similar to: Adtran TSU 600

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Adtran TSU 600"

2004 May 25
1
Problem - Adtran TSU 600, t100p
Hello, I have just received Adtran TSU 600 with 24 FXS ports. I have installed sucessfuly T100P card. Adtran is connected to t100p with crossover T1 cable. On T100P card I have a green light and on Adtran I do not get any errors or alarms. But I do not get dialtone on FXS ports. Adtran is configured: For Network Timing, fxs ports ore fxs_ls on Adtran. In zaptel.conf: span=1,1,0,esf,b8zs
2003 Aug 20
2
ADTRAN TSU 600 VP24 FXO 24 Port Channel Bank
It is possible to connect ADTRAN TSU 600 VP24 FXO 24 Port Channel Bank to Asterisk ? Somebody offered me that hardware, but I do not know if thats good hardware for Asterisk. rgs, Bartosz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030820/4a9e4608/attachment.htm
2003 Aug 25
4
T100P/ TSU 600 installation problem
I have just received a T100P and an Adtran TSU 600 in the mail. I seem to be having a problem with the T100P card. So far I have done the following: vi zaptel.conf fxoks=1-22 fxsks=23-24 ... vi zapata.conf ... signalling=fxo_ks ... channel => 1-22 ... signalling=fxs_ks ... channel => 23-24 I then run modprobe zaptel modprobe wct1xxp ztcfg -vv There are no errors to report. In
2005 Jan 06
1
T100P + Adtran TSU600 + FXO and caller id problems
I have following setup Asterisk - T100P -> Adtran TSU600 P + FXOcard -> PSTN line When PSTN line is plugged directly in to analog X100P caller id is received by Asterisk but when I plug it into adtran I'm not getting caller id. Any ideas what kind of setup Adtran TSU600 requires to pass caller id to T100P ??? regards m.
2004 Dec 12
1
Will Adtran TSU 600 work with *?
People on the list tend to think you can't make many cards work on a regular desktop. If you're willing to wait a couple of week I might have an answer for you. _____ From: Robert Augustyn [mailto:augustynr@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 7:13 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Will Adtran TSU 600 work with *?
2006 Mar 26
2
tsu-600
i wrote previous about a setup i thought might work with asterisk and the tsu-600. no one replied, so i thought i would ask if anyone is using a tsu-600 with asterisk and if so how do you have it setup ??
2003 Oct 01
2
(still) channel problems
Hi folks, I'm still having the following problem, maybe someone can help me out of it. Two IDENTICAL MACHINES (same motherboard, same RH 7.2, same *) communicate through IAX2. Everything works ok on machine 1. On machine 2, if I try to use 4 fxo's from a TDM400 card, sound gets lousy. If I manually destroy one of the zap channels (e.g. zap destroy channel 4), sound gets good again.
2004 Jan 30
3
Call quality questions
Our basic system is as follows: P4 3.0 Ghz w/ HT, 1GB PC3200 RAM, 120 GB HDD, RH 9.0 OS, * from CVS several weeks ago, working OK for routing, VM, and AA, calls in on separate PSTN lines to Adtran TSU 600, into * server through T100P card. The hardware is not taxed at all with little over 20% proc utilization ever, low mem use, etc. All Phones are SNOM 200's with various firmware revisions
2007 Dec 05
3
Adtran supervision problems
I am sending a call down a E&M wink trunk to a adtran tsu600 channelbank. The extension is setup like so... exten=>799179,1,Dial(zap/g2,20,D(9179)) exten=>799179,2,Hangup() It should Dial the Adtran and send some DTMF signals to a telephone on an fxs module in the Adtran. Asterisk is seeing the call answered when the T-1 is picked up by the Adtran not when the ringing phone is answered.
2003 Nov 05
5
The Minimum Cost of Setting up an Asterisk Phone System?
Everyone-- Here's a cost analysis, rather crude and inspecific, of using Asterisk to implement a phone system. I'm really quite naive and new to all this, so I'd appreciate any corrections, tips, pointers, etc, from those in the community, who have far greater experience, knowledge, skill, etc. than I. Am I forgetting something important? Am I way off in my estimates? The Minimum
2004 Apr 07
3
Dial-In/Out Modem Zap Channel Config. Adtran 750
I've been trying to get a Win 2000 RAS server working with my asterisk PBX for quite some time, to no avail. I've googled, I've tried loads of configurations, I've rewired phone lines, and still I am not winning the battle. Here's my config. PRI->T400P->Asterisk->T400P->Adtran 750(L36 Firmware)->RAS Server. I have 4 Zap channels signalled FXO_KS to the 750
2003 Oct 16
3
Adtran TA750 & T100P
Hello, So all the pieces are finally here, and I'm ready to play. I remember reading on this list that the connection Channel Bank <-> T100P requires a "reverse cable." Is this a regular Ethernet reverse cable (i.e., only a couple of pairs reversed?) Please help me before I blow something up! Saludos, Jose.
2004 Apr 24
1
\ Adtran Channel Bank? - Email found in subject
Jay, I have had a lot of trouble with the FXO ports on Adtran TA750. Unless the incoming POTS lines have a balance impedance, they will buzz very bad. Gregory P. Scasny Golden Technologies Inc. http://www.golden-tech.com 219-462-7200 -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jay Milk Sent: Sunday, April
2003 Oct 14
2
T100P to Adtran TA750 - No dialtone or ring
Hello all, I've got a T100P connected to an Adtran TA750 with a T1 crossover... This connects to a patch panel with phone ports. The Adtran is fully populated with FXS cards. All I get on any phone port is a fast clicking noise... No dialtone. Asterisk 'sees' the card, (the channels show up in /proc/zaptel). Incoming calls are routed to the zap/x channel, but no ring. I'm
2004 Aug 27
1
Problems dialing out with T100P and Adtran
I have a T100P card connected to an Adtran and then a T1. I have added the following configurations to Asterisk...but, when I dial 9 and then a local phone number, it bounces between the dial tone and silence and the *error* light on the Adtran blinks. zaptel.conf span=1,0,0,esf,b8zs fxsks=1-8 loadzone=us defaultzone=us zapata.conf [channels] context=from-sip signalling=fxs_ks
2003 Sep 13
9
LineJack + Asterisk HELP!
Hello, I have ISA card LineJack. I could not find any information if this card can work as fxo with Asterisk. If it can work, can somebody point me how to install it on my Asterisk box. Or maybe there is some documentation about it how to install LineJack. I will be very thankful for any help. Regards Bartosz Jozwiak ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP:
2004 Jul 06
3
odd behavior - adtran ta 850 + t100p
I've been working with an adtran ta 850 hooked to a t100p pretty much all day today, and I haven't gotten past configuring zaptel.conf and zapata.conf. For some reason, when I pick up analog phone hooked up to the first module of a quad fxs card in the second slot of the ta 850, asterisk thinks that all four of the fxs modules in that card are going off hook. If I pick up a phone hooked
2003 Aug 19
4
Analog lines
Hello, I am looking for hardware for Asterisk. I want to connect analog lines (from 6 to 12 or more) to Asterisk, what will be the best hardware for that? Thanks, Bartosz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030819/f4b31f82/attachment.htm
2003 Nov 04
8
Anyone using * in a live production environment?
Hullo again, all :) If you're using * to run telephony in a real business environment, can I trouble you to write a short paragraph about the setup, and how you've found the migration / daily use? I'm simply trying to add weight to the business case for new * installs, especially for those who have a very conservative management structure. Like I say, I'm not looking for a case
2003 Oct 13
7
PrePaid Application!!!!!
Hello, Here in our office we are testing Asterisk. My collage Igor created to Asterisk PrePaid application with Postgresql. It is not in Perl. We would like to release it to the group.... as soon as it will work ok. It will have authentication, different rates for users, different rates for destinations and so on. Is there anybody who would like to improve it ? -- Bart -------------- next part