net use * \\samba\mgerdts
Debug level 10 says:
[2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(554)
Couldn't find user 'mgerdts' in smb_passwd file.
[2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(951)
NT Password did not match for user 'mgerdts'!
[2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(961)
Defaulting to Lanman password for mgerdts
[2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(554)
Couldn't find user 'mgerdts' in smb_passwd file.
[2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(976)
Rejecting user 'mgerdts': authentication failed
[2001/06/22 10:28:50, 0, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1553)
domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain
MASTER
Why does samba need to know about the trust relationship between MASTER and
RES? Is this really saying that I need to establish an independent trust
relationship with MASTER?
Thanks,
Mike
--
Mike Gerdts (919) 850-5284
Unix Systems Administrator Michael.Gerdts@usa.alcatel.com
Return-Path: <DAOHARA1@motorola.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from motgate2.mot.com (motgate2.mot.com [136.182.1.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A484241 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: [from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by
motgate2.mot.com (motgate2 2.1) with ESMTP id HAA17794 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:56:17 -0700 (MST)]
Received: [from zuk28exb01.ecid.cig.mot.com (zuk28exb01.ecid.cig.mot.com
[175.12.130.200]) by pobox.mot.com (MOT-pobox 2.0) with ESMTP id
HAA04456 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:56:16 -0700
(MST)]
Received: by zuk28exb01.ecid.cig.mot.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <MM2Q4G42>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:56:15 +0100
Message-ID: <09C1525B7197D3118A4D0008C7E6EEE001D19041@zuk28exm05.ecid.ci
g.mot.com>
From: "O'hara Damian-DAOHARA1" <DAOHARA1@motorola.com>
To: "'samba@lists.samba.org'" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Unwelcome file deletions
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:56:15 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Greets,
We're having problems with data being deleted by internal users. They seem
to be accessing UNIX shared data through our samba servers (OK) and deleting
it (not OK).
Is there any way to log file deletes within samba - or does the logging
simply show file opens and closes ? We need to identify the offender(s).
We'd very much like to find out whether this activity is unintentional (an
educational issue) or not (malicious).
Thoughts ?
Damian
Return-Path: <Scott.Hadden@propero.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailrelay.lvl3.propero.net (unknown [212.187.215.37]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F1F48C6 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m34.propero.int ([192.168.202.34]) by
mailrelay.lvl3.propero.net (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id
f5MEl5P03484 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:47:05
+0100
Subject: Syslog error messages
To: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build V5_10182000 SHIMMER Beta 1 October 18, 2000
Message-ID: <OFBC931D6B.269A65FB-ON80256A73.0051D586@propero.int>
From: Scott.Hadden@propero.net
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:57:57 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Proplot1/Propero(Release 5.07a |May
14, 2001) at 22/06/2001 15:57:57
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi folks I seem to be getting a large number of the following
Jun 22 15:27:21 192.168.202.46 smbd[3307]: [2001/06/22 15:27:48, 0]
libsmb/clientgen.c:cli_send_smb(89)
Jun 22 15:27:21 192.168.202.46 smbd[3307]: Error writing 145 bytes to
client. -1
Jun 22 15:29:13 192.168.202.46 smbd[3461]: [2001/06/22 15:29:39, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
Jun 22 15:29:13 192.168.202.46 smbd[3461]: write_socket_data: write
failure. Error = Broken pipe
Jun 22 15:29:27 192.168.202.46 smbd[3306]: [2001/06/22 15:29:53, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
Jun 22 15:29:27 192.168.202.46 smbd[3306]: write_socket_data: write
failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
Jun 22 15:30:08 192.168.202.46 smbd[3307]: [2001/06/22 15:30:34, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
Jun 22 15:30:08 192.168.202.46 smbd[3307]: write_socket_data: write
failure. Error = Connection reset by peer
Jun 22 15:31:13 192.168.202.46 smbd[3461]: [2001/06/22 15:31:39, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
Jun 22 15:31:13 192.168.202.46 smbd[3461]: write_socket_data: write
failure. Error = Broken pipe
I have done a bit of research and it seems as if these are caused by the
client doing a nasty disconnect, which seems quite probable as we are using
citrix for all our apps so we have some remote connections flying around
and people doing nasty things with there sessions etc. Aside from that I
assume these are nopt much to worry about and that I can do little to
prevent it (or can I ?) However I would really like to stop the flow of
these messages to syslog as it is filling the logs up pretty fast and being
a general nuisance. Given that I am no syslog guru and suggestions, perhaps
I should have the syslog=1 option in samba.conf ????
Thanks
Scott Hadden
Propero
ph: +44 (0) 7866 474174
http://www.propero.net
Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311DE4F4E for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA26137; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
10:03:58 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:06:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter@pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Robert Claeson <r.claeson@computer.org>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Problems uploading printer driver to Samba 2.2.0
In-Reply-To: <009201c0fa96$03ebb030$820110ac@sto.brightinteractive.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106221003110.22191-100000@pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Robert Claeson wrote:
> I get the Add Printer Driver Wizard. On the second screen I click the
> Have Disk... button and select the folder where the printer drivers
> are located. I continue the dialog, and Windows starts copying files,
> until the very end where I get the following error: "Unable to install
> Lexmark Optra T614 PS3, Windows NT 4.0 or 2000, Intel driver.
> Operation could not be completed."
Ah...Yes. I just fixed this in CVS yesterday. Acftually I was working
with the Optra S 1855 PCL. Apparently there is a bug in this driver
because it call the AddPrinterProcessor() RPC without uploading the
processor file (don;t know is that can be done anyways). The funny thing
is that the driver cannot be installed on a Win2k server for a Win2k
client for the same reason.
So now we happily reply "Sure, the AddPrintProcessor() call succeeded"
and the reassign the winprint processor to the printer.
> The hard part here is that it's impossible to use the printers from
> Windows 2000 or NT without having the drivers installed. I'm leaning
> towards setting up a separate Windows NT server just for the purpose
> of being able to print, but perhaps there's a simple solution that
> I've overlooked? Or are there simply gotchas with Red Hat 7.1 that
> makes the normal instructions invalid?
This limitation is also fixed in the latest CVS. You will be able to
install locla print driver for Samba printers in the 2.2.1 release
(soon).
CHeers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0220A51ED for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA26955; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
10:13:43 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:16:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter@pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Rob MacGregor <Rob@the-macgregors.org>
Cc: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Bug report - Samba 2.2.0
In-Reply-To: <000001c0fae3$5dad42d0$6520a8c0@macgregor>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106221015580.22191-100000@pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> Samba 2.2.0 compiled from source with the following options:
>
> ./configure --with-smbmount --with-ssl --with-syslog
> --with-quotas --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba --prefix=/usr
> --sysconfdir=/etc
IIRC, Jeremy has already fixed this bug in CVS (some time ago)
jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <ctooley@amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id DBA144235 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 08:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A73.00552901 ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:30:10 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley@amoa.org
To: "Richard Shields" <rshields@customcolor.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A73.00552712.00@amoa.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:30:04 -0500
Subject: Re: HELP! Third Post same question...Ownership privileges Still
no reply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
My suggestion is then one that I got when posing a similar question. Get a book
on UNIX (UNIX System Administration by O'Reilly is good) and learn the
permissions scheme of it. That's what it comes down to when you are talking
about Samba permissions anyway.
Chris Tooley
"Richard Shields" <rshields@customcolor.com> on 06/22/2001
09:38:37 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA)
Subject HELP! Third Post same question...Ownership
: privileges Still no reply
I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a Macintosh OSX server ver 1.2 A file created,
copied or otherwise altered by a Windows client on this server is
unalterable by the Macintosh clients. Is there a way to fix this? A file
created, ETC by a Mac client can be altered by anyone... I have only limited
Unix/Linux exp so feel free to email me in person if the answer is too wordy
for the list server. Thank you for your help in advance...
Richard L. Shields
rshields@customcolor.com
Custom Color Corp.
300 W. 19th Terr.
K.C., MO 64108
ph. 816-474-3200
fx. 816-842-4909
http://www.customcolor.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <andreas.bulling@web.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mailgate3.cinetic.de (mailgate3.cinetic.de
[212.227.116.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D1D5240
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp01.web.de [194.45.170.210]) by
mailgate3.cinetic.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP
id f5MFg3F25083 for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:42:03 +0200
Received: from andreas by smtp.web.de with smtp (freemail 4.2.2.1 #3) id
m15DT4N-007nz1C; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:42 +0200
Message-ID: <001801c0fb31$ec542280$02caa8c0@andreas>
Reply-To: "Andreas Bulling" <andreas.bulling@web.de>
From: "Andreas Bulling" <andreas.bulling@web.de>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Problem with Samba 2.2.0 and Windows 2000 Pro Client
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:40:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear Sir or Madam,
I hope you can help me:
For weeks I've been trying to add a Windows 2000 Professional SP2 Client to
a Samba controlled
Domain using Samba 2.2.0 Release. I added the machine-account and the user
account according to
the Samba PDC Howto and checked everything I could find on the Internet but
got no solution:
Every time I want to connect to the domain a popup appears which says "The
amount of procedures is out of
the allowed range! (translated from german, but I hope you know this
errormessage)
Before I had to give my username and password in another window as it is
usual from my knowledge...
The logfile says:
[2001/06/22 17:28:51, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(316)
Allowed connection from (192.168.202.2)
[2001/06/22 17:28:51, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(316)
Allowed connection from (192.168.202.2)
[2001/06/22 17:28:51, 2] rpc_parse/parse_samr.c:samr_io_userinfo_ctr(5824)
samr_io_userinfo_ctr: unknown switch level 0x1a
[2001/06/22 17:28:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
[2001/06/22 17:28:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215)
api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed.
I tried the same with a Windows 2000 Pro Notebook and here it worked the
first time I tried!
In my opinion, its a problem with the Service Pack 2 because this is the
only difference to my desktop computer -
but I've found nothing concerning such a problem...
Besides this, Samba is real cool!! Thank you very much for this piece of
software! ;)
Yours sincerely
Andreas Bulling
Return-Path: <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f12.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.15.12]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A00521C for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:46:54 -0700
Received: from 64.192.99.49 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:46:54 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [64.192.99.49]
From: "Brandon Caudle" <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Installation Error
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:46:54 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F12GvseE4D3MBhe3WYI00001701@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2001 15:46:54.0350 (UTC)
FILETIME=[8FA892E0:01C0FB32]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I tryed to install samba 2.2.0 on my redhat 7.0, i downloaded the tar.gz
file this morning. I did the ./configure with all my options ./configure
--with-dfs --with-automount --with-smbmount --with-porfile --with-quotas
--with-msdfs --with-vfs --with-acl-support
then i did the make
then the make install
but i got this error
passdb/pass_check.c:69:27: dce/dce_error.h: No such file or directory
passdb/pass_check.c:70:27: dce/sec_login.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [passdb/pass_check.o] Error 1
how can i go about fixing this?
brandon caudle
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Return-Path: <swright@sls.bc.ca>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83C351E6 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by
fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA19317 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:53:46 -0700
Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Fri Jun 22 08:53:43
2001 -0700
Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO002132;
22 Jun 01 08:53:42 -0700
Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 22 Jun 01
08:52:58 -0700
From: "Shawn Wright" <swright@sls.bc.ca>
Organization: Shawnigan Lake School
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:51:30 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret
Message-ID: <3B330712.23617.4801E29D@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <15150.38799.855902.263766@frungy.org>
References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0@diamondback>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 19)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-description: Mail message body
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On 19 Jun 2001, at 10:06, Tim Potter wrote:
>
> There are a couple of problem areas with winbindd in head at the
> moment. The first is this one (not checking machine account
> properly), secondly the pam_winbind module isn't fully working,
> and thirdly it doesn't cope with large numbers of users/groups
> just yet. This may be the cause of your out of memory error
> alluded to in another message.
>
Hmm... so what is considered large? We have about 550 users in the
domain... is this why I'm getting 'out of memory' as mentioned in my
last
post?
I am getting a positive response to 'wbinfo -t', but nothing from
'wbinfo -
m', and errors from 'wbinfo -u or -g'
(using CVS 2.2 from a few days ago)
Am I just pushing a rope trying to get winbindd working right now, and
should I wait for some of these issues to be
resolved?=======================Shawn Wright
Computer Systems Manager
Shawnigan Lake School
http://www.sls.bc.ca
swright@sls.bc.ca
Return-Path: <dave@marketingtactics.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from gash2.peakpeak.com (unknown [207.174.178.17]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C2D4D97 for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dave900.marketingtactics.com (dslbarnes.peakpeak.com
[206.168.3.4]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
KAA29552 for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:05:18 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010622100322.02ab3770@pop.peakpeak.com>
X-Sender: dbarnes@pop.peakpeak.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:05:13 -0600
To: samba@samba.org
From: Dave Barnes <dave@marketingtactics.com>
Subject: promotion of CIFS Conference & Plug Fest
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Webmaster,
I would like to promote the CIFS 2001 Conference & Plug Fest on the Samba
website.
Ideally I would like to place a banner ad on your site.
A text link would be acceptable.
What do I have to do to make this happen?
thanks,
dave
CIFS Conference webmaste
Dave Barnes
MarketingTactics
890 South Josephine Street
Denver, CO 80209-4715 USA
Tel: +1.303.744.9024
dave@marketingtactics.com
www.marketingtactics.com
Return-Path: <uli.2001@gmx.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCC3D44F5 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11074 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jun 2001 16:25:33 -0000
Received: from kol.stud.uni-goettingen.de (HELO uli) (134.76.62.194) by
mail.gmx.net (mp005-rz3) with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001 16:25:33 -0000
Message-ID: <039f01c0fb37$f764b800$169c0a0a@uli>
From: "Uli" <uli.2001@gmx.de>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Moving files between different drives
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:25:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
on my Linux server, I have exportet a directory structure by Samba. There
are symbolic links to directories on other drives which appear as normal
subdirectories when I browse the directory tree with a Windows 2000 client.
When I move files between different subdirectories, I had the following
(fine) behaviour with Suse 7.0 (samba-2.0.7-72): between directories on the
same physical drive it took only 1 second, between directories on different
drives it took the normal time for moving files on the server (not using the
network connection).
Now, under Suse 7.2 (with samba-2.2.0-15), it is the same behaviour when the
directories are on the same drive, but moving does not work at all when the
source and the destination are on different drives.
Does anybody know the reason? I think the directory and file permissions are
fine.
Uli
Return-Path: <gleison@unitera.com.br>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from sr01.unitera.com.br (unknown [200.176.218.14]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C6F48FA for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by SR01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<NN5YDGY3>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:44:03 -0300
Message-ID: <D17345989A4CD51184BE00A0C9CE80686B3E@SR01>
From: Gleison Baioco <gleison@unitera.com.br>
To: "'samba@samba.org'" <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Samba Linux as Wins Server
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:44:02 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have some networks with Linux Red Hat 6.2 and each network have a
Linux with samba configured with a different workgroup. How do I do to
configure a wins server in my network and browseable between the workgroups?
Regards,
Gleison Baioco
Unitera Tecnologia
Return-Path: <gcarter@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FA54583 for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by
Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06142; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
11:53:05 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:55:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gerald Carter <gcarter@valinux.com>
X-X-Sender: <gcarter@pogo.plainjoe.org>
To: Brandon Caudle <bcaudle@hotmail.com>
Cc: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Installation Error
In-Reply-To: <F12GvseE4D3MBhe3WYI00001701@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106221155200.476-100000@pogo.plainjoe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Brandon Caudle wrote:
> I tryed to install samba 2.2.0 on my redhat 7.0, i downloaded the tar.gz
> file this morning. I did the ./configure with all my options ./configure
> --with-dfs --with-automount --with-smbmount --with-porfile --with-quotas
> --with-msdfs --with-vfs --with-acl-support
>
> then i did the make
>
> then the make install
> but i got this error
>
> passdb/pass_check.c:69:27: dce/dce_error.h: No such file or directory
> passdb/pass_check.c:70:27: dce/sec_login.h: No such file or directory
> make: *** [passdb/pass_check.o] Error 1
The dce/dfs stuff is not being maintained as far as I know.
No idea if it still works.
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
Return-Path: <r.claeson@computer.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mf2.bredband.net (mf2.lab.bredband.com [195.54.122.120])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5718F5189 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BRIGHT609XX9IC ([213.112.99.145]) by mf2.bredband.net
with ESMTP id <20010622165721.LCM299.mf2@BRIGHT609XX9IC> for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:57:21 +0200
Message-ID: <010001c0fb3c$3b0e0d00$916370d5@BRIGHT609XX9IC>
From: "Robert Claeson" <r.claeson@computer.org>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Read error when copying files over VPN connection
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:55:40 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I try to copy a large number of files over a VPN connection (both ends are
using Cisco equipment to terminate the VPN connection), and invaryably get
read errors after a few minutes. The client at this particular end site is not
running an English version of W2K on any of the PCs, but the error is
something like "File Help.pdf can't be copied. The source file or
source disk
can't be read". This error occurs after having copied several megs of
that
file, and many other files as well from that share. At first I though it was a
locking issue, but after having played some with various locking and tuning
settings in Samba I don't think it is a locking issue anymore. The only
thing
that changes is that I manage to copy more or less of the files, but the
problem doesn't go away.
What's strange here is that I can copy hundreds of megs of files over the
same
VPN connection from another but identically equipped server running Windows NT
SP6 at the same location. Accessing the Samba server over the LAN at the same
location where the Samba server is also works well - but not over the VPN
link. Copying the same files over FTP also works well, as does accessing the
server in a number of other ways.
The server is running Red Hat Linux 7.1 with Samba 2.2.0 and the clients are
running W2K SP1 and SP2.
/Robert
Return-Path: <JennerB@pauliseg.com.br>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from lihi-gcanyon.libertyinternational.com
(mail2.libertyinternational.com [12.6.229.71]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 80257523B for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 10:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 147.179.120.203 by lihi-gcanyon.libertyinternational.com
(InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:37:27 -0400
(Eastern Daylight Time)
Received: by us-lihi-03.libertyinternational.com with Internet Mail
Service (5.5.2650.21) id <MD8KNLGY>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:38:11 -0400
Received: from lihi-gcanyon.libertyinternational.com ([147.179.120.197])
by us-lihi-02.libertyinternational.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange
Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id NGCR71VN; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 13:38:00 -0400
Received: from 209.93.4.73 by lihi-gcanyon.libertyinternational.com
(InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:37:23 -0400
(Eastern Daylight Time)
Received: by mail.br-lihi.libertyinternational.com with Internet Mail
Service (5.5.2653.19) id <NNLXA32V>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:34:55 -0300
Message-ID: <F57074E2FE1FD3118DC30008C739ADA5055F15CE@mail2.br-lihi.libe
rtyinternational.com>
From: "Borges, Jenner Gigante (BR-Paulista Seguros)"
<JennerB@pauliseg.com.br>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: File name mangling
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:34:53 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am trying to map a unix directory on Win95 and the names of the files are
truncated , but when I use Win2000 I dont have any problem.
Any inputs?
Thanks
"A gente faz mais por vocj!"
Jenner Gigante Borges
Analista de Suporte Ticnico
Tel (5511) 5503-4215
jennerb@pauliseg.com.br
Return-Path: <galejos@essalud.sld.pe>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from gcdi.essalud.sld.pe (fw-essalud.essalud.sld.pe
[200.37.207.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071294517
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:53:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sag.essalud.sld.pe (sag.essalud.sld.pe [172.20.0.64]) by
gcdi.essalud.sld.pe (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA20863 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:15:09 -0500
Received: from gcp ([191.0.220.89]) by sag.essalud.sld.pe
(8.10.2/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with SMTP id f5MHnDN18916 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:49:13 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: sag.essalud.sld.pe: Host [191.0.220.89]
claimed to be gcp
Message-ID: <006201c0fb44$860a8c40$59dc00bf@essalud.sld.pe>
From: "Guillermo Alejos Egoavil" <galejos@essalud.sld.pe>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: users and passwords
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:55:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Greetings Samba People : please help me to solve this problem...
How i connect my Win98 pc to my Linux server samba on Redhat 7.0 using the
users and passwords register on the same server... 'cause when i connect
normally (security = share) to the samba server always the connected guest
uses the "other" rights on files and dir's in the "shared
dir" in smb.conf
file.
May i activate domain logon...?
Security = server? but how can i point itself the linux samba server without
'cause a trouble?
Thanks for your attention.... even you just read this.!!
Guillermo A. Alejos Egoavil
Administrador de red
Gerencia Central de Programas
EsSalud
Return-Path: <ae@aevetts.virtualynx.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from qmail.virtualynx.com (qmail.virtualynx.com
[204.244.216.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75AC452BF
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15780 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2001 18:21:53 -0000
Received: from schoolgirl.virtualynx.com (HELO user121.virtualynx.com)
(mail@207.194.66.120) by qmail.virtualynx.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001
18:21:53 -0000
Received: from ae by user121.virtualynx.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1
(Debian)) id 15DVeT-00008H-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:27:29 -0700
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:27:29 -0700
From: Alan Evetts <aevetts@virtualynx.com>
To: Schupp Alex <as@unitis.li>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Conversion Issues with W2K sp2 characters on default
roaming profile
Message-ID: <20010622112728.A394@virtualynx.com>
References: <E4FD2A385B5DD311830700105A9C4BA581081D@ltnexch.ltn.li>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <E4FD2A385B5DD311830700105A9C4BA581081D@ltnexch.ltn.li>;
from as@unitis.li on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:48:34AM +0200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Ah yes, it works perfectly now :)
Thank you very much,
Alan Evetts
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:48:34AM +0200, Schupp Alex
wrote:> Hi Alan
>
> Had the same problem and solved it after some extended headscratching.
> I dont know why, but it seems to me that the CP850.TXT is
> not correct in my case:
> Win2K SP1 english, but with german locale
> samba pre-3 from about 2 weeks ago
>
> smb.conf:
> client code page = 850
>
> Following is my codepage file i use now.
>
> You also have to compile the codepage text file to a codepage map,
> and copy the resulting unicode_map.850 file to $SAMBA/lib/codepages
>
> > make_unicodemap 850 CP850_W2k.TXT unicode_map.850
>
> Good luck
> Alex
>
>
> > cat CP850_W2k.TXT
> #
> # Name: ISO 8859-1 (1987) to Unicode
> # Unicode version: 1.1
> # Table version: 0.1
> # Table format: Format A
> # Date: 16 January 1995
> # Authors: Tim Greenwood
<greenwood@r2me2.enet.dec.com>
> # John H. Jenkins <John_Jenkins@taligent.com>
> #
> # Copyright (c) 1991-1995 Unicode, Inc. All Rights reserved.
> #
> # This file is provided as-is by Unicode, Inc. (The Unicode
> Consortium).
> # No claims are made as to fitness for any particular purpose. No
> # warranties of any kind are expressed or implied. The recipient
> # agrees to determine applicability of information provided. If this
> # file has been provided on magnetic media by Unicode, Inc., the sole
> # remedy for any claim will be exchange of defective media within 90
> # days of receipt.
> #
> # Recipient is granted the right to make copies in any form for
> # internal distribution and to freely use the information supplied
> # in the creation of products supporting Unicode. Unicode, Inc.
> # specifically excludes the right to re-distribute this file directly
> # to third parties or other organizations whether for profit or not.
> #
> # General notes:
> #
> # This table contains the data the Unicode Consortium has on how
> # ISO 8859-1 (1987) characters map into Unicode.
> #
> # Format: Three tab-separated columns
> # Column #1 is the ISO 8859-1 code (in hex as 0xXX)
> # Column #2 is the Unicode (in hex as 0xXXXX)
> # Column #3 the Unicode name (follows a comment sign,
'#')
> #
> # The entries are in ISO 8859-1 order
> #
> # Any comments or problems, contact <John_Jenkins@taligent.com>
> #
> 0x20 0x0020 # SPACE
> 0x21 0x0021 # EXCLAMATION MARK
> 0x22 0x0022 # QUOTATION MARK
> 0x23 0x0023 # NUMBER SIGN
> 0x24 0x0024 # DOLLAR SIGN
> 0x25 0x0025 # PERCENT SIGN
> 0x26 0x0026 # AMPERSAND
> 0x27 0x0027 # APOSTROPHE
> 0x28 0x0028 # LEFT PARENTHESIS
> 0x29 0x0029 # RIGHT PARENTHESIS
> 0x2A 0x002A # ASTERISK
> 0x2B 0x002B # PLUS SIGN
> 0x2C 0x002C # COMMA
> 0x2D 0x002D # HYPHEN-MINUS
> 0x2E 0x002E # FULL STOP
> 0x2F 0x002F # SOLIDUS
> 0x30 0x0030 # DIGIT ZERO
> 0x31 0x0031 # DIGIT ONE
> 0x32 0x0032 # DIGIT TWO
> 0x33 0x0033 # DIGIT THREE
> 0x34 0x0034 # DIGIT FOUR
> 0x35 0x0035 # DIGIT FIVE
> 0x36 0x0036 # DIGIT SIX
> 0x37 0x0037 # DIGIT SEVEN
> 0x38 0x0038 # DIGIT EIGHT
> 0x39 0x0039 # DIGIT NINE
> 0x3A 0x003A # COLON
> 0x3B 0x003B # SEMICOLON
> 0x3C 0x003C # LESS-THAN SIGN
> 0x3D 0x003D # EQUALS SIGN
> 0x3E 0x003E # GREATER-THAN SIGN
> 0x3F 0x003F # QUESTION MARK
> 0x40 0x0040 # COMMERCIAL AT
> 0x41 0x0041 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A
> 0x42 0x0042 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER B
> 0x43 0x0043 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C
> 0x44 0x0044 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER D
> 0x45 0x0045 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E
> 0x46 0x0046 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER F
> 0x47 0x0047 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER G
> 0x48 0x0048 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER H
> 0x49 0x0049 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I
> 0x4A 0x004A # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER J
> 0x4B 0x004B # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER K
> 0x4C 0x004C # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER L
> 0x4D 0x004D # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER M
> 0x4E 0x004E # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N
> 0x4F 0x004F # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O
> 0x50 0x0050 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER P
> 0x51 0x0051 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Q
> 0x52 0x0052 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER R
> 0x53 0x0053 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER S
> 0x54 0x0054 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER T
> 0x55 0x0055 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U
> 0x56 0x0056 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER V
> 0x57 0x0057 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER W
> 0x58 0x0058 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER X
> 0x59 0x0059 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y
> 0x5A 0x005A # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Z
> 0x5B 0x005B # LEFT SQUARE BRACKET
> 0x5C 0x005C # REVERSE SOLIDUS
> 0x5D 0x005D # RIGHT SQUARE BRACKET
> 0x5E 0x005E # CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT
> 0x5F 0x005F # LOW LINE
> 0x60 0x0060 # GRAVE ACCENT
> 0x61 0x0061 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A
> 0x62 0x0062 # LATIN SMALL LETTER B
> 0x63 0x0063 # LATIN SMALL LETTER C
> 0x64 0x0064 # LATIN SMALL LETTER D
> 0x65 0x0065 # LATIN SMALL LETTER E
> 0x66 0x0066 # LATIN SMALL LETTER F
> 0x67 0x0067 # LATIN SMALL LETTER G
> 0x68 0x0068 # LATIN SMALL LETTER H
> 0x69 0x0069 # LATIN SMALL LETTER I
> 0x6A 0x006A # LATIN SMALL LETTER J
> 0x6B 0x006B # LATIN SMALL LETTER K
> 0x6C 0x006C # LATIN SMALL LETTER L
> 0x6D 0x006D # LATIN SMALL LETTER M
> 0x6E 0x006E # LATIN SMALL LETTER N
> 0x6F 0x006F # LATIN SMALL LETTER O
> 0x70 0x0070 # LATIN SMALL LETTER P
> 0x71 0x0071 # LATIN SMALL LETTER Q
> 0x72 0x0072 # LATIN SMALL LETTER R
> 0x73 0x0073 # LATIN SMALL LETTER S
> 0x74 0x0074 # LATIN SMALL LETTER T
> 0x75 0x0075 # LATIN SMALL LETTER U
> 0x76 0x0076 # LATIN SMALL LETTER V
> 0x77 0x0077 # LATIN SMALL LETTER W
> 0x78 0x0078 # LATIN SMALL LETTER X
> 0x79 0x0079 # LATIN SMALL LETTER Y
> 0x7A 0x007A # LATIN SMALL LETTER Z
> 0x7B 0x007B # LEFT CURLY BRACKET
> 0x7C 0x007C # VERTICAL LINE
> 0x7D 0x007D # RIGHT CURLY BRACKET
> 0x7E 0x007E # TILDE
> 0x80 0x0080
> 0xA0 0x00A0 # NO-BREAK SPACE
> 0xA1 0x00A1 # INVERTED EXCLAMATION MARK
> 0xA2 0x00A2 # CENT SIGN
> 0xA3 0x00A3 # POUND SIGN
> 0xA4 0x00A4 # CURRENCY SIGN
> 0xA5 0x00A5 # YEN SIGN
> 0xA6 0x00A6 # BROKEN BAR
> 0xA7 0x00A7 # SECTION SIGN
> 0xA8 0x00A8 # DIAERESIS
> 0xA9 0x00A9 # COPYRIGHT SIGN
> 0xAA 0x00AA # FEMININE ORDINAL INDICATOR
> 0xAB 0x00AB # LEFT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
> 0xAC 0x20AC # EURO
> 0xAD 0x00AD # SOFT HYPHEN
> 0xAE 0x00AE # REGISTERED SIGN
> 0xAF 0x00AF # MACRON
> 0xB0 0x00B0 # DEGREE SIGN
> 0xB1 0x00B1 # PLUS-MINUS SIGN
> 0xB2 0x00B2 # SUPERSCRIPT TWO
> 0xB3 0x00B3 # SUPERSCRIPT THREE
> 0xB4 0x00B4 # ACUTE ACCENT
> 0xB5 0x00B5 # MICRO SIGN
> 0xB6 0x00B6 # PILCROW SIGN
> 0xB7 0x00B7 # MIDDLE DOT
> 0xB8 0x00B8 # CEDILLA
> 0xB9 0x00B9 # SUPERSCRIPT ONE
> 0xBA 0x00BA # MASCULINE ORDINAL INDICATOR
> 0xBB 0x00BB # RIGHT-POINTING DOUBLE ANGLE QUOTATION MARK
> 0xBC 0x00BC # VULGAR FRACTION ONE QUARTER
> 0xBD 0x00BD # VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF
> 0xBE 0x00BE # VULGAR FRACTION THREE QUARTERS
> 0xBF 0x00BF # INVERTED QUESTION MARK
> 0xC0 0x00C0 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH GRAVE
> 0xC1 0x00C1 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH ACUTE
> 0xC2 0x00C2 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xC3 0x00C3 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH TILDE
> 0xC4 0x00C4 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xC5 0x00C5 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE
> 0xC6 0x00C6 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER AE
> 0xC7 0x00C7 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA
> 0xC8 0x00C8 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH GRAVE
> 0xC9 0x00C9 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH ACUTE
> 0xCA 0x00CA # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xCB 0x00CB # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xCC 0x00CC # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH GRAVE
> 0xCD 0x00CD # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH ACUTE
> 0xCE 0x00CE # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xCF 0x00CF # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xD0 0x00D0 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER ETH (Icelandic)
> 0xD1 0x00D1 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH TILDE
> 0xD2 0x00D2 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH GRAVE
> 0xD3 0x00D3 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH ACUTE
> 0xD4 0x00D4 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xD5 0x00D5 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH TILDE
> 0xD6 0x00D6 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xD7 0x00D7 # MULTIPLICATION SIGN
> 0xD8 0x00D8 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER O WITH STROKE
> 0xD9 0x00D9 # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH GRAVE
> 0xDA 0x00DA # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
> 0xDB 0x00DB # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xDC 0x00DC # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xDD 0x00DD # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE
> 0xDE 0x00DE # LATIN CAPITAL LETTER THORN (Icelandic)
> 0xDF 0x00DF # LATIN SMALL LETTER SHARP S (German)
> 0xE0 0x00E0 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH GRAVE
> 0xE1 0x00E1 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH ACUTE
> 0xE2 0x00E2 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xE3 0x00E3 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH TILDE
> 0xE4 0x00E4 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xE5 0x00E5 # LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE
> 0xE6 0x00E6 # LATIN SMALL LETTER AE
> 0xE7 0x00E7 # LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA
> 0xE8 0x00E8 # LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH GRAVE
> 0xE9 0x00E9 # LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH ACUTE
> 0xEA 0x00EA # LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xEB 0x00EB # LATIN SMALL LETTER E WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xEC 0x00EC # LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH GRAVE
> 0xED 0x00ED # LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH ACUTE
> 0xEE 0x00EE # LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xEF 0x00EF # LATIN SMALL LETTER I WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xF0 0x00F0 # LATIN SMALL LETTER ETH (Icelandic)
> 0xF1 0x00F1 # LATIN SMALL LETTER N WITH TILDE
> 0xF2 0x00F2 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH GRAVE
> 0xF3 0x00F3 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH ACUTE
> 0xF4 0x00F4 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xF5 0x00F5 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH TILDE
> 0xF6 0x00F6 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xF7 0x00F7 # DIVISION SIGN
> 0xF8 0x00F8 # LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH STROKE
> 0xF9 0x00F9 # LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH GRAVE
> 0xFA 0x00FA # LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH ACUTE
> 0xFB 0x00FB # LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH CIRCUMFLEX
> 0xFC 0x00FC # LATIN SMALL LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS
> 0xFD 0x00FD # LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH ACUTE
> 0xFE 0x00FE # LATIN SMALL LETTER THORN (Icelandic)
> 0xFF 0x00FF # LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH DIAERESIS
>
>
>
> -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Alan Evetts [mailto:aevetts@virtualynx.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2001 21:17
> An: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betr
> eff: Conversion Issues with W2K sp2 characters on default roaming
> profile
>
>
> Hi There,
>
> After lots of struggling, I have finally been able to get my W2K SP2
> machines to logon to my samba domain (Running current CVS release
"Version
> pre-3.0.0"). Now I am having troubles with Character sets and
conversion.
> What the problem is, is that in the default Win2k sp2 roaming profile there
> is a link to your floppy drive, stored in the SendTo Folder. This links
> name is "3= Floppy (A)". In case email clients mangle that, the
2nd
> character in that string is the "1/2" symbol.
>
> When first logging onto a w2k machine (with the Client code page set to
> 850), it creates this profile, and when you save the roaming profile to the
> samba server, the Filename in the Sendto folder is "3= Floppy
(A).lnk".
> When you try and re-open this profile from the w2k machine - it fails to
> find that file. The error that follows is:
>
> Windows cannt copy file \\DOMAIN\profiles\asdf\SendTo\3| Floppy (A).lnk to
> location C:\Documents and Settings\asdf\SendTo\3| Floppy (A).lnk. Contact
> your network Administrator.
>
> Details - The filenmae, directory name, or volume label syntax is
incorrect.
>
> When repeating this process, but with Client code page set to 437, the
error
> on re-opening the profile is the same, but instead of a pipe it has the
cent
> sign symbol (as in dollars and cents), and the Detail is: The system cannot
> find the file specified.
>
> Has anyone had similar trouble / have any advice for me? The only
> workaround I have come up with is to remove the .lnk file from the Roaming
> profile - but that is only a workaround .. and I'm looking for a
solution :)
>
> Alan Evetts
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39385301 for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5MIdeo18854; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:39:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA04129; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 20:39:41 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA25287; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 20:39:47 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba@samba.org>, "Andreas Bulling"
<andreas.bulling@web.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:39:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Problem with Samba 2.2.0 and Windows 2000 Pro Client
Message-ID: <3B33AD05.23347.29538C6@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <001801c0fb31$ec542280$02caa8c0@andreas>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>
> I hope you can help me:
> For weeks I've been trying to add a Windows 2000 Professional SP2
Client to
> a Samba controlled
> Domain using Samba 2.2.0 Release. I added the machine-account and the user
> account according to
> the Samba PDC Howto and checked everything I could find on the Internet but
> got no solution:
> Every time I want to connect to the domain a popup appears which says
"The
> amount of procedures is out of
> the allowed range! (translated from german, but I hope you know this
> errormessage)
> Before I had to give my username and password in another window as it is
> usual from my knowledge...
> The logfile says:
>
> [2001/06/22 17:28:51, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(316)
> Allowed connection from (192.168.202.2)
> [2001/06/22 17:28:51, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(316)
> Allowed connection from (192.168.202.2)
> [2001/06/22 17:28:51, 2] rpc_parse/parse_samr.c:samr_io_userinfo_ctr(5824)
> samr_io_userinfo_ctr: unknown switch level 0x1a
> [2001/06/22 17:28:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
> api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
> [2001/06/22 17:28:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215)
> api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed.
>
> I tried the same with a Windows 2000 Pro Notebook and here it worked the
> first time I tried!
> In my opinion, its a problem with the Service Pack 2 because this is the
> only difference to my desktop computer -
Was in this list bevor:
SP 2 is the difference. Use current cvs or wait for 2.2.1
Christian
> but I've found nothing concerning such a problem...
>
> Besides this, Samba is real cool!! Thank you very much for this piece of
> software! ;)
> Yours sincerely
> Andreas Bulling
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <gaa@ulticom.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from chuckie.dgms.com (chuckie.dgms.com [38.150.156.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E065D5326 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ulticom.com (garnet.dgms.com [172.25.1.153]) by
chuckie.dgms.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA05165 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:57:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B33950F.EF491C1E@ulticom.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:57:19 -0400
From: Gary Algier <gaa@ulticom.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Runaway (many) processes per user
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
We are running Samba 2.0.6. It has been working just fine for many months. All
of a sudden we are spawning multiple smbd processes per user:
=================================================================================%
smbstatus -u milby
Samba version 2.0.6
Service uid gid pid machine
----------------------------------------------
users milby users 19974 pc-milby (172.25.5.74) Fri Jun 22
14:34:51 2001
users milby users 20057 pc-milby (172.25.5.74) Fri Jun 22
14:35:40 2001
Locked files:
Pid DenyMode R/W Oplock Name
--------------------------------------------------
Share mode memory usage (bytes):
1045624(99%) free + 2552(0%) used + 400(0%) overhead = 1048576(100%) total
=================================================================================
This seems to get the clients very confused. Any suggestions? Is this fixed
in 2.0.*? We are not ready for 2.2 (actually 2.2 is not ready for us, we need
a feature that got "lost")
BTW: Is there any way to search the mailing list archives? All I can find is
the
raw archive and I would need to manually search each month. I only went back a
couple months.
--
Gary Algier, WB2FWZ gary.algier@ulticom.com +1 856 787 2758
Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Fax:+1 856 866 2033
A self-addressed envelope would be addressed "envelope."
Return-Path: <gustavo@colltech.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from psasolar.colltech.com (psasolar.colltech.com
[208.229.236.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEB052A7
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:22:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost by psasolar.colltech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/not) with
ESMTP id OAA26465 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
14:26:46 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:26:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gustavo Vegas <gustavo@colltech.com>
X-Sender: gustavo@psasolar.private.psa.pencom.com
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Problems Running Samba 2.2.0+winbind on Solaris against a
Terminal Server
In-Reply-To: <20010622112728.A394@virtualynx.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106221415400.8125-100000@psasolar.private.ps
a.pencom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Everybody,
I hope someone can help me. I am running the setup described above
on Solaris 7, and I have the following 2 problems:
- When I start a session in the terminal server, a setup script is
fired. This script contains as sequence of calls to xcacls, configuring an
access list of sorts. It appears like these fail to execute properly, and
leave the script hung. I get lots of "Permission Denied" messages on
the
Terminal Server's session, and lots of "unable to map SID"
messages in the
session log file in the samba server.
- I am trying to use winbind to solve the above problem, but I get
"could not find any domain controllers for domain XXXX" in one of the
winbindd log files. I have configured the PAM modules the way it seems to
be correct for Solaris, and have added the "winbind" entries in the
/etc/nsswitch.conf.
Is there anyone that can spot what I am doing wrong here? I got
the CVS tree from today (6/22/01) and my winbindd and libraries are from
this distribution.
Any help, hints or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
-- Gustavo Vegas.
--
===========================================+========================== ****
***** Gustavo Vegas Gustavo_Vegas@colltech.com
** *
** * Collective Technologies
**** *
===========================================+==========================God is
real, unless declared integer.
===========================================+==========================
Return-Path: <davecb@canada.sun.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0872451EE for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canadamail1.Canada.Sun.COM ([129.155.5.100]) by
patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27807; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 13:29:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from opcom-mail.canada.sun.com (scot.Canada.Sun.COM
[129.155.8.107]) by canadamail1.Canada.Sun.COM
(8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id PAA02791; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 15:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from canada.sun.com (elsbeth [129.155.8.39]) by
opcom-mail.canada.sun.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA24116;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:29:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3B339C93.116D5214@canada.sun.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:29:23 -0400
From: David Collier-Brown <davecb@canada.sun.com>
Organization: Priv ate Person
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rshields@customcolor.com, samba@lists.samba.org, ctooley@amoa.org
Subject: Re: Third Post same question...Ownership privileges
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Richard Shields wrote:
I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a Macintosh OSX server ver 1.2 A file
created,
copied or otherwise altered by a Windows client on this server is
unalterable by the Macintosh clients. Is there a way to fix this? A
file
created, ETC by a Mac client can be altered by anyone... I have only
limited
Unix/Linux exp so feel free to email me in person if the answer is too
wordy
for the list server. Thank you for your help in advance...
Oops, I missed that one:
It's the same problem on Mac as Windows: the ownership
changes because editors create/rename/unlink files.
It's in the book under "File Permissions and Attributes.."
on page 141, under force create mode. Have a look in
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/ch05_01.html
for the fix.
--dave (sorry!) c-b
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
Performance & Engineering Team | some people and astonish the rest.
Americas Customer Engineering | -- Mark Twain
(905) 415-2849 | davecb@canada.sun.com
Return-Path: <bbowler@bigelow.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from alpha1.bigelow.org (blosfw.bigelow.org [198.116.72.8]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379EE44AB for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from b141.bigelow.org ([198.116.72.141] helo=bruce) by
alpha1.bigelow.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15DWiJ-00046C-00 for
samba@lists.samba.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:35:31 -0400
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:35:31 -0400
From: Bruce Bowler <bbowler@bigelow.org>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: newbie question
X-Face: ,\m{?h\)X
Message-Id: <20010622153054.2D5F.BBOWLER@bigelow.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.01
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I've decided it's time to make better use of our computing resources
here and towards that end, I'd like to get samba up and running on one
of our Linux boxes (RH7.0). The system came with 2.0.8 which I can't
seem to get to work. I can see the server from a W95 system but I can't
seem to connect to any of the shares I set up.
Seeing from the website that 2.2.0 is out, I decided I should download
and build that version, before trying to go any further. I downloaded
the latest tarball and when I try and build it, I get to this and die...
> checking for uint16 typedef included by rpc/rpc.h... no
> checking for int32 typedef included by rpc/rpc.h... no
> checking for uint32 typedef included by rpc/rpc.h... no
> checking for conflicting AUTH_ERROR define in rpc/rpc.h... no
> checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code.
Aborting config
Of course, since configure (no options) didn't finish, I can't make
etc...
Any ideas on where to go next?
Thanks!
Bruce
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Bruce Bowler +1.207.633.9600 BBowler@bigelow.org
This is my last message to you: In sorrow seek happiness.
- Dostoyevsky
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Return-Path: <oliver@samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CA952CD for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5MBbKS09468; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:37:20 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20353; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
15:08:37 -0400
Message-ID: <3B3397B4.6040007@samera.com.py>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:08:36 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver@samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arjan Oosting <ajoostin@students.cs.uu.nl>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Roaming profile problems
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106221620200.29382-100000@abeel.students.cs.
uu.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Add this:
force directory mode = 0700
inherit permissions = Yes
to your profiles share and should work
Oliver
Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > Do you have write acces in the Unix box for that user?
> > The directory for the profile of that user must be fully writeable
for
> > that user.
>Yes i have (drwxrwxrwt).
>
> > There is also a problem(I hate the word bug, but anyway) with
creating
> > directories inside the profile directory. The problem is that samba
creates
> > the directories in mode 600 and not 700.
>When my profile gets saved, it seems that al my directories created and are
>mode 0700, but al the files in the roaming profile are NOT saved.
>
>The strange part is that yesterday everything seemed to work for about
>half an hour, but after that the problem was bask (no chances in my
>config whatsoever). So i'm pretty confused.
>
>By the way, my entry for the profile directory in smb.conf is this
>
> [profiles]
> path = /data/samba/profiles
> writeable = yes
> create mode = 0600
> directory mode = 0700
> browseable = No
> guest ok = yes
>
>
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >I've got a linux (kernel 2.4.5) server with samba 2.2.0
installed and a
> > >Windows 2000 professional client. This server is PDC for my
network. But
> > >whenever I logout on the windows machine, samba seems not able to
save my
> > >roaming profile. In my samba log i find entries like this
> > >
> > >[2001/06/22 05:46:0, 0] smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037)
> > > open_directory: unable to create arjan/Start
Menu/Programs/Startup.
> > >Error was no such file or directory
> > >
> > >after a lot of these entries samba seems to stop responding to
the client.
> > >I've tried al king of permissions on the profile directory,
all kind of
> > >compile- smb.conf-options and the latest sources from cvs and
windows 2000
> > >professional without sp1, with sp1 an with sp2. Verifying my
username &
> > >password works, but i just can't save my profile. Please help
me, i'm
> > >desperate.
> > >
>
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver@samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <ctooley@amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 5D6EE475B for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 12:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A73.006C53CD ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:43:13 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley@amoa.org
To: Bruce Bowler <bbowler@bigelow.org>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A73.006C5263.00@amoa.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:43:08 -0500
Subject: Re: newbie question
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
There is a RedHat 7 RPM for that platform if you wish to bypass the compilation
process.
Other than that the reason that you probably (and I'm just guessing here)
couldn't connect with a W95 box is a (un)encrypted password issue. Most
revisions (all?) of Windows 95 had unencrypted passwords before a patch was
applied. Even after that patch there is a bit that can be changed in the
registry to turn off encryption. So, if you have encrypted passwords turned on
in your smb.conf it's most likely the problem.
Chris Tooley
Bruce Bowler <bbowler@bigelow.org> on 06/22/2001 02:35:31 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA)
Subject newbie question
:
I've decided it's time to make better use of our computing resources
here and towards that end, I'd like to get samba up and running on one
of our Linux boxes (RH7.0). The system came with 2.0.8 which I can't
seem to get to work. I can see the server from a W95 system but I can't
seem to connect to any of the shares I set up.
Seeing from the website that 2.2.0 is out, I decided I should download
and build that version, before trying to go any further. I downloaded
the latest tarball and when I try and build it, I get to this and die...
> checking for uint16 typedef included by rpc/rpc.h... no
> checking for int32 typedef included by rpc/rpc.h... no
> checking for uint32 typedef included by rpc/rpc.h... no
> checking for conflicting AUTH_ERROR define in rpc/rpc.h... no
> checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code.
Aborting
config
Of course, since configure (no options) didn't finish, I can't make
etc...
Any ideas on where to go next?
Thanks!
Bruce
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
Bruce Bowler +1.207.633.9600 BBowler@bigelow.org
This is my last message to you: In sorrow seek happiness.
- Dostoyevsky
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (unknown [66.64.6.25]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB0C5368 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id
6D77D10F416; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:47:44 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:47:44 -0500
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: 192.168.0.7 && samba
Message-ID: <20010622144744.B28315@leviathan.inethouston.net>
Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
For some reason samba is trying to connect to 192.168.0.7. I don't
have a 192.168.0.7 in my config files anywhere or on my network,
could anyone point out why it might be trying to contact this address?
Here's an excerpt from my log.nmbd
started asyncdns process 21009
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.7(137) ERRNO=Host is down
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.0.7 port 137 failed
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name
LEVIATHAN<20>
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.7(137) ERRNO=Host is down
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.0.7 port 137 failed
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name
LEVIATHAN<03>
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.7(137) ERRNO=Host is down
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.0.7 port 137 failed
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name
LEVIATHAN<00>
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.7(137) ERRNO=Host is down
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.0.7 port 137 failed
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name SAMBA<00>
Packet send failed to 192.168.0.7(137) ERRNO=Host is down
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 192.168.0.7 port 137 failed
register_name: Failed to send packet trying to register name
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
Return-Path: <gustavo@colltech.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from psasolar.colltech.com (psasolar.colltech.com
[208.229.236.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0EF5353
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost by psasolar.colltech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/not) with
ESMTP id OAA28497; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:50:42 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:50:41 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gustavo Vegas <gustavo@colltech.com>
X-Sender: gustavo@psasolar.private.psa.pencom.com
To: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Problems Running Samba 2.2.0+winbind on Solaris against a
Terminal Server
In-Reply-To: <026a01c0fb52$999f0700$1a00a8c0@diamondback>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106221443560.27497-100000@psasolar.private.p
sa.pencom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, M. Kilroy wrote:
> >From an earlier post....
> >
> > There are a couple of problem areas with winbindd in head at the
> > moment. The first is this one (not checking machine account
> > properly), secondly the pam_winbind module isn't fully working,
> > and thirdly it doesn't cope with large numbers of users/groups
> > just yet. This may be the cause of your out of memory error
> > alluded to in another message.
> >
> This may affect you... but i'm not sure what you pulled from the CVS
site...
I pulled the CVS HEAD distribution from a couple of hours ago, based on a
post from this morning stating that today's HEAD contained a healthier
winbind.> Also, could you post your smb.conf file so we have a better idea of what
> might be happening?
>
Sure, here goes the important part. There is nothing special in the
shares' definitions, so I am only sending the global definitions:
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = XXXX
netbios name = MYHOSTNAME
server string = ASP Samba Server
interfaces = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX/255.255.254.0
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = XXXXPDC XXXXBDC
username map = /opt/samba/default/private/username.map
log level = 2
log file = /opt/samba/default/var/log.%m
local master = No
dns proxy = No
wins server = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
winbind uid = 10000-20000
winbind gid = 10000-20000
template shell = /bin/sh
winbind separator = +
winbind cache time = 10
create mask = 0777
security mask = 0777
force security mode = 00
directory security mask = 0777
force directory security mode = 00
Thanks,
-- Gustavo Vegas
--
===========================================+========================== ****
***** Gustavo Vegas Gustavo_Vegas@colltech.com
** *
** * Collective Technologies
**** *
===========================================+==========================God is
real, unless declared integer.
===========================================+==========================
Return-Path: <torriem@cs.byu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.cs.byu.edu (mail.cs.byu.edu [128.187.2.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D6A4CA4 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from verdi.cs.byu.edu (IDENT:torriem@verdi.cs.byu.edu
[128.187.101.86]) by mail.cs.byu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5MJpCP01635 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:51:12
-0600
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:51:12 -0600 (MDT)
From: Michael L Torrie <torriem@cs.byu.edu>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba and ACLs
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106221241000.26434-100000@verdi.cs.byu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I recently installed the ACL kernel patch so I can get ACLs on Ext2. I
compiled Samba 2.2 CVS to support ACLs. Now when I'm working with a share
that doesn't support acls (brought in via NFS), samba can't change
permissions at all.
It looks like when acl support is compiled in, samba will only use acl
(libacl?) for changing permissions. On my nfs share (I know it's bad to
share from nfs -- I'll be moving samba to the actual file server soon) is
it possible to get Samba to use the normal chmod stuff in addition to the
acls when acl support is not there? I can work around this. No big deal.
But I'm curious.
thanks,
Michael
Return-Path: <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from rsdmail.k12.ar.us (rsdmail.k12.ar.us [170.211.146.216])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B48536D for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:54:44 -0500
Message-Id: <200106221454.AA215351490@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Thomas Rice" <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Reply-To: <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Can't access server/shares via NN
X-Mailer: <IMail v6.05>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Greetings,
== Warning Newbie question follows =
RH 7.1 with Samba 2.0.7
I can see the server in network neighborhood, but I cannot access any shares
when I click on it. I get the following message:
\\servername is not accessable
The computer or sharename cannot be found.
I cannot access the server by name or IP number.
My smb.conf file is as follows:
[global]
security = user
status = yes
workgroup = TECH
encrypt passwords = yes
domain logons =yes
logon script = scripts\%U.bat
domain admin group = @adm
guest account = smbguest
share modes=no
os level=65
[homes]
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0700
directory mask = 0700
oplocks = false
locking = no
[netlogon]
path = /usr/netlogon
writeable = no
guest ok = yes
I would greatly appreicate any help with my problem.
Thanks,
Thomas Rice
IS Manager
Russellville School District (K-12)
Russellville, AR USA
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at rsdmail.k12.ar.us
Return-Path: <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (unknown [66.64.6.25]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D8446A8 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id
4229610F416; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:09:59 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:09:59 -0500
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: git@bmts.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: 192.168.0.7 && samba
Message-ID: <20010622150959.E28315@leviathan.inethouston.net>
Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
References: <200106222007.QAA15105@Alice.BMTS.Com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200106222007.QAA15105@Alice.BMTS.Com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:08:13PM +0000, git@bmts.com
wrote:> Disclaimer, I don't really know what I'm talking
> about.
>
> If I saw something like this in my logs. (Samba
> trying to connect to a computer that does not
> exist on my network.) my first thought would be
> that someone is spoofing network packets.
>
> (Sending packets over the internet, in this case,
> made to look as though they came from within your
> internal network)
>
>
I would think so too, but I have those addresses blocked on my
firewall from coming in via the external interface and it only
happens right when samba is loaded.
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
Return-Path: <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D478B4301 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5MKDMS00634
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:13:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000085208@wizzard.rising-edge>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:10:56 -0400
Message-ID: <02aa01c0fb57$71becc70$1a00a8c0@diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
To: "Gustavo Vegas" <gustavo@colltech.com>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106221443560.27497-100000@psasolar.private.p
sa.pencom.com>
Subject: Re: Problems Running Samba 2.2.0+winbind on Solaris against a
Terminal Server
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:10:55 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
>I pulled the CVS HEAD distribution from a couple of hours ago, based on a
>post from this morning stating that today's HEAD contained a healthier
>winbind.
Ahh... didn't know this. I may try this myself :) Can anyone define
"healthier"? Is the machine account checking fixed by any chance??
password server = XXXXPDC XXXXBDC
When I listed my password server as PDC BDC I got errors. I listed just the
PDC and bam - things started magically working. How about your lmhosts
file, resolv.conf file?? I'm assuming you have those set up correctly?
Hope this helps!
Return-Path: <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2692532D; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
13:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5MKOCS01650;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:24:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000085216@wizzard.rising-edge>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:22:03 -0400
Message-ID: <02cf01c0fb58$ff4d3e40$1a00a8c0@diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>
Subject: [nsswitch/winbindd_cache.o] Error 1
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:22:02 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Got this when compiling the latest HEAD:
Compiling nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `winbindd_cache_init':
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:44: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer
wit
hout a cast
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `cached_sequence_number':
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:59: incompatible types in assignment
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `fetch_cache':
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:291: incompatible types in assignment
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `fetch_cache_entry':
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:357: incompatible types in assignment
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `winbindd_fetch_group_cache_entry':
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:428: incompatible types in assignment
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `winbindd_fetch_gid_cache_entry':
nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:470: incompatible types in assignment
make: *** [nsswitch/winbindd_cache.o] Error 1
[root@LINUXSERV source]#
Return-Path: <nailed@videotron.ca>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from VL-MS-MR002.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca
[24.201.245.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB1A53B1
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alain ([24.201.55.103]) by VL-MS-MR002.sc1.videotron.ca
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GFCLZ305.9FL; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 16:23:27 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Alain Toussaint <nailed@videotron.ca>
To: <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>, samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: Can't access server/shares via NN
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:23:27 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <200106221454.AA215351490@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
In-Reply-To: <200106221454.AA215351490@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01062216232700.06491@alain>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> I can see the server in network neighborhood, but I cannot access any
> shares when I click on it. I get the following message:
umm...did you add your account in the /etc/smbpasswd,if not,have a look
at the smbpasswd(8) manpage,there's lot of information there for
setting up password.
> guest account = smbguest
also,try changing that to:
guest account = ftp
Alain
p.s. by chance,have you someone named Kemper Porter over there ??
Return-Path: <lobo@mental.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from gate.mental.com (gate.mental.com [192.31.14.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90665424F for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gate.mental.com
(8.8.5/8.8.8/Lobo-20000426) id WAA25727 for <samba@lists.samba.org>;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:36:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from twen-et(172.16.0.5) by gate via smap (V2.0/Lobo-010123)
id xma025724; Fri, 22 Jun 01 22:36:31 +0200
Received: (from smap@localhost) by mental.com
(8.10.1/8.10.1/Lobo-20001016) id f5MKaTu05042 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:36:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from twen(172.17.0.5) by twen via smap (V2.0) id xma005039;
Fri, 22 Jun 01 22:36:27 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Codepage conversion is applied the wrong way
Organization: mental images GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:36:26 +0200
Message-ID: <5038.993242186@mental.com>
From: Alexander Lobodzinski <lobo@mental.com>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
If the NT client creates a file with, say, the 'o diaeresis'
character 0x94, Samba correctly translates it into 0xf6 so an ls
command on the Unix box also shows it as 'o diaeresis'.
However when the NT client lists that directory, Samba
incorrectly looks up the codepage in the forward direction again
and presents the character as 0xf7, 'division sign'.
Is this is known bug and supposed to be fixed, or should I use
a codepage with one-to-one translation, essentially replicating
2.0.7 behaviour that is consistent for NT, but uses weird
(untranslated) filenames on Unix?
This happens using CVS of Wednesday evening (current CVS doesn't
compile due to declaration/definition inconsistencies) and
codepage 437. Other pages give different mappings but are also
looked up in the wrong direction.
Ciao, Lobo
Return-Path: <gustavo@colltech.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from psasolar.colltech.com (psasolar.colltech.com
[208.229.236.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B30047BD
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost by psasolar.colltech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/not) with
ESMTP id PAA02970; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:38:42 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:38:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gustavo Vegas <gustavo@colltech.com>
X-Sender: gustavo@psasolar.private.psa.pencom.com
To: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Problems Running Samba 2.2.0+winbind on Solaris against a
Terminal Server
In-Reply-To: <02aa01c0fb57$71becc70$1a00a8c0@diamondback>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106221535380.27497-100000@psasolar.private.p
sa.pencom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, M. Kilroy wrote:
>
> >I pulled the CVS HEAD distribution from a couple of hours ago, based on
a
> >post from this morning stating that today's HEAD contained a
healthier
> >winbind.
> Ahh... didn't know this. I may try this myself :) Can anyone define
> "healthier"? Is the machine account checking fixed by any
chance??
I am not really sure what changed. I said healthier capturing the
perspective of whoever made the post.>
> password server = XXXXPDC XXXXBDC
>
> When I listed my password server as PDC BDC I got errors. I listed just
the
> PDC and bam - things started magically working. How about your lmhosts
> file, resolv.conf file?? I'm assuming you have those set up correctly?
I have not tried that, and haven't tried the '*' either. The lmhosts
only
contains references to my own system and the PDC and BDC. As for the other
system configurations files, they all work fine.
Thanks,
-- Gustavo Vegas.
--
===========================================+========================== ****
***** Gustavo Vegas Gustavo_Vegas@colltech.com
** *
** * Collective Technologies
**** *
===========================================+==========================God is
real, unless declared integer.
===========================================+==========================
Return-Path: <brucek@mizuhocap.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from damion.fcmc.com (gateway.fcmc.com [207.17.186.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543FF53C6 for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3B33ADA7.55C4972E@fcmc.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:42:15 -0400
From: "Bruce Kenney ( Tech Group )" <brucek@mizuhocap.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: copying a large file from NT/UNIX to UNIX/NT
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello one and all,
I'm having a problem copying a large file from
my NT box to my UNIX box and vice versa.
It starts to copy then it stops, after about a
minute. (honestly, the file is not that large, 150meg)
I'm using samba 2.X on a solaris 2.5 system.
It sounds like a configuration issue on my end.
Do I need to set "keep alive = 60"
or could it be something else?
I'm not looking for the perfect solution,
I'm just looking for a couple of rough ideas.
Thank you for your valuable time,
Bruce Kenney
1-212-898-2868
---------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail contains information some or all of which may be
confidential, proprietary and/or legally privileged. If an addressing
or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the
sender by replying to this e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on
this e-mail.
---------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <kkwok@bluebarn.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from EXCHANGE (unknown [63.167.160.83]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C9C5370 for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun
2001 13:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<LQAB41C0>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:01:34 -0400
Message-ID: <EBBFE607B252D4119D0200508BC5DA9CAAFF4F@EXCHANGE>
From: Ka-Lok Kwok <kkwok@bluebarn.com>
To: "'samba@samba.org'" <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Samba
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:01:33 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi! I'm a newbie and I have a question about Samba.
I'm currently in a Windows Environment that consists of NT 4 and Win2k. All
the Servers including the PDC are NT 4. Half the workstations are NT 4 and
some are Win2k.
I recently decided to try out Redhat Linux 7.1 with the 2.4 kernel. I
installed Samba 2.0.8-1.7.1 on it. A majority of the configuration was done
through SWAT. I set up the Samba server to be a file server. I joined the
domain as a member server. The Windows clients can see the samba shares.
Pinging machines are fine. But when Windows clients try to save/open files
onto Samba, it takes forever. The computer will just hang on the client
machines.
After a long wait, an error message will pop up stating: Error copying file:
The path is too deep.
I did a search on the mailing list and I don't see anyone with this problem.
Any recommendations as to how I can begin to fix this problem? Thanks in
advance!
Ka-Lok Kwok
Return-Path: <msolem@firstlinux.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from omta04.mta.everyone.net (sitemail.everyone.net
[216.200.145.35]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DB4421D
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sitemail.everyone.net (reports [216.200.145.62]) by
omta04.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C436C4F459 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by sitemail.everyone.net (Postfix, from userid 99) id
B1F89274F; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.117)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Solem <msolem@firstlinux.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: nmbd not starting. (No local interfaces)
Reply-To: msolem@firstlinux.net
X-Originating-Ip: [4.21.138.63]
Message-Id: <20010622212747.B1F89274F@sitemail.everyone.net>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am trying to get samba (2.0.7) working on a newly installed Red Hat 7.1
system. nmbd does not start. The log file shows the following errors:
"create_subnets: No local interfaces!"
"failed when creating subnet lists."
The file does show that it is able to open and bind to ports 137 & 138.
I ran this command "strace /usr/sbin/nmbd -D".
The trace shows that an atempt is made to open the file /etc/ls.so.preload. It
is unable to do so because this file does not exist. I don't know if it
needs this file to work.
Here is my smb.conf file.
[global]
workgroup = SIMPLE
log level = 3
[test]
path = /home/usr1/test
read only = no
guest ok = yes
Thanks
Mike
_____________________________________________________________
Want a new web-based email account ? ---> http://www.firstlinux.net
Return-Path: <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (unknown [66.64.6.25]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0808446F6 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id
E584210F417; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:30:45 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:30:45 -0500
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: 192.168.0.7 && samba
Message-ID: <20010622163045.G28315@leviathan.inethouston.net>
Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I managed to figure out what my problem was with samba trying to
connect to 192.168.0.7, for some reason it thinkgs that is the
braodcast address
added interface ip=66.64.12.249 bcast=66.64.12.255 nmask=255.255.255.248
added interface ip=192.168.0.2 bcast=192.168.0.7 nmask=255.255.255.248
added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0
Here is an ifconfig of my interfaces, I guess samba is picking up the
broadcast from the /29 subnet and applying it to the 192.168.0.x
subnet for some reason
fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 66.64.12.249 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 66.64.12.255
inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
ether 00:02:b3:3e:d0:6e
media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active
Any ideas, the only lines I have that even refer to ip addresses in
my config file is setting hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
66.64.12.248/255.255.255.248
But I still have the problem when I take that line out.
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
Return-Path: <gustavo@colltech.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from psasolar.colltech.com (psasolar.colltech.com
[208.229.236.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412AA46F6
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost by psasolar.colltech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/not) with
ESMTP id QAA09268 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
16:40:07 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:40:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: Gustavo Vegas <gustavo@colltech.com>
X-Sender: gustavo@psasolar.private.psa.pencom.com
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Problems Running Samba 2.2.0+winbind on Solaris against a
Terminal Server
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106221415400.8125-100000@psasolar.private.p
s a.pencom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106221613020.27497-100000@psasolar.private.p
sa.pencom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello again!
One of the problems I mentioned, was with an SID not being
translated or understood by samba. It turns out that it is my own SID, but
with reference to the "account Domain". The samba server belongs to
the
"resource Domain", and resolves properly the SID through the username
map. However, and although the SID is in both the same, it throws it out
when it tries to resolve it from the account Domain. I have tried
including it in the username map with the DOM\user syntax, without
success. So, is there a way of mapping an NT user in the username map in
this form?
Thanks,
-- Gustavo Vegas.
--
===========================================+========================== ****
***** Gustavo Vegas Gustavo_Vegas@colltech.com
** *
** * Collective Technologies
**** *
===========================================+==========================God is
real, unless declared integer.
===========================================+==========================
Return-Path: <lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from nimue.bos.bindview.com (unknown [216.41.50.187]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4FB47A0 for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (lcamtuf@localhost) by nimue.bos.bindview.com
(8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5MKhcc17767; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:43:39
-0400
X-Authentication-Warning: nimue.bos.bindview.com: lcamtuf owned process
doing -bs
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:43:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com>
To: samba@samba.org
Cc: razor@bos.bindview.com
Subject: smbd remote file creation vulnerability
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106221603060.10682-100000@nimue.bos.bindview
.com>
X-Nmymbofr: Nir Orb Buk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
Below is a draft of our advisory on samba 2.0.7 problem. I am not sure if
it applies to newest samba releases, 2.0.7 is the version currently
shipped with major Linux distributions. We would like to hear your
response on this issue, and, if you confirm it, to include vendor-provided
fix information. Also, we would like to sync our planned release of this
advisory with eventual public release of fixes or any other announcements.
Thanks in advance,
Michal Zalewski
-- samba advisory --
Author: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@razor.bindview.com>
Topic:
Insufficient parameter validation and unsafe default configuration
on popular Linux platforms make systems running samba SMB file sharing
daemon vulnerable to remote attacks.
Vulnerable platforms:
Tested on smbd 2.0.7 shipped with RedHat Linux 7.0 and 7.1.
Overview:
Due to insufficient NetBIOS computer name in incoming SMB requests,
in conjunction with default configuration found on Linux platforms
(like RedHat and derivates), samba daemon allows remote attackers to
create SMB session log files (*.log) with highly attacker-dependent
contents outside outside logs directory. This vulnerability itself can
be used to perform DoS attacks, or, if combined with unprivileged local
access, can be used to gain superuser privileges.
On vulnerable platforms, by default, each SMB session is logged
to the file /var/log/samba/<netbios-name>.log. If the attacker is
connecting from 'FOOBAR', logs would be put in /var/log/foobar.log.
Unfortunately, NetBIOS name '../../../evil' would be accepted, as
well,
creating /evil.log file.
This vulnerability is exploitable if the following setting is present
in smb.conf file:
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
...which is default on major Linux distributions, and probably few
other platforms, as well. On some systems, configuration might be
different:
log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m
In the second case (e.g. FreeBSD), there is usually no way to exploit
this vulnerability.
Exploit:
This is the scenario of local privilege escalation attack against
RedHat 7.x installation:
$ ln -s /etc/passwd /tmp/x.log
$ smbclient //NIMUE/"`perl -e '{print
"\ntoor::0:0::/:/bin/sh\n"}'`" \
-n ../../../tmp/x -N
...where 'NIMUE' stands for local host name (few error messages
should be returned).
$ su toor
#
Explaination of this attack is pretty trivial. Samba daemon tries
to access logfile for host introducing itself as '../../../tmp/x'.
This translates to open() on /var/log/samba/../../../tmp/x.log.
Thus, /tmp/x.log is opened in O_APPEND mode, following previously
created symlink to /etc/passwd.
Then, anonymous attempt to mount non-existing share named
"\ntoor::0:0::/:/bin/sh\n" is logged in /tmp/x.log, or, if you
prefer, in /etc/passwd. Error message looks this way:
[2001/06/22 14:53:03, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(925)
Rejecting user 'lcamtuf': authentication failed
[2001/06/22 14:53:03, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(214)
../../../tmp/x (192.233.133.108) couldn't find service
toor::0:0::/:/bin/sh
The last line is, obviously, accepted by /bin/su or /bin/login.
Fix information:
As a temporary workaround, we suggest changing 'log file' setting,
as described above.
*** VENDOR RESPONSE ***
Return-Path: <teg@redhat.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5775336 for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from halden.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool.corp.redhat.com
[199.183.24.200]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
f5MLl8b15999; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:47:08 -0400
Received: (from teg@localhost) by halden.devel.redhat.com
(8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5MLmHt20462; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:48:17 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: halden.devel.redhat.com: teg set sender to
teg@redhat.com using -f
To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com>
Cc: samba@samba.org, razor@bos.bindview.com
Subject: Re: smbd remote file creation vulnerability
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106221603060.10682-100000@nimue.bos.bindview
.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
Date: 22 Jun 2001 17:48:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106221603060.10682-100000@nimue.bos.bindvie
w .com>
Message-ID: <xuyu2189of2.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com>
Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.103
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Below is a draft of our advisory on samba 2.0.7 problem. I am not sure if
> it applies to newest samba releases, 2.0.7 is the version currently
> shipped with major Linux distributions. We would like to hear your
> response on this issue, and, if you confirm it, to include vendor-provided
> fix information. Also, we would like to sync our planned release of this
> advisory with eventual public release of fixes or any other announcements.
We released samba-2.0.8-1.7 some time ago....
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
Red Hat, Inc.
Return-Path: <teg@redhat.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.redhat.com (mail.redhat.com [199.183.24.239]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE3D52F6 for
<samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from halden.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool.corp.redhat.com
[199.183.24.200]) by mail.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
f5MM3bb17268; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:03:37 -0400
Received: (from teg@localhost) by halden.devel.redhat.com
(8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5MM4kx20842; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:04:46 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: halden.devel.redhat.com: teg set sender to
teg@redhat.com using -f
To: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com>
Cc: samba@samba.org, razor@bos.bindview.com
Subject: Re: smbd remote file creation vulnerability
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0106221603060.10682-100000@nimue.bos.bindview
.com> <xuyu2189of2.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
From: teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?q?Glomsr=F8d?=)
Date: 22 Jun 2001 18:04:46 -0400
In-Reply-To: <xuyu2189of2.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <xuypubw9nnl.fsf@halden.devel.redhat.com>
Lines: 19
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.103
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrxd) writes:
> Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Below is a draft of our advisory on samba 2.0.7 problem. I am not sure
if
> > it applies to newest samba releases, 2.0.7 is the version currently
> > shipped with major Linux distributions. We would like to hear your
> > response on this issue, and, if you confirm it, to include
vendor-provided
> > fix information. Also, we would like to sync our planned release of
this
> > advisory with eventual public release of fixes or any other
announcements.
>
> We released samba-2.0.8-1.7 some time ago....
Which is vulnerable. Bah.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrxd
Red Hat, Inc.
Return-Path: <981710@ic.unicamp.br>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from grande.dcc.unicamp.br (grande.dcc.unicamp.br
[143.106.7.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A01747A7
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from saofrancisco.ic.unicamp.br (saofrancisco.ic.unicamp.br
[143.106.7.4]) by grande.dcc.unicamp.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
TAA26909 for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:08:04 -0300 (EST)
Received: from jaguari.dcc.unicamp.br (jaguari.dcc.unicamp.br
[143.106.16.135]) by saofrancisco.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.2/8.11.2) with
ESMTP id f5MM9OT22185 for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:09:24
-0300
Received: from localhost by jaguari.dcc.unicamp.br (8.11.0/8.11.0) with
ESMTP id f5MM83u01188 for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:08:03
-0300 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: jaguari.dcc.unicamp.br: 981710 owned process
doing -bs
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:08:03 -0300 (EST)
From: Marcos Vinicius Lazarini <981710@ic.unicamp.br>
X-Sender: 981710@jaguari.dcc.unicamp.br
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Contribuition
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10106221902350.1037-100000@jaguari.dcc.unicam
p.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have found a interisting gui interface not listed in your site. It names
"LinNeighborhood" and I found this program pretty good; there
aren't many
options, but it has a nice interface.
http://www.bnro.de/~schmidjo/index.html
Keep doing this great job with Samba!
Marcos Vinicius Lazarini
mailto:981710@ic.unicamp.br
Return-Path: <ruralgue@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f93.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.93]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFD85362 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:09:14 -0700
Received: from 148.233.175.231 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:09:13 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [148.233.175.231]
From: "edwin rivera" <ruralgue@hotmail.com>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Help!
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:09:13
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F938vjqueolj8Jecd9200000242@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2001 22:09:14.0028 (UTC)
FILETIME=[F8C5A6C0:01C0FB67]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi
I have configured my smb.conf file in linux mandrake but i have a problem in
the windows98 machine when i make double click on the Samba Server icon it
asks me my password i give it to it and it sends me a message that my
password is wrong.
I have the same user account and password in linux system and in windows98.
what do i have to do?
Thanks.
regards everybody
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Return-Path: <johnl@blurbco.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from blurbco.com (mail.energynet.com [207.18.68.225]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F27F52B2 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from john (amawireless.pull.dhcp-39-96.amaonline.com
[63.119.39.96]) (authenticated) by blurbco.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with
ESMTP id f5MNifh24418 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001
18:44:41 -0500
Message-ID: <003701c0fb73$ad846640$6700a8c0@john>
From: "John Laur" <johnl@blurbco.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: 2nd time: CUPS support either imcomplete or fubar
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:32:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have asked these questions numerous times before and twice here:
I am using samba 2.2.0 (samba-2.2.0-final2.deb Debian package release) with
CUPS, and I am experiencing the following problems:
1) SAMBA does not clean up smbprint files in the spool directory.
2) SAMBA does not inform CUPS it is sending raw data; hence, you can't use
the
same CUPS printer for UNIX and SAMBA clients since CUPS will only accept
postscript, images, anything else it has a parsing engine for, etc.
3) CUPS print jobs submitted from particular users all show up in the queue as
being owned by root, even though the smbprint file in the spool is owned by
the correct user.
4) When printing=cups is specified, you cannot create a printer share using
any other print system, eg. bsd and specify custom print/queue commands. This
screws the ability to use CUPS and still use SAMBA as a fax server or other
fun tricks like that.
The only workarounds I have found involve either: writing custom CUPS filters
or backends (which is absolutely totally and completely the worst way in the
world to fix these problems) or using CUPS lpr emulation (which is very
painful and adds another layer of junk into the mix). Issue #1 and #3 should
be extremely simple fixes. I have been in communication with another felllow,
Ian Zink experiencing and identifying the problem with issue #2. His detailed
description of a fix (for whoever maintains CUPS support for SAMBA) can be
found at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=97372 Issue #4 is
probably the only thing that isn't a quick fix, and it IMHO is very very
important. I hope these can make it into 2.2.1, but as it seems to be
impossible to even find out who works on what within SAMBA, and all my emails
go unanswered, I don't even know who I can contact for discussion.
Please, if you even know who is maintaining cups support in SAMBA, please let
me know. I couldn't find anything in the source. Does Michael Sweet develop
this?
Thanks in advance to anyone,
John Laur
Return-Path: <ajoostin@students.cs.uu.nl>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.students.cs.uu.nl (solar.students.cs.uu.nl
[131.211.82.28]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E5753D4
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from abeel.students.cs.uu.nl (abeel.students.cs.uu.nl
[131.211.82.40]) by mail.students.cs.uu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id
764DD85F7 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 02:46:51 +0200
(MET DST)
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 02:46:51 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Arjan Oosting <ajoostin@students.cs.uu.nl>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Roaming profile problems
In-Reply-To: <3B3397B4.6040007@samera.com.py>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106230244420.645-100000@abeel.students.cs.uu
.nl>
X-Org: Students of the Department of Computer Science; Utrecht
University
X-Org: P.O. Box 80.089; 3508 TB Utrecht; The Netherlands.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Add this:
> force directory mode = 0700
> inherit permissions = Yes
> to your profiles share and should work
Tried that one, and it doesn't work for me. Stil cannot save my profile.
But thanx anyway
Arjan
--
This signature has been infected by the signature virus.
Please help me spread and copy me to your .signature
--
Arjan Oosting
Student Informatica, Universiteit Utrecht
E-mail : ajoostin@students.cs.uu.nl
E-mail @home : arjanoosting@home.nl
Telephone : +31384221224
Mobile telephone: +31629148383
Return-Path: <grupis@via-rs.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from quebec.procergs.com.br (quebec.procergs.com.br
[200.198.128.236]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
CE0CE442A for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:28:07 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from pro.via-rs.com.br (pro.via-rs.com.br [200.198.128.235])
by quebec.procergs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFF8F0651 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:36:44 -0300 (EST)
Received: from hemp.grupis.org (p05.sa01.plt.procergs.com.br
[200.198.163.69]) by pro.via-rs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id
A3F5D24D51 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:36:43
-0300 (BRT)
Received: by hemp.grupis.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3924810A2;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:29:30 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemp.grupis.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA01120 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 22:29:30 -0300 (BRT)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:29:30 -0300 (BRT)
From: Rodrigo Gruppelli <grupis@via-rs.net>
X-X-Sender: <grupis@ramone.grupis.org>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: remote samba servers
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106222225530.9024-100000@ramone.grupis.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Greetings..
This is my first e-mail in this mailing list.
My graduation project is about VPN and I'm trying to setup a FreeS/WAN vpn
to connect 2 windows networks. I already made frees/wan work.. I would
like to know if is it possible to have 2 distinct windows LAN's, each one
with a Samba server and then interconnect this 2 samba server over the
internet to connect these 2 windows LAN's and act like if it was just one.
Can samba do that?
Thank you all.
Return-Path: <slu@firerun.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D5044E0 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by
impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5N55DY13321; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 23:05:14 -0600
Message-ID: <3B342389.85667802@firerun.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:05:13 -0600
From: Patrick <slu@firerun.net>
Reply-To: critter@rmci.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: edwin rivera <ruralgue@hotmail.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Help!
References: <F938vjqueolj8Jecd9200000242@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
did you enable encrypted passwords? The username that you logged onto win98,
is it exactly identical to the one you are using on the Linux system. If it is
slightly different that could cause the error. My fist guess would be the
encrypted passwords.
Patrick
edwin rivera wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have configured my smb.conf file in linux mandrake but i have a problem
in
> the windows98 machine when i make double click on the Samba Server icon it
> asks me my password i give it to it and it sends me a message that my
> password is wrong.
>
> I have the same user account and password in linux system and in windows98.
>
> what do i have to do?
>
> Thanks.
> regards everybody
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <fred@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au
(ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.50]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id A470D47DD for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22
Jun 2001 22:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thesystem.planb ([203.164.71.225]) by
mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20
201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20010623052019.VZGE22932.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@thesystem.plan
b> for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 15:20:19 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ray <nojunkmail@optushome.com.au>
Reply-To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Kix scripts
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 15:20:16 +1000
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01062315201602.03103@thesystem.planb>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
This is not exactly on topic, but if anyone would reply privately to my
question I'd very much appreciate it.
I'm trying to convince management that we should ditch our batch file login
scripts (200+!) in favour of a single Kixtart script. To support my argument
I need examples of companies which are running Kixtart as the login script
system. Ideally they would have many remote sites, and a large number of
servers & clients.
Alternatively, what other scripting languages would be recommended? I've
heard rumour that Microsoft are removing Kix from the reskit. Can anyone
confirm their attitude towards Kix?
Many thanks in advance!
--
Return-Path: <orakulo@quickweb.com.ph>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from goku.quickweb.com.ph (goku.quickweb.com.ph
[208.235.228.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB9BA47C3
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15370 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jun 2001 06:57:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO demo) (208.235.228.19) by
goku.quickweb.com.ph with SMTP; 23 Jun 2001 06:57:46 -0000
Message-ID: <003101c0f74a$9c4ce6e0$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
From: "joey" <orakulo@quickweb.com.ph>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:28:57 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi...
Im just want to know how to use a samba?
Thanks.....
Return-Path: <jimmy10@quickweb.com.ph>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from goku.quickweb.com.ph (goku.quickweb.com.ph
[208.235.228.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECF125343
for <samba@samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 23:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15580 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jun 2001 06:59:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO demo) (208.235.228.19) by
goku.quickweb.com.ph with SMTP; 23 Jun 2001 06:59:02 -0000
Message-ID: <004801c0f74a$c9937a60$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
From: "jimmy" <jimmy10@quickweb.com.ph>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:30:14 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi....
Im just want to know how to use a samba?
Thanks....
Return-Path: <MMcAtee@philamuseum.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.philamuseum.org (unknown [38.155.38.22]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F35D422D for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 07:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by MAILHOST with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<MNKSQJ9Z>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:01:16 -0400
Message-ID: <3CB23A9F8C3DD511BC2500508BC741332DFF3F@MAILHOST>
From: "McAtee, Malcolm" <MMcAtee@philamuseum.org>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Samba is so slow...sometimes??
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:01:15 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Any suggestions on how to improve performance with Samba. I am at work on a
Saturday when I know that network traffic is practically none.
Sometimes when I try to attach to the samba server I receive a "localhost
is
not available, duplicate user exist on the network" message. Other time it
logs in fine and so fast I cantbelieve it..
2 other strange observations...
1. I sometimes "see" the samba server as a shared drive in ,my network
neighborhood other times as a member of the workgroup I created called
"webgroup". Sometimes as both.
2. When I initially created the webgroup share I misspelled it as webgruop.
Even though I have changed it back to the proper spelling it still appears
with the misspelling (and it still works) There must be some file deep down
in windows that controls this. Anyone know where that might be?? Could this
be effecting performance?
TIA
Malcolm
Return-Path: <jamie1184@home.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com
[24.0.95.89]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5264A4397 for
<samba@samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cx399043a ([24.181.85.210]) by femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20010623170557.QFNC23553.femail9.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cx399043a> for
<samba@samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 10:05:57 -0700
Message-ID: <001201c0fc06$7ddcf590$0200a8c0@cx399043a>
From: "Jamie" <jamie1184@home.com>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:03:57 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Return-Path: <jbarton@highridgefire.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from damocles.highridgefire.com (110-198.bestdsl.net
[216.162.110.198]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
B786F420D for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:45:41 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (jbarton@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
damocles.highridgefire.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5NInsZ13573
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:49:54 -0500
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:49:54 -0500 (CDT)
From: John Barton <jbarton@highridgefire.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Help with roaming profiles
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106231340530.13024-100000@damocles.highridge
fire.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Any help on the following would be appreciated:
I am using samba 2.2.0 on a SuSE 7.2 box running 2.4.5. I have configured
samba to act as domain controller for local network, and authentication
works great. However, roaming profile information is being stored in
user's home directory, and I am trying to get it to store all the profile
info (Desktop, StartMenu, etc. directories) in a subdirectory called
winprofile off of users home directory. I have consulted smb.conf man
page, as well as samba in 24 hours book and samba pocket reference, and it
seems to me that I need to specify the location in the logon path
directive, however, it stores everything in my home directory regardless
of the value of this directive. Can someone tell me if I ma missing
sonething here?
Here is a snippet of my configuration file:
[global]
netbios name = NAME
workgroup = WORKGROUP
os level = 34
local master = yes
preferred master = yes
domain master = yes
domain logons = yes
wins support = yes
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
logon path = \\%L\%H\winprofile\
I have also tried to these values for logon path:
\\HERAKLES\home\%U\winprofile\
John Barton
Unix Systems Administrator
Primary Networks, Inc.
jbarton@primary.net
Return-Path: <nas@chartpilot.ru>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from relay.wplus.net (relay.wplus.net [195.131.52.179]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8917149E0 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Real-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from venus.design.chartpilot.ru (ip50-213.dialup.wplus.net
[195.131.50.213]) by relay.wplus.net (8.9.1/8.9.1/wplus.2) with ESMTP
id AAA57322; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:05:39 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from dimetra (dimetra.design.chartpilot.ru [192.168.0.1]) by
venus.design.chartpilot.ru (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id f5NK4fd00856;
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:05:40 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from
nas@chartpilot.ru)
From: "Andrey Nepomnyaschih" <nas@chartpilot.ru>
To: "John Barton" <jbarton@highridgefire.com>,
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Help with roaming profiles
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:04:41 +0400
Message-ID: <LNEEKBEPHJHNDLPKMLIAAEFLCKAA.nas@chartpilot.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106231340530.13024-100000@damocles.highridg
e fire.com>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello John,
Well there is a difference between how Windows NT and Windows 9x store
profiles. It's an issue of the windows networking implementation, and
it arises even with Windows NT PDC serving SMB requests.
Windows 9x store user roaming profile under his/her home path. It
doesn't know anything about 'logon path'.
Windows NT behaves better it stores roaming profiles under 'logon
path' and uses 'logon home' for mapping it to 'logon drive'
letter.
After that it tries to substitutes the Personal (My Documents) with
the mapped drive. Note that it's a good idea not to mix Win9x profile
with WinNT one.
So if you want to serve only Windows 9x you should be fine with
setting 'logon home' to path where do you want to store profile.
Alternatively if there's only NT (I believe it's not your situation),
setting 'logon path' will do it too.
But if you have both the Win9x and WinNT in your network then I think
you should go this way (Correct me if someone have tried it before,
because I haven't had).
Set your smb.conf should contain:
[global]
...
include /usr/local/etc/samba/%m.conf
logon script = logon.bat
[homes]
...
path = /usr/local/samba/home/%u
For each machine on your network create file named <machine name>.conf
in /usr/local/etc/samba/
If the machine runs under Win9x then the file should look like:
logon home = \\%L\profile
logon drive = Z:
[profile]
...
browsable = no
path = /usr/local/samba/profiles/win9x/%u
If the machine runs under WinNT:
logon home = \\%L\%u
logon drive = H:
logon path = \\%L\profile
[profile]
...
browsable = no
path = /usr/local/samba/profiles/winnt/%u
Then write script, name it script.bat. And put it where it will be
accessible through netlogon share. The script should contain
following:
@echo off
net time \\<server name> /set /yes
if %OS% == Windows_NT goto WinNT
:Win9x
net use h: \\<server name>\homes
goto end
:WinNT
goto end
:end
After that you should get a system where profiles from Win9x and WinNT
are stored separately. After login user will get their home directory
mapped under H: letter.
There are at least two issues with this method.
First - synchronization. Users will have two different copies of
profile for each OS. So if you own software that stores something
under user profiles you will need either to move that data to home
share (/usr/local/samba/home/%u) or put soft/hard link under unix.
Second - there was a security hole with using %m macro.
Have a nice time,
Andrey Nepomnyaschih
nas@chartpilot.ru
Return-Path: <nas@chartpilot.ru>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from relay.wplus.net (relay.wplus.net [195.131.52.179]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F98549E1 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Real-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from venus.design.chartpilot.ru (ip50-213.dialup.wplus.net
[195.131.50.213]) by relay.wplus.net (8.9.1/8.9.1/wplus.2) with ESMTP
id AAA57373; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:05:59 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from dimetra (dimetra.design.chartpilot.ru [192.168.0.1]) by
venus.design.chartpilot.ru (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id f5NK5xd00865;
Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:06:00 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from
nas@chartpilot.ru)
From: "Andrey Nepomnyaschih" <nas@chartpilot.ru>
To: "John Barton" <jbarton@highridgefire.com>,
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Help with roaming profiles
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:06:00 +0400
Message-ID: <LNEEKBEPHJHNDLPKMLIACEFLCKAA.nas@chartpilot.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106231340530.13024-100000@damocles.highridg
e fire.com>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello John,
Well there is a difference between how Windows NT and Windows 9x store
profiles. It's an issue of the windows networking implementation, and
it arises even with Windows NT PDC serving SMB requests.
Windows 9x store user roaming profile under his/her home path. It
doesn't know anything about 'logon path'.
Windows NT behaves better it stores roaming profiles under 'logon
path' and uses 'logon home' for mapping it to 'logon drive'
letter.
After that it tries to substitutes the Personal (My Documents) with
the mapped drive. Note that it's a good idea not to mix Win9x profile
with WinNT one.
So if you want to serve only Windows 9x you should be fine with
setting 'logon home' to path where do you want to store profile.
Alternatively if there's only NT (I believe it's not your situation),
setting 'logon path' will do it too.
But if you have both the Win9x and WinNT in your network then I think
you should go this way (Correct me if someone have tried it before,
because I haven't had).
Set your smb.conf should contain:
[global]
...
include /usr/local/etc/samba/%m.conf
logon script = logon.bat
[homes]
...
path = /usr/local/samba/home/%u
For each machine on your network create file named <machine name>.conf
in /usr/local/etc/samba/
If the machine runs under Win9x then the file should look like:
logon home = \\%L\profile
logon drive = Z:
[profile]
...
browsable = no
path = /usr/local/samba/profiles/win9x/%u
If the machine runs under WinNT:
logon home = \\%L\%u
logon drive = H:
logon path = \\%L\profile
[profile]
...
browsable = no
path = /usr/local/samba/profiles/winnt/%u
Then write script, name it script.bat. And put it where it will be
accessible through netlogon share. The script should contain
following:
@echo off
net time \\<server name> /set /yes
if %OS% == Windows_NT goto WinNT
:Win9x
net use h: \\<server name>\homes
goto end
:WinNT
goto end
:end
After that you should get a system where profiles from Win9x and WinNT
are stored separately. After login user will get their home directory
mapped under H: letter.
There are at least two issues with this method.
First - synchronization. Users will have two different copies of
profile for each OS. So if you own software that stores something
under user profiles you will need either to move that data to home
share (/usr/local/samba/home/%u) or put soft/hard link under unix.
Second - there was a security hole with using %m macro.
Have a nice time,
Andrey Nepomnyaschih
nas@chartpilot.ru
Return-Path: <anelson@vikinglobal.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from dfw7-1.relay.mail.uu.net (dfw7-1.relay.mail.uu.net
[199.171.54.106]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3EB4AB3
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ANDREW by dfw7sosrv11.alter.net with SMTP (peer
crosschecked as: [65.201.156.170]) id QQkurx21046; Sat, 23 Jun 2001
20:15:05 GMT
From: "Andrew Nelson" <anelson@vikinglobal.com>
To: "Rodrigo Gruppelli" <grupis@via-rs.net>,
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: remote samba servers
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:15:05 -0700
Message-ID: <ALEHKEMKIKCEKCINDBCFOENLCBAA.anelson@vikinglobal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106222225530.9024-100000@ramone.grupis.org>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I managed to do something similar, and posted a similar question to this
group without answer.
I have three locations with samaba/windows networks, San Diego, San
Fransico, and Maryland.
The San Fransico location is our IT hub so to speak. Here I have our
central WINS server. Each client gets DHCP config info and the central wins
server is included in this info. However this alone did not work. I had to
set each Samba server to announce itself to each remote network. Thus San
Diego would announce to San Fransico and Maryland and so forth. While this
solution is a total and complete cludge I don't know how else to do it.
Now if anyone can help me with getting a windows ME system in Maryland be a
member of a Win2K domain in San Fransico and authenticate against it, I
would be very thankful.
good luck!
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On
Behalf Of Rodrigo Gruppelli
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 6:30 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: remote samba servers
Greetings..
This is my first e-mail in this mailing list.
My graduation project is about VPN and I'm trying to setup a FreeS/WAN vpn
to connect 2 windows networks. I already made frees/wan work.. I would
like to know if is it possible to have 2 distinct windows LAN's, each one
with a Samba server and then interconnect this 2 samba server over the
internet to connect these 2 windows LAN's and act like if it was just one.
Can samba do that?
Thank you all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <awesome-dave1@juno.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from m12.boston.juno.com (m12.boston.juno.com [64.136.24.75])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178A74A5D for
<samba@samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cookie.juno.com by cookie.juno.com for
<"8acBbvM7uHVHcGTugSU3tekGacJe56W49s80W9ucLwE3yEkmGDGncg==">
Received: (from awesome-dave1@juno.com) by m12.boston.juno.com
(queuemail) id F8M59HJ3; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:23:00 EDT
To: samba@samba.org
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:13:18 -0400
Subject: samba authentication through nis?
Message-ID: <20010623.161319.-1904347.0.awesome-dave1@juno.com>
X-Mailer: Juno 4.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Juno-Att: 0
X-Juno-RefParts: 0
From: awesome-dave1@juno.com
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has got either samba 2.0.8 or samba 2.2.0
working with nis? If so, please let me know.
Thanks.
Dave.
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
Return-Path: <jeremy@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02897423A; Sat, 23 Jun 2001
13:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by
mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1 (Debian)) id
15DuJ7-0002Io-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:47:05 -0700
Received: from jeremy by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com with local (Exim 3.12
#1 (Debian)) id 15DuLs-0000Kj-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:49:56 -0700
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:49:56 -0700
To: samba@samba.org
Cc: samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org
Subject: Samba 2.2.0a and Samba 2.0.10 security bugfixes released.
Message-ID: <20010623134956.A997@valinux.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
New releases of Samba to fix the security hole described at :
http://samba.org/samba/whatsnew/macroexploit.html
have been released. Note these are security bugfix releases
only and contain NO new or changed functionality other than
fixing the security hole. The next release, Samba 2.2.1 will
contain new functionality.
Samba 2.2.0a source code can be downloaded from here :
ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/samba-2.2.0a.tar.gz
and the patch against 2.2.0 is available here.
ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/patches/samba-2.2.0-2.2.0a.diffs.gz
Samba 2.0.10 source code can be downloaded from here :
ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/samba-2.0.10.tar.gz
and the patch against 2.0.9 is available here :
ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/patches/samba-2.0.9-2.0.10.diffs.gz
Binary packages for operating systems will be made available
over the next few days. In the meantime, if you cannot compile
Samba yourself and need to address this problem please
see the configuration file changes needed to secure your
system available here :
http://samba.org/samba/whatsnew/macroexploit.html
Regards,
The Samba Team.
Return-Path: <bill@maine.60north.net>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from maine.60north.net (unknown [198.143.201.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118144A3E for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bill@localhost) by maine.60north.net
(8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5NLAgO10695 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:10:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:10:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: bill <bill@maine.60north.net>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: tar and spaces in file names
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106231659310.10681-100000@maine.60north.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi there, Ive been toiling over this problem for some time now and I
apologize if its a bit off topic. From the command line be it bash or sh
when I do:
smbclient \\\\pcname\\share passwd -Tc /tmp/test.tar 'My Documents'
'Data'
smbclient proceeds as expected and creates an archive with the contenst of
the My Documents folder and the data folder. The problem Im having is if I
envoke this command from an sh scrips replacing said filenames with a
varialbe $FILES="\047My Documents\047 \047Data\047" smbclient trys to
tar
\'My'
\'Documents'
\'Data'
placing set -x in the top of the script shows $FILES as 'My Documents'
'Data' . If anyone has any pointer Id appreciate them.
thanks for your time.
Return-Path: <jfeise@ics.uci.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from gremlin.ics.uci.edu (gremlin.ics.uci.edu [128.195.1.70])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6129E4AA3 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ics.uci.edu ( pv182069.reshsg.uci.edu [128.195.182.69] )
by gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu id aa08148 for <samba@lists.samba.org>;
23 Jun 2001 14:25 PDT
Message-ID: <3B350978.8D14B0F0@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:26:16 -0700
From: Joachim Feise <jfeise@ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: jfeise@ics.uci.edu
Organization: University of California, Irvine
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en-US,de-DE
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: tar and spaces in file names
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106231659310.10681-100000@maine.60north.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
bill wrote:>
> Hi there, Ive been toiling over this problem for some time now and I
> apologize if its a bit off topic. From the command line be it bash or sh
> when I do:
> smbclient \\\\pcname\\share passwd -Tc /tmp/test.tar 'My Documents'
'Data'
> smbclient proceeds as expected and creates an archive with the contenst of
> the My Documents folder and the data folder. The problem Im having is if I
> envoke this command from an sh scrips replacing said filenames with a
> varialbe $FILES="\047My Documents\047 \047Data\047" smbclient
trys to tar
No need to use quotation marks (either literal or as \047).
Just prepend the space with a backslash: My\ Documents
-Joe
Return-Path: <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
(dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net [210.215.8.100]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9ED4AA0 for <samba@samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun
2001 17:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from piglett.bartlett.house (as5-117.cbr.au.asiaonline.net
[210.215.14.117]) by dnscache.cbr.au.asiaonline.net (8.10.2/8.10.2)
with ESMTP id f5O0Der22213; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:13:41 +1000 (EST)
Received: from yowiee.bartlett.house (IDENT:root@yowiee.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.99]) by piglett.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
KAA04477; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:13:11 +1000
Received: from bartlett.house (IDENT:abartlet@piglett.bartlett.house
[192.168.1.1]) by yowiee.bartlett.house (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
KAA26906; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:13:11 +1000
Message-ID: <3B353096.D9B46ADB@bartlett.house>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:13:10 +1000
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@pcug.org.au>
Reply-To: abartlet@samba.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-6.2.1 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: awesome-dave1@juno.com
Cc: samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: samba authentication through nis?
References: <20010623.161319.-1904347.0.awesome-dave1@juno.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
awesome-dave1@juno.com wrote:>
> Hello,
> I was wondering if anyone has got either samba 2.0.8 or samba 2.2.0
> working with nis? If so, please let me know.
> Thanks.
> Dave.
I have samba working with NIS. I use (depending on the host) either a
local smbpasswd or secrity=server authentication for the encrypted
passwords.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet@pcug.org.au
abartlet@samba.org
Return-Path: <christopher.jensen@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (seagoon.newcastle.edu.au
[134.148.24.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A414664
for <samba@samba.org>; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banerjee (banerjee.newcastle.edu.au [134.148.4.49]) by
mail.newcastle.edu.au (PMDF V5.2-32 #35875) with ESMTP id
<0GFE005KRUOQLW@mail.newcastle.edu.au> for samba@samba.org; Sun, 24
Jun 2001 11:26:50 +1000 (EST)
Received: from chris (c53h3-asy14.newcastle.edu.au [134.148.10.134]) by
banerjee.newcastle.edu.au (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built
Dec 14 2000)) with SMTP id <0GFE00GO9UOPF8@banerjee.newcastle.edu.au>
for samba@samba.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:26:50 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:34:44 +1000
From: Chris Jensen <christopher.jensen@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au>
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Samba_mounts_hangs_umount=A0-a=A0-r?To: samba@samba.org
Reply-To: Chris Jensen <dr_spirograph@technologist.com>
Message-id: <000901c0fc4d$d9661080$0100a8c0@chris>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I've installed samba 2.2.0 on my system running linux 2.4.5
I've only been using it to mount a windows 98 share read only, using
mount -t smbfs //computer/share /mnt/net
and it seems to work fine, but if the share is still mounted when I run
shutdown, the system hangs when it reaches
umount -a -r
in the shutdown scripts.
The script that runs this is the last before reboot or halt is called.
If I run umount /mnt/net before I shutdown then it unmounts fine, and
shutdown works fine as well.
I have the smb daemons being launched by inetd, which is launched by init.
The system is using devfs
I only installed the kernel and samba, is it necissary to patch the kernel
or perhaps mount/umount to use 2.2.0 because I have another system similarly
set up (except without devfs) that's using samba 2.0.7 and it doesn't
have
this problem.
Thanks for any help
Chris Jensen
Return-Path: <jhonold@bigfoot.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from demon.honold.org (womenbeshoppen.com [64.81.28.91]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAECE4794 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zerocool (zerocool [192.168.0.6]) by demon.honold.org
(8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5O7cuU47124 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 02:38:56 -0500 (CDT)
(envelope-from jhonold@bigfoot.com)
From: "Justin Honold" <jhonold@bigfoot.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: windows xp
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 02:38:18 -0500
Message-ID: <000001c0fc80$a2fe1d70$0600a8c0@zerocool>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
build 2495 of the os has apparently broken samba compatibility - it
worked fine on 2485. i'm running a samba 2.2.0a server on a freebsd
4.3-stable system (still works fine with other clients and no changes).
it's failing to auth xp in both plaintext and encrypted mode. there's
an interesting registry setting about digital security signing in all
the lm sections (there are many now) of the registry - apparently it
attempts to send a digital signature to the server, and it uses it as an
auth mechanism if the server accepts it. i've disabled that in the
registry, upped the os level in smb.conf, etc with no avail. here's a
debug level 3 log of an attempted connection:
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(1198)
open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket.
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(873)
bind succeeded on port 0
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/oplock.c:init_oplocks(1229)
open_oplock ipc: pid = 47068, global_oplock_port = 4321
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] lib/access.c:check_access(308)
check_access: no hostnames in host allow/deny list.
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(319)
Allowed connection from (192.168.0.6)
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831)
Transaction 0 of length 72
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(94)
netbios connect: name1=DEMON name2=ZEROCOOL
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(113)
netbios connect: local=demon remote=zerocool
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831)
Transaction 1 of length 137
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBnegprot (pid 47068)
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(347)
Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(347)
Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(347)
Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(347)
Requested protocol [LM1.2X002]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(347)
Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(347)
Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(431)
Selected protocol NT LM 0.12
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831)
Transaction 2 of length 242
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 47068)
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(847)
Domain=[ZEROCOOL] NativeOS=[Windows 2002 2495] NativeLanMan=[Windows
2002 5.1]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(850)
sesssetupX:name=[honold]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(955)
NT Password did not match for user 'honold'!
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(965)
Defaulting to Lanman password for honold
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(566)
pass_check_smb failed - invalid password for user [honold]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(980)
Rejecting user 'honold': authentication failed
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(123)
error string = No such file or directory
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(130)
32 bit error packet at line 681 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX)
eclass=c000006d [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831)
Transaction 3 of length 242
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 47068)
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(847)
Domain=[ZEROCOOL] NativeOS=[Windows 2002 2495] NativeLanMan=[Windows
2002 5.1]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(850)
sesssetupX:name=[honold]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(955)
NT Password did not match for user 'honold'!
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(965)
Defaulting to Lanman password for honold
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(566)
pass_check_smb failed - invalid password for user [honold]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(980)
Rejecting user 'honold': authentication failed
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(123)
error string = No such file or directory
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(130)
32 bit error packet at line 681 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX)
eclass=c000006d [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)]
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1055)
end of file from client
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440)
Closing connections
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54)
Yielding connection to
[2001/06/24 02:31:17, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473)
Server exit (normal exit)
Return-Path: <thomas.meinke@gmx.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BEA8423D for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18195 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jun 2001 07:57:56 -0000
Received: from pd901c779.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO pebbles) (217.1.199.121)
by mail.gmx.net (mail02) with SMTP; 24 Jun 2001 07:57:56 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Thomas Meinke <thomas.meinke@gmx.de>
Reply-To: thomas.meinke@gmx.de
To: "John Laur" <johnl@blurbco.com>,
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: 2nd time: CUPS support either imcomplete or fubar
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:58:40 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <003701c0fb73$ad846640$6700a8c0@john>
In-Reply-To: <003701c0fb73$ad846640$6700a8c0@john>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01062409584002.00391@pebbles>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello John Laur!
I`m using Samba 2.0.9 with Cups and it still works fine. You have to do the
following things to use Cups with Samba.
Add that lines to /etc/smb.conf
printcap name = lpstat
printing = cups
print command = lpr -P %p -oraw %s
lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p
lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j
queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p
queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p
That`s all. Now you can use the Cups Printer as Raw Printer.
The printjobs from smbprint in the spool directory are cleaned up by me, but
I don`t have any idea what could be the problem at your configuration.
The Cups print jobs are owned by the users who have printed the job. Maybe it
is a configuration problem with your Cups configuration.
Hope this helps you.
Thomas Meinke
Return-Path: <vit@email.orgus.ru>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from email.orgus.ru (email.orgus.ru [213.242.43.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8F0423F for
<samba@samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vit@localhost) by email.orgus.ru
(8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5OGiSu43391 for <samba@samba.org>; Sun,
24 Jun 2001 22:44:29 +0600 (YEKST)
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:44:28 +0600 (YEKST)
From: Victor M <vit@email.orgus.ru>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: problem
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106242243300.43334-100000@email.orgus.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have a Samba server on my FreeBSD as a member of the NT domain DOM.
I put it into NT domain exactly as this was described in the docs.
1. Added Samba to the NT domain using Server Manager as a "WinNT
Server".
2. Stopped smbd & nmbd.
3. Joined the domain by the command: smbpasswd -j DOM -r DOMPDC
4. put in smb.conf lines:
secutity = domain
workgroup = DOM
encrypt password = yes
password server = DOMPDC
5. Started samba.
Everything works fine with this and Samba can share it's resources with the
domain members.
The problem is that according to our schedule PDC shuts down every
night, while Samba works all the time and when PDC starts up next morning it
refuses to accept Samba to be a domain member.
The only way to get it back into NT domain is to remove Samba from domain
membership in PDC using "Server Manager" and then repeat all the steps
above
once again.
Could anyone help me to get around this problem?
Victor.
Return-Path: <urban@teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from fungus.teststation.com (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382B9420D
for <samba@samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cola.teststation.com (tron.teststation.com
[212.32.186.212]) by fungus.teststation.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f5OHKS032594; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:20:28 +0200
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:20:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw@cola.teststation.com>
To: Chris Jensen <dr_spirograph@technologist.com>
Cc: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Samba_mounts_hangs_umount=A0-a=A0-r?In-Reply-To:
<000901c0fc4d$d9661080$0100a8c0@chris>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106241914380.17853-100000@cola.teststation.c
om>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Chris Jensen wrote:
> Hi,
> I've installed samba 2.2.0 on my system running linux 2.4.5
What distro is your system based on?
> I've only been using it to mount a windows 98 share read only, using
> mount -t smbfs //computer/share /mnt/net
> and it seems to work fine, but if the share is still mounted when I run
> shutdown, the system hangs when it reaches
> umount -a -r
> in the shutdown scripts.
This is a known problem. It tries to tell the server bye-bye, and will
block because the network is down. At least I think that is what
happens for you.
Change your shutdown scripts to umount smbfs before shuting down the
network.
(Add a umount -a -t smbfs to only umount all smbfs mounts.)
> I only installed the kernel and samba, is it necissary to patch the kernel
> or perhaps mount/umount to use 2.2.0 because I have another system
similarly
> set up (except without devfs) that's using samba 2.0.7 and it
doesn't have
> this problem.
2.2.0 or 2.0.7 shouldn't matter, I think.
What distro is this system based on?
/Urban
Return-Path: <densign@danedesign.tv>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from ns1.totlcomds.net (ns1.totlcomds.net [64.84.35.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995F64BC1 for
<samba@samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from densign (68-dsl2.ca.totlcomds.net [64.84.33.68]) by
ns1.totlcomds.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5OLaZP15209 for
<samba@samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:36:35 -0700
From: "Dane Ensign" <densign@danedesign.tv>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: my Samba isnt working.
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:44:12 -0600
Message-ID: <MBEGJLGLNNPPINLDJOCDKEHBCBAA.densign@danedesign.tv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am trying to setup a samba share in webmin but when i click on the start
samba server it acts as if it started
but it really didnt. I tried it from a terminal on the linux box and again
it acted as if it did but really it didnt.
How might I try to fix it?
Thank you very much for any help that you can offer.
Dane Ensign
Return-Path: <jdeas@jadsystems.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from snfc21.pbi.net (mta5.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.241]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26A74240 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jimdeas ([207.105.157.104]) by mta5.snfc21.pbi.net
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with SMTP id
<0GFG0049LEYYW3@mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> for samba@lists.samba.org; Sun,
24 Jun 2001 14:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:44:39 -0700
From: Jim Deas <jdeas@jadsystems.com>
Subject: >2G NT file mounted to Linux 2.4.x kernel
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Reply-To: Jim Deas <jdeas@jadsystems.com>
Message-id: <001801c0fcf6$df332800$9d8bfea9@jimdeas>
Organization: JAD Systems
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I am using samba to transfer video and audio files between my Linux servers and
NT workstations.
Where this works well, I want to add smb shares to the Linux side of the
equation.
I read somewhere that smb shares on Linux still had a problem with the 2Gig
files size.
Can anyone confirm this or let me know at what version the 2G files size was
fixed?
Linux raid used as nas for NT works with >2G files. (I know this)
NT raid used as nas on Linux workstation with >2G file support ????????
Thanks
J. Deas
Return-Path: <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from goku.quickweb.com.ph (goku.quickweb.com.ph
[208.235.228.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B8FA47FC
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1552 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jun 2001 10:21:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO demo) (208.235.228.19) by
goku.quickweb.com.ph with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001 10:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <006201c0f70e$4482cec0$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
From: "Joey Boy" <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: help
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:16:58 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Im a fool & Stupid im new here pls. help me i dont know what to do to add a
parameter in my smb.conf file? i want to test 3workstation under my
samba2.0.9.
i did:
testparm
smbclient -L yourhostname
smbclient file://yourhostname/aservice
and it works fine. pls. tell me what aare the other commands that im going to
do. coz im stuck there? is it necessary to me to have a winNT workstation or
server? i really dont understand samba when its involving a winNT. maybe coz i
dont know how to administer or run winNT. thanks
:)
Return-Path: <tridge@samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id C5E51524A;
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andrew Tridgell <tridge@valinux.com>
To: samba-announce@samba.org
Subject: URGENT: Samba security hole
Reply-To: tridge@samba.org
Message-Id: <20010623002620.C5E51524A@lists.samba.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
IMPORTANT: Security bugfix for Samba
------------------------------------
June 23rd 2001
Summary
- -------
A serious security hole has been discovered in all versions of Samba
that allows an attacker to gain root access on the target machine for
certain types of common Samba configuration.
The immediate fix is to edit your smb.conf configuration file and
remove all occurances of the macro "%m". Replacing occurances of %m
with %I is probably the best solution for most sites.
Details
- -------
A remote attacker can use a netbios name containing unix path
characters which will then be substituted into the %m macro wherever
it occurs in smb.conf. This can be used to cause Samba to create a log
file on top of an important system file, which in turn can be used to
compromise security on the server.
The most commonly used configuration option that can be vulnerable to
this attack is the "log file" option. The default value for this
option is VARDIR/log.smbd. If the default is used then Samba is not
vulnerable to this attack.
The security hole occurs when a log file option like the following is
used:
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
In that case the attacker can use a locally created symbolic link to
overwrite any file on the system. This requires local access to the
server.
If your Samba configuration has something like the following:
log file = /var/log/samba/%m
Then the attacker could successfully compromise your server remotely
as no symbolic link is required. This type of configuration is very
rare.
The most commonly used log file configuration containing %m is the one
distributed in the sample configuration file that comes with Samba:
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
in that case your machine is not vulnerable to this attack unless you
happen to have a subdirectory in /var/log/samba/ which starts with the
prefix "log."
New Release
- -----------
While we recommend that vulnerable sites immediately change their
smb.conf configuration file to prevent the attack we will also be
making new releases of Samba within the next 24 hours to properly fix
the problem. Please see http://www.samba.org/ for the new releases.
Please report any attacks to the appropriate authority.
The Samba Team
security@samba.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard
<http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE7M+Gobf9zMVhTZ5ERAoVvAJ9CX93rSHbEyPD95mS3C5XaQXx5RgCfeOIx
bKPS2xD1L8C0mlr6y5i8uBo=M/K7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return-Path: <timothy.nguyen@swisslog.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from digitron.com.au (ppp135.adsl89.pacific.net.au
[202.7.89.135]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170F94250
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.10.112] (account tnguyen HELO swisslog.com.au) by
digitron.com.au (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5) with ESMTP-TLS id 1871446
for samba@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:26:30 +1000
Message-ID: <3B36AF23.A1965F61@swisslog.com.au>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:25:23 +1000
From: Timothy Nguyen <timothy.nguyen@swisslog.com.au>
Organization: Digitron Logistics Pty. Ltd
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: cross subnet problem
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Our office network is in 10.10.10.* subnet. Some of our Windows machine
got 2 network
cards, one for the 10.10.10.* route (for internal office) and the other
for the 10.53.170.* subnet (for
development machines) since the development server machine ( a HP
running Samba 2.0.7)
IP is 10.53.170.3.11. A Linux machine is act as a router to route
between 2 subnets.
If I am on a machine with 2 network cards then I can access files on the
Samba drive on the HP.
This is fine so far. But not when someone using a laptop need access to
the Samba drive and since
the laptop cannot plug another network card then it become a bit of a
hassle because I need
go to a machine (that got 2 network cards) that can access the Samba
drive to do it copy it over to
the laptop HD.
Now this is start confuse me a bit since from that laptop, I can run a
ping, telnet or ftp to the HP machine
(where Samba is running) but not access the the Samba drive. I thought
the Linux router would taking
care of cross subnet communication. I always get "Network timeout or
HCLNFSD/PCNFSD not running
on Host" error when I try to map the Samba drive.
Am I right or something missing here?
--
*************************************************************************
"CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLAIMER
This e-mail and its attachments ("Mail") are intended for the above
named
addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in
error you must take no action based on them nor must you copy or show
them
or disclose them to anyone. If the Mail has come to you in error please
reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. In addition, we kindly ask
you to destroy the Mail.
Please be aware that we disclaim all liability for the integrity or for
the
accuracy of this Mail, as transmissions via Internet are not error free
communications medium. We advice you that you understand and observe
this
lack of security when e-mailing us. We furthermore advice you
that in keeping with a good computing practice you should ensure that
this
Mail is virus free. We disclaim all liability for the virus free
transmission of the same. Please do take notice that with respect to
essential messages we expect you to confirm your message in writing due
to
the possibility of manipulation of transmissions via Internet."
*************************************************************************
Return-Path: <christopher.jensen@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (seagoon.newcastle.edu.au
[134.148.24.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020214242
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banerjee (banerjee.newcastle.edu.au [134.148.4.49]) by
mail.newcastle.edu.au (PMDF V5.2-32 #35875) with ESMTP id
<0GFG00COAVRPZ2@mail.newcastle.edu.au> for samba@lists.samba.org; Mon,
25 Jun 2001 13:45:40 +1000 (EST)
Received: from chris (c53h3-asy55.newcastle.edu.au [134.148.10.175]) by
banerjee.newcastle.edu.au (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built
Dec 14 2000)) with SMTP id <0GFG00EJXVR9AP@banerjee.newcastle.edu.au>
for samba@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:45:29 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:52:36 +1000
From: Chris Jensen <christopher.jensen@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au>
Subject: ./configure --without-swat
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Reply-To: Chris Jensen <dr_spirograph@technologist.com>
Message-id: <004201c0fd2a$61b54fa0$0100a8c0@chris>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
Could this option be added to configure for people who don't want to install
swat?
Chris Jensen
Return-Path: <christopher.jensen@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from seagoon.newcastle.edu.au (seagoon.newcastle.edu.au
[134.148.24.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B334408
for <samba@samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banerjee (banerjee.newcastle.edu.au [134.148.4.49]) by
mail.newcastle.edu.au (PMDF V5.2-32 #35875) with ESMTP id
<0GFG00C18VQYXX@mail.newcastle.edu.au> for samba@samba.org; Mon, 25
Jun 2001 13:44:59 +1000 (EST)
Received: from chris (c53h3-asy55.newcastle.edu.au [134.148.10.175]) by
banerjee.newcastle.edu.au (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built
Dec 14 2000)) with SMTP id <0GFG00EJOVQDAP@banerjee.newcastle.edu.au>
for samba@samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:44:58 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:52:31 +1000
From: Chris Jensen <christopher.jensen@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au>
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Samba_mounts_hangs_umount=A0-a=A0-r?To:
samba@samba.org
Reply-To: Chris Jensen <dr_spirograph@technologist.com>
Message-id: <004101c0fd2a$4efc8680$0100a8c0@chris>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106241914380.17853-100000@cola.teststation.c
om>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> What distro is your system based on?
It's not really a distro, a built it following (mostly) Linux from Scratch
(www.linuxfromscratch.org)
> This is a known problem. It tries to tell the server bye-bye, and will
> block because the network is down. At least I think that is what
> happens for you.
>
> Change your shutdown scripts to umount smbfs before shuting down the
> network.
> (Add a umount -a -t smbfs to only umount all smbfs mounts.)
>
That fixed it, thanks.
Chris Jensen
Return-Path: <vit@email.orgus.ru>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from email.orgus.ru (email.orgus.ru [213.242.43.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472714268 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vit@localhost) by email.orgus.ru
(8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5P4KO787621 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:20:24 +0600 (YEKST)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:20:24 +0600 (YEKST)
From: Victor M <vit@email.orgus.ru>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: problem
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106251018560.87378-100000@email.orgus.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have a Samba server on my FreeBSD as a member of the NT domain DOM.
I put it into NT domain exactly as this was described in the docs.
1. Added Samba to the NT domain using Server Manager as a "WinNT
Server".
2. Stopped smbd & nmbd.
3. Joined the domain by the command: smbpasswd -j DOM -r DOMPDC
4. put in smb.conf lines:
secutity = domain
workgroup = DOM
encrypt password = yes
password server = DOMPDC
5. Started samba.
Everything works fine with this and Samba can share it's resources
with the
domain members.
The problem is that according to our schedule PDC shuts down every
night, while Samba works all the time and when PDC starts up next morning it
refuses to accept Samba to be a domain member.
The only way to get it back into NT domain is to remove Samba from
domain
membership in PDC using "Server Manager" and then repeat all the
steps above
once again.
Could anyone help me to get around this problem?
Victor.
Return-Path: <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BBF455A for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5P5QiC26633; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:26:44 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA13630; Mon, 25
Jun 2001 07:26:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA15902; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 07:26:42 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>, "Joey Boy"
<joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:26:41 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: help
Message-ID: <3B36E7B1.21460.10EFF6@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <006201c0f70e$4482cec0$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Im a fool & Stupid im new here pls. help me i dont know what to do to
add a
> parameter in my smb.conf file?
Open smb.conf in your favorite text editor (vi, emacs, xedit, xemacs,
...) and wirte the the parameter into the file :-)
> i want to test 3workstation under my
> samba2.0.9.
> i did:
> testparm
> smbclient -L yourhostname
> smbclient file://yourhostname/aservice
> and it works fine. pls. tell me what aare the other commands that im going
to
> do. coz im stuck there? is it necessary to me to have a winNT workstation
or
> server? i really dont understand samba when its involving a winNT. maybe
coz i
> dont know how to administer or run winNT. thanks
You don't need NT for samba to run. You can share files and printers
to any smb-clients (win95, win98, winNT, win2k, dos and 3.11 with
appropriate network drivers, dave (?) for Mac, smbclient, ...). samba
will run with out any clients as well - but that probably pretty
useless.
There are a couple of good book about samba. One comes with the
source in html. Do some reading, start simpel: file and print sharing
with paintext passwords. Once you are familiar with this you may
switch to encrypted passwords and then if you want to the domain
stuff.
Good luck!
Christian
>
> :)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482814A6D for
<samba@samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5P5TtC26721; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:29:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA13672; Mon, 25
Jun 2001 07:29:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA15959; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 07:29:54 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba@samba.org>, "Dane Ensign"
<densign@danedesign.tv>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:29:53 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: my Samba isnt working.
Message-ID: <3B36E871.13612.13DCC5@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <MBEGJLGLNNPPINLDJOCDKEHBCBAA.densign@danedesign.tv>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> I am trying to setup a samba share in webmin but when i click on the start
> samba server it acts as if it started
> but it really didnt. I tried it from a terminal on the linux box and again
> it acted as if it did but really it didnt.
What error messeges do you get? Any thing in the logs?
Christian
> How might I try to fix it?
>
> Thank you very much for any help that you can offer.
>
> Dane Ensign
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <anelson@vikinglobal.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from dfw7-1.relay.mail.uu.net (dfw7-1.relay.mail.uu.net
[199.171.54.106]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798FB455A
for <samba@samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ANDREW by dfw7sosrv11.alter.net with SMTP (peer
crosschecked as: [65.201.156.170]) id QQkuxd24367 for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:17:47 GMT
From: "Andrew Nelson" <anelson@vikinglobal.com>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Password / User Authentication...
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:17:47 -0700
Message-ID: <ALEHKEMKIKCEKCINDBCFMEOECBAA.anelson@vikinglobal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I need a bit of clarity on the following. I have a samba box wich is a
member of a Win2K domain... All is working fine... except that smbpass entry
must be the same as the users password on the Win2K server. I thought that
if a machine is a member of the domain and the settings are properly set up
then the user does not need to have the password set on the samba machine.
Is there something I'm not doing correctly??
Here is global section.... edited to protect the names of the guilty... ;-)
[global]
workgroup = COMPANYWORKGROUP
server string = Tux (Samba 2.0.7)
interfaces = a.b.c.67/255.255.255.192
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
password server = winblows.mycompany.bogus
time server = Yes
keepalive = 30
logon home = \\tux\%U
os level = 64
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
wins support = Yes
kernel oplocks = No
remote announce = aaa.bbb.ccc.broadcast ddd.eee.ggg.broadcast
remote browse sync = aaa.bbb.ccc.broadcast ddd.eee.ggg.broadcast
unix realname = Yes
Return-Path: <urban@teststation.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from fungus.teststation.com (fungus.teststation.com
[212.32.186.211]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDC54B36
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cola.teststation.com (tron.teststation.com
[212.32.186.212]) by fungus.teststation.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f5P6Zj001868; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:35:45 +0200
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:35:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark <urban@teststation.com>
X-Sender: <puw@cola.teststation.com>
To: Jim Deas <jdeas@jadsystems.com>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: >2G NT file mounted to Linux 2.4.x kernel
In-Reply-To: <001801c0fcf6$df332800$9d8bfea9@jimdeas>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106250830290.18629-100000@cola.teststation.c
om>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Jim Deas wrote:
[using some rather long lines ... keep it < 76 chars per line, please?]
> I am using samba to transfer video and audio files between my Linux
> servers and NT workstations.
> Where this works well, I want to add smb shares to the Linux side of
> the equation.
> I read somewhere that smb shares on Linux still had a problem with the
> 2Gig files size.
> Can anyone confirm this or let me know at what version the 2G files
> size was fixed?
There was (is?) a problem with detecting that you can enable large files
on Linux. The requirements are a 2.4 kernel and a 2.2 glibc, and samba
2.2.0 should detect that.
./configure will tell you if it thinks it's safe to enable LFS.
(As this is checked at compile time, you won't get LFS if it was compiled
on a system that fails these requirements)
/Urban
Return-Path: <r.phillips@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from egalite.jkmrc.uq.edu.au (egalite.jkmrc.uq.edu.au
[130.102.20.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1537F4BDD
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.102.20.138] (Ray-Mac.jkmrc.uq.edu.au
[130.102.20.138]) by egalite.jkmrc.uq.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP
id RAA25254 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:39:38
+1000 (EST)
X-Sender: e5rphill@egalite.jkmrc.uq.edu.au
Message-Id: <l03130304b75c5a612a5f@[130.102.20.138]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:39:45 +1000
To: samba@lists.samba.org
From: Ray Phillips <r.phillips@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
Subject: Samba 2.2.x on NetBSD
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dear Samba Team:
As of version 2.2.x Samba will not compile under NetBSD, although it did up
to and including 2.0.10. The problem is that SHM_R and SHM_W are not
defined in NetBSD's /usr/local/sys/shm.h so make fails with this error:
Compiling profile/profile.c
profile/profile.c: In function `profile_setup':
profile/profile.c:110: `SHM_R' undeclared (first use in this function)
profile/profile.c:110: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
profile/profile.c:110: for each function it appears in.)
profile/profile.c:110: `SHM_W' undeclared (first use in this function)
make: *** [profile/profile.o] Error 1
jonathan@littlepeople.net has written to a NetBSD mailing list saying that
compilation will proceed if these are defined in profile.c using values
copied from a linux machine, thus
#define SHM_R 0400 /* or S_IRUGO from
<linux/stat.h> */
#define SHM_W 0200 /* or S_IWUGO from
<linux/stat.h> */
I suppose that isn't optimal, so I wonder if the distribution code could be
modified to affect a permanent solution? Does using these values create
any problems?
Another thing I've noticed with version 2.2.x is that make's first line
of
output is:
WARNING: you need to rerun autoconf
which is disconcerting considering that I didn't run it at all. What
should I do?
Ray Phillips
Return-Path: <aro@suse.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from Cantor.suse.de (ns.suse.de [213.95.15.193]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B56247DB for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136]) by
Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD3F1E480; Mon, 25 Jun 2001
09:50:35 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:49:33 +0200
From: Andreas Rother <andreas.rother@suse.de>
To: Wilmar =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= <wilmar.perez@caribe.udea.edu.co>
Cc: Samba List <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Sveral logon scripts
Message-ID: <20010625094916.B1201@osiris.col.suse.de>
References: <007601c0fa8b$36333e60$e949a8c0@udea.edu.co>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To: <007601c0fa8b$36333e60$e949a8c0@udea.edu.co>; from
wilmar.perez@caribe.udea.edu.co on Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:48:57PM
-0500
X-OS: Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686
X-Get-Public-Key: send mail with subject: send_public_key
X-GPG-Fingerprint: E4C3 045F E546 ADD4 DDF6 D891 2D33 9CD0 B909 A2AC
X-A.N.D.R.E.A.S.: Artificial Networked Device Responsible for
Exploration and Accurate Sabotage
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Wilmar Pirez wrote:> Hello guys
>
> I wonder whether it's possible or not to have several user's groups
on the
> same box running a different logon script each.
>
If the users have different primary groups:
logon script = scripts\%G.bat
HTH
Andreas
--
andreas.rother@SuSE.de SuSE Linux Solutions AG -o>
Tel: +49 2241 92917 - 28 Marie-Curie-Str. 11-17 /\\
Fax: +49 2241 314599 D-53757 St. Augustin _\_V
Return-Path: <dm@belkam.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from pipe.aspec.ru (pipe.aspec.ru [195.161.29.125]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AE34C9C for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 03:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from belkam.com (dm.p100.belkam.com [192.168.21.111]) by
pipe.aspec.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5PA4q824124 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:04:52 +0500 (SAMST)
Message-ID: <3B370CC2.2CC5D07C@belkam.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:04:50 +0500
From: Dmitry Melekhov <dm@belkam.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-xfs i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Unable to install printer driver with today 2.2 CVS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello!
I can't install printer drivers with today version from CVS.
I wrote user (me) to printer admin
and added me to write list to print$.
NT4 copy files and then say "Unable to change to specified driver,
original settings will be resored".
In log I can see only one error:
[2001/06/25 14:48:36, 5] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(277)
api_fd_reply
[2001/06/25 14:48:36, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952)
search for pipe pnum=7030
[2001/06/25 14:48:36, 1] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(294)
api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 7030
[2001/06/25 14:48:36, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_no_reply(256)
Unsupported API fd command
[2001/06/25 14:48:36, 5] smbd/ipc.c:copy_trans_params_and_data(65)
copy_trans_params_and_data: params[0..4] data[0..0]
[2001/06/25 14:48:36, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(292)
The same problem with w2k:
It copy files and then say "Unable to install HP Laser Jet 2100 Serios
PCL 6, Windows NT 4.0 or
2000, Intel driver. Operation could not be completed"
I can't find errors in logs...
But I can send loglevel 10 log...
--
Wire connection and Windows reinstallation senior engineer
Dmitry Melekhov
http://www.belkam.com/~dm
2:5050/11.23@fidonet
Return-Path: <ingmar@algorithmics.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from viemail1.algorithmics.com (unknown [194.112.157.115]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CD24D12 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 03:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by viemail1.algorithmics.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2448.0) id <MBSZQV80>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:30:10 +0200
Message-ID: <19D4D5CB602DD311A4220060943F1F55D62B2C@viemail1.algorithmic
s.com>
From: Ingmar Koecher <ingmar@algorithmics.com>
To: "'samba@lists.samba.org'" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: dfree, lvm and reiser
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:30:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
we are running Samba 2.2.0 on a 2.4.4 Debian and are having problems
after the server is running for more than 2 days or so. Unfortunately my
coworker installed the LVM with ReiserFS - are there any known issues with
ReiserFS?
I would appreciate any input - thank you.
Those messages appear in the log.smbd all the time:
*) smbd/dfree.c:disk_free(142)
WARNING: dfree is broken on this system
I am not sure what this means, am I missing something or was something
missing in the source ? I couldn't find information in the newsgroups or
other sources. It turned out that after a while, after running a dir on a
client, this dir would take very long when it comes to displaying the free
diskspace. At the same time this entry would appear in the log file.
Other errors that appear in the logfile:
[2001/06/25 11:36:25, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(768)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/cfcored.lib (dev = a,
inode = 1181202).
[2001/06/25 11:36:25, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file
dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/cfcored.lib
[2001/06/25 11:36:25, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4323)
reply_lockingX: Error : oplock break from client for fnum = 8858 and no
oplock granted on this file (dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/cfcored.lib).
[2001/06/25 11:36:55, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(768)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/zlibstat.lib (dev = a,
inode = 1181174).
[2001/06/25 11:36:55, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file
dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/zlibstat.lib
[2001/06/25 11:36:55, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4323)
reply_lockingX: Error : oplock break from client for fnum = 8860 and no
oplock granted on this file (dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/zlibstat.lib).
Once again, oddly enough, after a reboot all problems seem to go away for
the client, the messages in the log remain. Restarting the two daemons does
not help.
Ingmar.
Return-Path: <C.Ehrke@allweiler.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail2.allweiler.de (unknown [145.253.253.135]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B697478B for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 03:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: FROM aw_nt5.allweiler.de BY mail2.allweiler.de ; Mon Jun 25
12:49:51 2001 +0200
Received: by aw_nt5 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<NQ2380ZC>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:50:06 +0200
Message-ID: <A0E191005F54D011B68B00805F9A848801BB3DEA@aw_nt5>
From: "Ehrke, Christian" <C.Ehrke@allweiler.de>
To: "'samba@lists.samba.org'" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba 2.2.0 on HP-UX
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:50:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
is there anybody who has some experience with Samba 2.2.0 on HP-UX 10.20?
I compiled the sources with gcc and installed the binaries.
So far so good but there are some problems like this:
[2001/06/25 10:04:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/06/25 10:04:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(566)
write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 3: ERRNO = Broken pipe
[2001/06/25 10:04:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(753)
Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
[2001/06/25 10:05:08, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(499)
too many connections - rejected
[2001/06/25 10:05:09, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(499)
too many connections - rejected
After this occured nobody can access to Samba recources from NT machines.
This problem occures sometimes.
I have seen that some of the files in var/locks are very big:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 833249280 Jun 25 10:31 connections.tdb
Are there any chance to check or analyse *.tdb files?
We have Windows NT and 2000 Clients.
The security level is set to "domain".
Can it be that is a problem if two or more Samba server are running with
security = domain?
So I swiched back to Samba 2.0.7 - no problems since this time.
Mit freundlichem Gru_ / Kind regards
Christian Ehrke, Abt./Dept. ZOS
Organisation/Informationsystems
ALLWEILER AG
A Member of the
COLFAX PUMP GROUP
Postfach 1140 . 78301 Radolfzell
Allweilerstra_e 1 . 78315 Radolfzell
Germany
Tel. +49 (0)7732 86-509
Fax +49 ((0)7732 86-552, 86-99509
E-mail: C.Ehrke@allweiler.de
http://www.allweiler.com
Return-Path: <alexander_siegelin@fastmultimedia.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from gatekeeper.fastmultimedia.de
(gatekeeper.fastmultimedia.de [212.14.82.17]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3974C6D for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25
Jun 2001 04:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gatekeeper.fastmultimedia.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA06202 for
samba@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:48:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: alexander_siegelin@fastmultimedia.de
Received: (from localhost) by gatekeeper.fastmultimedia.de (MSCAN) id
1/gatekeeper.fastmultimedia.de/smtp-gw/mscan; Mon Jun 25 13:48:40 2001
Subject: 4GB File Size Limit with Samba Server (2.00) on Irix?
To: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.07a May 14, 2001
Message-ID: <OFF2CE04B1.ADD05BDC-ONC1256A76.003F4F22@fastmultimedia.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:37:25 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on MUC-MAIL/FAST Multimedia(Release
5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 25.06.2001 13:37:25
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
we have the problem, that there seems to be a file size limit of 4GB with
Samba running under Irix with XFS file system (so it is not a file system
limitation). As soon as we write a file larger 4GB the file gets discarded
once the capture process ends. We are using a video editing application so
that is where the big files come from. 4GB in this scenario is about 14
minutes video, so not really that much. The client (the editing station)
captures and uses it's video material over Gigabit Ethernet from an Origin
Server. The client itself runs under Windows 2000.
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Alexander Siegelin
__________________
Alexander Siegelin
FAST Multimedia AG
Germany, Munich
Return-Path: <dan_bethe@yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from web11003.mail.yahoo.com (web11003.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.131.53]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1798C4216
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 05:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010625123408.15491.qmail@web11003.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [198.144.206.221] by web11003.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 05:34:08 PDT
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 05:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Bethe <dan_bethe@yahoo.com>
Subject: major questions and notes
To: samba@lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello all. I spent quite a while studying the entire online HTML copy of the
Samba book, and I came up with some questions and answers for how to set up a
basic modern Samba-based workgroup, perhaps the most common case. Thanks to
all contributors to Samba's development, discussion, etc!
Perhaps you Samba masters can at least reply to this list, quoting at least a
keyword for me to search for, or a URL to start from, in answering whichever
ones are convenient for you. I'd also like comments on the items I'm
not sure
on, or corrections for mistakes. The book I read was based on Samba 2.0.7, and
I haven't implemented this yet. I intend to then update this document
appropriately.
The url for my Samba doc is http://mmmgood.net/doc/samba_notes.html, which
I've
converted to ASCII for you below.
Thanks in advance for anybody who helps answer even one question, especially
those marked "Very important". I only subscribe to the Samba-digest
list, so a
cc is appreciated.
Notes about the transparent deployment of Samba in a modern Windows
client environment
Please send comments to dan_bethe at yahoo.com.
Preface The purpose of this document is to migrate from a Windows
NT/2000 file/print/authentication server to a Linux Samba
file/print/authentication server, and then provide that service to
clients running Windows 95/98/NT/2000. 2000 seems to be the latest
incompatibility pickle. The term "planned workgroup" means that a
Linux sysadmin is required to support an environment of Windows
desktops where the users are given free reign to customize their
desktop systems within the sysadmin's authentication structure. The
server also works around popular but crippled Windows client
applications. It's a very typical workgroup scenario.
Notes
* set up a "domain", not a "workgroup"
+ domain involves distributed authentication database and uses
SAM (security account manager)
+ workgroup is identical to domain except no distribution to
its authentication database
+ Samba 2.0 may not support domain control (authentication)
for NT; check the latest Samba and Samba-TNG
+ server side roaming profiles are cool -- rename user.dat or
ntuser.dat to *.man for read-only (manual) roaming profile
* the "magic script" feature could provide user-prompted
impromptu
backups of the database of a finicky low end app that require the
user to stop using its database in order to back up(Quickbooks,
ACT, Peachtree, etc)
* client family specific conf file with the 'include' directive
Questions
* Very important: migrating to Samba while keeping encrypted
authentication
+ How do you prompt users to enter an encrypted password for
the first time, from their Windows client, while migrating
them to Samba?
+ Can Samba use PAM for encrypted passwords, rather than just
smbpasswd's own text file?
+ If we can't support encrypted Windows client authentication
from PAM (and only use smbpasswd's database instead), can we
automatically translate enrypted password entries from PAM
into smbpasswd?
* Very important: general authentication
+ Ideally, we could authenticate every network service from
PAM, which would authenticate from LDAP. Can any version of
Samba be made to do that?
+ What is the name of the Samba feature I should look up, for
authenticating a Linux VPN user from a legacy NT PDC server?
IOW, a remote Windows-based VPN client connects to a
Linux-based VPN server and logs in, authenticated from an NT
PDC on the intranet.
* Very important: how do we migrate from Windows NT/2000 related
ACLs and user/group ownership to unix-like filesystem permissions
and user/group ownership?
+ Is there a cross-platform archive tool, like 'tar' under
Cygwin, that can read most of the NT ACLs (user/UID,
group/GID, rwx) and write them back on Linux? How about
preserving _all_ ACLs on a Linux-based ACL-based filesystem
like XFS?
+ It would be cool both for obsoleting Windows servers while
preserving all that info, and by allowing Windows NT/2000
users to manage their own permissions.
* How do you configure or require a Windows 9x client to
authenticate from a domain server for local client desktop
logins? IOW, an immediate domain logon upon boot. Analogy would
be /etc/passwd plus PAM/LDAP. Password control panel?
* Can a server assign a client its NetBIOS name if the client has
none?
* Does the average planned workgroup need PDC features beyond that
of the current stable Samba? Does it do more than just basic
auth, especially for Windows 2000 clients?
* Does Samba support NT's "Create a computer account in the
domain"?
* Will the average planned workgroup ever need to care about
users/groups in the context of "local group map", "domain
user
map", or "domain group map"? Check DOMAIN.txt.
* Do we need WINS? Wouldn't Windows just ignore it and use DNS for
the LAN instead, or should Samba just provide a WINS frontend to
DNS in addition to DNS in general?
Procedures
* Read DOMAIN.txt and NTDOMAIN.txt
* Read about Samba TNG
* home Private directory possibilities
1. 'mkdir ~user/Private && chmod 700 ~user/Private'
2. do the above and create entry in [homes] for "%U/Private"
to
be user read/write
3.
[homesprivate]
path = %H/Private
comment = %U's Private Data
valid users = %U
* use a valid but disabled 'guest' account,
for resolving the $IPC username
* --with-pam
* netatalk interoperability?
+ --with-netatalk
+ does netatalk respect kernel file locking? will it be safely
compatible with concurrent accesses by Samba and by Linux on
the same files?
* quota support
* dot files = yes
* follow symlinks = yes
* getwd cache = yes
* create mask = 664
* directory mask = 775
* delete readonly = yes (perhaps only on the CVS tree)
* map readonly = yes (investigate)
* locking = yes (check default)
* kernel oplocks = yes (research support and put in [global])
* oplocks = no (unless you know that you need it, probably only for
a separate share)
* valid users = @group
* invalid users = root, bin, etc ([global])
* wins support = yes
* dns proxy = yes
* time server = yes
* encrypt passwords = yes
* smb passwd file = ...
* unix password sync = yes
* passwd program = changepass %u
* passwd chat = (check necessity for alternate Redhat compatible
chat script.)
* workgroup = OEI
* printing-related configs
+ CUPS
printcap name = lpstat
printing = cups
print command = lpr -P %p -oraw %s
lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p
lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j
queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p
queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p
* roaming profile related configs
+ rename user.dat or ntuser.dat to *.man for read-only
(manual) roaming profile
+ [profiles]
o logon path = \\%N\%U\profile
o writeable = yes
o create mode = 0600
o directory mode = 0700
o browseable = no
o guest ok = yes
o force directory mode = 0700
o inherit permissions = yes
* PDC-related configs
+ domain logons = yes
+ security = user
+ os level = 34
+ local master = yes
+ preferred master = yes
+ domain master = yes
+ [netlogon]
o comment = The domain logon service
o path = ...
o public = no
o locking = no
o writeable = no
o browsable = yes
+ logon home = \\%N\%U
+ wins support = yes
+ name resolve order = lmhosts wins hosts bcast (research this
sequence)
+ host trust accounts are named "hostname$"
o create dummy Linux user with UID & GID that are totally
unique among NT domain
o hostname$:*:65000:65000:Samba Host Trust
Account:/bin/false:/bin/false
o # smbpasswd -a -m hostname
o change passwd with smbpasswd
+ configure clients for domain logins
o Lose 98
# network control panel
@ properties for "Client for Microsoft
Networks"
# reboot
o Lose NT
# network control panel
@ Identification
- Change
# reboot
* CVS-related configs
+ dos filetimes = yes
+ fake directory create times = yes
+ dos filetime resolution = yes
+ delete readonly = yes
* logon script = %U.bat
+ echo Setting Current Time...
+ net time \\server /set /yes
* fstype = samba
====Medium System Administrator and Junior I.T. Manager of 5 yrs
-- Now available -- Linux, MacOS, Unix-like systems
-- http://mmmgood.net -- dan_bethe@yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <kuhlman@uamont.edu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from cotton.uamont.edu (cotton.uamont.edu [192.112.26.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165D24384 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 05:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from juniper (192.112.26.35) by cotton.uamont.edu (MX V5.2
AnFb) with SMTP for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:31:53
-0600
From: "Jason M. Kuhlman" <kuhlman@uamont.edu>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: GUI configuration programs
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:37:51 -0500
Message-ID: <NLECIPOCBNBOELLBDPKLEELPCBAA.kuhlman@uamont.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello list
Has anyone had any experience with the GUI smb.conf configuration programs
linked on the Samba page?
Jason M. Kuhlman
Spatial Analysis Laboratory Manager
Arkansas Forest Resources Center
110 University Court
Monticello, AR 71655
Phone: 870-460-1292
Fax : 870-460-1092
Return-Path: <dan_bethe@yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from web11008.mail.yahoo.com (web11008.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.131.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A74D49CF
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 05:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010625125423.50177.qmail@web11008.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [198.144.206.221] by web11008.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 05:54:23 PDT
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 05:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Bethe <dan_bethe@yahoo.com>
Subject: Linux VPN server for Windows clients and auth server
To: samba@lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi all. As was indicated in my last document I sent to the list, I'm doing
a
piecemeal migration from an NT server to Samba. I'm about to install a new
Linux VPN server, but the user authentication is still centralized on a private
intranet NT server. I can make loose suggestions to the admin of the NT auth
server if necessary which will probably go unheeded, and I have _no_ control or
trust whatsoever over the clients. So I have a two-sided question for you.
1) What VPN server have you felt is most compatible with any given random
Windows client? I'd like it to be reasonably simple to administrate, too,
if
possible. I've heard from previous research that PPTP clients are built
into
Windows, which is the most important because of having no control over the
clients.
2) How would you bridge authentication between these remote users and the
private intranet NT server? Perhaps if Samba could securely authenticate via
PAM? A Linux LDAP client, enabling LDAP service on NT?
Thank you very much!
====Medium System Administrator and Junior I.T. Manager of 5 yrs
-- Now available -- Linux, MacOS, Unix-like systems
-- http://mmmgood.net -- dan_bethe@yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <mnehemiah@urschel.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.urschel.com (unknown [208.193.3.4]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB4E4CB2 for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:09:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [208.193.3.5] by mail.urschel.com (NTMail
4.30.0010/QS0633.00.71509e67) with ESMTP id xixraaaa for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:13:45 -0500
Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<MJ1PPD8T>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:11:03 -0500
Message-ID: <E139411D3415D311872E006008319454E061@EXCHANGE>
From: "Nehemiah, Mark" <mnehemiah@urschel.com>
To: "'samba@samba.org'" <samba@samba.org>
Subject: 2nd post.locking problem, is it fixed?inCVS?
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:11:02 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Script: \\filterscript.mml
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Does anyone have any idea, if this is a bug, and if so, is it fixed? I
posted last week to comp.protocols.smb, and comp.lang.clairion, and here, no
replies. Please help me figure this out. I want to know if Samba will be a
real alternative for us over Micro$oft, and these are our apps we have to be
able to run.
--Mark.
Hello all.
I am trying to evaluate samba in a production environment for our company.
We use Clarion programming language for our windows database information.
We have approx 200 users and currently data(~10Gig) resides on a Netware
4.11 server. I have tried installing some of the applications on samba and
here are my results.
2 servers, both RH7.1 kern2.4.2-2(Intel)
1 running samba 2.0.7
1 running samba 2.2.0
( I know 2.2.1 has fixed some stale locking issues, but haven't tried it to
see if it helps me.)
samba 2.2
a))).single user database access - works
b)))multi user single shared database - works
c)))single user(machine) open data table twice, either 2 instances of the
same app, or 2 different apps that access the same data table - does not
work from 98se- appears to effectively lock any further file access for any
user. (BIG problem for us)
samba 2.0.7
a)))works
b)))works
c)))works
appears to work fine on 2.0.7
***Troubleshooting so far:
move binaries from 1 machine to another.
I ran both versions of samba on both different machines with the same
results.
smbstatus shows no locks on the files that are inaccessible
Try to learn how Clarion works and locks, was at the
http://www.clarionmag.com site, found a utility called testlock that they
had available for free download. Testlock is a program by www.burtonsys.com
that is wrote in c for windows to test file sharing and locking on network
servers.
I have been running testlk32(the 32bit version) with interesting results.
It consistently works ok by itself on either samba v.
It has a switch that lets it run so many tests and then wait for another
instance to start up so they can both try locking on the same files. When I
run `testlock o:\ auto2` from the second computer it 70-80% of the time
fails on test 7-a(2-session file region locking). It works consistently OK
on samba 2.0.7 for me but not 2.2.0
note:testlock program is proprietary, but it looks like they will distribute
source code, if wanted by developers(after non-disclosure), to see exactly
what it does.
Is this possibly fixed in 2.2.1?
I would definitely suggest a good look at the testlock program suite, as it
may help the samba team.
regards,
Mark
*******************************
Mark E. Nehemiah Urschel Laboratories, Inc.
Network Administrator http://www.urschel.com/
mailto:mnehemiah@urschel.com mailto:info@urschel.com
*******************************
Return-Path: <oliver@samera.com.py>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from Polaris.Pla.net.PY (polaris.pla.net.py [216.250.196.10])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE76D4442 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by Polaris.Pla.net.PY (8.11.2/8.11.2)
with UUCP id f5P5kjS01547; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:46:45 +0400
Received: from samera.com.py (sojourner.samera.com [192.168.1.1]) by
samera.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03562; Mon, 25 Jun 2001
09:41:13 -0400
Message-ID: <3B373F78.9000803@samera.com.py>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:41:12 -0400
From: "Oliver Schulze L." <oliver@samera.com.py>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1)
Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-py
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Shields <rshields@customcolor.com>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: HELP! Third Post same question...Ownership privileges Still
no reply
References: <NFBBKMHCKLFBEHOPKPMAKEGMCAAA.rshields@customcolor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
What about he options:
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 0770
force user
force group
I asume this is only a unix permision issue
Oliver
Richard Shields wrote:
>I am running Samba 2.0.7 on a Macintosh OSX server ver 1.2 A file created,
>copied or otherwise altered by a Windows client on this server is
>unalterable by the Macintosh clients. Is there a way to fix this? A file
>created, ETC by a Mac client can be altered by anyone... I have only limited
>Unix/Linux exp so feel free to email me in person if the answer is too wordy
>for the list server. Thank you for your help in advance...
>
>Richard L. Shields
>rshields@customcolor.com
>
>Custom Color Corp.
>300 W. 19th Terr.
>K.C., MO 64108
>ph. 816-474-3200
>fx. 816-842-4909
>http://www.customcolor.com
>
--
Oliver Schulze L.
oliver@samera.com.py
Asuncion-Paraguay
Return-Path: <Luis@paycom.net>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from natty.paycom.net (natty.paycom.net [208.236.105.27]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA4B4232 for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: mail@127.0.0.1
Message-ID: <3B377145.802811E@paycom.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:13:41 -1000
From: Luis <Luis@paycom.net>
Reply-To: Luis@paycom.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: joey <orakulo@quickweb.com.ph>, samba@samba.org
Subject: Re: (no subject)
References: <003101c0f74a$9c4ce6e0$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
joey wrote:
> Hi...
>
> Im just want to know how to use a samba?
>
> Thanks.....
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
well what are you trying to do with samba. let me know i could help
you out setting it up
Luis
Return-Path: <cynic@mail.cz>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from k0r3.reflektor.cz (k0r3.reflektor.cz [212.24.129.54]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E813B44CA for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1886 invoked by uid 202); 25 Jun 2001 14:09:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zvahlav.mail.cz) (212.24.143.100) by
k0r3.reflektor.cz with SMTP; 25 Jun 2001 14:09:45 -0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010625072439.01f3cd40@mail.cz>
X-Sender: cynic@mail.cz
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:18:06 +0200
To: samba@lists.samba.org
From: Cynic <cynic@mail.cz>
Subject: NT 5, FreeBSD 4.3, Red Hat 6.2, WINS
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi there,
I'm new to samba, and would like to know whether the environment
I set up is sane, and/or when it can be made more efficient. Plus
I have couple of other questions. TIA.
I have three SMB servers (all samba) on a heterogenous network
consisting of four segments. Two segments contain only a single
RH6.2 server each (samba-2.0.6), the other two segments are
populated by win9x and NT5 workstations, plus one FreeBSD 4.3 box
(samba-2.2). I wanted to see the RH servers in win32 machines'
"Network Neighborhood"s; to achieve this, I enabled the WINS server
functionality in one of the RHs' nmbd, and set the other values
accordingly.
FreeBSD: inet x.y.143.102 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast x.y.143.111
workgroup = BOYS
os level = 64
preferred master = True
local master = Yes
domain master = False
wins server = x.y.139.4
RedHat: inet addr:x.y.139.4 Bcast:x.y.139.7 Mask:255.255.255.248
os level = 65
preferred master = yes
local master = yes
domain master = yes
wins support = yes
(The other RH box is irrelevant so far, I leave it alone for the
moment.)
So, I guess my question is: is this actually the way I should go?
Also, where can I set how often the WINS server (if I got it right
and this is the way it works) recollects the browsing list? It haven't
updated "server string" of the FBSD box for at least three hours.
(Without WINS, any config changes on any of the samba servers were
immediately visible.)
Another question: the FreeBSD box has the [Printers] service disabled,
but it shows up in the machine's share listing anyway. Why?
TIA, and please, CC me, I'm not on the list.
cynic@mail.cz
-------------
And the eyes of them both were opened and they saw that their files
were world readable and writable, so they chmoded 600 their files.
- Book of Installation chapt 3 sec 7
Return-Path: <mloiterman@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (law2-oe42.hotmail.com [216.32.180.39]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDEA4D70 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:26:42 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [12.99.187.98]
Reply-To: "Mike Loiterman" <mloiterman@hotmail.com>
From: "Mike Loiterman" <mloiterman@hotmail.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Cannot access SMB shares from 2000
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:51:15 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
Message-ID: <LAW2-OE42ySsxVY60mJ00000522@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2001 14:26:42.0116 (UTC)
FILETIME=[DA953040:01C0FD82]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
===PROBLEM==Unable to browse SMB shares from Windows 2000 Network Neighborhood.
===CONFIGURATION==Redhat 7.1
Samba 2.0.7: 1 machine
Windows 2000 Professional: 1 machine
===TROUBLESHOOTING STEPS AND RESULTS==Failed tests are marked by **
#. TEST: RESULT
1. testparm: ok
2. ping Linux IP from Windows: ok
3. ping Windows IP from Linux: ok
**4. ping Linux Hostname from Windows: "Unknown host SERVERNAME"
5. ping Windows Hostname from Linux: ok
6. smbclient -NL WINDOWS_SERVER_HOSTNAME: ok
7. smbclient -NL LOCALHOST: ok
8. smbclient -NL LINUX_SERVER_HOSTNAME: ok
9. nmblookup -B LINUX_SERVER_HOSTNAME __SAMBA__: ok
10. nmblookup -B WINDOWS_SERVER_HOSTNAME '*': ok
11. smbmount \\WINDOWS_SERVER_HOSTNAME: ok
**12. net view \\LINUX_SERVER_HOSTNAME: "System error 53 has
occured. The Network path was not found."
**13. net use x: \\LINUX_SERVER_HOSTNAME\SHARE: "System error 53
has occured. The Network path was not found."
**14. Able to see linux shares in Network Neighborhood, but cannot
browse. Error: "The Network path was not found."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOzbfXHJ6B0BI4qMYEQJbvgCg/iyRajkE5AvxiSxcx+9ZpT4RNEQAnR/F
jCt2enCrRdLuDNA/AhCGIiMs
=ALQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return-Path: <astrand@lysator.liu.se>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from a88.lambo.student.liu.se (a88.lambo.student.liu.se
[130.236.229.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79B44D83
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by a88.lambo.student.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 500) id
56F6334CDD; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
a88.lambo.student.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E599CF3B for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_=C5strand?= <astrand@lysator.liu.se>
X-X-Sender: <peter@sofie.lambo.student.liu.se>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: getpeername failed
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106251621020.1804-100000@sofie.lambo.student
.liu.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm running Samba 2.2.0. After upgrading, I've got lots of errors in the
log files like:
Jun 18 07:41:12 fs2 smbd[8407]: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4.
Error = Connection reset by peer
After removing SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF options from the "socket
options"
parameter, these problems disappeared. Is this a known problem?
But, know I have more troubles. I keep getting:
[2001/06/25 16:22:31, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1084)
getpeername failed. Error was Bad file descriptor
[2001/06/25 16:22:31, 0] lib/util_sock.c:get_socket_addr(1084)
getpeername failed. Error was Bad file descriptor
for example in 0.0.0.0.log. (I've changed "log file" to %I.log).
There are
also some problems when connecting with clients. I've noticed that
/proc/sys/fs/inode-nr was high, so I've increased /proc/sys/fs/inode-max
quite much. After doing this, things seems to work better, but I keep
getting the error messages in 0.0.0.0.log. What can be the source of this
problem?
The distribution is basically RedHat 6.2 and I'm using the binary from
samba.org.
--
/Peter Estrand <astrand@lysator.liu.se>
Return-Path: <don_mccall@hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from palrel2.hp.com (palrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.234]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292FF4502 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xparelay1.corp.hp.com (unknown [15.58.136.173]) by
palrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA17015D0; Mon, 25 Jun 2001
07:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpabh1.corp.hp.com (xpabh1.corp.hp.com [15.58.136.191])
by xparelay1.corp.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EA91F507; Mon, 25
Jun 2001 00:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by xpabh1.corp.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NHGP413Q>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:44:31 -0700
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050B00@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com>
To: "'Ehrke, Christian'" <C.Ehrke@allweiler.de>,
"'samba@lists.samba.org'" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 on HP-UX
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:44:24 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Christian,
There was an issue with the gr version of 2.2.0 when it was released
with mmapped files, and the fact that HP-UX does not have a unified
cache. Problem occurred when growing the .tdb files, as I recall.
I believe Jeremy or Andrew may have fixed this in the latest cvs
of 2.2...
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Ehrke, Christian [mailto:C.Ehrke@allweiler.de]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 6:50 AM
To: 'samba@lists.samba.org'
Subject: Samba 2.2.0 on HP-UX
Hello,
is there anybody who has some experience with Samba 2.2.0 on HP-UX 10.20?
I compiled the sources with gcc and installed the binaries.
So far so good but there are some problems like this:
[2001/06/25 10:04:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(542)
write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe
[2001/06/25 10:04:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(566)
write_socket: Error writing 4 bytes to socket 3: ERRNO = Broken pipe
[2001/06/25 10:04:00, 0] lib/util_sock.c:send_smb(753)
Error writing 4 bytes to client. -1. Exiting
[2001/06/25 10:05:08, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(499)
too many connections - rejected
[2001/06/25 10:05:09, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(499)
too many connections - rejected
After this occured nobody can access to Samba recources from NT machines.
This problem occures sometimes.
I have seen that some of the files in var/locks are very big:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 833249280 Jun 25 10:31 connections.tdb
Are there any chance to check or analyse *.tdb files?
We have Windows NT and 2000 Clients.
The security level is set to "domain".
Can it be that is a problem if two or more Samba server are running with
security = domain?
So I swiched back to Samba 2.0.7 - no problems since this time.
Mit freundlichem Gru_ / Kind regards
Christian Ehrke, Abt./Dept. ZOS
Organisation/Informationsystems
ALLWEILER AG
A Member of the
COLFAX PUMP GROUP
Postfach 1140 . 78301 Radolfzell
Allweilerstra_e 1 . 78315 Radolfzell
Germany
Tel. +49 (0)7732 86-509
Fax +49 ((0)7732 86-552, 86-99509
E-mail: C.Ehrke@allweiler.de
http://www.allweiler.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <ctooley@amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 2F6E7421C for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 07:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A76.00520AFD ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:56:07 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley@amoa.org
To: samba@samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A76.00520A2D.00@amoa.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:56:04 -0500
Subject: Taking away Root Permissions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have some users (Human Resources and Payroll in particular) that would like me
to be able to assign them Administrator control over the shares that they have
their information on. However, this is pointless on a Linux box because root
will still have permission to those files and it's not like they can take
that
way as they don't know what Linux is let alone how to use it. My position
in
this is rather divided. On one hand I can perfectly see the rationale behind
taking away my rights to view some of the data. On the other hand I'm not
sure
I feel completely comfortable giving those controls to someone else.
In Netware this was possible, in NT it is not, what are other people's
thoughts
on this?
Chris Tooley
Return-Path: <don_mccall@hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from atlrel7.hp.com (atlrel7.hp.com [192.151.27.9]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0A0421C for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xatlrelay1.atl.hp.com (xatlrelay1.atl.hp.com
[15.45.89.190]) by atlrel7.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A289B1F6A0;
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:58:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xatlbh2.atl.hp.com (xatlbh2.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.187]) by
xatlrelay1.atl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E599C1F50E; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 10:57:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by xatlbh2.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <MZ6WL1GQ>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:58:17 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050B01@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com>
To: 'Andrew Nelson' <anelson@vikinglobal.com>, samba@samba.org
Subject: RE: Password / User Authentication...
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:58:12 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello Andrew,
You are correct; if you have security = domain, and you STILL need a
username/passwd
entry in your smbpasswd file for the user to successfully connect, it
indicates that
the authentication attempt for the user at the domain controller is FAILING,
and samba
is 'falling back' to trying to find the user and appropriate password in
the
local
smbpasswd file (sort of like a 'local user'). So what's really
needing to
be figured out
is why the domain controller is not authenticating your user when Samba does
it's rpc stuff
to request this authentication. Turning on log level = 10 and studying the
log files will
help with this.
You might try removing the samba machine account from the domain controller,
and recreating it, then joining the domain again from samba using the
smbpasswd command...
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Nelson [mailto:anelson@vikinglobal.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:18 AM
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Password / User Authentication...
I need a bit of clarity on the following. I have a samba box wich is a
member of a Win2K domain... All is working fine... except that smbpass entry
must be the same as the users password on the Win2K server. I thought that
if a machine is a member of the domain and the settings are properly set up
then the user does not need to have the password set on the samba machine.
Is there something I'm not doing correctly??
Here is global section.... edited to protect the names of the guilty... ;-)
[global]
workgroup = COMPANYWORKGROUP
server string = Tux (Samba 2.0.7)
interfaces = a.b.c.67/255.255.255.192
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
map to guest = Bad User
password server = winblows.mycompany.bogus
time server = Yes
keepalive = 30
logon home = \\tux\%U
os level = 64
preferred master = Yes
domain master = Yes
wins support = Yes
kernel oplocks = No
remote announce = aaa.bbb.ccc.broadcast ddd.eee.ggg.broadcast
remote browse sync = aaa.bbb.ccc.broadcast ddd.eee.ggg.broadcast
unix realname = Yes
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <rworwood@orchestream.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail2.orchestream.com (mail2.orchestream.com
[195.153.64.126]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674FE4221
for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rimmer.orchestream.com (rimmer.orchestream.com) by
mail2.orchestream.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <Tc0a83ffa545cbeb1dd@mail2.orchestream.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001
16:07:34 +0100
Received: from s1000.orchestream.com (s1000.orchestream.com
[192.168.0.16]) by rimmer.orchestream.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
QAA27079; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:06:22 +0100
Received: by s1000.orchestream.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <NTTQC7J3>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:01:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CB1E59E84CE5D3118E5C00508B6D755501125B66@s1000.orchestream.
com>
From: "Worwood, Richard" <rworwood@orchestream.com>
To: "'ctooley@amoa.org'" <ctooley@amoa.org>,
samba@samba.org
Subject: RE: Taking away Root Permissions
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:01:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I believe it is possible to do this in NT however I'm not sure how
comfortable I would be about this as it would make a chunk of that server
effectively unsupportable as if you take access away from all other users it
won't be able to be backed up and even if they made a special exception for
the backup user you would still not be permitted to confirm the backups
worked properly in that area of the systems as you yourself are not
permitted to check the logs.
Basically talk them out of it. Explain to them in a tactfull and diplomatic
way that they have two choices either go back to pen and paper and extra
large filing cabinets or trust you as when it comes down to it that is the
choice.
Even if you gave them a completely separate server which was there
responsibility, they looked after it perfectly well and everything worked
100% sooner or later the will be an issue which they want you to look at for
them.
When it comes down to it if you look after servers or data comms you have to
be a trusted employee in most cases more trusted than HR as you have the
ability to bankrupt the organisation with a couple of key strokes.
Richard Worwood
___________________________________________________________________________
Support Engineer
T: +44 (0)20 7348 1608 M: +44 (0)7771 662 880 US M: +1 703 963 2042
Orchestream
Avon House, Kensington Village, Avonmore Road, London W14 8TS
T: +44 (0)20 7348 1500 F: +44 (0)20 7348 1501
www.orchestream.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ctooley@amoa.org [mailto:ctooley@amoa.org]
Sent: 25 June 2001 15:56
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Taking away Root Permissions
I have some users (Human Resources and Payroll in particular) that would
like me
to be able to assign them Administrator control over the shares that they
have
their information on. However, this is pointless on a Linux box because
root
will still have permission to those files and it's not like they can take
that
way as they don't know what Linux is let alone how to use it. My position
in
this is rather divided. On one hand I can perfectly see the rationale
behind
taking away my rights to view some of the data. On the other hand I'm not
sure
I feel completely comfortable giving those controls to someone else.
In Netware this was possible, in NT it is not, what are other people's
thoughts
on this?
Chris Tooley
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
This communication contains confidential information intended solely for the use
of the individual/s and/or entity or entities to whom it was intended to be
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact
the sender immediately, delete this communication from your system, and do not
disclose its contents to any third party, or use its contents. Any opinions
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those
of Orchestream Ltd or its group of companies unless otherwise specifically
stated.
Return-Path: <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98874A8C; Mon, 25 Jun 2001
08:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5PF6SS77843;
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:06:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000085618@wizzard.rising-edge>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:03:56 -0400
Message-ID: <020701c0fd88$0de51370$1a00a8c0@diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>, <samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>
Subject: _get_trust_account_password( )
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:03:55 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
_get_trust_account_password( ) //called from winbindd_misc.c
Where can I find this function implementation? I wanna see where in the code
i'm dying....
THANKS!
Return-Path: <ctooley@amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 801BC4D87 for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 08:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A76.00543290 ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:19:39 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley@amoa.org
To: peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk
Cc: samba@samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A76.0054322F.00@amoa.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:19:37 -0500
Subject: Re: Taking away Root Permissions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
This actually was a plea to people at other companies as to what their
"stance"
is toward sensitive information. :)
Apparently it is touted as a major feature in Netware (as Novell noted this as a
security flaw in Active Directory that was not a problem in NDS) and Microsoft
sees having a "god user" type account, Administrator, as a feature,
not a flaw.
At any rate, with Windows 2000 this was a major mulling point for Novell and
Microsoft to bicker over when the release was first made of ADS. Things may
have changed since that time.
Chris Tooley
Peter Hicks <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com> on 06/25/2001 10:13:09 AM
Please respond to peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk
To: Chris Tooley/AMOA@AMOA
cc: cc@poggs.co.uk
Subject Re: Taking away Root Permissions
:
Chris,
I didn't think it was possible in NetWare as you will always need a user
that can access any file, anywhere. Typical cases are when you want to
back up a server :)
I would suggest you ask friends or contacts in other companies what their
stance is regarding 'sensitive' HR data.
The most difficult problems are not normally technical ;)
Peter.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote:
> I have some users (Human Resources and Payroll in particular) that would
like
me> to be able to assign them Administrator control over the shares that they
have
> their information on. However, this is pointless on a Linux box because
root
> will still have permission to those files and it's not like they can
take that
> way as they don't know what Linux is let alone how to use it. My
position in
> this is rather divided. On one hand I can perfectly see the rationale
behind
> taking away my rights to view some of the data. On the other hand I'm
not
sure> I feel completely comfortable giving those controls to someone else.
>
> In Netware this was possible, in NT it is not, what are other people's
thoughts> on this?
>
> Chris Tooley
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from tufnell.poggs.com (tufnell.poggs.com [193.118.189.50]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AE74DA9 for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (pwh@localhost) by tufnell.poggs.com
(8.11.4/8.11.2/poggs-1.1-inet) with ESMTP id f5PFQ3432181; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 16:26:03 +0100
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:26:03 +0100 (BST)
From: Peter Hicks <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com>
Reply-To: <peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk>
To: <ctooley@amoa.org>
Cc: <peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk>, <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Taking away Root Permissions
In-Reply-To: <86256A76.0054322F.00@amoa.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106251624260.32159-100000@tufnell.poggs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Chris,
I have just had a thought!
Can you encrypt the information on the share? That way, you don't have to
give away rights to XYZ, and you can still back up all the data, just not
read it...?
Peter.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote:
>
>
> This actually was a plea to people at other companies as to what their
"stance"
> is toward sensitive information. :)
>
> Apparently it is touted as a major feature in Netware (as Novell noted this
as a
> security flaw in Active Directory that was not a problem in NDS) and
Microsoft
> sees having a "god user" type account, Administrator, as a
feature, not a flaw.
> At any rate, with Windows 2000 this was a major mulling point for Novell
and
> Microsoft to bicker over when the release was first made of ADS. Things
may
> have changed since that time.
>
> Chris Tooley
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Hicks <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com> on 06/25/2001 10:13:09 AM
>
> Please respond to peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk
>
>
>
> To: Chris Tooley/AMOA@AMOA
>
> cc: cc@poggs.co.uk
>
>
>
> Subject Re: Taking away Root Permissions
> :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> I didn't think it was possible in NetWare as you will always need a
user
> that can access any file, anywhere. Typical cases are when you want to
> back up a server :)
>
> I would suggest you ask friends or contacts in other companies what their
> stance is regarding 'sensitive' HR data.
>
> The most difficult problems are not normally technical ;)
>
>
>
> Peter.
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote:
>
> > I have some users (Human Resources and Payroll in particular) that
would like
> me
> > to be able to assign them Administrator control over the shares that
they have
> > their information on. However, this is pointless on a Linux box
because root
> > will still have permission to those files and it's not like they
can take that
> > way as they don't know what Linux is let alone how to use it. My
position in
> > this is rather divided. On one hand I can perfectly see the rationale
behind
> > taking away my rights to view some of the data. On the other hand
I'm not
> sure
> > I feel completely comfortable giving those controls to someone else.
> >
> > In Netware this was possible, in NT it is not, what are other
people's
> thoughts
> > on this?
> >
> > Chris Tooley
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
>
>
>
>
Return-Path: <ctooley@amoa.org>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 2DC3A4434 for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 08:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id
86256A76.005508BC ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:28:47 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA
From: ctooley@amoa.org
To: peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk
Cc: samba@samba.org
Message-ID: <86256A76.0055081D.00@amoa.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:28:45 -0500
Subject: Re: Taking away Root Permissions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
That might be a good possibility. Now to come up with a method of doing that
and giving individual users the ability to de-crypt it. Also if they have to go
through an extra effort to decrypt the information, they will probably just drop
the issue in favor of ease of use. :)
Chris Tooley
Peter Hicks <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com> on 06/25/2001 10:26:03 AM
Please respond to peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk
To: Chris Tooley/AMOA@AMOA
cc: peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk, samba@samba.org
Subject Re: Taking away Root Permissions
:
Chris,
I have just had a thought!
Can you encrypt the information on the share? That way, you don't have to
give away rights to XYZ, and you can still back up all the data, just not
read it...?
Peter.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote:
>
>
> This actually was a plea to people at other companies as to what their
"stance"> is toward sensitive information. :)
>
> Apparently it is touted as a major feature in Netware (as Novell noted this
as
a> security flaw in Active Directory that was not a problem in NDS) and
Microsoft
> sees having a "god user" type account, Administrator, as a
feature, not a
flaw.> At any rate, with Windows 2000 this was a major mulling point for Novell
and
> Microsoft to bicker over when the release was first made of ADS. Things
may
> have changed since that time.
>
> Chris Tooley
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Hicks <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com> on 06/25/2001 10:13:09 AM
>
> Please respond to peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk
>
>
>
> To: Chris Tooley/AMOA@AMOA
>
> cc: cc@poggs.co.uk
>
>
>
> Subject Re: Taking away Root Permissions
> :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> I didn't think it was possible in NetWare as you will always need a
user
> that can access any file, anywhere. Typical cases are when you want to
> back up a server :)
>
> I would suggest you ask friends or contacts in other companies what their
> stance is regarding 'sensitive' HR data.
>
> The most difficult problems are not normally technical ;)
>
>
>
> Peter.
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote:
>
> > I have some users (Human Resources and Payroll in particular) that
would
like> me
> > to be able to assign them Administrator control over the shares that
they
have> > their information on. However, this is pointless on a Linux box
because
root> > will still have permission to those files and it's not like they
can take
that> > way as they don't know what Linux is let alone how to use it. My
position
in> > this is rather divided. On one hand I can perfectly see the rationale
behind> > taking away my rights to view some of the data. On the other hand
I'm not
> sure
> > I feel completely comfortable giving those controls to someone else.
> >
> > In Netware this was possible, in NT it is not, what are other
people's
> thoughts
> > on this?
> >
> > Chris Tooley
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
>
>
>
>
Return-Path: <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from tufnell.poggs.com (tufnell.poggs.com [193.118.189.50]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724214DA7 for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (pwh@localhost) by tufnell.poggs.com
(8.11.4/8.11.2/poggs-1.1-inet) with ESMTP id f5PFUfY32193; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 16:30:41 +0100
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:30:41 +0100 (BST)
From: Peter Hicks <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com>
Reply-To: <peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk>
To: <ctooley@amoa.org>
Cc: <peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk>, <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Taking away Root Permissions
In-Reply-To: <86256A76.0055081D.00@amoa.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106251629100.32159-100000@tufnell.poggs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Chris,
That's exactly my way of thinking - propose a difficult-for-them-to-use
system that they will drop in favour of rethinking their ideas!
Unfortunately it doesn't always work for me, as I found out when I was
asked to implement my "route Citrix traffic over ISDN, route e-mail over
VPN" proposal I put forward :-(
Peter.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote:
>
>
> That might be a good possibility. Now to come up with a method of doing
that
> and giving individual users the ability to de-crypt it. Also if they have
to go
> through an extra effort to decrypt the information, they will probably just
drop
> the issue in favor of ease of use. :)
>
> Chris Tooley
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Peter Hicks <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com> on 06/25/2001 10:26:03 AM
>
> Please respond to peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk
>
>
>
> To: Chris Tooley/AMOA@AMOA
>
> cc: peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk, samba@samba.org
>
>
>
> Subject Re: Taking away Root Permissions
> :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> I have just had a thought!
>
> Can you encrypt the information on the share? That way, you don't have
to
> give away rights to XYZ, and you can still back up all the data, just not
> read it...?
>
>
>
> Peter.
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > This actually was a plea to people at other companies as to what their
> "stance"
> > is toward sensitive information. :)
> >
> > Apparently it is touted as a major feature in Netware (as Novell noted
this as
> a
> > security flaw in Active Directory that was not a problem in NDS) and
Microsoft
> > sees having a "god user" type account, Administrator, as a
feature, not a
> flaw.
> > At any rate, with Windows 2000 this was a major mulling point for
Novell and
> > Microsoft to bicker over when the release was first made of ADS.
Things may
> > have changed since that time.
> >
> > Chris Tooley
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Peter Hicks <pwh@tufnell.poggs.com> on 06/25/2001 10:13:09 AM
> >
> > Please respond to peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk
> >
> >
> >
> > To: Chris Tooley/AMOA@AMOA
> >
> > cc: cc@poggs.co.uk
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject Re: Taking away Root Permissions
> > :
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > I didn't think it was possible in NetWare as you will always need
a user
> > that can access any file, anywhere. Typical cases are when you want to
> > back up a server :)
> >
> > I would suggest you ask friends or contacts in other companies what
their
> > stance is regarding 'sensitive' HR data.
> >
> > The most difficult problems are not normally technical ;)
> >
> >
> >
> > Peter.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote:
> >
> > > I have some users (Human Resources and Payroll in particular)
that would
> like
> > me
> > > to be able to assign them Administrator control over the shares
that they
> have
> > > their information on. However, this is pointless on a Linux box
because
> root
> > > will still have permission to those files and it's not like
they can take
> that
> > > way as they don't know what Linux is let alone how to use it.
My position
> in
> > > this is rather divided. On one hand I can perfectly see the
rationale
> behind
> > > taking away my rights to view some of the data. On the other
hand I'm not
> > sure
> > > I feel completely comfortable giving those controls to someone
else.
> > >
> > > In Netware this was possible, in NT it is not, what are other
people's
> > thoughts
> > > on this?
> > >
> > > Chris Tooley
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
the
> > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
Return-Path: <weage98@yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from web13409.mail.yahoo.com (web13409.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.172.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EF2B4DEC
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20010625155539.46109.qmail@web13409.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [193.116.20.221] by web13409.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 08:55:39 PDT
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Joshua Weage <weage98@yahoo.com>
Subject: Major problems under HP-UX 11.00
To: samba@lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I tried installing Samba 2.2.0 under HP-UX 11.00.
There was no response from smbd when using smbclient.
So, I went back to Samba 2.0.9. This works a little
better, but Windows NT and 2000 clients start locking
up after awhile. Restarting the smbd daemon fixes the
problem. There are no error messages in the log
files. It seems to occur randomly.
Please forward any suggestions/questions to
weage98@yahoo.com as I'm not on the list.
Thanks,
Joshua Weage
====--
-- <http://origin.me.gatech.edu/~weage> --
-- <http://members.xoom.com/joshua_weage> --
-- <http://weage.freeservers.com/> --
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from rsdmail.k12.ar.us (rsdmail.k12.ar.us [170.211.146.216])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF7D4D0D for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:23:41 -0500
Message-Id: <200106251123.AA160104584@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Thomas Rice" <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Reply-To: <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba as a PDC
X-Mailer: <IMail v6.05>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Newbie question # 2 (you have been warned)
Is it possible to setup Samba to act as a PDC and then have Windows 9x clients
authenticate against it?
I have been extremely unsuccessful in getting this to work, so I wanted to be
sure that it could be done before I spend any more time working on this.
Thanks,
Thomas Rice
IS Manager
Russellville School District
________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at rsdmail.k12.ar.us
Return-Path: <drek@smashpow.net>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from smashpow.net (mail.smashpow.net [216.138.195.192]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DF1441B for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smashpow.net([216.138.195.192]) (999 bytes) by
smashpow.net via smail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:smtp (sender:
<drek@smashpow.net>) id <m15EZEh-000Mi1C@smashpow.net> for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:29:15 -0400 (EDT)
(Smail-3.2.0.111 2000-Feb-17 #1 built 2001-Mar-18)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:29:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Agent Drek <drek@smashpow.net>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: grant a pdc user admin priv?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106251111460.365-100000@smashpow.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have to support a really silly application. It requires each user to
have temporary 'full' Administrator privelege's on the local machine
to run
a setup 'wizard' (after the software has been installed by
administrator).
My problem is that the users are logged in via the samba pdc and I don't
see any obvious way to grant privelege's to network users on their local
workstation.
With a samba 2.2.X PDC and Win2k SP1 clients is it at all possible to
effectivly turn my network users into Administrator temporarily to
facilitate this software install?
thanks,
Derek Marshall
Return-Path: <bruno@lifl.fr>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from malonne.lifl.fr (malonne.lifl.fr [134.206.10.29]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93DC4423 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from watney.lifl.fr (watney.lifl.fr [134.206.10.90]) by
malonne.lifl.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id SAA15264 ; Mon, 25
Jun 2001 18:31:41 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from bruno by watney.lifl.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1
(Debian)) id 15EZGK-0000Fl-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:30:56 +0200
From: Bruno BEAUFILS <Bruno.Beaufils@lifl.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15159.26427.731336.354364@watney.lifl.fr>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:30:51 +0200
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Samba 2.2.0 - Printers - Windows 2000 - Driver upload
X-Mailer: VM 6.92 under Emacs 20.7.2
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have sent this mail to the list on May 16th but have had not reply and
furthermore the mail did not seems to appear on th archive (last mail in list
archive appear to be from May 11th).
So I try to repost it since I really need help :-(
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
I am just trying to share a Printer connected directly to the parallel port of
a machine serving as a Samba 2.2.0 server.
I read the complete update Samba-HOWTO-Collection documentation which does not
help me a lot :-(
Here what I try to do. I get the Samba server being a Sun Ultra Sparc 1,
running Solaris 7 (let us call it UNIX). On that station I have access to some
NIS defined users and group. One of this user/group is leorini/smac.
On the Windows 2000 station (let us call it WORKSTATION) I am logged as a user
called leorini which has the same passwd as on the Sun workstation. This
station is not configured to be connected to a NT domain, but simply in a
workgroup : this is because we have another samba server 2.0.x (which I did
not control) being a gateway between UNIX and M$ world.
The smb.conf file is the following one :
/----------------------------------------------------------------------\
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = LIFL
security = SHARE
log level = 3
log file = /usr/local/var/log/samba/smb.log
printcap name = /usr/local/etc/lprng/printcap
preferred master = False
local master = No
domain master = False
write list = leorini, beaufils
printer admin = leorini, beaufils
printing = lprng
print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -P%p %s
lpq command = /usr/local/bin/lpq -P%p
lprm command = /usr/local/bin/lprm -P%p %j
lppause command = /usr/local/sbin/lpc hold %p %j
lpresume command = /usr/local/sbin/lpc release %p %j
queuepause command = /usr/local/sbin/lpc -P%p stop
queueresume command = /usr/local/sbin/lpc -P%p start
[print$]
path = /usr/local/share/printers
[printers]
path = /usr/local/var/spool/samba
printable = Yes
browseable = No
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
The UNIX user leorini has write access on the print$ share :
/----------------------------------------------------------------------\
$ ls -al /usr/local/share/printers
total 4
drwxrwxr-x 4 beaufils smac 512 May 4 17:57 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 beaufils smac 512 May 4 17:51 ..
drwxrwxr-x 2 beaufils smac 512 May 4 17:57 W32X86
drwxrwxr-x 2 beaufils smac 512 May 4 17:57 WIN40
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
The main problem is that I am unable to add a printer driver on the samba
server.
I did exactly what is described in the documentation but when I try to upload
the printer driver to the samba server from a Windows 2000 station I am unable
to use the "Add new printer driver" button since it is disable and the
security tab says that only "WORKSTATION\root" has write access to the
printer.
Any idea of what I did the wrong way ?
--
-- Bruno
Return-Path: <jbarton@highridgefire.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from damocles.highridgefire.com (110-198.bestdsl.net
[216.162.110.198]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
1603F44EE for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:31:25 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (jbarton@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
damocles.highridgefire.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5PGZSZ16005;
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:35:28 -0500
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:35:28 -0500 (CDT)
From: John Barton <jbarton@highridgefire.com>
To: Thomas Rice <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba as a PDC
In-Reply-To: <200106251123.AA160104584@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0106251134010.15357-100000@damocles.highridge
fire.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Yes, it is possible, I have just completed setting up the exact same setup
on one of my networks. What types of problems are you experiencing?
John Barton
Unix Systems Administrator
Primary Networks, Inc.
jbarton@technicalworks.net
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Thomas Rice wrote:
> Newbie question # 2 (you have been warned)
>
> Is it possible to setup Samba to act as a PDC and then have Windows 9x
clients authenticate against it?
>
> I have been extremely unsuccessful in getting this to work, so I wanted to
be sure that it could be done before I spend any more time working on this.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas Rice
> IS Manager
> Russellville School District
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sent via the WebMail system at rsdmail.k12.ar.us
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <S_Elble@yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net
(snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A344514 for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 09:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com
[24.151.19.181]) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3)
with SMTP id JAA04772; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <013601c0fd96$dc18abe0$0600a8c0@elbles>
Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble@yahoo.com>
From: "Sean P. Elble" <S_Elble@yahoo.com>
To: "Agent Drek" <drek@smashpow.net>, <samba@samba.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106251111460.365-100000@smashpow.net>
Subject: Re: grant a pdc user admin priv?
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:48:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Sure can; to do this, you have to use the following line in smb.conf:
domain admin group = @usergroup
This parameter can take multiple groups, but it is much easier to make your
users a member of a single group. Just add their group to this line, being
sure to keep the "@" prefix. Good luck.
Sean Elble
----- Original Message -----
From: "Agent Drek" <drek@smashpow.net>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: grant a pdc user admin priv?
> I have to support a really silly application. It requires each user to
> have temporary 'full' Administrator privelege's on the local
machine to
run> a setup 'wizard' (after the software has been installed by
administrator).
>
> My problem is that the users are logged in via the samba pdc and I
don't
> see any obvious way to grant privelege's to network users on their
local
> workstation.
>
> With a samba 2.2.X PDC and Win2k SP1 clients is it at all possible to
> effectivly turn my network users into Administrator temporarily to
> facilitate this software install?
>
> thanks,
>
>
> Derek Marshall
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <r.claeson@computer.org>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp.brightinteractive.net (smtp.brightinteractive.net
[213.242.165.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445ED442C
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brighte3ltolsd (d00-1005.brightinteractive.net
[213.242.165.28]) by smtp.brightinteractive.net (Postfix) with SMTP id
3E73757245; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:38:31 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <050e01c0fd99$258cec30$820110ac@sto.brightinteractive.com>
From: "Robert Claeson" <r.claeson@computer.org>
To: "Bruno BEAUFILS" <Bruno.Beaufils@lifl.fr>,
<samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <15159.26427.731336.354364@watney.lifl.fr>
Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 - Printers - Windows 2000 - Driver upload
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:06:16 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
"Bruno BEAUFILS" <Bruno.Beaufils@lifl.fr>:
> The main problem is that I am unable to add a printer driver on the samba
> server.
>
> I did exactly what is described in the documentation but when I try to
upload> the printer driver to the samba server from a Windows 2000 station I am
unable> to use the "Add new printer driver" button since it is disable
and the
> security tab says that only "WORKSTATION\root" has write access
to the
> printer.
>
> Any idea of what I did the wrong way ?
I reported a similar or even identical problem last week. Somebody responded
that the problem had now been found and fixed in the latest CVS versions.
Then I saw a message from somebody earlier today that they were still having
problems - I can't tell yet, I haven't got around to fetch today's
version
and compile it.
/Robert
Return-Path: <dm@belkam.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from pipe.aspec.ru (pipe.aspec.ru [195.161.29.125]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5A84D6A for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmsystems (dm.dialup.aspec.ru [195.161.29.106]) by
pipe.aspec.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5PH1p802104; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 22:01:51 +0500 (SAMST)
Message-ID: <000f01c0fda1$f9cd09a0$6a1da1c3@dmsystems>
From: "Dmitry Melekhov" <dm@belkam.com>
To: <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>, <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <200106251123.AA160104584@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
Subject: Re: Samba as a PDC
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:09:27 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
----- Original Message -----
From: Thomas Rice <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 8:23 PM
Subject: Samba as a PDC
> Newbie question # 2 (you have been warned)
>
> Is it possible to setup Samba to act as a PDC and then have Windows 9x
clients authenticate against it?>
Yes. But if you have only win9x clients I recommend you samba 2.0
Wire connection and Windows reinstallation senior engineer
Dmitry Melekhov
http://www.belkam.com/~dm
2:5050/11.23@fidonet
> I have been extremely unsuccessful in getting this to work, so I wanted to
be sure that it could be done before I spend any more time working on
this.>
> Thanks,
>
> Thomas Rice
> IS Manager
> Russellville School District
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sent via the WebMail system at rsdmail.k12.ar.us
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <jeremy@valinux.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA224D40 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com)
by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30
#1 (Debian)) id 15EZzb-0000jw-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:17:43 -0700
Message-ID: <3B377348.D7CEA19F@valinux.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:22:16 -0700
From: Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com>
Organization: VA Linux Systems
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: alexander_siegelin@fastmultimedia.de
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: 4GB File Size Limit with Samba Server (2.00) on Irix?
References: <OFF2CE04B1.ADD05BDC-ONC1256A76.003F4F22@fastmultimedia.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
alexander_siegelin@fastmultimedia.de wrote:>
> Hello,
>
> we have the problem, that there seems to be a file size limit of 4GB with
> Samba running under Irix with XFS file system (so it is not a file system
> limitation). As soon as we write a file larger 4GB the file gets discarded
> once the capture process ends. We are using a video editing application so
> that is where the big files come from. 4GB in this scenario is about 14
> minutes video, so not really that much. The client (the editing station)
> captures and uses it's video material over Gigabit Ethernet from an
Origin
> Server. The client itself runs under Windows 2000.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Can you coordinate with Herb Lewis (Samba Team member at
SGI). Samba on IRIX should be fully 64 bit clean, so we need
more info on your exact setup.
Regards,
Jeremy Allison,
Samba Team.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
--------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <mthomas@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de (sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.50])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 220824423 for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de ( exim@aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de
[131.246.137.3] ) by sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de id aa21723 for
<samba@samba.org>; 25 Jun 2001 19:27 MESZ
Received: from fuchur.arubi.uni-kl.de ([131.246.50.19] helo=fuchur) by
aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15Ea8s-000DhQ-00 for
samba@samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:27:18 +0200
Message-ID: <000f01c0fd9b$f9fcdaf0$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de>
From: Martin Thomas <mthomas@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
To: samba@samba.org
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at
sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de
Subject: lpq with lpqng
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:26:32 +0200
Organization: University of Kaiserslautern
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I have some problems viewing the print jobs on
a Windows 2000 machine. No job is listed in the window.
Some information:
Clients: Windows 2000 SP1 german
Server: Linux with Samba 2.2 cvs (from today)
Printing System on Server: lpqng Version 3.6.12
printing = lprng in smb.conf
lpq command = lpq -P%p in the printer shares
output from 'lpq -Pcps-fol' on the unix-box
Queue Dev Status Job Name From To
Submitted Rnk Pri Blks Cp PP %
------- ----- --------- --------- --- --- ----- --- ---- --
cps-fol hp@tk DOWN
QUEUED 415 Microsoft Powe kremers@moses. kremers@MOSES
06/25/01 16:14:17 1 15 452 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA591MOSES.993478454
QUEUED 421 c9.prn rheini@aixd1.r rheini@aixd1.r
06/25/01 16:16:13 2 15 42 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA642aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de.993478
QUEUED 429 LST: hennes@neutron hennes@mathe_n
06/25/01 16:19:11 3 15 210 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA502mathe_novell2.993478751
QUEUED 462 Microsoft Powe lop@lopserver. lop@LOP-PC6
06/25/01 16:32:01 4 15 109 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA005LOP-PC6.993479521
QUEUED 480 TSE.prn avetter@aixd1. avetter@aixd1.
06/25/01 16:35:12 5 15 292 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA655aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de.993479
QUEUED 550 Kapitel_6.Betr Henrich@resy40 Henrich@RESY62
06/25/01 17:10:41 6 15 675 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA530RESY62.993481839
QUEUED 552 Kapitel_6.Betr Henrich@resy40 Henrich@RESY62
06/25/01 17:10:51 7 15 293 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA947RESY62.993481850
QUEUED 583 BPlan_Schwedel lop@lopserver. lop@LOP-PC6
06/25/01 17:20:46 8 15 24796 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA907LOP-PC6.993482290
QUEUED 602 BVorschlag_Sch lop@lopserver. lop@LOP-PC6
06/25/01 17:24:16 9 15 25770 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA731LOP-PC6.993482487
QUEUED 612 /tmp/ArktisOve jnzimmer@gatew jnzimmer@donau
06/25/01 17:37:03 10 15 55 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA769donau.informatik.uni-kl.de.
QUEUED 620 Microsoft Powe lop@lopserver. lop@LOP-PC6
06/25/01 17:50:50 11 15 19161 1
/var/spool/lpd/dfA303LOP-PC6.993484123
I _think_ the function parse_lpq_lprng in lpq_parse.c expects another format.
Seems to be a samba problem because smbclient //linux/cps-fol > queue
does not show the jobs too.
Any idea?
Thank you,
Martin
Return-Path: <blalwani@kana.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from RWC-EX2.kana.com (pointofnoreturn.kana.com
[206.107.225.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C994420
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by RWC-EX2.kana.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NTFLG07P>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:39:08 -0700
Message-ID: <ED9F9340545ACD49813EC6B6EC688F4289577F@RWC-EX2.kana.com>
From: Bobby Lalwani <blalwani@kana.com>
To: "'samba@lists.samba.org'" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: SWAT not starting
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:39:07 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
I've installed Samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.8.
I have NIS on the server I installed samba. The /etc/services file and the
inetd seem to have the correct parameters during install. When I start
samba, swat doesn't seem to start up. I don't see the specified swat
port
in listening mode. Plus, I can't connect to the url & port.
What additionally configuration would I need to do regarding this? When I
installed samba on other Unix hosts without NIS there was no problems.
Thanks...Bobby
Return-Path: <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A204D98; Mon, 25 Jun 2001
10:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by
mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5PHxuS95020;
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by
wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000085692@wizzard.rising-edge>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:57:22 -0400
Message-ID: <02fe01c0fda0$4808e0f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback>
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
To: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy@risingedge.com>,
<samba@lists.samba.org>,
<samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>
References: <020701c0fd88$0de51370$1a00a8c0@diamondback>
Subject: Re: _get_trust_account_password( )
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:57:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Nevermind...
Sorry :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "M. Kilroy" <mekilroy@risingedge.com>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>; <samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:03 AM
Subject: _get_trust_account_password( )
_get_trust_account_password( ) //called from winbindd_misc.c
Where can I find this function implementation? I wanna see where in the
code
i'm dying....
THANKS!
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <nailed@videotron.ca>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from VL-MS-MR003.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca
[24.201.245.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F92349BD
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alain ([24.201.55.103]) by VL-MS-MR003.sc1.videotron.ca
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 MR003 Jun 11 2001 16:23:30) with SMTP
id GFI0M101.ATO; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:27:37 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Alain Toussaint <nailed@videotron.ca>
To: "Thomas Rice" <thomas.rice@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>,
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba as a PDC
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:27:36 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <200106251123.AA160104584@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
In-Reply-To: <200106251123.AA160104584@rsdmail.k12.ar.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01062514273601.00730@alain>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> Is it possible to setup Samba to act as a PDC and then have Windows
> 9x clients authenticate against it?
yes i'm currently doing that,here's the smb.conf i use:
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from localhost (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2001/06/25 14:19:21
# Global parameters
[global]
client code page = 852
workgroup = TOUSSAINT
netbios name = ALAIN
interfaces = lo eth1
bind interfaces only = Yes
encrypt passwords = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
unix password sync = Yes
log level = 2
log file = /opt/samba/var/%M.log
time server = Yes
load printers = No
logon script = startup.bat
logon path =
logon home =
domain logons = Yes
os level = 65
preferred master = True
domain master = True
wins support = Yes
template homedir =
template shell =
winbind separator =
winbind cache time = 0
guest account = ftp
preserve case = No
short preserve case = No
mangle case = Yes
[homes]
comment = Users home dir
path = /home/%u
read only = No
locking = No
oplocks = No
level2 oplocks = No
[netlogon]
comment = Netlogon stuff
path = /opt/samba/netlogon
[devel]
comment = Devel Share
path = /devel
read only = No
blocking locks = No
locking = No
oplocks = No
level2 oplocks = No
> I have been extremely unsuccessful in getting this to work, so I
> wanted to be sure that it could be done before I spend any more time
> working on this.
you may need to have a close look at these setting:
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u # i need to use %u instead of %U
path = /home/%u # ditto here
and the locking stuff,the devel share is unimportant,it's only used for
testing purpose (it get chowned and chmoded quite a bit depending on
which machine and account i use).
Alain Toussaint
Return-Path: <cygnusx__1@hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f238.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.238]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D394E50; Mon, 25 Jun 2001
12:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:50:09 -0700
Received: from 216.95.225.17 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:50:07 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [216.95.225.17]
From: "Tim Carr" <cygnusx__1@hotmail.com>
To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Subject: WINS + browsing question
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:50:07 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F2389BzqREGcvcoCru40000b3c1@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2001 19:50:09.0569 (UTC)
FILETIME=[0A538110:01C0FDB0]
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I'm not sure that this is a general question, so I emailed it to both the
samba and samba-technical lists.
I have a very complicated network setup, with multiple remote subnets, some
tunneled in, and other such quirks. I've successfully made all of the
machines (some linux some M$) correctly enlist themselves in ONE WINS-server
provided by Samba 2.0.x . I can look at wins.dat, and see all the machines
properly listed, with the right IPs, and the correct <1B> designations etc
from primary domain masters, and all that jazz.
HOWEVER... the problem is that this same samba machine never updates its own
browse list (browse.dat) from the wins server! So whilst the wins.dat file
will have everything, the browse.dat will have very few machines, only the
ones that the wins-server can see locally. Why is this? How can I force the
browse list to be updated from the wins server on the SAME machine? I'm
experimenting with "remote browse synch", but have had no love yet.
Many thanks to anyone who can shed light on this subject!
Tim Carr
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Return-Path: <robert_p@freemail.hu>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from fm3.freemail.hu (fm3.freemail.hu [194.38.105.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3157B4EC8 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 58288 invoked by uid 959626); 25 Jun 2001 22:50:48
+0200
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:50:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Papp "Róbert" <robert_p@freemail.hu>
Subject: samba problem
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <freemail.20010525225048.58092@fm3.freemail.hu>
X-Originating-IP: [212.40.107.42]
X-HTTP-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
hello,
I have a big problem with Samba:
I see the Linux PC (called CHARON) on the network, but i
doesn't browse it!!
I have a little network with 1 Linux PC, 1 NT pc, and 4
Win98 pc's.
the linux pc is : redhat 7.1 linux, samba 2.0.7
NT pc is : Windows NT 4.0 workstation sp1
Win98 ps's : Windows 98 SR2
NET VIEW result is:
--------------------
Kiszolgalsniv Megjegyzis (comment)
------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
\\CHARON Samba 2.0.7
\\EVA Eva's pc
\\MARCIGEPE
\\MARIANN Mariann's pc
\\ROBI
\\SANYI Sanyi's pc
A parancs sikeresen befejezudvtt.
my smb.conf file is:
--------------------
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = PRONET
encrypt passwords = Yes
smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd
ssl CA certFile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt
local master = yes
os level = 500
preferred master = Yes
dns proxy = No
wins support = Yes
browsable = Yes
protocol = NT1
[test]
comment = test terulet
path = /tmp
writeable = Yes
guest ok = Yes
browsable = Yes
[homes]
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0755
browsable = Yes
[cdrom]
comment = Charon's CdRom
path = /mnt/cdrom
guest ok = Yes
locking = No
browsable = Yes
my SMBUSER file is:
-------------------
# Unix_name = SMB_name1 SMB_name2 ...
nobody = guest pcguest smbguest
charon = administrator admin
robi = administrator admin
marci = administrator admin
sanyi = administrator admin
andras = administrator admin
mariann = administrator admin
eva = administrator admin
my lmhosts file is:
--------------------
127.0.0.1 localhost
192.168.200.100 charon
192.168.200.101 robi
192.168.200.102 marcigepe
192.168.200.103 sanyi
192.168.200.104 mariann
192.168.200.105 eva
smbclient -L charon (this is the Linux PC)
------------------------------------------
added interface ip=192.168.200.100 bcast=192.168.200.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[PRONET] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.0.7]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
test Disk test terulet
homes Disk
cdrom Disk Charon's CdRom
IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba 2.0.7)
Server Comment
--------- -------
CHARON Samba 2.0.7
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
PRONET CHARON
smbclient -L robi (this is the NT pc)
-------------------------------------
added interface ip=192.168.200.100 bcast=192.168.200.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[PRONET] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager
4.0]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
Error returning browse list: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access
denied.)
Server Comment
--------- -------
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
smbclient -L marcigepe (this is one of win98 pc)
------------------------------------------------
added interface ip=192.168.200.100 bcast=192.168.200.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
PRINTER$ Disk
EP Printer
C Disk
D Disk
F Disk
DINST Disk
E Disk
IPC$ IPC RIPC (Remote Inter Process
Communication)
Server Comment
--------- -------
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
the smblookup -d 2 '*' result is:
-----------------------------------
added interface ip=192.168.200.100 bcast=192.168.200.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
querying * on 192.168.200.255
Got a positive name query response from 192.168.200.105 (
192.168.200.105 )
Got a positive name query response from 192.168.200.102 (
192.168.200.102 )
Got a positive name query response from 192.168.200.101 (
192.168.200.101 )
Got a positive name query response from 192.168.200.103 (
192.168.200.103 )
192.168.200.105 *<00>
192.168.200.102 *<00>
192.168.200.101 *<00>
192.168.200.103 *<00>
What can i do??
Thanks!
Robert
Return-Path: <aissa.char@lmco.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mailgw1a.lmco.com (mailgw1a.lmco.com [192.31.106.7]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810BF42A2 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emss02g01.ems.lmco.com (relay2.ems.lmco.com
[166.29.2.54]) by mailgw1a.lmco.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id
RAA14839 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:45:58 -0600
(MDT)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by lmco.com (PMDF V5.2-33 #38887) id
<0GFI00H01FCKMJ@lmco.com> for samba@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001
17:45:58 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from emss08m01.ems.lmco.com ([144.197.176.1]) by lmco.com
(PMDF V5.2-33 #38887) with ESMTP id <0GFI009IAFCH5M@lmco.com> for
samba@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:45:53 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from skunkworks.lmsw.lmco.com ([144.197.7.2]) by
emss08m01.ems.lmco.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id N3ZXL56V; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:46:59
-0700
Received: from lmco.com ([144.197.174.175]) by skunkworks.lmsw.lmco.com
(post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-11530) with ESMTP id AAA466 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:45:52 -0700
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:45:52 -0700
From: Aissa Char <aissa.char@lmco.com>
Subject: Samba 2.2.0 for AIX
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Message-id: <3B37CD30.56903EC3@lmco.com>
Organization: LM Aero - Palmdale
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Does Samba 2.2.0 work on IBM/AIX 4.3.3? I'm having a problem
configuring it. Thanks
Return-Path: <don_mccall@hp.com>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from atlrel2.hp.com (atlrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.202]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19854E2C for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com
[15.45.89.191]) by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E59B01;
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:30:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xatlbh4.atl.hp.com (xatlbh4.atl.hp.com [15.45.89.189]) by
xatlrelay2.atl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997131F502; Mon, 25 Jun
2001 14:29:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by xatlbh4.atl.hp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <NP8VQTLZ>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:30:27 -0400
Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050B05@xatl02.atl.hp.com>
From: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com>
To: "'Worwood, Richard'" <rworwood@orchestream.com>,
"MCCALL,DON
(HP-USA,ex1)" <don_mccall@hp.com>, 'Andrew Nelson'
<anelson@vikinglobal.com>, samba@samba.org
Subject: RE: Password / User Authentication...
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:30:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi Richard,
Just looking quickly, what I see from lines in your log file:
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/reply.c:smb_create_user(507)
smb_create_user: Running the command `' gave 0
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(954)
No such user rworwood - using guest account
Indicate that there is no unix user 'rworwood'; (it is trying to create
one
on the fly, but your smb.conf file is not set up to do this - needs
configuration
of a useradd command in unix that would allow a user to be created... IMHO,
this
is NOT a good thing to do anyway; better to create your users ahead of
time)...
So I don't think samba is even bothering actually going thru with the user
authentication
request to the domain controller for user rworwood, as even if the domain
controller
authenticated rworwood, there would be no Unix uid to map this user to,
therefore Samba
would be unable to determine what access to give him to files and
directories...
Try verifying that there actually IS a rworwood user in your /etc/passwd
file (or create
one, if there isn't) and see if you don't get farther.
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Worwood, Richard [mailto:rworwood@orchestream.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:08 PM
To: 'MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)'; 'Andrew Nelson'; samba@samba.org
Subject: RE: Password / User Authentication...
Could someone take a look at the following smb.conf and log file as I appear
to be having an identical issue.
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from UNKNOWN (0.0.0.0)
# Date: 2001/06/25 16:07:47
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = OVLAB
server string = Samba Server %V
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = ovlcqdl380a ovlcqdl380b
debug level = 4
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%I
max log size = 50
name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast
load printers = No
preferred master = Yes
dns proxy = No
wins server = 192.168.64.66
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
writeable = Yes
browseable = No
[Orchestream]
path = /home/ftpdir
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
[Build]
path = /home/Images
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0777
[IOS]
path = /home/IOS
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
[mp3]
path = /share/mp3s
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
[apps]
comment = Utilities and Applications
path = /home/apps
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
[scratch]
path = /home/scratch
writeable = Yes
create mask = 0777
log file:
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(547)
Trying sysv shmem open of size 1048576
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] locking/shmem_sysv.c:sysv_shm_open(707)
Initialised IPC area of size 1048576
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 2] smbd/server.c:main(746)
Changed root to /
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(126)
open_oplock_ipc: opening loopback UDP socket.
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(880)
bind succeeded on port 0
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/oplock.c:open_oplock_ipc(153)
open_oplock ipc: pid = 20055, global_oplock_port = 32812
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] lib/time.c:TimeInit(110)
Serverzone is -3600
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 0 of length 72
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(96)
netbios connect: name1=OVLCQAP550B name2=OVLCQDL380A
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 1 of length 137
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBnegprot (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(341)
Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0]
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(341)
Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0]
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(341)
Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a]
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(341)
Requested protocol [LM1.2X002]
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(341)
Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1]
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(341)
Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12]
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/negprot.c:reply_negprot(424)
Selected protocol NT LM 0.12
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 2 of length 201
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(806)
Domain=[OVLAB] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000
5.0]
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(811)
sesssetupX:name=[rworwood]
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_wins(518)
resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name OVLCQDL380A<0x20>
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(880)
bind succeeded on port 0
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/nmblib.c:debug_nmb_packet(109)
nmb packet from 192.168.64.66(137) header: id=19188 opcode=Query(0)
response=No
header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=No rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=No
header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=0
question: q_name=OVLCQDL380A<20> q_type=32 q_class=1
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/nmblib.c:debug_nmb_packet(109)
nmb packet from 192.168.64.66(137) header: id=19188 opcode=Query(0)
response=Yes
header: flags: bcast=No rec_avail=Yes rec_des=Yes trunc=No auth=Yes
header: rcode=0 qdcount=0 ancount=1 nscount=0 arcount=0
answers: nmb_name=OVLCQDL380A<20> rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=0
answers 0 char `...@B hex 6000C0A84042
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 2] libsmb/namequery.c:name_query(312)
Got a positive name query response from 192.168.64.66 ( 192.168.64.66 )
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_out(912)
Connecting to 192.168.64.66 at port 139
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_req_chal(223)
cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from OVLCQDL380A to OVLCQAP550B:
48C3667177C4212E
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_session_key(64)
cred_session_key
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95)
cred_create
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(133)
cli_net_auth2: srv:\\OVLCQDL380A acct:OVLCQAP550B$ sc:2 mc: OVLCQAP550B
chal 7562991640CEF475 neg: 1ff
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95)
cred_create
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126)
cred_assert
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95)
cred_create
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon(358)
cli_net_sam_logon: srv:\\OVLCQDL380A mc:OVLCQAP550B clnt 2FE0675A5B7A0A0C
3b37544d ll: 2
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95)
cred_create
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126)
cred_assert
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/reply.c:smb_create_user(507)
smb_create_user: Running the command `' gave 0
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(954)
No such user rworwood - using guest account
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(197)
nobody is in 1 groups: 99
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(275)
uid 99 registered to name nobody
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(277)
Clearing default real name
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(778)
Chained message
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtconX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(313)
Got device type ?????
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(821)
ACCEPTED: guest account and guest ok
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(441)
Connect path is /tmp
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(333)
dos_ChDir to /tmp
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(550)
ovlcqdl380a (192.168.64.66) connect to service IPC$ as user nobody
(uid=99, gid=99) (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(333)
dos_ChDir to /
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(359)
tconX service=ipc$ user=nobody
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 3 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(333)
dos_ChDir to /tmp
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \srvsvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe srvsvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested srvsvc (pipes_open=0)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe srvsvc with handle 701a (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 4 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701a
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\srvsvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=701a nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 5 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701a
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=701a min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 6 of length 176
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=96 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701a
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "srvsvc" (pnum 701a)Doing \PIPE\srvsvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_srvsvc_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
SRV_NETSHAREENUM
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 7 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701a
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name srvsvc pnum=701a (pipes_open=0)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 8 of length 96
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \spoolss.
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(133)
error packet at line 568 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=2 ecode=4
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 9 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \winreg.
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe winreg opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested winreg (pipes_open=0)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe winreg with handle 701b (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 10 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\winreg -> \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=701b nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 11 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=701b min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 12 of length 116
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=36 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0x2 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_OPEN
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129)
Opened policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4D 54 37
3B ........ ....MT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 13 of length 224
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=144 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_OPEN_ENTRY
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144)
Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4D 54 37 3B
........ ....MT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129)
Opened policy hnd[2] [000] 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4D 54 37
3B ........ ....MT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 14 of length 124
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=44 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0x5 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_CLOSE
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144)
Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4D 54 37 3B
........ ....MT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:05, 3] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_lsa_policy_hnd(298)
Closed policy name pnum=1
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 15 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \srvsvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe srvsvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested srvsvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe srvsvc with handle 701c (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 16 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701c
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\srvsvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=701c nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 17 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701c
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=701c min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 18 of length 176
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=96 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701c
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "srvsvc" (pnum 701c)Doing \PIPE\srvsvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_srvsvc_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
SRV_NETSHAREENUM
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 19 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701c
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name srvsvc pnum=701c (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 20 of length 96
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \spoolss.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(133)
error packet at line 568 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=2 ecode=4
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 21 of length 116
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=36 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0x2 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_OPEN
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129)
Opened policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4E 54 37
3B ........ ....NT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 22 of length 224
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=144 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_OPEN_ENTRY
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144)
Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4E 54 37 3B
........ ....NT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129)
Opened policy hnd[3] [000] 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4E 54 37
3B ........ ....NT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 23 of length 124
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=44 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0x5 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_CLOSE
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144)
Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4E 54 37 3B
........ ....NT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_lsa_policy_hnd(298)
Closed policy name pnum=1
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 24 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \wkssvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe wkssvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested wkssvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 701d (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 25 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701d
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\wkssvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=701d nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 26 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701d
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=701d min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 27 of length 152
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=72 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701d
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "wkssvc" (pnum 701d)Doing \PIPE\wkssvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_wkssvc_rpc op 0x0 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
WKS_Q_QUERY_INFO
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 28 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701d
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name wkssvc pnum=701d (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 29 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \srvsvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe srvsvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested srvsvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe srvsvc with handle 701e (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 30 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701e
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\srvsvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=701e nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 31 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701e
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=701e min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 32 of length 152
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=72 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701e
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "srvsvc" (pnum 701e)Doing \PIPE\srvsvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_srvsvc_rpc op 0x15 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
SRV_NET_SRV_GET_INFO
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 33 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701e
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name srvsvc pnum=701e (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 34 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \wkssvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe wkssvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested wkssvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 701f (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 35 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701f
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\wkssvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=701f nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 36 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701f
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=701f min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 37 of length 152
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=72 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701f
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "wkssvc" (pnum 701f)Doing \PIPE\wkssvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_wkssvc_rpc op 0x0 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
WKS_Q_QUERY_INFO
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 38 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701f
[2001/06/25 16:10:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name wkssvc pnum=701f (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 39 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \srvsvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe srvsvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested srvsvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe srvsvc with handle 7020 (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 40 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7020
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\srvsvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=7020 nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 41 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7020
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=7020 min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 42 of length 176
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=96 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7020
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "srvsvc" (pnum 7020)Doing \PIPE\srvsvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_srvsvc_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
SRV_NETSHAREENUM
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 43 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7020
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name srvsvc pnum=7020 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 44 of length 96
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \spoolss.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(133)
error packet at line 568 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=2 ecode=4
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 45 of length 116
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=36 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0x2 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_OPEN
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129)
Opened policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4F 54 37
3B ........ ....OT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 46 of length 224
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=144 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_OPEN_ENTRY
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144)
Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4F 54 37 3B
........ ....OT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129)
Opened policy hnd[4] [000] 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4F 54 37
3B ........ ....OT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 47 of length 124
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=44 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0x5 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_CLOSE
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144)
Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4F 54 37 3B
........ ....OT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_lsa_policy_hnd(298)
Closed policy name pnum=1
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 48 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \srvsvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe srvsvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested srvsvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe srvsvc with handle 7021 (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 49 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7021
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\srvsvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=7021 nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 50 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7021
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=7021 min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 51 of length 176
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=96 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7021
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "srvsvc" (pnum 7021)Doing \PIPE\srvsvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_srvsvc_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
SRV_NETSHAREENUM
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 52 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7021
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name srvsvc pnum=7021 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 53 of length 96
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \spoolss.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(133)
error packet at line 568 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=2 ecode=4
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 54 of length 116
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=36 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0x2 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_OPEN
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129)
Opened policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4F 54 37
3B ........ ....OT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 55 of length 224
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=144 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_OPEN_ENTRY
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144)
Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4F 54 37 3B
........ ....OT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129)
Opened policy hnd[5] [000] 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4F 54 37
3B ........ ....OT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 56 of length 124
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=44 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=701b
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "winreg" (pnum 701b)Doing \PIPE\winreg
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_reg_rpc op 0x5 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: REG_CLOSE
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144)
Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 4F 54 37 3B
........ ....OT7;
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007)
[010] 57 4E 00 00 WN..
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_lsa_policy_hnd(298)
Closed policy name pnum=1
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 57 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \wkssvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe wkssvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested wkssvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 7022 (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 58 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7022
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\wkssvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=7022 nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 59 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7022
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=7022 min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 60 of length 152
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=72 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7022
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "wkssvc" (pnum 7022)Doing \PIPE\wkssvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_wkssvc_rpc op 0x0 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
WKS_Q_QUERY_INFO
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 61 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7022
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name wkssvc pnum=7022 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 62 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \srvsvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe srvsvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested srvsvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe srvsvc with handle 7023 (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 63 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7023
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\srvsvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=7023 nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 64 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7023
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=7023 min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 65 of length 152
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=72 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7023
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "srvsvc" (pnum 7023)Doing \PIPE\srvsvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_srvsvc_rpc op 0x15 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
SRV_NET_SRV_GET_INFO
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 66 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7023
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name srvsvc pnum=7023 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 67 of length 95
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(560)
nt_open_pipe: Opening pipe \wkssvc.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:nt_open_pipe(576)
nt_open_pipe: Known pipe wkssvc opening.
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(115)
Open pipe requested wkssvc (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(204)
Opened pipe wkssvc with handle 7024 (pipes_open=2)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 68 of length 140
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7024
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(696)
api_pipe_bind_req: \PIPE\wkssvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(198)
writeX-IPC pnum=7024 nwritten=72
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 69 of length 63
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7024
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(239)
readX-IPC pnum=7024 min=1024 max=1024 nread=68
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 70 of length 152
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtrans (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(3660)
trans <\PIPE\> data=72 params=0 setup=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(3518)
named pipe command on <> name
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7024
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3320)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "wkssvc" (pnum 7024)Doing \PIPE\wkssvc
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084)
api_rpcTNP: api_wkssvc_rpc op 0x0 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command:
WKS_Q_QUERY_INFO
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 71 of length 45
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBclose (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(186)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(817)
search for pipe pnum=7024
[2001/06/25 16:10:07, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(783)
closed pipe name wkssvc pnum=7024 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 72 of length 141
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(333)
dos_ChDir to /
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(806)
Domain=[] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0]
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(811)
sesssetupX:name=[]
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/password.c:setup_groups(197)
nobody is in 1 groups: 99
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(275)
uid 99 registered to name nobody
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(277)
Clearing default real name
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:chain_reply(778)
Chained message
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtconX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(313)
Got device type ?????
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/password.c:authorise_login(821)
ACCEPTED: guest account and guest ok
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(441)
Connect path is /tmp
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(333)
dos_ChDir to /tmp
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(550)
ovlcqdl380a (192.168.64.66) connect to service IPC$ as user nobody
(uid=99, gid=99) (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] lib/doscalls.c:dos_ChDir(333)
dos_ChDir to /
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(359)
tconX service=ipc$ user=nobody
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 73 of length 80
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtconX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(313)
Got device type ?????
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(284)
Invalid username/password for orchestream
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(133)
error packet at line 166 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143)
error string = No such file or directory
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 74 of length 80
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtconX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(313)
Got device type ?????
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(284)
Invalid username/password for orchestream
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(133)
error packet at line 166 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143)
error string = No such file or directory
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 75 of length 80
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtconX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(313)
Got device type ?????
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(284)
Invalid username/password for orchestream
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(133)
error packet at line 166 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:09, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143)
error string = No such file or directory
[2001/06/25 16:10:15, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 76 of length 80
[2001/06/25 16:10:15, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtconX (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:10:15, 4] smbd/reply.c:reply_tcon_and_X(313)
Got device type ?????
[2001/06/25 16:10:15, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(284)
Invalid username/password for orchestream
[2001/06/25 16:10:15, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(133)
error packet at line 166 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=2 ecode=2
[2001/06/25 16:10:15, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143)
error string = No such file or directory
[2001/06/25 16:11:19, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(621)
Transaction 77 of length 39
[2001/06/25 16:11:19, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(451)
switch message SMBtdis (pid 20055)
[2001/06/25 16:11:19, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(581)
ovlcqdl380a (192.168.64.66) closed connection to service IPC$
[2001/06/25 16:11:19, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(45)
Yielding connection to IPC$
Richard Worwood
___________________________________________________________________________
Support Engineer
T: +44 (0)20 7348 1608 M: +44 (0)7771 662 880 US M: +1 703 963 2042
Orchestream
Avon House, Kensington Village, Avonmore Road, London W14 8TS
T: +44 (0)20 7348 1500 F: +44 (0)20 7348 1501
www.orchestream.com
-----Original Message-----
From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) [mailto:don_mccall@hp.com]
Sent: 25 June 2001 15:58
To: 'Andrew Nelson'; samba@samba.org
Subject: RE: Password / User Authentication...
Hello Andrew,
You are correct; if you have security = domain, and you STILL need a
username/passwd
entry in your smbpasswd file for the user to successfully connect, it
indicates that
the authentication attempt for the user at the domain controller is
FAILING,and samba
is 'falling back' to trying to find the user and appropriate password in
the
local
smbpasswd file (sort of like a 'local user'). So what's really
needing to
be figured out
is why the domain controller is not authenticating your user when Samba does
it's rpc stuff
to request this authentication. Turning on log level = 10 and studying the
log files will
help with this.
You might try removing the samba machine account from the domain controller,
and recreating it,
then joining the domain again from samba using the smbpasswd command...
Hope this helps,
Don
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Nelson [mailto:anelson@vikinglobal.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:18 AM
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Password / User Authentication...
I need a bit of clarity on the following. I have a samba box wich is a
member of a Win2K domain... All is working fine... except that smbpass entry
must be the same as the users password on the Win2K server. I thought that
if a machine is a member of the domain and the settings are properly set up
then the user does not need to have the password set on t
Return-Path: <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from goku.quickweb.com.ph (goku.quickweb.com.ph
[208.235.228.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AFF44526
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 19:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20186 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jun 2001 03:18:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO demo) (208.235.228.19) by
goku.quickweb.com.ph with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 03:18:49 -0000
Message-ID: <003901c0f7d2$19d73160$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
From: "Joey Boy" <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: ME?
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:38:51 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
does samba works with Windows ME?
thnx
Return-Path: <nailed@videotron.ca>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from VL-MS-MR002.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca
[24.201.245.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3644526
for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alain ([24.201.55.103]) by VL-MS-MR002.sc1.videotron.ca
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GFIOXJ02.O7D; Mon, 25
Jun 2001 23:12:55 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Alain Toussaint <nailed@videotron.ca>
To: "Joey Boy" <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>,
<samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: ME?
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:12:55 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <003901c0f7d2$19d73160$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
In-Reply-To: <003901c0f7d2$19d73160$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01062523125502.00730@alain>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> does samba works with Windows ME?
yes
Return-Path: <prgoon@email.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail4.wi.rr.com (fe4.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.51]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628A4802 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from email.com ([65.25.162.153]) by mail4.wi.rr.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:13:34 -0500
Message-ID: <3B37FD7F.4FC12BA9@email.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:11:59 -0500
From: Rajat Goon <prgoon@email.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Windows 2000 cannot logon to Samba automatically
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I have samba 2.2.x running in my redhat box. I have a small network,
the other 2 client is Nt 4.0 and Win 2k Pro and internally
linked by the static ip. I 've the same user name and password setting
in redhat box, nt 4.0 box and win 2k box. From win NT all the shares are
visible and it takes the login/password from nt and
authenticate the samba server but win 2k can see that only after
the explicit login which is popping up when we are trying to access the
shares. I changed the registry settings I changed the local profile to
"Send plain password to 3rd party Samba server" as enabled but
didn't
work. I am giving my smb.conf file, If anyone can help me I'll be really
helpful. I just want to login to win2k and it will in turn automatically
log in to the samba server since the username/password is same as in
linux box.
Thanks,
-Rajat.
"smb.conf"
# This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the
# smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed
# here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too
# many!) most of which are not shown in this example
#
# Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash)
# is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a #
# for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you
# may wish to enable
#
# NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command
"testparm"
# to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors.
#
#======================= Global Settings
====================================[global]
log file = /var/log/samba-log.%m
lock directory = /var/lock/samba
#workgroup = DELUXE
share modes = yes
interfaces = 192.168.1.1/24
security = USER
#netbios name = I78FTA46
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browsable = no
read only = no
create mode = 0750
guest ok = yes
[tmp]
comment = Temporary file space
path = /tmp
read only = no
public = yes
[public]
comment = Public Stuff
path = /home/guest
public = yes
writable = yes
printable = no
[printer]
comment = Printer on Linux box
path = /var/spool/lpd/lp
browsable = no
read only = no
guest ok = yes
print ok = yes
oplocks = no
public = yes
security = share
printable = yes
writable = no
share mode = no
create mode = 0700
[hpDeskJet]
security = share
path = /var/spool/lpd/lp
printer name = lp
writable = yes
public = yes
security = server
printable = yes
print command = lpr -r -h -P %p %s
Return-Path: <skanthak@compuserve.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from demdwu43.mediaways.net (smtp.compuserve.de
[62.52.27.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38EC54F20
for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7090 invoked by uid 4218); 26 Jun 2001 03:14:30 -0000
Received: from pd9e4db0f.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO skanthak)
(217.228.219.15) by relay1b with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 03:14:30 -0000
Message-ID: <056201c0fdee$1d0207d0$c0c0a8c0@dialin.tonline.de>
Reply-To: "Stefan Kanthak" <skanthak@nexgo.de>
From: "Stefan Kanthak" <skanthak@compuserve.de>
To: <jht@samba.org>
Cc: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Typo in docs/NT4-Locking.reg
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 05:13:32 +0200
Organization: Me, myself and I
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello John,
see the following diff for docs/NT4-Locking.reg:
diff -u samba-2.2.0a/docs/NT4-Locking.reg samba-2.2.0b/docs/NT4-Locking.reg
--- samba-2.2.0a/docs/NT4-Locking.reg Sun Feb 14 03:40:06 1999
+++ samba-2.2.0b/docs/NT4-Locking.reg Mon Jun 25 23:38:10 2001
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
REGEDIT4
;Contributor: John H Terpstra <jht@samba.org>
-;Updated: Feb 15, 1999
+;Corrected: Stefan Kanthak <skanthak@nexgo.de>
+;Updated: Jun 25, 2001
;
;Subject: Registry Entries That Affect Locking and Caching
@@ -15,7 +16,8 @@
"UtilizeNtCaching"=dword:00000000
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Filesystem]
-"Win95TruncateExtensions"=dword:00000000
+"Win95TruncatedExtensions"=dword:00000000
+"NTFSDisable8dot3NameCreation"=dword:00000001
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanManServer\Parameters]
"EnableOpLockForceClose"=dword:00000001
Despite the typo in "Win95TruncatedExtensions" I don't see what
this setting has to do with locking. I'd recommend to move it
to a new *.REG of its own, preferrably together with the entry
I added, which gains SOME performance on NTFS volumes with many
files per directory.
regards
Stefan
Return-Path: <gork@blurbco.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from blurbco.com (mail.energynet.com [207.18.68.225]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C574228 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (gork@localhost) by blurbco.com (8.11.1/8.11.1)
with ESMTP id f5Q4Nd108619; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:23:39 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: blurbco.com: gork owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:23:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: John Laur <gork@blurbco.com>
To: Ingmar Koecher <ingmar@algorithmics.com>
Cc: "'samba@lists.samba.org'" <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: dfree, lvm and reiser
In-Reply-To: <19D4D5CB602DD311A4220060943F1F55D62B2C@viemail1.algorithmi
c s.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10106252316080.8562-100000@blurbco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Are you running potato with Samba 2.2.0 compiled by you or have you
compiled it for potato from the deb-src packages in unstable? There are a
great many packages you need to upgrade from stock potato in order to be
able to use kernel 2.4 properly - that is that it will compile and boot
and the system will run fine with stock potato, but your dfree messages
are probably due to this. I am running ReiserFS fine here with Debian
woody, Samba 2.2 (compiled from samba-2.2.0-final2 deb-src packages) and
Kernel 2.4; however, I don't have LVM running. I do at home; though, where
I also run Samba, so I'll check my longs. LVM shouldnt be affecting you
though.
I would recommend compiling and running the Debian maintainer's
installation of samba even if you have to compile it yourself. And make
sure you have everything necessary for full 2.4 support if you are running
potato. Check www.debianhelp.org for an article that will give you an apt
source for potato 2.4 compatibility packages.
As for the oplocks - I have some similar messages in my logs, but no
client problems due to them. I figured it was normal behavior for this
misbehaving network.
John Laur
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Ingmar Koecher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are running Samba 2.2.0 on a 2.4.4 Debian and are having problems
> after the server is running for more than 2 days or so. Unfortunately my
> coworker installed the LVM with ReiserFS - are there any known issues with
> ReiserFS?
>
> I would appreciate any input - thank you.
>
> Those messages appear in the log.smbd all the time:
>
> *) smbd/dfree.c:disk_free(142)
> WARNING: dfree is broken on this system
>
> I am not sure what this means, am I missing something or was something
> missing in the source ? I couldn't find information in the newsgroups
or
> other sources. It turned out that after a while, after running a dir on a
> client, this dir would take very long when it comes to displaying the free
> diskspace. At the same time this entry would appear in the log file.
>
> Other errors that appear in the logfile:
>
> [2001/06/25 11:36:25, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(768)
> oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
> oplock_break failed for file dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/cfcored.lib (dev = a,
> inode = 1181202).
> [2001/06/25 11:36:25, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
> oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file
> dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/cfcored.lib
> [2001/06/25 11:36:25, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4323)
> reply_lockingX: Error : oplock break from client for fnum = 8858 and no
> oplock granted on this file (dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/cfcored.lib).
> [2001/06/25 11:36:55, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(768)
> oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
> oplock_break failed for file dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/zlibstat.lib (dev =
a,
> inode = 1181174).
> [2001/06/25 11:36:55, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
> oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file
> dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/zlibstat.lib
> [2001/06/25 11:36:55, 0] smbd/reply.c:reply_lockingX(4323)
> reply_lockingX: Error : oplock break from client for fnum = 8860 and no
> oplock granted on this file (dev21/cframe/lib/WIN32/zlibstat.lib).
>
> Once again, oddly enough, after a reboot all problems seem to go away for
> the client, the messages in the log remain. Restarting the two daemons does
> not help.
>
>
> Ingmar.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
Return-Path: <gork@blurbco.com>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from blurbco.com (mail.energynet.com [207.18.68.225]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A492E42EB for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (gork@localhost) by blurbco.com (8.11.1/8.11.1)
with ESMTP id f5Q4b6t08685; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:37:11 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: blurbco.com: gork owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:37:06 -0500 (CDT)
From: John Laur <gork@blurbco.com>
To: Bruno BEAUFILS <Bruno.Beaufils@lifl.fr>
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 - Printers - Windows 2000 - Driver upload
In-Reply-To: <15159.26427.731336.354364@watney.lifl.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10106252328500.8562-100000@blurbco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
A workaround (vs. installing from the latest CVS) is to connect to your
samba server as root who will be able to upload the printer drivers. After
you do this then the clients will be able to use them. Try this:
1) Make sure that root is not in 'invalid users' in your smb.conf
[Global]
section.
2) Unmap any drives from this samba server
3) Attempt to access \\sambaserver\root (with a proper [homes] section
this will prompt you for a username/password on your W2K client as it
doesn't currently have credentials able to access this directory.) Enter
'root' and the root password. Then browse to \\sambaserver\ into
"Printers" and you should see the Add Printer Wizard and have access
to
upload printer drivers. All this assuming you have [printer$] set up
correctly.
I think that the root thing was in a FAQ somewhere, though I don't know
that there is any info anywhere on forcing W2k's credentials like this.
When the bug is properly fixed, any user/group listed in admin users
under a printer share (or via printer ACL's) should be able to do driver
uploads, queue management, etc. Best of luck!
John Laur
Return-Path: <wow@net.e.pl>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from demon.szi.pl (demon.szi.pl [195.117.88.17]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99CFA421E for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12540 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jun 2001 05:09:44 -0000
Received: from pe53.rzeszow.sdi.tpnet.pl (HELO jajks) (213.77.160.53) by
demon.szi.pl with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 05:09:44 -0000
Message-ID: <000b01c0fdfe$7f9d2720$0b01010a@fak>
From: "wow" <wow@net.e.pl>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:11:46 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Passed: 1
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
I have samba-2.2.0 as PDC.
I would like configurate samba-2.2.0 as BDC on another computer. How can I
do?
wow
--
http://sklep.e.pl/
Return-Path: <Makis.Marmaridis@learnnow.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from exchange.angusknight.com.au (unknown [203.111.32.219]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B264F4A45 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from AKLN01 ([10.10.60.148]) by exchange.angusknight.com.au
with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version
5.5.2653.13) id NS5LQG0Y; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:18:22 +1000
From: "Makis Marmaridis" <Makis.Marmaridis@learnnow.com.au>
To: "'wow'" <wow@net.e.pl>
Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: (no subject)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:20:57 +1000
Message-ID: <000b01c0fdff$c8082a40$943c0a0a@akln01>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <000b01c0fdfe$7f9d2720$0b01010a@fak>
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Unfortunately, Samba does not support being a BDC at this point in time.
If you do need very high availability you should perhaps look into making a
samba cluster, even though Samba boxes are normally much more reliable and
with higher uptimes than their Windows counterparts.
HTH,
Cheers,
Makis.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On
Behalf Of wow
Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2001 3:12 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: (no subject)
I have samba-2.2.0 as PDC.
I would like configurate samba-2.2.0 as BDC on another computer. How can I
do?
wow
--
http://sklep.e.pl/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C21421E for
<samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5Q5pl519884; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:51:47 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA12806; Tue, 26
Jun 2001 07:51:47 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA01244; Tue, 26 Jun
2001 07:51:42 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
To: densign@danedesign.tv
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:51:41 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: my Samba isnt working.
Cc: samba@samba.org
Message-ID: <3B383F0D.1864.19CEC4@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <FMENLJOFPALEOIBPIACIEEPICAAA.densign@danedesign.tv>
References: <3B36E871.13612.13DCC5@localhost>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Dane,
First: Please send all answers to the list, not only to me so that we
all can help You.
Second: The list doesn't like attechments. Send your logs like this:
log.smbd:
[2001/06/24 19:54:11, 1] smbd/server.c:main(641)
smbd version 2.0.7 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998
[2001/06/24 19:54:11, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216)
file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are
available.
[2001/06/24 19:54:12, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(824)
Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host server01.aptusinteractive.com
[2001/06/24 19:54:15, 1] smbd/server.c:main(641)
smbd version 2.0.7 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998
[2001/06/24 19:54:15, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216)
file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are
available.
[2001/06/24 19:54:15, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(824)
Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host server01.aptusinteractive.com
Or:
[2001/06/24 00:20:13, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(824)
Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host localhost.localdomain
An other smbd-Log, called laptop.smbd:
[2001/06/21 21:11:30, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(492)
Couldn't find user 'dane ensign' in UNIX password database.
[2001/06/21 21:11:30, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(492)
Couldn't find user 'dane ensign' in UNIX password database.
[2001/06/21 21:11:30, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(925)
Rejecting user 'dane ensign': authentication failed
[2001/06/21 21:11:43, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(550)
laptop (192.168.254.251) connect to service www as user densign
(uid=500, gid=500) (pid 5324)
[2001/06/21 21:11:44, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(550)
laptop (192.168.254.251) connect to service www as user densign
(uid=500, gid=500) (pid 5324)
[2001/06/21 21:11:44, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(583)
laptop (192.168.254.251) closed connection to service www
[2001/06/21 21:56:09, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(583)
laptop (192.168.254.251) closed connection to service www
OK,
Your samba starts and is running. You have problems with connecting
to the samba server. You seem to have a problem with the name
resolution: Even localhost.localdomain can not be resolved. You
should have big problems with this box in all services (ftp, ssh,
telnet, ping, ....) check /etc/resolve.conf, /etc/nsswitch.conf,
/etc/hosts, ...
The laptop-Log shows that you don't have a user "dane ensign" on
unix
and probably a space in a unix user name isn't that good. Check your
/etc/passwd and set up a user map in samba if you need that user
name. But I would not start with this. An then there are to fine
conections of densign to the share www. Where is the problem?
Christian
> Christian,
>
> Here are the log files that I found for Samba. I hope they are the right
> ones.
> I am not really sure about the errors.
>
> Dane
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Barth [mailto:barth@cck.uni-kl.de]
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 11:30 PM
> To: samba@samba.org; Dane Ensign
> Subject: Re: my Samba isnt working.
>
>
> > I am trying to setup a samba share in webmin but when i click on the
start
> > samba server it acts as if it started
> > but it really didnt. I tried it from a terminal on the linux box and
again
> > it acted as if it did but really it didnt.
> What error messeges do you get? Any thing in the logs?
>
> Christian
>
> > How might I try to fix it?
> >
> > Thank you very much for any help that you can offer.
> >
> > Dane Ensign
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE993421E for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 22:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5Q5uJ520133; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:56:19 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA12914; Tue, 26
Jun 2001 07:56:19 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA01330; Tue, 26 Jun
2001 07:56:20 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth@cck.uni-kl.de>
To: <samba@lists.samba.org>, "Mike Loiterman"
<mloiterman@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:56:18 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Cannot access SMB shares from 2000
Message-ID: <3B384022.20098.1E0BEB@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <LAW2-OE42ySsxVY60mJ00000522@hotmail.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ===PROBLEM==> Unable to browse SMB shares from Windows 2000 Network
Neighborhood.
>
> ===CONFIGURATION==> Redhat 7.1
> Samba 2.0.7: 1 machine
> Windows 2000 Professional: 1 machine
>
> ===TROUBLESHOOTING STEPS AND RESULTS==> Failed tests are marked by **
> #. TEST: RESULT
>
> 1. testparm: ok
> 2. ping Linux IP from Windows: ok
> 3. ping Windows IP from Linux: ok
> **4. ping Linux Hostname from Windows: "Unknown host
SERVERNAME"
Solve this problem an the others should go away. Check the DNS
settings in the network configuration of the Windows PC. If you do
not have a reliable dns-server on the network, you may use
%WINNT%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts. At least this works on NT.
> 5. ping Windows Hostname from Linux: ok
> 6. smbclient -NL WINDOWS_SERVER_HOSTNAME: ok
> 7. smbclient -NL LOCALHOST: ok
> 8. smbclient -NL LINUX_SERVER_HOSTNAME: ok
> 9. nmblookup -B LINUX_SERVER_HOSTNAME __SAMBA__: ok
> 10. nmblookup -B WINDOWS_SERVER_HOSTNAME '*': ok
> 11. smbmount \\WINDOWS_SERVER_HOSTNAME: ok
> **12. net view \\LINUX_SERVER_HOSTNAME: "System error 53 has
> occured. The Network path was not found."
> **13. net use x: \\LINUX_SERVER_HOSTNAME\SHARE: "System error 53
> has occured. The Network path was not found."
> **14. Able to see linux shares in Network Neighborhood, but cannot
> browse. Error: "The Network path was not found."
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use
<http://www.pgp.com>
>
> iQA/AwUBOzbfXHJ6B0BI4qMYEQJbvgCg/iyRajkE5AvxiSxcx+9ZpT4RNEQAnR/F
> jCt2enCrRdLuDNA/AhCGIiMs
> =ALQ+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
>
_______________________________________________________________________
In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN)
Return-Path: <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from goku.quickweb.com.ph (goku.quickweb.com.ph
[208.235.228.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E2234CCA
for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21975 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jun 2001 06:25:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO demo) (208.235.228.19) by
goku.quickweb.com.ph with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 06:25:05 -0000
Message-ID: <015201c0f7ec$1f33b9c0$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
From: "Joey Boy" <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Good day!
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:45:07 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
good day to all of you i have the ff. question pls. help me thanks!
1, is it necessary for samba to stop smbd and nmbd while im editing my
smb.conf file or changing anything concerning to samba? if yes how?
2, how to restart my samba after i finished editing my smb.conf?
Return-Path: <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from goku.quickweb.com.ph (goku.quickweb.com.ph
[208.235.228.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FBCA4E9C
for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22752 invoked by uid 0); 26 Jun 2001 06:28:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO demo) (208.235.228.19) by
goku.quickweb.com.ph with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 06:28:59 -0000
Message-ID: <016501c0f7ec$a9e0d300$13e4ebd0@manilaonline.net>
From: "Joey Boy" <joeyboy@quickweb.com.ph>
To: <samba@samba.org>
Subject: help!
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:48:59 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
on my log.nmb file:
[2001/06/20 18:03:22, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755)
Packet send failed to 208.235.228.31(137) ERRNO=Network is unreachable
[2001/06/20 18:03:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_netbios_packet(172)
send_netbios_packet: send_packet() to IP 208.235.228.31 port 137 failed
[2001/06/20 18:03:22, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namerelease.c:release_name(231)
release_name: Failed to send packet trying to release name SUPER<03> IP
208.23
5.228.21
on my log.smb file:
[2001/06/26 12:59:38, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(925)
Rejecting user 'glenn': authentication failed
[2001/06/26 12:59:44, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(925)
Rejecting user 'glenn': authentication failed
[2001/06/26 12:59:44, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(925)
Rejecting user 'glenn': authentication failed
[2001/06/26 13:00:48, 0] smbd/chgpasswd.c:check_oem_password(644)
check_lanman_password: account walter disabled.
[2001/06/26 13:01:04, 0] smbd/chgpasswd.c:check_oem_password(644)
check_lanman_password: account walter disabled.
[2001/06/26 13:01:29, 0] smbd/chgpasswd.c:check_oem_password(644)
check_lanman_password: account walter disabled.
[2001/06/26 13:01:48, 0] smbd/chgpasswd.c:check_oem_password(644)
check_lanman_password: account walter disabled.
i cant open my samba server icon on my network neighborhood, coz it always
prompt me to a password. i created my smbpasswd file. which password im going
to use? is it the acct. on my smbpasswd file? pls. help!!!
thnx everybody!!!
Return-Path: <goetz.reinicke@filmakademie.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mail.filmakademie.de (mail.filmakademie.de
[193.196.129.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
876444216 for <samba@samba.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filmakademie.de (g3goetz.filmakademie.de [172.17.20.7])
by mail.filmakademie.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5Q6p8x31583 for
<samba@samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:51:08 +0200
Message-ID: <3B383FA7.564CA79E@filmakademie.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:54:15 +0100
From: Goetz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke@filmakademie.de>
Organization: Filmakademie
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: de,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ml <samba@samba.org>
Subject: Deleted files are still locked
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I'm a little confused:
on my RH7.1-Server I have a temp-share, that will be deleted once a day
in the night. I noticed, that smbstatus showes a lot of locked (but
removed) files like:
Locked files:
Pid DenyMode R/W Oplock Name
--------------------------------------------------
4346 DENY_ALL WRONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH
/temp_animation/Benutzer/mixdowm.mov Tue Jun 26 06:55:36 2001
2608 DENY_WRITE RDONLY NONE
/temp_animation/ray/RADVideo/vic32.dll Mon Jun 25 13:20:53 2001
4342 DENY_ALL WRONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH
/temp_animation/Benutzer/lamerklein Tue Jun 26 05:09:38 2001
2608 DENY_WRITE RDONLY NONE
/temp_animation/ray/RADVideo/binkmake.dll Mon Jun 25 13:24:52 2001
2608 DENY_WRITE RDONLY LEVEL_II
/temp_animation/ray/RADVideo/radvideo.exe Mon Jun 25 13:20:52 2001
2608 DENY_WRITE RDONLY NONE
/temp_animation/ray/RADVideo/bink.exe Mon Jun 25 13:24:51 2001
2957 DENY_ALL WRONLY EXCLUSIVE+BATCH
/temp_animation/Caravan.mpg Mon Jun 25 16:09:35 2001
2608 DENY_WRITE RDONLY NONE
/temp_animation/ray/RADVideo/radutil.dll Mon Jun 25 13:20:52 2001
so can someone explain me the DenyMode and the Oplock? Thanks.
cu...
...Gvtz - reinicke@linux.de
Return-Path: <haakon.einertsen@eterra.no>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mailrelay.merkantildata.com (mailrelay.merkantildata.com
[195.0.204.54]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DBC442B
for <samba@samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from osl01fw.merkantildata.no (osl02fw.merkantildata.com
[195.0.204.6]) by mailrelay.merkantildata.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP
id KAA17058 for <samba@samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:27:32 +0200
From: haakon.einertsen@eterra.no
Received: from no.name.available by osl01fw.merkantildata.no via smtpd
(for mailrelay.merkantildata.com [195.0.204.54]) with SMTP; 26 Jun
2001 08:27:32 UT
Received: from osl01fw.merkantildata.no (unverified) by (Content
Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id <T5460ac5a3aac1002f2598@> for
<samba@samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:26:00 +0200
Received: from osl-06-msg.merkantildata.no by osl01fw.merkantildata.no
via smtpd (for [172.16.2.242]) with SMTP; 26 Jun 2001 08:27:31 UT
Received: by osl-06-msg.merkantildata.no with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <NNPJA65B>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:27:32 +0200
Message-ID: <51A8E31DE32DD211A0590008C71E7E4C019E2936@TRO-03-MSG>
To: samba@samba.org
Subject: Problems
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:27:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello
I`m a consultant from Norway.
I have a problem with one of my samba users.
- we have an IBM RS/6000 machine witk AIX 4.3.3
- Samba v.2 .06 was upgraded from 1.9.18 six months ago
- Concorde with no database (as Oracle etc....) Just its own Native
database.
- Clients are Win95/98/2000 and NTWS 4
The problem is that the database file for Concorde become corrupt 3-5 times
a week
The customer has to reindex the file everytime.Sometimes he has to restore
this file from tape.
I have searched the nett and in my opinion its something about
"oplocks" or
maybe i should go back to the eralier version off
samba 1.9.18.
Or maybe its something with the clients.
The customer have an NT 4 Server that`s stands as an "password-server"
for
samba .
Here is the smb.conf file
<<Samba smb fil Microplast.doc>>
IF someone can help me here i would be very happy.
PS. The concorde database file is no moved over to the NT 4 server, and they
have now no problems at all.
Med vennlig hilsen
Hekon Einertsen
Gruppeleder Unix
PM IBM RS/6000 og IBM Storage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Direkte: 73 53 95 82 Mobil: 92 26 46 80
Sentralbord: 73 53 95 00 Telefaks: 73 53 95 01
E-post: Haakon.Einertsen@eterra.no
Eterra as,
Stiklestadveien 3
7489 TRONDHEIM
Organisasjonsnr. 976239997
http://www.eterra.no
Et Merkantildata selskap.
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/msword which had a name
of Samba smb fil Microplast.doc]
Return-Path: <Jens-Uwe.Walther@force.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from proxy.force.de (proxy.force.de [158.116.254.130]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80562420F for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ex-deu-munich02.force.de (ex-deu-munich02.force.de
[10.254.2.10]) by proxy.force.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id
f5Q8vi510579 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:57:44
+0200 (MET DST)
Received: from nick.force.de ([10.254.1.6]) by ex-deu-munich02.force.de
with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version
5.5.2651.58) id NCXJJ201; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:57:44 +0200
Received: from hotzenplotz.force.de (hotzenplotz [192.168.30.45]) by
nick.force.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5Q8vdq24300 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:57:39 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from hotzenplotz (hotzenplotz.force.de [192.168.30.45]) by
hotzenplotz.force.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA20344 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:57:43 +0200 (MEST)
Message-Id: <200106260857.KAA20344@hotzenplotz.force.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:57:43 +0200 (MEST)
From: Jens-Uwe Walther <Jens-Uwe.Walther@force.de>
Reply-To: Jens-Uwe Walther <Jens-Uwe.Walther@force.de>
Subject: multiple smbd setup with same binaries ?
To: samba@lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: qp56chDglYRuiItIlrDjWA=X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4
SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
I 'm running samba 2.2.0 on Solaris 2.7. I want to setup two completly
separate smbd processes for a high availibility cluster each with it's
own lock and log directory and different smb.conf files.
# ps -ef|grep smbd
root 671 1 0 12:39:37 ? 0:00 ./smbd -D -s
../lib/smb.conf.satriani -l /opt/samba-2.2.0/var/satriani/log.smbd
root 1080 1 0 13:02:36 ? 0:00 ./smbd -D -s
../lib/smb.conf.hotzenplotz -l /opt/samba-2.2.0/var/hotzenplotz/lo
# more ../lib/smb.conf.hotzenplotz
[global]
workgroup = FORCE
netbios name = hotzenplotz
server string = Samba %v %h
interfaces = 192.168.30.45/24
bind interfaces only = true
socket address = 192.168.30.45
map to guest = Bad user
log level = 1
syslog = 0
log file = /opt/samba-2.2.0/var/hotzenplotz/log.%m
lock dir = /opt/samba-2.2.0/var/hotzenplotz/locks
max log size = 10
deadtime = 5
os level = 31
domain master = no
local master = no
wins server = 199.182.40.12
name resolve order = wins hosts bcast
# make sure you 've domain account for samba server to NT domain
# and typed "smbpasswd -j DOM -r DOMPDC" before
security = domain
password server = md-deu-force01
encrypt passwords = true
username map = /opt/samba-2.2.0/private/users.map.hotzenplotz
smb passwd file = /opt/samba-2.2.0/private/smbpasswd.hotzenplotz
...
Both servers must run in an NT domain "FORCE". But it seems that
"smbpasswd -j FORCE -r <pdcname>" of the second server join
only overwrites
the existing "private/secrets.tdb" file and after that the first
server
cannot take part in the domain anymore. It was possible with samba 2.0.x
because the name of the machine trust account file included the domain
name and machine name DOMAIN.MACHINE.mac.
So my questions is: Is this actually a bug or is it possible to maintain
secrets.tdb for multiple entries.
Sure it is possible to compile samba with different --prefix compile
time directives and this is my cureent cluster setup which works well for
month. But I want to maintain only one set of binaries !
So I use the following trick. I set the "netbios name =
hotzenplotz" for both
servers so they can use the same "secrets.tdb". I only get a WINS
server error
when trying to register the name the second time. But htis doesn't matter
because the clients only use the "netbios aliases".
[global]
workgroup = FORCE
netbios name = hotzenplotz
netbios aliases = satriani
server string = Samba %v %h
interfaces = 192.168.30.46/24
bind interfaces only = true
socket address = 192.168.30.46
map to guest = Bad user
log level = 1
syslog = 0
log file = /opt/samba-2.2.0/var/satriani/log.%m
lock dir = /opt/samba-2.2.0/var/satriani/locks
max log size = 10
deadtime = 5
os level = 31
domain master = no
local master = no
wins server = 199.182.40.12
name resolve order = wins hosts bcast
# make sure you 've domain account for samba server to NT domain
# and typed "smbpasswd -j DOM -r DOMPDC" before
security = domain
password server = md-deu-force01
encrypt passwords = true
username map = /opt/samba-2.2.0/private/users.map.satriani
smb passwd file = /opt/samba-2.2.0/private/smbpasswd.satriani
...
This works fine but now I went the second step and run one of the servers on the
second host. But then only nmbd can start, smbd panics:
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 6] param/loadparm.c:(2140)
lp_file_list_changed()
file /opt/samba-2.2.0/lib/smb.conf.satriani ->
/opt/samba-2.2.0/lib/smb.conf.satriani last mod_time: Tue Jun 26 10:54:53 2001
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 2] lib/interface.c:(85)
added interface ip=192.168.30.46 bcast=192.168.30.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 5] lib/hash.c:(72)
Hash size = 521.
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 6] lib/charset.c:(339)
codepage_initialise: client code page = 850
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 5] lib/charset.c:(196)
load_client_codepage: loading codepage 850.
Adding chars 0x85 0xb7 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xa0 0xb5 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x83 0xb6 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xc6 0xc7 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x84 0x8e (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x86 0x8f (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x91 0x92 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x87 0x80 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x8a 0xd4 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x82 0x90 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x88 0xd2 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x89 0xd3 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x8d 0xde (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xa1 0xd6 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x8c 0xd7 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x8b 0xd8 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xd0 0xd1 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xa4 0xa5 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x95 0xe3 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xa2 0xe0 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x93 0xe2 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xe4 0xe5 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x94 0x99 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x9b 0x9d (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x97 0xeb (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xa3 0xe9 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x96 0xea (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x81 0x9a (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xec 0xed (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0xe7 0xe8 (l->u = True) (u->l = True)
Adding chars 0x9c 0x0 (l->u = False) (u->l = False)
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 5] lib/util_unistr.c:(546)
load_unicode_map: loading unicode map for codepage 850.
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 3] smbd/server.c:(731)
loaded services
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 3] smbd/server.c:(739)
Becoming a daemon.
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 8] lib/util.c:(1370)
fcntl_lock 6 34 0 1 2
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 8] lib/util.c:(1410)
fcntl_lock: Lock call successful
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 0] lib/fault.c:(40)
==============================================================[2001/06/26
10:54:58, 0] lib/fault.c:(41)
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 2595 (2.2.0)
Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution
[2001/06/26 10:54:58, 0] lib/fault.c:(43)
==============================================================[2001/06/26
10:54:58, 0] lib/util.c:(1158)
PANIC: internal error
Any ideas are welcome.
Uwe Walther
Return-Path: <abruno@zeta.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba@us5.samba.org
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588CF420F for
<samba@us5.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 02:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zeta.org.au (ppp9.dyn144.pacific.net.au [210.23.144.9])
by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA25933 for
<samba@us5.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:12:26 +1000
From: Andrew Bruno <abruno@zeta.org.au>
To: Samba Mailing list <samba@us5.samba.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:12:23 +1000
Message-ID: <yam8577.1182.140497736@mail.zeta.org.au>
X-Mailer: YAM 2.2 [040] AmigaOS E-Mail Client (c) 1995-2000 by Marcel
Beck http://www.yam.ch
Subject: nmbd problems - I think.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
Folks, I have been away for a while and have missed a bit.
Sorry. :-/
I hope this is not something I have just missed, but this is the problem:
I have a nmbd in my config but sometimes, it goes crazy and starts to cause
errors.
Firstly this is my "config" file:
## This file was generated by GENESiSPrefs 1.0.6
##
#ntalk dgram tcp wait root amitcp:serv/talkd
#ntalk dgram udp wait root amitcp:serv/talkd (talkd)
amiganetfs stream tcp nowait root amitcp:serv/netfs-server
AmiPhone stream tcp nowait root amitcp:serv/AmiPhoned
chargen dgram udp nowait root internal
chargen stream tcp nowait root internal
daytime dgram udp nowait root internal
daytime stream tcp nowait root internal
discard dgram udp nowait root internal
discard stream tcp nowait root internal
echo dgram udp nowait root internal
echo stream tcp nowait root internal
finger stream tcp nowait nobody amitcp:serv/in.fingerd
-in.fingerd amitcp:s/.plan
ftp stream tcp nowait root AmiTCP:serv/ftpd in.ftpd
ident stream tcp nowait nobody amitcp:serv/in.identd
-in.identd
login stream tcp nowait root amitcp:serv/telserd -telserd
-r
#netbios-ns dgram udp wait root amitcp:bin/nmbd nmbd -H
SAMBA:lib/lmhosts#
##netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root amitcp:bin/smbd smbd
quote stream tcp dos bin - echo "I'm not in a
smart mood today."
swat stream tcp nowait root samba:bin/swat swat -a
telnet stream tcp nowait root amitcp:serv/telserd -telserd
time dgram udp nowait root internal
time stream tcp nowait root internal
whois stream tcp dos bin - echo The whois service
is not installed
I have highlited the line which causes the problem.
Samba is installed to allow me to "network" between my 586 and
"this"
machine.
If I am doing local stuff, no problems, but if I am online, it CAN go mad.
This is an example of the error log:
Sun Jun 24 09:20:10 2001 [warn ]: inetd[8912698]: amitcp:bin/nmbd: exit
status 0x1
Sun Jun 24 09:20:12 2001 [warn ]: inetd[8912698]: amitcp:bin/nmbd: exit
status 0x1
I *SUSPECT* this URL:
http://www.blackstar.co.uk
or one of their sub-pages.
(Maybe the "about" page)
No sorry, you ain't getting my cookie. ;-)
I don't know how to find out if it is though.
Any onew mind helping me?
Cya!
--
I'd love to, but you know how we psychos are.
Andrew Bruno
abruno@zeta.org.au
Return-Path: <Wolfgang.Kramarczyk@asys-online.de>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from post.webmailer.de (natpost.webmailer.de [192.67.198.65])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76A143FF for
<samba@samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 02:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asys-online.de (p3EE34524.dip.t-dialin.net
[62.227.69.36]) by post.webmailer.de (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id
LAA13454; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:17:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <3B385403.8060406@asys-online.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:21:07 +0200
From: Wolfgang Kramarczyk <Wolfgang.Kramarczyk@asys-online.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; de-DE; m18)
Gecko/20001106 Netscape6/6.0
X-Accept-Language: de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: forums@redhat.com, samba@samba.org
Subject: A Linux/Samba/Windows 2000 printingproblem
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hello,
Problem description
Installed Samba versions: Version 2.0.7
Version 2.0.8
Version 2.2.0
System environment: RedHat Linux 7.0 (Server)
Windows 2000 (no Service Pack)
Epson printer
Kyocera printer
100 MBit Network
Occasionally, there is a problem when our Linux server sends a printer
job to a printer connected to a Windows 2000 client.
What in such cases happens, is that the file generated by Samba seems to
be OK, at least as far as we can judge, but what the Windows client gets
is not so. In cases, when all works fine, the Windows 2000 spooler gets
2 files, one containing the data to be printed and a small one
containing solely a few bytes (just 2 or 4 CR/LF). In cases, where the
problem occurs, only the second file (the small one) is received.
Unfortunately, we are not able to reproduce that problem and it occurs
rather seldom. Has anybody already experienced that problem? Any idea,
what can we do, to avoid it?
Dr. Wolfgang Kramarczyk
ASYS Softwareentwicklung GmbH
Im Lipperfeld 25
D-46047 Oberhausen
Wolfgang.Kramarczyk@asys-online.de
Return-Path: <abruno@zeta.org.au>
Delivered-To: samba@us5.samba.org
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4948420F for
<samba@us5.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 02:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zeta.org.au (ppp9.dyn144.pacific.net.au [210.23.144.9])
by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA26495 for
<samba@us5.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:19:25 +1000
From: Andrew Bruno <abruno@zeta.org.au>
To: Samba Mailing list <samba@us5.samba.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:19:22 +1000
Message-ID: <yam8577.1146.140497736@mail.zeta.org.au>
X-Mailer: YAM 2.2 [040] AmigaOS E-Mail Client (c) 1995-2000 by Marcel
Beck http://www.yam.ch
Subject: Password problems from PC to other machine.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
Another problem.
If any of you people use an Amiga computer you may be able to help me
quicker.
Setup:
PC 586 and an Amiga.
Encrypted passwords set on both.
The Amiga can see all the PC drives, but if I Network to the Amiga, I get a
requestor asking me for a password.
Now, I am not sure if I should have the network as "user" or,
"share". One
day though I did get it working. VERY HAPPY.
Then it didn't the next time. I didn't change anything. All that
happened
was a total power down of both machines.
Ok, the setting of "user" or "share" may be a problem, I
don't know.
Im SAMBA:private there is a file with passwords
This is what it looks like:
(think think) No sorry. Security risk.
Suffice to say that there is a line with the PC's "name" in it,
but that
doesn't work.
When I got the network working, I had played with smbd program.
Alas I can't get it to work again.
Looking at the samba HTTP page, there is a "password" page, and there
is a
"create user", "change password", etc.
Bingo! This is how to do it!
Doesn't work.
I delete the line in that file for the PC and say "create new user"
and then
make a password.
Looking at all that happens, the programs run, but NOTHING is saved to my
machine: User name or password.
I think that is a problem.
Can anyone help me please?
Cya!
--
Now is the time for all good men to come to.
Andrew Bruno
abruno@zeta.org.au
Return-Path: <robert.casties@philo.unibe.ch>
Delivered-To: samba@samba.org
Received: from mailhub.unibe.ch (mailhub.unibe.ch [130.92.9.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C4344A3 for
<samba@samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 03:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by mailhub.unibe.ch (PMDF V5.2-32
#42480) id <0GFJ00E019M11K@mailhub.unibe.ch> for samba@samba.org; Tue,
26 Jun 2001 12:39:38 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ubecx01 (ubecx01.unibe.ch [130.92.6.40]) by
mailhub.unibe.ch (PMDF V5.2-32 #42480) with ESMTP id
<0GFJ001LG9M1YZ@mailhub.unibe.ch> for samba@samba.org; Tue, 26 Jun
2001 12:39:37 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from idcasties.unibe.ch (idcasties.unibe.ch [130.92.7.160]) by
ubecx01.unibe.ch (PMDF V5.2-32 #42481) with ESMTP id
<0GFJ00C939MGTS@ubecx01.unibe.ch> for samba@samba.org; Tue, 26 Jun
2001 12:39:52 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:39:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Robert Casties <robert.casties@philo.unibe.ch>
Subject: Re: grant a pdc user admin priv?
In-reply-to: <013601c0fd96$dc18abe0$0600a8c0@elbles>
X-X-Sender: <casties@idcasties.unibe.ch>
To: samba@samba.org
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106261053550.7749-100000@idcasties.unibe.ch>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Sean P. Elble wrote:
> Sure can; to do this, you have to use the following line in smb.conf:
>
> domain admin group = @usergroup
But that makes these users domain administrators, i.e. they have
administrator privileges on every machine they log on to.
I think the problem was to set up users as administrators only on their
local box. This can be achieved by adding the network user to the local
administrator group. But you have to go and set it up on every machine.
[...]
> > My problem is that the users are logged in via the samba pdc and I
don't
> > see any obvious way to grant privelege's to network users on their
local
> > workstation.
> >
> > With a samba 2.2.X PDC and Win2k SP1 clients is it at all possible to
> > effectivly turn my network users into Administrator temporarily to
> > facilitate this software install?
--
Robert Casties --------------------- http://philoscience.unibe.ch/~casties
History & Philosophy of Science Tel: +41/31/631-8505 Room: 216
Institute for Exact Sciences Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern
Uni Bern (PGP key on homepage: D7 2B DE 64 2D 65 16 A0)
Return-Path: <juergen@maihoefner.de>
Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org
Received: from gecko.sbs.de (gecko.sbs.de [194.138.37.40]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EA944FD for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 04:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: juergen@maihoefner.de (at relayer gecko.sbs.de)
Received: from mail.fth.sbs.de (mail.fth.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by
gecko.sbs.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5QBQvV12669 for
<samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:26:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fthw323a.fthw.siemens.de (fthw323a.fthw.siemens.de
[157.163.160.123]) by mail.fth.sbs.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
f5QBQuw24550 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:26:56
+0200 (MET DST)
Received: by fthw323a.fthw.siemens.de with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <GR3AZMCQ>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:26:56 +0200
Received: from maihoefner.de (fthw024x.fthw.siemens.de [157.163.160.24])
by fthw345a.fthw.siemens.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet
Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id GTFRJLV9; Tue, 26 Jun 2001
13:26:45 +0200
From: "Maihoefner Juergen (Ext.)"
<Ext.Juergen.Maihoefner@fthw.siemens.de>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Message-ID: <3B3871E6.1B3CB45B@maihoefner.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:28:38 +0200
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: ru, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: samba y ldap
References: <20010622124418.67EBD4B2A@lists.samba.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-admin@lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba@lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General questions regarding Samba <samba.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>,
<mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/
Hi,
> Message: 12
> Subject: Re: samba y ldap
>
> Even though ldap stores your unix passwords in some encrypted form, when
> pam is called, it receives the plaintext password from the authenticating
> program (be it login or sshd or whatever). Then pam feeds it to ldap,
> which encrypts it according to whatever method is needed and compares the
> hashes. In samba, the password is arriving at the samba server already
> hashed, so samba can't pass on a plaintext version to pam. Also, the
> hashing algorithm is not the same as standard unix crypts or md5s, so we
> can simply compare hashes. (Are the samba hashes 2-way? if so, then why
> can't samba unencrypt the passwords and send them to pam in plain?)
>
> I'm using a variety of scripts to keep my three entries per person
> synchronized. It's not too bad. Of course it will be ideal when We
can
> get win2k, samba and kerberos to all play nice together. Then kerberos
> can be the one authentication database (using ldap for session/account
> information).
>
> Michael
Has anyone looked at NT-Sync Service form iPlanet/Netscape's Directory
Server ?
They fixed the problem using a DLL, which captures the password before it
is crypted.
