Anton Korobeynikov dixit:>> Any suggestions?>Please do read http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html about correct >way of building clang.Oh, I did. I took LLVM and Clang from the very same SVN revision even, placed clang in llvm/tools/ and built. This has worked on GNU/Linux for me once, but clang-current seems to rely on things not yet in llvm. Like I said, I’m using r58565 for both llvm and clang (now). bye, //mirabilos --> Hi, does anyone sell openbsd stickers by themselves and not packaged > with other products?No, the only way I've seen them sold is for $40 with a free OpenBSD CD. -- Haroon Khalid and Steve Shockley in gmane.os.openbsd.misc
Dixi quod…>Like I said, I’m using r58565 for both llvm and clang (now).Must have been broken, as r58935 for both works. I’ve even fixed some system headers for clang now, and mksh – http://mirbsd.de/mksh – builds fine and passes the regression tests (with the Xcode version, about 83% of it failed, back then). Now up to llvm-gcc *sigh*… //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C"
Dixi quod…>Must have been broken, as r58935 for both works. >I’ve even fixed some system headers for clang now, and mksh >– http://mirbsd.de/mksh – builds fine and passes the regression >tests (with the Xcode version, about 83% of it failed, back then).Works with compiling to bytecode as well, even though CCC_CC and CCC_LD might have to be set. However, ccc neither understands -version nor -Wc,* (for passing -Wc,-version to clang for example). bye, //mirabilos -- "Using Lynx is like wearing a really good pair of shades: cuts out the glare and harmful UV (ultra-vanity), and you feel so-o-o COOL." -- Henry Nelson, March 1999