search for: mpcf

Just tried the latest cvs samba_2_2 (trying to avoid the winbind memory leak thing). It configured, compiled and installed fine, but when it came up there was an issue. When my Windows users (Win98 ad Win2K) went into explorer, they could see no names on the folders in samba shares, just blank folders. I quickly put it back to the older 2.2.2 configuration and everyone is back to normal. Was

...d from that list, because it's so lame:) Arpi wrote: > Hi, > > > > It's been done and it works, but it's not good. The ogg container is > > > just a horrible design. Read all the mplayer-dev-eng archives > > > regarding "new container format"/MPCF for lots of discussion on the > > > matter. Soon the draft for our new spec will be complete and then we > > > can store (wonderful) vorbis audio without the (crappy) ogg container, > > > as standalone audio files or in movie files. > > > Rich > > > &gt...

...>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>It's been done and it works, but it's not good. The ogg container is >>>just a horrible design. Read all the mplayer-dev-eng archives >>>regarding "new container format"/MPCF for lots of discussion on the >>>matter. Soon the draft for our new spec will be complete and then we >>>can store (wonderful) vorbis audio without the (crappy) ogg container, >>>as standalone audio files or in movie files. >>>Rich >>> >>> &g...

...rwise would follow >>is anyone's guess, but it seems like a reasonable idea. Thoughts? > > It's been done and it works, but it's not good. The ogg container is > just a horrible design. Read all the mplayer-dev-eng archives > regarding "new container format"/MPCF for lots of discussion on the > matter. Soon the draft for our new spec will be complete and then we > can store (wonderful) vorbis audio without the (crappy) ogg container, > as standalone audio files or in movie files. > Rich Felker, whats your problem ? I can normally smell a wanker...

I have been (unsuccessfully) trying to get this up and running for the past few days. I have successfully setup samba itself NUMEROUS times but this winbind stuff has me stumped. I have built a fresh box for this server using Turbo Linux server 6.5 and samba 2.2.2. I have followed all the docs and man pages that i could find. 1. I have samba compiled (using --with-winbind --with-pam) and

...e's guess, but it seems like a reasonable idea. Thoughts? >>> >>> >>It's been done and it works, but it's not good. The ogg container is >>just a horrible design. Read all the mplayer-dev-eng archives >>regarding "new container format"/MPCF for lots of discussion on the >>matter. Soon the draft for our new spec will be complete and then we >>can store (wonderful) vorbis audio without the (crappy) ogg container, >>as standalone audio files or in movie files. >>Rich >> >> > >Felker, whats yo...

Hello to all, I am trying to setup samba 2.2.2 with winbind and i have gone through all the documentation that i could find in regards to this. Everything has been going smoothly up until now. The html docs for setting up winbind states that i should copy "pam_winbind.so" from the /samba/source/nsswitch/ to /lib/security/, simple enough but i do not have "pam_winbind.so" in

That's pretty much the question. I've got Symantec NAVCE running on my NT server protecting itself, the Windows clients and the Exchange server, but what do i do about my Linux based Samba server? Will a linux based AV app search for Win32 based viruses? Thanks, VeKTeReX

Hello all, Is there a way to install samba without installing SWAT? Thanks, VeKTeReX

In the winbind docs it says the following: "In /etc/pam.d/* replace the auth lines with something like this:" By this (/etc/pam.d/*) do they mean that we change ALL the files in that directory? If not, what files do we change? Another set of docs i read for winbind stated that i should change the /etc/pam.d/samba file, but on my TurboLinux 6.5 and RH 7.1 systems that file doesn't

The README.Win32-Viruses file distributed with Samba 2.2.2 gives procedures for trying to stop the Nimda virus on Samba shares. It contains mostly good info and it is a good idea to implement this extra level of protection but there is one thing to watch out for. The README says to veto the file "riched20.dll" (along with a few others). This is fine unless you are using your Samba box

I've got Samba 2.2.2 and winbind up and running fine between a TurboLinux server and an NT 4.0 PDC. I can "chown" files on the linux box fine using "$chown DOMAIN+username filename" but when i try to change an objects group using "$chgrp DOMAIN+groupname filename" i get errors stating that it is an invalid group name. What's the deal here? None of my group