-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375452423794&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375456923804&w=2 Does this affect FreeBSD? - -Justin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/Z7QbdYQBw9Ox1VgRAsb2AJ0eZxI/s3Q5KJQxvgROLM8FnU1kiQCfSsma XcJ/R/6s9yQJwBTYDeWI2+Y=BoVH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:08:36PM -0400, Justin wrote:> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375452423794&w=2 > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375456923804&w=2 > > Does this affect FreeBSD? >How about you actually read the FreeBSD mailing lists before asking the same question that has been asked n times already today. Kris -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/attachments/20030916/636d87a0/attachment.bin
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:34:50 -0700 Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: KK> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 09:08:36PM -0400, Justin wrote: KK> > KK> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375452423794&w=2 KK> > KK> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106375456923804&w=2 KK> > KK> > Does this affect FreeBSD? KK> > KK> KK> How about you actually read the FreeBSD mailing lists before asking KK> the same question that has been asked n times already today. I just wonder if recent patches brings openssh from FreeBSD to 3.7 or to 3.7.1 level of protection? -- Alex.
At 12:13 17/09/2003 +0400, Alex Povolotsky wrote:>I just wonder if recent patches brings openssh from FreeBSD to 3.7 or to >3.7.1 level of protection?It looks like the 3.7.1 patches are in -CURRENT right now, while the release branches and ports only have the 3.7 fix. I think we can safely assume that the security officer will MFC these patches and send out a revised advisory once he is satisfied with them. Colin Percival