search for: unjustly

Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > However, it is incredibly > important to not expect or demand that a person *you have made feel > unsafe* take the time to explain why. I feel what you have written here to be offensive to the highest degree, and your words make me feel unsafe when contemplating their effect on my prospects for future interaction with this community.

The bounty stands at $5,500. I'm seriously considering taking a shot at it if I can find a decent T.38 provider to test with (I'm still hoping for reliable PAYG T.38). It looks like a lot of very smart people have done a lot of very hard work (t38modem, spandsp) that would go towards getting this working. At this point it appears to be mostly a matter of integration

...n't consider my personal sense of being offended to constitute a valid counter argument.) > I don't think that he's saying that that person will *never* have to > explain, or that at least someone else could not explain. Nor he's > saying, IIUC, that this is an excuse for unjustly mistreating the > offender. We don't want excuses either way. We want resolve. > > I also felt that the wording reflected that, and why I raised the > issue in the first place. But I never thought Chandler or Tanya have > ever *meant* that, only that careful wording is in order...

There is a new updated kernel for centos 3.1 that fixes a security issue. As I have not had time to test this build I am releasing it for testing for 24 hours to pick up any problems before general release. It is available at :- http://caos2.caosity.org:/centos/3.1/updates/i386/RPMS/ The version is 2.4.21-15.0.2.el.c0 Please install and test these packages, they are as yet unsigned and not

again, from here: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS5 regarding a newer version of PHP, a number of PHP experts that i know of suggest that, if you truly need an up-to-date version of PHP, you should: rpm -ivh http://rpms/famillecollet.com/enterprise/remi-release-5.rpm while remi collet's repo isn't official, it's accepted by numerous developers as a reliable source of newer PHP

Hi everyone, after attempting to correct Ivo's statement about Theora and Vorbis being the "default codecs" in the HTML 5 draft, I just got the following mail off list: "Why are you still here? And by here I mean the Xiph lists. I've seen you speaking ill of our formats and of free software more than in one occasion. So, for what purpose do you still stick around? What

Dont know if iys the done thing, but I contacted the writer of an app I maintain in AppDB, to point out that his app runs perfectly under Linux and Wine. Straught away he modified his webpage to include the fact, and a link to the AppDB page for his application. Cheers, Ron. -- I prefer the most unjust peace to the most righteous war.

On 2 May 2018 at 17:37, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Summary: > > I am leaving llvm effectively immediately. I am sorry for any > inconvenience this may cause. Hi Rafael, Against better judgement, and for what it's worth, here's my view. We have had heated technical discussions in the past and now that you leave, I

Please be patient and read this... Can AJ please change the license of the wine-launcher (like mono does)? You can still keep the libraries under LGPL. Please note proprietary is not bad and no oss w/o proprietary... You can make WINE a standard of binaries because of competition of Linux/BSD/Solaris binaries. It would be good for OS developers if you Change the license of the WINE launcher.

...ry version of R or compiled it yourself. <h3>Common posting mistakes</h3> Doing any of the following may result in you getting a response that you may find rude or insulting. (However, such a response may be justified in the eyes of some because you have wasted people's time or unjustly insulted people's work.) * Not doing your homework before posting a question. * Asking R-help to do your classroom homework for you (remember that many of the subscribers of R-help are university professors and can recognize homework questions with great speed and accuracy) * Claiming...

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:53 AM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> wrote: > > Thanks again for your thoughts, Chris. > >> As a straw man I would suggest the following criteria for inclusion into the mono-repo: >> >> (1) Projects in the mono-repo must be tightly coupled to specific versions or commits of other projects in the mono-repo > > I'm fine

Hi all, I'm new to the forum. Oh no....newbie question coming, I hear you all cry! I'm playing around with Asterisk@home and have installed software and fiddled around with sip and extensions files. I have manage to make out going calls through Sipgate using X-Lite but cannot for some reason receive incoming calls. Incoming calls do not even show up on the switchboard panel. I've

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 28, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Chris Bieneman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:53 AM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks again for your thoughts, Chris.

This comes from Indymedia audio list, Whamb! should probobally be listed on the vorbis.com software pages. ----- Forwarded message from nathaniel t <vsea75@hotmail.com> ----- The whole world doesn't use Linux or Windows. Some tiny fraction of computer users use Macs. I didn't realize until yesterday evening how difficult and mysterious it is to try to listen to an icecast ogg

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:59 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2016 8:36 a.m., "David Chisnall via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > This does not apply to libc++. We support building the entire LLVM suite with other C++ standard library implementations (at

Just wanted to catch everybody up. So many people contributed to the work list that I'd probably miss several if I tried to notify just them. Many people contributed funds, too, which I greatly appreciate. We were able to get the entire list done, which added up to two full hours of work on Allison's part. And that's just the recordings -- I'm doing the editing myself. Which

>> The decision of whether or not to include these projects >> affects only read-write consumers of these projects -- of which there >> are relatively few people. > > Maybe there are few, but the impact is non-insignificant. Also I think the opinions of the read-write consumers of the sub-projects being included should count for a lot I agree. > as a read-write

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> wrote: > >>> The decision of whether or not to include these projects >>> affects only read-write consumers of these projects -- of which there >>> are relatively few people. >> >> Maybe there are few, but the impact is non-insignificant. Also I think the opinions of the

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Justin Lebar <jlebar at google.com> wrote: > > Chris, > > What I notice in your latest e-mail -- and I don't know if this is > intentional, so sorry if I'm reading too much into it -- is that the > language has switched from "an unwarranted and unacceptable burden" to > "a burden”: I consider it unwarranted and

Hi Duncan, > […] > 2. Those working on projects *outside* the monolithic repo will get the downsides of both: a monolithic repo that they are only using parts of, and multiple repos that are somehow version-locked. > > 3. For many (most?) developers, changing to a monolithic git repo is a *bigger* workflow change than switching to separate git repos. Many people (and at least some