search for: unpackaged

...debug smbspool.debug smbstatus.debug smbtree.debug smbumount.debug swat.debug tdbbackup.debug tdbdump.debug tdbtool.debug testparm.debug testprns.debug wbinfo.debug winbindd.debug Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/samba-3.0.10-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/samba/pdb/mysql.so RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/samba/pdb/mysql.so ---------------------------------------------------- This /...

When trying to build the centos5 srpm under x86_64 I am getting the following error: Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/xen-3.2.0-0xs-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader Anyone have any ideas as to what causes this? Thanks, jlc __...

Hello, For the very first time, I tried the command bellow on a newly build Debian Buster box on which I successfully built Asterisk 17.2.0 before. I got : # contrib/scripts/install_prereq install-unpackaged *** Installing NBS (Network Broadcast Sound) *** A nbs-trunk/LICENSE A nbs-trunk/nbsclient.c A nbs-trunk/nbsd.c A nbs-trunk/nbs.h A nbs-trunk/nbscat.c A nbs-trunk/Makefile A nbs-trunk/nbscat8k A nbs-trunk/xmms-nbs-1.2.10.patch A nbs-trunk/xmms-nbs-orig.patch Révision 15 e...

...without_storage_disk 1 %define _without_storage_mpath 1 %define _without_nwfilter 1 %define _without_libssh2 1 %define _without_hyperv 1 %define _without_phyp 1 %define dist tizen I commented out %check section from the spec because it failed and I got the fallowing error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found. Logs are in the attachment. Any ideas? Thanks! Jan

...m to be a bug in the install-info.pl script. My data regard R 1.6.2 but I don't suppose the script has been changed so perhaps this could be fixed for R 1.7.0. Someone mailed me saying they could not recompile my R 1.6.2 src.rpm for mandrake 9.1. This was the error message: ..... Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/R-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: ?? /usr/share/info/dir.old.bz2 RPM build errors: ??? Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: ?? /usr/share/info/dir.old.bz2 I therefore obtained a version of 9.1 and reproduced the problem. Buil...

...e914e41e kernel(strlcpy) = 0x672144bd kernel(strlen) = 0x25ec1b28 kernel(unregister_netdevice) = 0x24498994 kernel(unregister_netdevice_notifier) = 0xfe769456 kernel(unregister_pernet_gen_device) = 0xf3ff6e0c kernel(wait_for_completion) = 0x1cefe352 kernel(wake_up_process) = 0x266c7c38 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/clopezma/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/openvswitch-kmod-1.11.0-1.el6.x86_64 error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/depmod.d/openvswitch.conf RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/depmod.d/openvswitch.conf Any idea w...

...en I run the command rpmbuild --bb cvsnt.spec I get the below error at the end. I don't know the reason why the rpmbuilding is failing . What package or rpm do I need to install to fulfill this dependency or get rid of this error ? Processing files: cvsnt-debuginfo-2.5.04.2471-1 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/cvsnt-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/cvsnt/protocols/sync.la /usr/lib/cvsnt/protocols/sync.so RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/cvsnt/protocols/sync.la /usr/lib/cvsnt/protocols...

...s is what it tells me to do when i try to run a program with WINE). I downloaded the tar.bz2 file from sourceforge and have no idea what to do from there. When you guys say, type ~/blah blah I do not know what that means, type it where? I need step by step instructions on what to do. At first I unpackaged it and ran the winesetup.sh file and it asked me to "Just Configure" or setup kde. I clicked setup kde, it closed the window nothing happened, and now when I try running the winesetup.sh, it says "No such file or directory". I already tried deleteing the fiels and re-unpackage...

...g fake_perms.so.debug libnss_winbind.so.debug libnss_wins.so.debug libsmbclient.so.debug netatalk.so.debug pam_smbpass.so.debug pam_winbind.so.debug readonly.so.debug recycle.so.debug Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/samba-3.0.0rc2-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/samba/charset/CP437.so /usr/lib/samba/charset/CP850.so RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/samba/charset/CP437.so /usr/lib/sa...

I it possible to install gems into custom directory (user dir)? There no any specific parameters in setup.rm I don''t wanna see unpackaged binaries into my Debian system ;) Or maybe someone can send me a link with .deb''s? Thanks in advance.

...d-provides.sh error: line 352: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': - Updated SuSE package to work with Fedora error: Failed to find Provides: Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/nx-3.2.0-8-root-root RPM build errors: line 352: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_' or '/': - Updated SuSE package to work with Fedora Failed to find Provides: #

I noticed with rsync and compressed files or package files the transfer efficiency drops considerably. Eg. rsync an ISO image of a distribution will give you between 30% and 60% of the original transfer although from Beta1-Beta2 the change could not have been that great. The same thing happens with ZIP files for obvious reasons. My question or feature request if you want to call it is. Is it

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc28.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc28.tar.gz.sig Still a bit more fixes. My coding TODO list is again empty. Unless something special happens in the next few weeks, I'll still make rc29 with the documentation included and v1.0 will be released April 13. * deliver + userdb static: Verify the user's existence from passdb,

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc28.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc28.tar.gz.sig Still a bit more fixes. My coding TODO list is again empty. Unless something special happens in the next few weeks, I'll still make rc29 with the documentation included and v1.0 will be released April 13. * deliver + userdb static: Verify the user's existence from passdb,

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 04:49:22AM +0000, emlyn.jose@wipro.com wrote: > Hello Richard! > > Ocaml solved my problem. Thank you so much :) > > There are many unpackaged ocaml files created outside the BUILDROOT. Will removing them harm the working of the package? > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/lib64/ocaml/guestfs/META > /usr/lib64/ocaml/guestfs/guestfs.cmi > /usr/lib64/ocaml/guestfs/guestfs.cmx > /usr/lib...

You say that there are rpm-packages for rc2 available for redhat9. But when i browse the ftp directory, i saw that it is empty. How come? -- COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test -------------------------------------------------- 1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger! 2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualit?tssieger! 3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7.

....so.debug libnss_wins.so.debug libsmbclient.so.debug mysql.so.debug netatalk.so.debug pam_smbpass.so.debug pam_winbind.so.debug readonly.so.debug recycle.so.debug shadow_copy.so.debug Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/samba-3.0.10-root error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/samba/pdb/mysql.so ------------------------------------------------------------------ what can I do ? thanks Gianni -- -- ----------------------------------------------------...

...nto: Number 1 change - 2.7.2 no longer has the HAL scripts that 2.6.5 has. I am working on if HAL is actually required on CentOS6.6 with the 2.7.2 code or if they have another way around it. This is code diving which is taking some time. Number 2 change - RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/nut-scanner /usr/sbin/upsdrvctl A dozen + Man pages You mentioned the following a couple of weeks ago: I haven't really used RedHat products regularly since before they started the Fedora project, but from what I understand, it should still be possible to gra...

....2 code or if they have another way around it. This is code diving which is taking some time. HAL support in NUT was bit-rotting, so it was removed. It isn't necessary for the traditional /etc-based configuration method. > Number 2 change - > RPM build errors: > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/bin/nut-scanner > /usr/sbin/upsdrvctl > A dozen + Man pages See attached nut.spec (gzipped). Hasn't been tested, but it builds on CentOS 6.6 (after installing the dependencies from the error message the first time I ran 'rpmbuild -bb'). -- Cha...

...ntu or Debian packages (please correct me if I am wrong). The source files are available at tufte-latex.googlecode.com (a.k.a. code.google.com/p/tufte-latex) and I presume they should end up in a subdirectory of /usr/local/share/texmf or something like that. Is there a standard approach to adding unpackaged class files?