search for: worthlessness

If this is off subject or has already been addressed, sorry. "Windows Genuine Advantage" looks like a move to make wine worthless. What I mean is that M$ development API pushes windows developers' applications to require you install IE 6.0 (soon 7.0) or later, making IE a key part of wine. If IE requires Genuine MicroSoft (Windows Genuine Advantage) to install, then most if not all

As a newcomer to Asterisk, you will not be welcomed with open arms. First, you will find almost no documentation on it's features. Second, if you try to ask questions, you will be flamed and pointed to worthless how-tos and 'the wiki'. These worthless documents can only be useful for explaining how things work to those already in-the-know. Lastly, Asterisk is so bug ridden, expect

On 06/12/2017 01:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:42:36AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >> On 06/12/2017 09:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> >>>> The hypervisor is going to throw away the contents of these pages, >>>> right? >>> It should be careful and only throw away contents that was there before >>>

On 06/12/2017 01:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:42:36AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: >> On 06/12/2017 09:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> >>>> The hypervisor is going to throw away the contents of these pages, >>>> right? >>> It should be careful and only throw away contents that was there before >>>

When I set up the Evolution mail agent, I could find no way to change the outbound port from 25 to 587. I have to do this due to port 25 being blocked by the cable company. Thunderbird is no problem. Altho I don't particularly use Evolution as a mail agent, there are times when I might use it, but its worthless without being able to send mail out to my server. Did I miss something in

Do note that not everyone is running a Debian based system, so "the current Debian Testing binary packages" are worthless to us. On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 12:42:45AM +0000, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > Any response would be welcome :-) > > > As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same > platform (bios/ia32/x64). > > Currently,

>>>>> "JC" == Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> writes: JC> This stems from PJSIP not being dynamic with transports (it JC> doesn't like its environment changed to that degree while JC> in use). I'm afraid if your IP changes you'd have to restart JC> Asterisk when you are using PJSIP. Wow. I say this having voted for pjsip over the listed

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Given a server with MySQL userdb/passwd and maildir storage, excluding unused storages and authentications in configure options does save some memory and/or speed or is it worthless? I mean, is there a performance difference between this two versions of configure parameters or is just a waste of time to exclude what is not used? ./configure

Nevermind, that stats.xml page is worthless anyways. got a updated version of icecast2 status http://www.casterclub.com/icecast_status.php parses the status2.xsl page <p><p>Dave St John (C.E.O.) Xstream1.com Mediacast1.com Casterclub.com (720-641-7586) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave St John" <dstjohn@mediacast1.com> To: <icecast-dev@xiph.org> Sent:

I have a couple of devices that need an analog modem to communicate outside of our Asterisk system. Most FXS gateways don't seem to support this... I have a stack of Sipura 2002's that are, AFAIK, worthless for this purpose. I've heard that Digium's IAXy FXS will work with modems, but I can't find any reference to that in their documentation. There is also the

With a (late prerelease of) 1.5.0 on Windows, using sprintf on NaN yields garbage when the number of decimal is specified while it works fine for NA: > sprintf("%.2f", NA) [1] "0.00" > sprintf("%.2f", NaN) [1] "-1.#J" Not specifying the decimal precision lets both print garbage: > sprintf("%f", NaN) [1] "-1.#IND00" >

On 06/17/2018 09:11 AM, Alice Wonder via CentOS wrote: > On 06/17/2018 08:52 AM, Michael Hennebry via CentOS wrote: >> I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> >>>> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >>>> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> >>>> So, if your mail hosting provider

Hi All, Can we stop this thread pl. This lady has no intentions to learn asterisk. She is just a troll and wasting our time. With her corporate attitude, what she expects is support that available with paid commercial products. Her company has enough money to buy commercial products, let she go there. Hey lady, whoever u are, dont waste our time. this is not for u. Lets move on to something

Hello, I?m currently running a script that takes several days to complete, and have therefore chosen to start two instances of R, each doing half the work (since I have a two-processor machine). The problem is that this renders my computer worthless to do other work on. So - is it possible to pause one of the running R instances to do other things for a while, and then starting it again

Any feedback on this brand and in particular on doing business with WelltechUSA? I am looking to the Wellgate 3701A which is a 1FXS-1FXO arrangement. I am hoping to replace the near worthless Grandstream HT-488. This company is telling me that I need to wire $ directly into there bank account. Most unusual. Thanks for any feedback on this, Marty

I have some 30 XP boxes in one offices joined to a w2k domain. The w2k server has no problem mapping drives on the samba server, however, the XP workstations refuse. Put in user name and password in the box after mapping, and it just pops back up like you've entered a wrong pass/user name. I have changed signorseal to 0 in registry to no avail. Of course, when the server was NT4, I

Hello all I have a somewhat annoying problem with OpenSSH. Now, granted, it's certainly not a bug. I'm just wondering what the best course of action is. At work, we have multiple customers with machines named "fw0", "fs0", etc. This is all good, since it conforms to a standard naming scheme, so it's easier to administrate. However, when we go to our

On 06/12/2017 09:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> The hypervisor is going to throw away the contents of these pages, >> right? > It should be careful and only throw away contents that was there before > report_unused_page_block was invoked. Hypervisor is responsible for not > corrupting guest memory. But that's not something an mm patch should > worry about.

On 06/12/2017 09:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> The hypervisor is going to throw away the contents of these pages, >> right? > It should be careful and only throw away contents that was there before > report_unused_page_block was invoked. Hypervisor is responsible for not > corrupting guest memory. But that's not something an mm patch should > worry about.

I'm petty sure I messed up attributions, so am deleting them. >> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> So, if your mail hosting provider enforces dmarc,(gmail does) and you >> get mail from a list that doesn't rewrite the headers, and people >> from places like yahoo post to the list,