search for: unicom

UNICOM, Video Conferencing in Pakistan http://www.unicom.net.pk/ We at Unicom are pleased to inform you that we have expanded our network of video conferencing studios in all major cities of Pakistan including Karachi, Lahore, Peshawar, Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Quetta, Hayderabad, Nawabshah, Muzafarabad, S...

...ntication properly. I've attached a testparm -vs and my smb.conf, I can provide logs or whatever is needed to help me solve the problem. -------------- next part -------------- # Global parameters [global] dos charset = CP850 unix charset = UTF-8 display charset = LOCALE workgroup = UNICOM afs username map = netbios name = CARTMAN netbios aliases = netbios scope = server string = Cartman Anchorage Samba Server %v interfaces = bind interfaces only = No security = USER auth methods = encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = No client schannel = Auto server schannel...

> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Richard Laager wrote: > > I see you've added a Reply-To header later. The canonical response in > > this case is for someone to reference: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Yes, I've read that page. It says basically that it makes replying > privately to the sender difficult. I'm sure it does, but in this list I > don't think pretty much anyone ever wants to reply to someone only > privately. Since delibera...

...at you want to do. I'm stuck using Outlook, possibly the worst e-mail client ever written, and even there it's easy. I just hit 'Reply to all', then trim out the poster's address if I don't want them to get a direct copy. I pretty much agree with this document: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

This patch fixes a typo in MetaInfo.from_stream. Alexander. -------------- next part -------------- Index: rubytorrent/metainfo.rb =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/rubytorrent/rubytorrent/rubytorrent/metainfo.rb,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 metainfo.rb --- rubytorrent/metainfo.rb 7 Feb 2005 19:52:53 -0000 1.8 +++

Could whomever is in charge of the lartc mailing list please change it to add the header: Reply-To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Every other list I''m on is setup so that by default replies will go to the list. When replying to lartc emails I notice myself and others constantly forgetting this list does not behave like the rest, and that we have to either do a reply-to-all, or manually enter in

Hi list owner, Sorry for this. Is it possible to change the reply-to in mailman to be the list, and not the person who replied? Also the [Dovecot] on the subject would be handy. Just two things to get better. Thanks,

On Mar 14, 2014 3:41 PM, "Ady" <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > A few years ago, at popular request, I changed the default of the list > > to have a Reply-To: pointing at the list. I personally find it very > > annoying, and I would like to change the default back. > > > > Would people object to trying it? >

I'm a bit confused because the fellows who answer do this straight to my personal address. I had to reply-to-all to get the mailinglist's address. Is this intentional? I don't see the point. Shouldn't all communication only go via the mailinglist? However, I'm now off the list. Dennis

...gical point of view. It makes total sense. This came up not to long ago on the LARTC list. I was for it being the old way. Till a user provided the following. After reading all (long reads but necessarily) I reversed my stance and had to agree with list admins decision. First read: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Then, the rebuttal: http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html Finally, the rebuttal to the rebuttal: http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.txt -- Sincerely, William L. Thomson Jr. Obsidian-Studios, Inc. http://www.obsidian-studios.com

Just wondering... Would it be possible for the list software to set the reply-to: field to compiz@lists.freedesktop.org? Best regards, Sune M?lgaard -- I can resist everything except temptation. - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)

...too am curious at how this is annoying. I find it generally useful but > even with reply-to and the message on the bottom I find users/mailers still > emailing me directly rather than the list. FWIW: I'm voting _for_ this change. So do _not change_ the Reply-To: header. See http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html for motivation. That webpage is over a decade old, so it lacks that good e-mail programms have _three_ reply-buttons: "Reply", "Reply to all" and "Reply to List". Most likely we will encounter posters who aren't aware of a "Reply...

Hi everyone I have been trying to get Dovecot installed with OpenSSL support, but no matter what I do, when I run Configure, it says "Building with SSL support.........No". I have even tried configure --with-ssl=openssl, to no avail. I have built and installed OpenSSL, and libssl.so and libcrypto.so are in the /lib directory - what more does Dovecot want? I have tried figuring it out

Dear Samba and Linux list users - Several people have commented on the volume of spam reaching the list. Andrew (the list maintainer, I am but a lowly assistant) has been advised of your comments and will take action if he thinks it's necessary. People wishing to make further comment should do so directly to the list admins and NOT, repeat NOT to the list itself! My thanks to those list

Hi, is there a chance to alter the list behaviour to not use the sender address of a posting in the reply-to field but dovecot at dovecot.org instead? That way one has to either use "reply to all" in the MUA or manually enter dovecot at dovecot.org in any replies. And a "reply to all" duplicates postings because the posting once goes to the list and once to the original

On 22 May 2013, at 13:23, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > Why the private message? If unintentional, please forward this to the list. Ooops, forgot to hit reply-all. Didn't the LLVM lists used to default to reply-to-list behaviour? > So, the JIT is analogous to dlopen, so it should be using general > dynamic and local dynamic models. It is only the

I am running RedHat 9 and samba. I need to be able to set one password for each user and sync them with ssh, web, unix password. i.e. When I change samba pass, it changes unix, ftp, etc. Is this possible with samba? I saw that it is if you are running windows and then you can change the unix pass via samba. Is this possible when running linux. I just want to easily administer my users.

Question about the list in general: by default, it''s set up so that replies go to the sender, rather than the list. However, on other lists I usually chat on, replies by default generally go to the list. This seems to encourage more discussion. Would it be a good idea to change that default? Or am I just crazy. Best, Raymond -- Raymond Brigleb, Needmore Designs Website

I just added 802.1Q VLAN support to redhat initscripts. And after support was ready, I tried to restart shorewall. Well it blew into pieces. Seems like shorewall can''t handle device names like: eth0.3 very properly. That''s default naming of vlan devices. eth1 is master device and 3 is id of my test vlan. So when I added to interfaces line: home eth0.3 detect seems like

Hi everybody, My problem is that I want to add a new node to an existing RAC with ocfs2, without stop the database. If I add a new node to an existing ocfs cluster, do I need to stop the ocfs in the others nodes of the cluster? I've tried to do it without stop the ocfs in the others nodes but I get the following error: