search for: obscurity

Thanks in advance. here's the total firehose drink. I've obscured host, domain, subnet. Hope that will still work for you. Don't want all the info publicized. klist -ket /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab!! there is no /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab klist -ket /etc/krb5.keytab KVNO Timestamp           Principal ---- -------------------

Hai, In addition to Rowlands question. Can you run this script and post it to the list also. It gives a complete overview of what your running. Its basicly what Rowland asked, but with a few extra things. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh And the output of: kinit Administrator klist klist -ket /var/lib/samba/private/secrets.keytab

Hello, I've been reading up on lots of documents that mention the different ways to do things as far as joining a linux machine to AD and authentication. I've tried most of them but its not helping at all. I've included my config files for smb.conf, krb5.conf, pam.d/system-auth and the applicable nsswitch.conflines. For security reasons, i've obscured part of the domain name. Any

This is not a major issue, but is there any way to get the full directory name out when dir.create issues a warning? I am running R 2.8.0 patched on Windows Vista - full details below. With the following code: dir.create("test") obscure<-"test" dir.create(obscure) I get the warning message: In dir.create(obscure) : 't' already exists Session details: R

...45' is just there as an example. Perhaps a line in the HOWTO mentioning that it is preferred to have it listen to a port below 1024 would be appropriate. > That way SSH is still binding to a low port restricted to the root user and > you can still get a little of that security through obscurity being desired. > I hate to break it to you, but all security is security through obscurity in some form or fashion. Some forms of obscurity (such as RSA private keys) are just more obscure than other forms of obscurity (like which of a mere 65,535 ports SSH is listening to today, or what kno...

...s good, and std. repo. > > - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. (Things get a lot > quieter when you do that, but it comes with it's own problems and don't > get complacent because someone will find the port eventually.) I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity. > > - if you only have a limited number of hosts or subnets logging in to > your machine, adjust the firewall so that only they are allowed > through. Yep. And iptables rules are not that big a deal to write. mark

Hi, just a quick note to whoever is maintaining this page: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH The procedure is missing the firewall-cmd calls necessary in EL7: firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp --permanent Also, it may be worth mentioning that semanage is in the policycoreutils-python package, which isn?t installed by default in all stock

Hi, just a quick note to whoever is maintaining this page: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH The procedure is missing the firewall-cmd calls necessary in EL7: firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp firewall-cmd --add-port 2345/tcp --permanent Also, it may be worth mentioning that semanage is in the policycoreutils-python package, which isn?t installed by default in all stock

Dear colleagues, This may be a question with a really obvious answer, but I can't find it. I have access to a large file with real medical record identifiers (mixed strings of characters and numbers) in it. These represent medical events for many thousands of people. It's important to be able to link events for the same people. It's much more important that the real record numbers

...es check higher ports for SSH *_BUT_* I only see > 4% of the brute force attempts to login on ports other than 22. > > I would say that dropping brute force login attempts by 96% is quite a > good reason to move the SSH port from 22 to something else. I am not a fan of security through obscurity. If a port is open to the internet then it must be secured whether it is well known or not and if it is properly secured then changing the port number customarily assigned provides no measurable benefit. In my opinion, arbitrarily switching port numbers for well known services provides only the i...

I have two chromatograms I want plotted on the same axes. I would like the plots to be transparent, so the first chart is not obscured. I have tried adjustcolor(..., alpha.f=0.3), the problem is that my chromatogram is so dense with datapoints that they overlap and the entire graph just ends up a solid color. The second histogram still obscures the first. Consider this example: col1 <-

I want to put multiple plots on a page using par(mfrow), then a single title at the top. This should work, but doesn't: R> par(oma=c(0,0,4,0), mfrow=c(3,4)) R> for (i in 1:12) {plot(1); title(i)} R> ## text(10,10, ".") R> par(mfrow=c(1,1), oma=c(0,0,1,0)) R> title("Main Title") The main title does not appear. However, uncommenting the third line

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=809 Summary: ssh-keyscan breaks too obscurely when remote isn't an SSH server Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/228828 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

With `obscure' I mean there is no appdb entry for it. The game (~?UhB?Y - Marisa to Alice -MariAri-) is a technically simple puzzle game, but it crashes during certain animations. `Worlds' (set of levels) show the animation only the first time you try so it is just annoyance, but boss levels always show that animation so you cannot play them. I am using wine 1.3.23; with a clean prefix

New chapter by Esteve Camps <esteve@hades.udg.es> on ''DSMARK'' for Differential Services: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/HOWTO//cvs/2.4routing/output/2.4routing-9.html#ss9.6 And three obscure settings /proc files that are now documented, thanks to Jorge Novo <jnovo@educanet.net>: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/icmp_ignore_bogus_error_responses,

Hello! I am new to R (before used python exclusively and would actually call the R solution for this issue inside a python notebook, hope that doesn?t disqualify me right of the batch). Right now I am looking for a piece of software to fit a 1D data sample to a mixture of t-distributions. I searched quite a while already and it seems to be that this is a somehwat obscure endeavor as most

On 11/27/2017 02:02 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Pete Biggs wrote: >> - don't run ssh on 22, use a different port. > I consider that pointless security-through-obscurity. Security through obscurity it may be, but it isn't pointless. Tarpits are in a similar class; they don't help with security in the absolute sense, but they slow the attacker down, and that might be enough to prevent the attack from continuing.? (that is, put a tarpit on port 22 and run...

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!-- #msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:

Ok, thanks for clearing it up. But: > It's not a bug things work in ways that confuse users when they pry > into things they were not expected to pry into.... Do you have a good= > reason to call this a bug? Well if it's intended to work that way then it's not a bug. As I said, I was computing on the language, in particular writing code = that processes the parse tree of a