Nikolas Britton
2006-Mar-27 19:05 UTC
-march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
Why does GCC produce faster code using "-march=pentium2 -mtune=pentium4" on a Pentium 4 chip versus plain -march=pentium4? Try it... CPUTYPE=pentium2 CFLAGS+= -mtune=pentium4 COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=pentium4 -- BSD Podcasts @ http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/
Kris Kennaway
2006-Mar-27 19:21 UTC
-march=pentium2 + -mtune=pentium4 faster then -march=pentium4?
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 01:05:13PM -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote:> Why does GCC produce faster code using "-march=pentium2 > -mtune=pentium4" on a Pentium 4 chip versus plain -march=pentium4? > > Try it... > > CPUTYPE=pentium2 > CFLAGS+= -mtune=pentium4 > COPTFLAGS+= -mtune=pentium4Talk to the gcc developers (and provide benchmarks). Kris -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060327/5f15bba8/attachment.pgp
Possibly Parallel Threads
- ICH7 SATA RAID Broken, Was (Re: Timescale for 6.1-RELEASE...)
- Is mount_smbfs broken in 6.1-PRERELEASE?
- Command line not responding
- Need 3.3v 64 PCI Booard with 800FSB (for ordinary Pentium4, not Xeon)
- Compiling 64-bit libFLAC/libFLAC++ on OS X Lion, anyone successful?