similar to: Asterisk-Users List Etiquette

OK guys and gals ... can we please stop all the fighting? When technical questions are asked, they should be answered. I lot of people on this list have something that a lot of newbies need ... experience. So answering a question with "RTFM" or "JFGI" is not going to impart any of your experience ... which is one of the things they need and want. Also ... if someone attacks

I can ping it just fine. I am on gw5.voicepulse.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040615/054c83f4/attachment.htm

Just a tag-on for the thread about list posting etiquette, etc., etc. The following is a link to an excellent (if wordy) how-to-do-it-right instruction manaual replete with links to other treatises on the topic. The entire text of this document is emailed to the mailing list on the 1st of each month. This is the Cadillac of etiquette manuals. http://www.linux-sxs.org/index2.html Enjoy, --

What exactly is top posting? I thought that was when someone responds to the very first message instead of the latest one. Jim C. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | I can be reached on the following Instant Messenger services: | |---------------------------------------------------------------| | MSN: j_c_llings@hotmail.com AIM: WyteLi0n ICQ: 123291844 |

Hi I've taken apart a 7960 to fit a backlight to the LCD. Would others on the list be interested in this as a project when I've finished (i.e. should I document and photo all the stages)? Also I can source some 7960's at a very good price but what are the rules about posting this information on the list if others were interested? P

Perhaps, the question is silly. But, I prefer asking it before making a mistake. I have just packed a binary distribution of R for Windows3.1/Win32s. It is equivalent to the previous one for Win95/NT (R-0.61.3 + many of the available packages) and it is compiled with egcs-mingw32 (GPL not a commercial compiler). Now, in preparing the README, I put the following sentence:

I''ve written a little ruby/rails hangman-ish app to keep my wife occupied at work that I think list members might also find interesting. I''m new to this list so I wanted to see if it would be considered bad form to post the link before I did. There aren''t any ads so I''m not getting anything out of more visitors, but I still didn''t want to take the

Hi, The thread titled "Another Fedora Decision" is rapidly turning into a political and opinion driven flame fest that is unsuited for the CentOS mailing list. This list should try and remain focused on CentOS, what we have and keep the area sane for new users as well as old hands to participate in a fair and thoughtful conversation around the CentOS Linux platform and the CentOS

Since i've gotten so much help from this list with my samba issues, i've been trying to be active and help others, but heres my question. If I reply to someone, should I send it JUST to the mailing list, JUST to the person i'm helping, or both? I've been keeping it on the mailing list, but some people may want the help to come into their main mailbox. Should I send to both?

"Beast" is more appropriate than you know. It''s definately Frankenstein code. (read: it ain''t pretty, but it works - some of the time). Anyway, it entertains my wife; not sure if hardcore programmers will get anything out of it or not. You might find it interesting (or pointless) that in a complete bastardization of rails'' main reason for being it

Hi Jim, Thanks for putting in the effort here. It's never a good situation to have to moderate, but sometimes it is necessary. >From my perspective, this kind of thing happens far more often than the current example, though maybe not with such intensity. This situation forces me to evaluate if replying to any message on this list is going to be worth the headache of the inevitable noise

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: > CentOS is unquestionably one of the most used Linux distros > in the world, and yet the mailing list is relatively quiet. To me this is > a symptom of a problem, and I feel that it's partially a result of the same > regular people, I think it is generally a good thing when the

To everyone who spends time in #asterisk or #asterisk-bugs or basically anything with #asterisk in its name, I want to implore you to please treat new users with respect, and act as good representatives of the Asterisk community. Recently I have had more reports of new users being severely turned off of the project in general due to the comments, reactions and attitudes of a few members of

Hello All! I am in the process of assembling an asterisk-based phone system for my office - using SPA-3000s to connect the network to the PSTN. I am wondering if anybody else can get (or has already seen) the same behaviour out of their 3000. The short version: Send multiple Calls to the SPA's FXO port at the same time it is re-registering with Asterisk. SPA HTTP Configuration:

I'm about to present a report (for internal use of governmental agency). I used extensively R , contibuted packages, as well as communications on the R-list As well as citing R, I would like to know how to cite the contributed packages (it is not so easy, as some have been used exensively, other marginally, some are called from another package and some were not used as softwares but gave me

Juan, I dont see people here with "attitude" or any need to shut down this list as you suggested. Contrary to your experience, I find people to be quite helpful here. Steven's comment "Start here and then ask a real question" is definitely not arrogant IMHO. He is just trying to knock some etiquette on Luan. Besides, he did give him all the answer Luan was looking for.

If you're reading the digest of the Asterisk-users mailing list: * Please always strip the parts of the message you're not replying to - do not resend the whole digest! * Please always change the subject so it reflects your message - Do not send a message with a subject of RE: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #3413 - 14 msgs It does *not* reflect the content of your message

Hello again, I have been working on the Rice Encoder/Decoder now since my first post. However, I can't identify what's wrong with it. I was hoping there might be someone out there interested in answering my questions outside of this forum. I am not very good at programming at all, but I really want to see this project come together with my own work. (i.e. I don't want someone just

Ex-girlfriend logic not working in latest CVS? Incoming sip calls don't work. Anyone else seen this problem? Extension logic looks good: exten => 6153248305/_931NXXXXXXX,1,Queue(queue1); exten => 6153248305/_615NXXXXXXX,1,Queue(queue2); ;exten => 6153248305,1,Queue(queue3); show dialplan looks good: -- Added extension '6153248305' priority 1 (CID match

For those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the document is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.