search for: obsecurity

Why does GCC produce faster code using "-march=pentium2 -mtune=pentium4" on a Pentium 4 chip versus plain -march=pentium4? Try it... CPUTYPE=pentium2 CFLAGS+= -mtune=pentium4 COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=pentium4 -- BSD Podcasts @ http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/

FYI ----- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> ----- X-Original-To: kkenn@localhost Delivered-To: kkenn@localhost.obsecurity.org Delivered-To: kris@freebsd.org Delivered-To: ports-committers@freebsd.org From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 06:45:06 -0800 (PST) To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync Makefile distinfo...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375452423794&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375456923804&w=2 Does this affect FreeBSD? - -Justin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Z7QbdYQBw9Ox1VgRAsb2AJ0eZxI/s3Q5KJQxvgROLM8FnU1kiQCfSsma XcJ/R/6s9yQJwBTYDeWI2+Y= =BoVH

FYI Kris ----- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> ----- X-Original-To: kkenn@localhost Delivered-To: kkenn@localhost.obsecurity.org Delivered-To: kris@freebsd.org Delivered-To: ports-committers@freebsd.org From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:45:03 -0700 (PDT) To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: ports/security/snort Makefile dis...

Hi folks, I think we need to update compat5x binary to fix FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl, but will the binaries built by ``make universe'' be identical with actual build on Alpha, Sparc64, etc? (Yes, I'm volunteering to do the work iff they are identical ;-) Cheers, -- Xin LI <delphij frontfree net> http://www.delphij.net/ See complete headers for GPG key and other information.

I just upgraded the second half of a two node puppetmaster cluster and now I am having issues with puppet-dashboard report processing. If I have workers running on both servers, they try to process each others reports, but since the report data file is not there, it fails. I would have assumed this data was local, not in the database. Does anyone else have this issue, or have a suggestion

[ Asked on -questions on Friday; re-asking now on -stable without cross-post] I recently upgraded a 4.11-REL machine to 6.0-REL and have run into some snags. While the installation from CD went fine, after configuring and enabling my ed0 NIC, bad things start to happen. FWIW, this machine is an ancient (hardware circa 1991, BIOS circa 1994) dual-Pentium 133 MHz machine, with EISA/PCI and

Dear list! I've tried to compile tripwire-2.3.1-2 port on my 5.2 release. Two diffe- rent tarballs have failed with message, that port was broken, all in one sentence. No any details. Well! Makefile has so- mething like: .if ${OSVERSION} >= 500000 BROKEN= "Fails to build inder 5.X" .endif One more: USE_GMAKE= yes Has someone compiled it successfully? Is it for a good

Apparently rsync breaks on FreeBSD if you turn off -O2 (which is the default.) The breakage is apparently inside zlib. You'd have to think it was a compiler bug, but perhaps not. I haven't tried to reproduce it yet. -- Martin ----- Forwarded message from grog@FreeBSD.org ----- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 23:14:46 -0700 (PDT) From: <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: mbp@samba.org Subject: PR

I think, there is a neat exploit in the phpbb2.0.8 because I found my home page defaced one dark morning. The patch for phpBB is here. http://www.phpbb.com/downloads.php The excerpt of the log is attached. I believe the link to the described exploit is here. http://secunia.com/advisories/13239 The defacement braggen page is here filter to show the exploited FreeBSD machines that aneurysm.inc

We're being ping-flooded by the Nachi worm, which probes subnets for systems to attack by sending 92-byte ping packets. Unfortunately, IPFW doesn't seem to have the ability to filter packets by length. Assuming that I stick with IPFW, what's the best way to stem the tide? --Brett Glass

this is 6.0-STABLE as for Mar 17. KDB: debugger backends: ddb KDB: current backend: ddb Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #2: Fri Mar 17 11:05:32 UTC 2006 vlad@host:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/DEF_WEB Timecounter

or "How do I know my copy of FreeBSD is the same as yours?" I have recently been meditating on the issue of validating X.509 root certificates. An obvious extension to that is validating FreeBSD itself. Under "The Cutting Edge", the handbook lists 3 methods of synchronising your personal copy of FreeBSD with the Project's copy: Anonymous CVS, CTM and CVSup. There are

First, I hope that this message is not considered flame bait. As someone who has used FreeBSD for for 5+ years now, I have a genuine interest in the integrity of our source code. Second, I hope that this message is not taken as any form of insult or finger pointing. Software without bugs does not exist, and I think we all know that. Acknowledging that point and working to mitigate the risks