similar to: Linux Servers: Eccentric Practices for Disk Slicing

I wrote part of a FAQ last November, and if you're interested in the breakdown of GCC, GLibC and kernel adoption since Red Hat Linux 4.0, you'll want to read this: http://www.geocities.com/thebs413/RH-Distribution-FAQ-3.html I've been loosely working on a "Linux Configuration Management" book covering Red Hat distributions since. I might update this FAQ if I have

It seems that unstable PowerNow support on the Tyan S2895 is not limited to Linux according to this review: http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-296-1.htm Their solution was to upgrade the BIOS as well. -- Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org http://thebs413.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The best things in life are NOT

I've been reading back through the archives, really detailed, especially a select few people. And I promise, this is the last time I'm going to say this. I think CentOS stands great on itself, and you don't need to define many things is dislike of other distro. I know many of us (at least us Americans) like to put things in terms of "versus" as much as we can. And I am too

1: e-mail is a people skill, you affect people with it. The value of your presentation rises or falls with your skill at presentation. 2: My embedded headless linux targets live in isolated networks, even relative to other computer or network equipment at the target site. At times, the nearest land is 2 miles straight down (ocean floor). 3: These targets are also without

From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> > MUCH more FOSS oriented I've been taking an informal survey on this for awhile now. I know the new, official acronym is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS). But even before that acronym was popular, I had long argued that Stallman's insistence on calling it "Free Software" when that could be confused with

Bryan... NOBODY CARES how many times Chris is wrong. NOBODY CARES what you prove on this point. Whether Chris is right, wrong or stoopid is NOT proper fodder for this (CENTOS) list. Chris being wrong is *strictly* a "Bryan Fixation". Part of YOU growing up is YOU realizing that whether Chris is or is not wrong is UNIMPORTANT to ANYTHING that you or anybody important to you think is

Ryan wrote: > I did, 1024x768. > Sorry, analog Matthew Miller wrote: > Maybe the problem is just in that adjustment, then. Yes. You need to have your signaling _exact_ when dealing with LCDs. Some are very good at taking the timings of VESA standards. But some support some eccentric Windows timings that are _not_ the exact same as VESA. Or maybe you have configured your monitor for

> How's forever work for you? ;-> Absolutely FINE thank you! When your WizWonder package is housebroken, let me try it if I'm interested. Until then, a (stubbornly) broken distro will persuade me to try something else. That's why I left Windows, I guess, if you prognosticate correctly, it will be why I leave RedHat/CentOS. btw this has nothing to do with Firewalls at

Should be simple and perhaps I'm tired but it's not coming to me. In its simplest form... for old in `cat "$FILENAME"`;do echo "$old" dirname "$old" new="$(echo $old | sed 's/\*/\-/')" done I'm trying to take out some stupid Macintosh things - in this case filenames with asterisks but I have others like tilde's and probably

The laws already exist: Disturbing the peace, Misappropriation of public funds, Prohibition on unfunded mandates. What's lacking is prosecutors, judges, and juries who see the politicians as getting in the way of the statesmen and the people. To drag this back towards On Topic, it seems to me that the ntp folks might be petitioned to write up and submit to the Congress, a paper

From: Bryan J. Smith [mailto:thebs413 at earthlink.net] > > Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at BUC.com> wrote: > > It is an interesting choice. It supports multi-master > > replication which I will need and has some GUI management > > utilities. > > Anyone know of any problems with it? > > Only that many people on this list have been ignorant of what >

From: "Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith at ieee.org>" <thebs413 at earthlink.net> > I wrote a pre-sale evaluation back in January 2005 here: > http://lists.leap-cf.org/pipermail/leaplist/2005-January/000532.html > ... Tyan S2895 -- nForce Pro 2200+2050 Just know that the pre-sale evaluation was of the nForce4, and didn't take the nForce Pro 2200 and 2200+2050

"Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith at ieee.org> wrote: > Fedora Directory Server is out now and does exactly this. > I posted the link to the manual earlier. BTW, you can run Fedora Directory Server on Windows 2000 itself! You don't have to run Linux, although you could start by using Windows 2000, then synchronizing to Linux later. You'll also need a service on your ADS

I have found that lower cased boolean operators such as "and" or "or" does not work. Of course I never forget setting FLAG_BOOLEAN_ANY_CASE flag. QP seems to treat them as terms. Just look at the following tests regardless of search results! $ python search.py -v woman AND man Performing query 'Xapian::Query((woman:(pos=1) AND man:(pos=2)))' 0 results

Dear Jin, I've talked with Vikram, and we agree that having this code (and a dynamic backwards slicing pass that Swarup and I wrote) in a publicly available SVN repository is a good thing. I'll try to get you a copy of the static slicing code some time next week (I should be able to work on it Monday morning) so that you can start working with it right away. I can work on making a

Dear all, Is anyone aware of any implementation of an inter procedural slicing algorithm for LLVM? I am mostly interested in a static algorithm but a dynamic one can be helpful too. Thanks, Silviu Ganceanu Research Student, Ecole Polytechique Federale de Luasanne -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, Are there any known implementations of static inter-procedural slicing for LLVM (especially forward slicing)? I did find a few references to it in the archives dating back to 2008, but am not sure what the current status is. Any pointers would be highly appreciated. Thanks Rohit Grad Student Middleware Security and Testing Group http://cs.wisc.edu/mist University of Wisconsin-Madison

Hello John et al - I have been struggling to implement static backwards slicing with LLVM. After digging llvmdev postings for some time, I see that other people were having similar difficulties and John's got almost complete code that may be shared. May I get a copy of it, too? Better yet, it would be helpful for many other people if the code were checked in to an example directory or

We have done a few class projects on static interprocedural slicing but they are all of "course project" quality. I will put you in touch with some of the students who did those, if you're interested? --Vikram Associate Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/~vadve On Aug 15, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Silviu-Ionut Ganceanu wrote:

Hi, This might sound like a n00b question, but I've honestly never done this with a Linux machine... (it is running Centos3) We have a 1U mail server with two 36GB SCSI drives in a hardware mirror config. There's no more room for any other drives in the case. It's filling up, so we now have two 74GB drives ready to take their place. Possible solutions that I've come up