search for: out5

Hi, how about to provide a simple way to forward raw file descriptors through ssh tunnels. something which may provide a way to write something like : (echo 3; read > out3) |& exec 3<&p 4>&p echo 5 >| out5 exec 5<> out5 echo 1 | ssh -d 3:rd -d 4:wr -d 5:rw ' read <&3; echo $REPLY >&4 read; echo $REPLY read <&5; echo $REPLY >&5 ' > out1 the expected result is 1 in out1, 3 in out3 and 5\n5 in out5. PS : hope the sample is right :-) Regards, Cyrille Le...

Hello Everyone - I want to print a number of results from lme function objects out to a txt file. How could I do this more efficiently than what you see here: out2 <- capture.output(summary(mod2a)) out3 <- capture.output(summary(mod3)) out4 <- capture.output(summary(mod5)) out5 <- capture.output(summary(mod6)) out6 <- capture.output(summary(mod7)) cat(out2,file="out.txt",sep="\n",append=TRUE) cat(out3,file="out.txt",sep="\n",append=TRUE) cat(out4,file="out.txt",sep="\n",append=TRUE) cat(out5,file="out....

...} for (i in 2:n) { # START FOR LOOP upr1 <- (y[i]-rho1*y[i-1]) upr2 <- (y[i]-y[i-1]+delta) # INTEGRATING THE THREE FUNCTIONS out1 <- integrate(f1, lower = (-1)*upr1, upper = upr1) out3 <- integrate(f3, lower = -Inf, upper = upr2) out5 <- integrate(f5, lower= -Inf, upper = upr2) pdf <- (out1$val + out3$val + out5$val) lglik[i] <- log(pdf) # LOGLIKELIHOOD FOR OBSERVATION i } # END FOR LOOP return(-sum(lglik)) # RETURNING NEGATIVE OF THE LOGLIKELIHOOD # BECAUSE op...

Anyone knows how to fix that? [...] /set.rb:202: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i686-linux] Aborted [...] and server shut down :( -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To

...ter long _out3 asm ("out3") = (long) (out3); \ + LOAD_ARGS_3 (out0, out1, out2) +#define LOAD_ARGS_5(out0, out1, out2, out3, out4) \ + register long _out4 asm ("out4") = (long) (out4); \ + LOAD_ARGS_4 (out0, out1, out2, out3) +#define LOAD_ARGS_6(out0, out1, out2, out3, out4, out5) \ + register long _out5 asm ("out5") = (long) (out5); \ + LOAD_ARGS_5 (out0, out1, out2, out3, out4) + +#define ASM_OUTARGS_1 "=r" (_out0) +#define ASM_OUTARGS_2 ASM_OUTARGS_1, "=r" (_out1) +#define ASM_OUTARGS_3 ASM_OUTARGS_2, "=r" (_out2) +#define ASM_OU...

...ch/ia64/pipe.c --- /dev/null Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969 +++ b/klibc/arch/ia64/pipe.c Mon Nov 24 16:39:39 2003 @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +/* + * pipe.c + */ + +#include "syscommon.h" +#include <klibc/archsys.h> + +#define ASM_CLOBBERS ,"out2", "out3", "out4", "out5", "out6", "out7", \ + /* Non-stacked integer registers, minus r8, r9, r10, r15. */ \ + "r2", "r3", "r11", "r12", "r13", "r14", "r16", "r17", "r18", \ + "r19",...

...frame(d12, pr, ju) colnames(out22) = colnames(out2) out3 = rbind(out22, out2) out3[, 3] = as.factor(out3[, 3]) out3[, 4] = as.factor(out3[, 4]) out4 = out3 out4[-c(1:I), 1] = out3[-c(1:I), 1]/sqrt(acm$eig[1, 1]) out4[-c(1:I), 2] = out3[-c(1:I), 2]/sqrt(acm$eig[2, 1]) out5 = out4 out5$moyen = out5 sim = simulation(out5, nbsimul = B) if (graph) { ##x11() plotellipse(sim, alpha = alpha, eig = signif(acm$eig, 4)) } texte = matrix(NA, (I * J), 3) texte = data.frame(texte) texte[, 1] = rep(rownames(don), J) text...

I have updated the klibc patchset based on feedback received. In particular, the patchset has been reorganized so as not to break git-bisect. Additionally, this updates the patch base to 2.6.17-git12 (d38b69689c349f35502b92e20dafb30c62d49d63) and klibc 1.4.8; the main difference on the klibc side is removal of obsolete code. This is also available as a git tree at:

...); } /* @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int keyctl_dh_compute_kdf(struct kdf_sdesc *sdesc, ret = -EFAULT; err: - kzfree(outbuf); + kfree_sensitive(outbuf); return ret; } @@ -395,11 +395,11 @@ long __keyctl_dh_compute(struct keyctl_dh_params __user *params, out6: kpp_request_free(req); out5: - kzfree(outbuf); + kfree_sensitive(outbuf); out4: crypto_free_kpp(tfm); out3: - kzfree(secret); + kfree_sensitive(secret); out2: dh_free_data(&dh_inputs); out1: diff --git a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c index 14cf81d1a30b..deebbf1...

...); } /* @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int keyctl_dh_compute_kdf(struct kdf_sdesc *sdesc, ret = -EFAULT; err: - kzfree(outbuf); + kfree_sensitive(outbuf); return ret; } @@ -395,11 +395,11 @@ long __keyctl_dh_compute(struct keyctl_dh_params __user *params, out6: kpp_request_free(req); out5: - kzfree(outbuf); + kfree_sensitive(outbuf); out4: crypto_free_kpp(tfm); out3: - kzfree(secret); + kfree_sensitive(secret); out2: dh_free_data(&dh_inputs); out1: diff --git a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c index f6797ba44bf7..4b4c1d8...

...); } /* @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int keyctl_dh_compute_kdf(struct kdf_sdesc *sdesc, ret = -EFAULT; err: - kzfree(outbuf); + kfree_sensitive(outbuf); return ret; } @@ -395,11 +395,11 @@ long __keyctl_dh_compute(struct keyctl_dh_params __user *params, out6: kpp_request_free(req); out5: - kzfree(outbuf); + kfree_sensitive(outbuf); out4: crypto_free_kpp(tfm); out3: - kzfree(secret); + kfree_sensitive(secret); out2: dh_free_data(&dh_inputs); out1: diff --git a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c index 14cf81d1a30b..deebbf1...

v5: - Break the btrfs patch out as a separate patch to be processed independently. - Update the commit log of patch 1 to make it less scary. - Add a kzfree backward compatibility macro in patch 2. v4: - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter so that it can be backported to stable. - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary

v4: - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter so that it can be backported to stable. - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged. This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree()

v4: - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter so that it can be backported to stable. - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged. This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree()

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

This patchset makes a global rename of the kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to highlight the fact buffer clearing is only needed if the data objects contain sensitive information like encrpytion key. The fact that kzfree() uses memset() to do the clearing isn't totally safe either as compiler may compile out the clearing in their optimizer. Instead, the new kfree_sensitive() uses