupid it'll never know the
difference!)
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Jackson
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:39 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: a question?
Hi
does the command line
smbpasswd -j <domain> -r <PDC>
apply to clients joining a
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
for this process is "root", that is correct. The PID 7247 is one of the
users, but the UID shouldn't be "root" and should be the username that was
authenticated during logon.
Anyone have same or similar problem? and how do I prevent this problem
from happening again? I would appreciate any help.
Thanks.
Will Sun
wsun@jpl.nasa.gov
(818) 354-2311
Return-Path:
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
apply to this (security=domain) case, since auth is via the PDC.
So, shouldn't winbind_lookup_sid() be succeeding. Should I be
trying to track the failure in that code?
In case it's helpful, ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows:
libdl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40017000)
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x4001a000)
libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x40030000)
libc.so.6 =>
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
read list (S)
This is a list of users that are given read-only
access to a service. If the connecting user is in
this list then they will not be given write access,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
no matter what the writeable option is set to. The
2003 Mar 12
1
Samba BDC and secrets.tdb question
I have a question about setting up a samba BDC
(with a samba PDC).
I am running Samba as the PDC on a small network.
Other Unix boxes on the network are running
with:
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
update encrypted = Yes
password server = 192.168.1.5
So they make use of the PDC for smbmount and smbsh
applications. The W2K box also uses Samba at the PDC.
I want to set up a Redhat
2002 Jan 03
0
Configure parameters for Redhat Linux 7.1
Redhat Linux will install and configure Samba
Currently 2.2.1a.
The pieces are not placed in /usr/local/samba/...
Does anyone have the configure parameters that would
allow a "make install" of Samba 2.2.2 to put
everything in the right place?
I could not find this in the archives.
Also, it appears smbsh is still broke in
Samba 2.2.1 for Redhat 7.2. Is this known
to be the case?
2003 Feb 14
0
Re: problems with win 2k (Cristi S)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm runnig a red hat 8 with a samba 2.2.5 and my client computer is =
> configured in our network with dhcp. But the problem is I can see my =
> computer from a NT4 system with sp6 and from a win 2k I can not see him. =
> I put in the smb.conf file encrypted passwords =3D yes.
>
> What else should I do?
>
> Thank you!
>
> Cristi S
>
2001 Nov 28
0
SAMBA and network security (Try 2 without HTML)
I did not mean to send the previous question in HTML.
I wish to solicit information and comments.
I am attempting to convince our ITS department to
create trust accounts for the Samba server nodes on
some of our lab machines which sit across an internal firewall
from the corporate network. My purpose is to access
UNIX files on the samba servers from PC's connected
to the corporate lan.
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
net use * \\samba\mgerdts
Debug level 10 says:
[2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(554)
Couldn't find user 'mgerdts' in smb_passwd file.
[2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(951)
NT Password did not match for user 'mgerdts'!
[2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(961)
2011 Oct 27
1
Mail lost - maybe a bug???
Hello everybody
I'm struggling against what seems a really serious trouble: sometimes
mail get lost
I did all the possible checks, but they seems really lost - I know is
absurd, but it seems so
it has been noticed by two users on my server: intially I tought that
was their mistake (mail deleted, mail into spam, ecc), but it wasn't
I deeply checked mail logs, and it seems that
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
network. I did read somewhere on the web (several years ago) of a guy
who managed to boot windows from the net.
With the start of Win 98/ME/ etc.etc it's not posible anymore.
I currently use PXE to install machine from the net using bpbatch that
works great only bpbatch is not really under developnt and the script
language is a bit buggy.
I see only one option to boot windows from the net and