search for: vanity

How long does it take to get a vanity number? I signed up for an account, pre-paid some money, and then placed a vanity number order. I did all of that around Dec. 31st 2004. They said it would take 2-10 business days. It is now Feb. 15th and still no vanity number. I've called them about a dozen times and every time they tell me t...

...apping). Is there anyway to achieve this goal? I would have liked the users to keep their unix 'home directory' with their Windows home directory. My thanks in advance, Paul. INFORMATION: smbmount version: 2.0.7 smbd version: 2.0.7 debian potato (v2.2r2) TRANSCRIPT FOR (1) ABOVE: paul@vanity:~$ ls -ld /tmp/paul drwxrwxrwx 2 paul paul 4096 Dec 17 21:44 /tmp/paul paul@vanity:~$ chmod go-rwx /tmp/paul paul@vanity:~$ ls -ld /tmp/paul drwx------ 2 paul paul 4096 Dec 17 21:44 /tmp/paul paul@vanity:~$ mount /tmp/paul paul@vanity:~$ ls -ld /tmp/paul drwxr-xr-x...

>From what I understand if I have an asterisk pbx set up, I can also get a vanity DID. 1) Where I get the DID from does not matter, my voip provider can use the DID i ask them to. Is this correct? 2) What place has good vanity DID's? 3) Do toll free DID's save me or the person calling me money? Or are toll free DIDS more expensive? 4) Where can I get a good vanity...

...From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of > Paul Dugas > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:41 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sixtel.net / IAX.CC - Vanity > Toll-Free Number > > On Tue, February 15, 2005 9:27 am, Rob Risner said: > > I'm just wondering, how long should a vanity number > transfer really take? > > No help here, just posting a "me too" to warn others. Friday > was 10 days for me. No happy...

...//imap.serverY.com> (dovecot's running on serverY.com .. but let me know if there are any tricks that I need to make this work). 2. If I maintain large mailboxes and check my mail frequently, how does the dovecot server load compare to something like apache or Samba? I ask because I have a vanity domain that I mostly use for email and I want to ensure that I can migrate my precious emails to a new service provider. And the provider that I'm considering offers low-cost virtual dedicated servers but meters usage (including RAM and CPU). One of the reasons I have question #1 is that the s...

...nd asked about the problem it took them until 3/11/05 to respond, I responded back to them and they ignored me until Today. Finally I got someone on the phone reguarding this and they said "don't bother us until after the 18th as we won't do anything, it says 10 days to provision a vanity" I told them, if the site said that, I wouldn't have accepted the terms. They said so, we won't refund you and that we have your money already. I emailed support with a screen shot of the website and asked him where it said 7-10, well at first he said it was on the at&t site th...

Hello! I am in the middle of having a vanity toll-free DID set up. It's been 13 days now (9 business days). This is the first time I'm doing this, and I'm not sure of the process. There has been a very weird progression of changes on my number, from fast-busy, to a message saying that I'm calling from a phone with restr...

...ted some information about SMS Aggregators, this is just a follow-up, based on changes in the US market. As of January 31st, any commercial application, sending to US networks, is required to lease a CSC (short code) from CTIA. A CSC runs $6000/year for a random code, and $12,000/year for a vanity code. These charges are on top of the normal per message fees. This does NOT affect applications using SMS by E-mail (sending a mobile phones e-mail address). I checked with Simplewire.com (US) and Clickatell.com (South Africa). This policy is dictated by the US mobile providers, and affects...

Since shapecfg is no longer part of the distro what are people using in place of cbq to limit/throttle bandwidth? I have an ftp mirror that, if left unchecked, will suck up the entire bandwidth of the CoLo site. TIA, Joe -- My Useless Vanity Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other useless junk

I just BFU''ed up to B61 and started to play with IP Instances. I''m having trouble making my zone happy: root at aeon zones$ zoneadm -z testing1 boot zoneadm: zone ''testing1'': WARNING: unable to hold network interface ''skge0''.: Invalid argument root at aeon zones$ dladm show-dev nge0 link: up speed: 100Mb duplex: full

We are looking at the alternatives to VXVM/VXFS. One of the feature which we liked in Veritas, apart from the obvious ones is the ability to call the disks by name and group them in to a disk group. Especially in SAN based environment where the disks may be shared by multiple machines, it is very easy to manage them by disk group names rather than cxtxdx numbers. Does zfs offer such

On 23/06/18 21:03, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:58:21PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> * Is there a better page I can point at? > 'Better' is quite subjective; however this all goes back to > > https://web.archive.org/web/20060523223519/https://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=127 > > and is as good of a reference as any. >

Hi. I''d like to request a feature be added to zfs. Currently, on SAN attached disk, zpool shows up with a big WWN for the disk. If ZFS (or the zpool command, in particular) had a text field for arbitrary information, it would be possible to add something that would indicate what LUN on what array the disk in question might be. This would make troubleshooting and general

...e that''s dominating the execution time or that you can''t change. THEN you can go buy all the stuff you need to get your application to your measurable performance metric. Ok, but there''s a trap in all this: take your meds first. Programmers typically get obsessed with vanity number of performance and will spend way more time and effort than is economical trying to make their server fast. The way to avoid this is to set *measurable* targets and base them on actual needs. This does two things: 1) It tells you when to stop. 2) It tells you when you''re screwed...

I am considering using iax.cc (sixtel) and wondering if anyone had opinions, good or bad. Are there outages with any regularity? How responsive are tech support? How is packet loss? I am particularly interested in termination to the UK, but will accept any comments people have. Thanks -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US

Hi, One of my model generates short messages that has to be delivered to mobile phones as SMS''s. I am not sure how to proceed from here. 1. What are the components I would need? 2. Do I need a GSM modem? If yes how would it integrate with my app? 3. Does my hosting provider needs to have a GSM modem? 4. Does sending an SMS cost anything? If yes how much would a single SMS cost? Any

...%45(%struct._foo* %46, i8* %47, i8* %48) store %struct._foo* %49, %struct._foo** %1 br label %50 ; <label>:50 ; preds = %43, %7 %51 = load %struct._foo** %1 ret %struct._foo* %51 } ~~~ ------------------------------------------------------ When vanity and rivalry disappear, all the lines go out of your stomach and you slow down and coast slowly to a stop in the middle. -- DLR

Anton Korobeynikov dixit: >> Any suggestions? >Please do read http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html about correct >way of building clang. Oh, I did. I took LLVM and Clang from the very same SVN revision even, placed clang in llvm/tools/ and built. This has worked on GNU/Linux for me once, but clang-current seems to rely on things not yet in llvm. Like I said, I’m using r58565 for

Dixi quod… >Like I said, I’m using r58565 for both llvm and clang (now). Must have been broken, as r58935 for both works. I’ve even fixed some system headers for clang now, and mksh – http://mirbsd.de/mksh – builds fine and passes the regression tests (with the Xcode version, about 83% of it failed, back then). Now up to llvm-gcc *sigh*… //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too

A revised illustration that incorporates Meem''s earlier recommendations has been posted on our project page: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/clearview/cv-linkif.gif Aside from showing the interrelationships between the devices, links, and interfaces, it also shows how vanity naming might be applied to the configuration. The illustration continues to be a work in progress (already, some minor errors have been spotted :) ) so feedback is certainly welcome. Cc''ing the Crossbow team in case the figure could be expanded and utilized for their purposes. Raoul...