similar to: No subject

\\Pettit Connect As: Password: On the server side, I didn't get far because the domain name come up NULL so it failed on that test. Below are two logs log98.txt and log2000.txt that show full debug info. I might just have a stupid configuration or installation mistakes. I am sure that my basic configuration must work since it is a very typical setup. Any help will be highly appreciated

Are you using wins? Try lmhosts for the start? Are all machines on the same subnet? Just a few hints to start with ... Christian > > > I have absolutely no clue what I could do to fix it. The only solution I > can think of, is to downgrade to redhat 6.2. > > Your help would be greatly appreciated. > > Stefan Kaes > > portax.com GmbH > Zielstattstrasse 40, Geb.

-------- --Multipart_Thu_Apr__8_13:33:51_1999-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Hello guys, I always wondered why smbclient keeps timestamp in `put'ting a file but does not keep it in `get'ting a file. Alternative to keep the time stamp in `get'ting file is to use -Tc option or smbtar script, but they are a bit hairy for interactive use, and it can only dump files with an

smbclient (and smbtar) in version 2.2.7a (and prior) has problems with large files (> 4GB). The following patch (against 2.2.7a) fixes all known problems with this. This code has been checked into the CVS tree in all branches as well. -- ====================================================================== Herb Lewis Silicon Graphics Networking Engineer

server machine or OS, just the samba stuff and some interaction with 98/ME and apparently 2000 in my testing. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Allison" <jeremy@valinux.com> To: "cpctc" <cpctc@vt.edu> Cc: <samba@lists.samba.org> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 2:59 AM Subject: Re: samba transmits only one packet per second > On Sat, Jul 14,

have a hosts allow or hosts deny line in your smb.conf. If you don't want samba to do reverse lookups, then comment out any allow/deny hosts lines in your smb.conf file. Don -----Original Message----- From: future@yxtc.edu.cn [mailto:future@yxtc.edu.cn] Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 3:00 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: dns and samba Hi, I find that my samba server always does

When I run smbclient 1. smbclient //LINUX01//homes -U test password is requested, I enter the password, and I get in 2. smbclient //LINUX01//homes -U Jane password is requested, I enter the password, and I cannot get in (ERRSV - ERRbadpw (Bad Password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid) 3. smbclient

net use * \\samba\mgerdts Debug level 10 says: [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(554) Couldn't find user 'mgerdts' in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(951) NT Password did not match for user 'mgerdts'! [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(961)

the files when you attempt to rename it. This is caused by Window's Media Player loading the file when you click on it. To work around this I had to go into Windows Explorer and change the folder options from "Enable Web Contents in Folders" to "Use Windows Classic Folders". This way, Windows Media player won't load the file when you click on it. Just trying to save

... (port 138, setting options)... [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 3] nmbd/nmbd.c:(541) open_sockets: Broadcast sockets opened. [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 2] lib/interface.c:(85) added interface ip=141.43.132.161 bcast=141.43.132.191 nmask=255.255.255.192 [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 3] lib/util_sock.c:(832) bind succeeded on port 137 ... (port 138, setting options)... [2001/07/10 20:11:23, 2]

remove unix password sync = yes Reply on a question.... http://www.mail-archive.com/redhat-devel-list@redhat.com/msg04223.html Good Luck, Ries Return-Path: <ries@franksintl.nl> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl [195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6771C4AC8 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Thu, 17

Please note that Windows 9x clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this article. Therefore the protocol for support Windows 9x style domain logons is completely different from NT4 domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. Did you read this document? Let me know what needs to be updated and i will take care of it. Cheers, jerry

why the install is failing. Do in need to rpm -e on all the 2.07 packages??? Return-Path: <nikolaus@erlm.siemens.de> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B884C4278 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Sun, 27 May 2001 22:05:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from

share in the samba box, from the PDC server itself. The log.winbindd and log.nmbd are empty. [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(865) Domain=[EERDBR001] NativeOS=[Windows NT 1381] NativeLanMan=[] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(876) sesssetupX:name=[administrator] [2001/08/08 13:11:28, 3] libsmb/namequery.c:resolve_lmhosts(733)

Are you using wins? Try lmhosts for the start? Are all machines on the same subnet? Just a few hints to start with ... Christian > > > I have absolutely no clue what I could do to fix it. The only solution I > can think of, is to downgrade to redhat 6.2. > > Your help would be greatly appreciated. > > Stefan Kaes > > portax.com GmbH > Zielstattstrasse 40,

<-----------------------------------------------------------------------> Changes to user passwords are captured by a special DLL, which traps and then stores the password changes in encrypted form in a private area. On each synchronization schedule, the synchronization service first examines the SAM file for changes, and then checks this private area for passwords to be synchronized. Once

Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed by the SAMBA dev people.. Regards, Marc. Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com

read list (S) This is a list of users that are given read-only access to a service. If the connecting user is in this list then they will not be given write access, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no matter what the writeable option is set to. The

it were a Microsoft box... (Windoze is so stupid it'll never know the difference!) -----Original Message----- From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Fred Jackson Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 10:39 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: a question? Hi does the command line smbpasswd -j <domain> -r <PDC> apply to clients joining a

I will get a smbd process started. (If this is incorrect please let me know ;) But this morning I did a quick ps -ax on my machine and found *two* smbd -D in the process list. But as far as I know there is no connection to the samba server right now. I did connect to and disconnect from the server yesterday but I would think that that connection would have been released by now. Can anyone