search for: pascutto

...s option because for FM radio broadcasting I don't want to encode frequencies above 15khz. I'm waiting for this option before switching to ogg from mp3(lame). Ross. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vorbis@xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis@xiph.org]On Behalf Of > Gian-Carlo Pascutto > Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2001 01:46 > To: vorbis@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [vorbis] channel coupling in rc2 > > > > On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > Gian-Carlo Pascutto (gcp@sjeng.org) wrote: > > > > > What I've been wondering abo...

Hello all, I'm glad to announce to you that Vorbis now has full ReplayGain support. If you're not familiar with ReplayGain, take a look at www.replaygain.org. The main features are: a) all songs play back with equal loudness b) removes the need for normalization c) allows for clipping prevention Using it is very simple. Get a compatible decoder (ogg123, XMMS and WinAmp all support it

...k de Bokx Internet Service Engineer ICT Communication and Media Services PlanetMediaGroup the Netherlands "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty not safety." --Benjamin Franklin -----Original Message----- From: Gian-Carlo Pascutto [mailto:gcp@sjeng.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 10:50 PM To: vorbis@xiph.org Subject: Re: [vorbis] MP3PRO On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, FlipSide wrote: > Has anyone seen the demo of MP3PRO? You are about half a year late to the party. Check out the mailing list archives for discussions about...

In case you missed it, RC2 is on slashdot.org too: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/08/13/1811241 BTW Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote on /. that RC3 should appear very soon (in a week or so)? Also, it looks like Wall Street Journal article is not available on-line (at least to non-registered persons). If someone is registered or have a paper edition, please post this article somewhere so that we can all read it! -- Vorb...

Hi all, I started testing the RC1 encoder at ftp://sjeng.sourceforge.net/pub/sjeng/oggdrop.exe (based on branch_monty_20010708) On the songs I have tested so far (not much :) I did not hear any stereo issues, but there are some very noticeable problems with the produced files. Songs without much high-end will suddenly have one when encoded. (you'd expect it the other way around) It

Hi! I am very pleased with the progress that Ogg is making, expecially after I read the latest comparision tests on http://ff123.net/128test/instruct.html that put OGG on top aside with MPC. BUT the APPLAUD.WAV test case ( http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/applaud.wav ) still produces **VERY** easily audible high-frequency artifacts when encoded with OGG RC3 up to q4.9 (!!!). Things

After doing an informal (128k) listening test, I have concluded that I prefer Beta4 over RC2. The 16kHz low-pass on the RC2 encoder makes it sound like FM radio. Both encoders SEEM to have a couple of dB bump at 10kHz. JT --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

---------- > Van: ORK <korsmo@solungen.hm.no> > Aan: vorbis@xiph.org > Onderwerp: [vorbis] OggEnc help file > Datum: maandag 3 september 2001 18:21 > > Somebody asked how to use OggEnc a while ago. > > OggEnc v0.8 (libvorbis rc2) > (c) 2001 Michael Smith <msmith@labyrinth.net.au) > > Usage: oggenc [options] input.wav [...] LOL! --- >8 ---- List

...Netherlands "This is not an add banner, click here to find out why" -- seen on the Web -----Original Message----- From: volsung@asu.edu [mailto:volsung@asu.edu] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 4:19 PM To: vorbis@xiph.org Subject: Re: [vorbis] Mailflood On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > Is anyone else on this list currently being flooded > into oblivion by a broken vietnamese mailserver? > > Mail seems to originate from getronics.com.vn. I'm getting emails I send to the list bounced back to me directly because a (possibly) no longer existent email is su...

Hi all, ome people asked if it was possible to make an even higher quality mode by incorporating some of the changes from the first tuned version into the 350kbps mode. I did so and made a new version with this new mode. It gives bitrates from roughly 300-350kbps. That's a lot, but it also gets very hard to find something it artifacts on :) Should be sufficient for archival quality. In

>No big deal. I thought someone might be interested in a bug report. I >guess not. Your report is very much appreciated. Thanks! I hope the fixed version works for you. Hint to other posters: It never hurts to check the facts before wildly speculating and preaching about shells and operating systems. Thank you. -- GCP <p>--- >8 ---- List archives:

When using the abx utility that is in LAME's misc dir, trying it on an ogg (with ogg123) gives the following output: Standard Open Source Bug detected, try murksaround ... (ogg123 is decoding to stdout) IIRC this also happened with older mpg123's but no longer with the latest release. Latest ogg123 from CVS still gives it though. Someone stole code but forgot to check for fixes? :)

Hi! I would like to share with you an interesting test result. I re-encoded a song 10 times (the 2. made from the 1., the 3. made from the 2.,... the 10. made from the 9.), with a beta4 (CVS 20010620) and with an RC2 (CVS 20010817) library version, 256 kbit/s mode, channel coupling disabled at RC2. The beta4 is very good at the 10. encoding too, but the RC2 has some interesting quality bugs. So,

Hi all, I have implemented ReplayGain support for Vorbis. If you are not familiar with it, it is basically a method of making sure all your files have equal loudness, remove the need for normalization and prevent clipping during playback. The process is totally lossless, and supporting it requires minimal work. More info about the exact workings can be found on www.replaygain.org (recommended

Found this on usenet: August 13, 2001 E-Business Inventors Release Free Alternative To MP3 Music, but Cost Is High By MEI FONG Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL SOMERVILLE, Mass. -- Christopher Montgomery wants to be the Linus Torvalds of music, the creator of a piece of free software that has the sweeping impact of Mr. Torvalds's Linux operating system. He soon may begin finding

Hello everyone, I'm a student at the Universtiy of Delaware, and will be soon starting some research on the effects of lossy audio compression on speech sounds. I will be preforming test with both mp3 and vorbis. First of all, if I use the '--ogg' switch to lame, does lame use GPSYCHO to encode the wave, or some other psychoacoustic model (perhaps one designed for

As far as I can see, transcoding could be usefull for people who do not primarly care about quality but about filesizes. One could assume that such a user would have a collection of mp3's at 128kbps or higher bitrates, and uses an encoder like BladeEnc or Xing. He wants to take uses of ogg's supposed quality and transcode his 128-or-higher files into 96 or 112kbps oggs to save diskspace.

Hello -- I desperately want to start using Ogg compression on music I release on the internet, but I am encountering a fair amount of artifacts. I noticed some in beta4 and was hoping they would disappear with RC1. However, I've been playing with RC2 and I've still been banging my head into a number of problems. A majority of the music I make has long drones with a fair amount of spectral

I have problems getting streams with the Vorbis WinAmp plugin. MP3 streaming works fine. If I connect to a server, I can see data being sent/received, and the kbps/khz display will change, but no sound is played. Also, after a while the kbps/khz display starts giving bogus values. All the while, data keeps being sent/received, but no sound is ever played. I am behind a HTTP proxy for port 80,

>Ogg Vorbis is a fully Open, non-proprietary, >patent-and-royalty-free, general-purpose compressed >audio format for high quality (44.1-48.0kHz, 16+ bit, >polyphonic) audio and music at fixed and variable >bitrates from 16 to 128 kbps/channel The 'to 128kbps/channel' looks incorrect to me. If I am not mistaken, Ogg Vorbis can go a lot higher than that? -- GCP ---