vorbis@xiph.org wrote:
>Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org.
>We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of
>"Re: Please confirm your message".
>
>Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your
>mailer's "Reply" feature.
>
> vorbis+confirm+1047633476.23331.c524c3@xiph.org
>
>Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org mailing
>lists, we've set up a whitelist system by which anyone can post, but
>the first message from an unknown email address must be confirmed to
>verify that's it's not email from a spam robot. Your confirmation
>reply will add this email address to our whitelist, and allow you to
>post freely to Xiph.Org mailing lists from the confirmed address.
>
>[ This notice was generated by TMDA/0.68 (http://tmda.net/),
> an automated junk-mail reduction system. ]
>
>--- Enclosed is a copy of your message.
>
>Return-Path: <chris@wiesneronline.net>
>X-Original-To: vorbis@xiph.org
>Delivered-To: vorbis@xiph.org
>Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com (mailout06.sul.t-online.com
> [194.25.134.19])
> by motherfish-II.xiph.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061FB532A46
> for <vorbis@xiph.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 04:17:55 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de
> by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp
> id 18tlK6-0004kn-07; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:17:55 +0100
>Received: from smtprelay.wiesneronline.net
> (320071164149-0001@[80.145.210.104]) by fmrl04.sul.t-online.com
> with esmtp id 18tlK1-2HSYtsC; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:17:49 +0100
>Received: from Spooler by smtprelay.wiesneronline.net (Mercury/32 v3.32) ID
> MO000040; 14 Mar 03 10:19:07 +0100
>Received: from spooler by wiesneronline.net (Mercury/32 v3.32);
> 14 Mar 03 10:19:03 +0100
>Received: from wiesneronline.net (217.229.163.97) by smtp.wiesneronline.net
> (Mercury/32 v3.32) with ESMTP ID MG00003F; 14 Mar 03 10:18:56 +0100
>Message-ID: <3E719E34.9040003@wiesneronline.net>
>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:17:40 +0100
>From: Christian HJ Wiesner <chris@wiesneronline.net>
>Reply-To: chris@wiesneronline.net
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
> rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210
>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: vorbis@xiph.org
>Subject: Re: Please confirm your message
>References: <1047571362.3e70aba2384fe@imp.free.fr>
> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0303131743110.6971-100000@purple.cs.nott.ac.uk>
> <20030314060705.GB27429@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
> <3E719D72.5070501@wiesneronline.net>
> <1047633300.22723.TMDA@motherfish-II.xiph.org>
>In-Reply-To: <1047633300.22723.TMDA@motherfish-II.xiph.org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Sender: 320071164149-0001@t-dialin.net
>
>
>
>vorbis@xiph.org wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org.
>>We need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of
>>"Re: Ogg Vorbis tracks in QT files".
>>
>>Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your
>>mailer's "Reply" feature.
>>
>> vorbis+confirm+1047633300.22723.3e382f@xiph.org
>>
>>Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org mailing
>>lists, we've set up a whitelist system by which anyone can post, but
>>the first message from an unknown email address must be confirmed to
>>verify that's it's not email from a spam robot. Your
confirmation
>>reply will add this email address to our whitelist, and allow you to
>>post freely to Xiph.Org mailing lists from the confirmed address.
>>
>>[ This notice was generated by TMDA/0.68 (http://tmda.net/),
>> an automated junk-mail reduction system. ]
>>
>>--- Enclosed is a copy of your message.
>>
>>Return-Path: <chris@wiesneronline.net>
>>X-Original-To: vorbis@xiph.org
>>Delivered-To: vorbis@xiph.org
>>Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com
>> [194.25.134.83])
>> by motherfish-II.xiph.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3180F532A66
>> for <vorbis@xiph.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 04:14:58 -0500 (EST)
>>Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de
>> by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp
>> id 18tlH6-0003Bd-0M; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:14:48 +0100
>>Received: from smtprelay.wiesneronline.net
>> (320071164149-0001@[80.145.210.104]) by fmrl04.sul.t-online.com
>> with esmtp id 18tlGz-1OKFvsC; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:14:41 +0100
>>Received: from Spooler by smtprelay.wiesneronline.net (Mercury/32 v3.32)
ID
>> MO00003B; 14 Mar 03 10:15:59 +0100
>>Received: from spooler by wiesneronline.net (Mercury/32 v3.32);
>> 14 Mar 03 10:15:45 +0100
>>Received: from wiesneronline.net (217.229.163.97) by
smtp.wiesneronline.net
>> (Mercury/32 v3.32) with ESMTP ID MG00003A; 14 Mar 03 10:15:43 +0100
>>Message-ID: <3E719D72.5070501@wiesneronline.net>
>>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:14:26 +0100
>>From: Christian HJ Wiesner <chris@wiesneronline.net>
>>Reply-To: chris@wiesneronline.net
>>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
>> rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210
>>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>To: ffmpeg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, vorbis@xiph.org
>>Cc: D Richard Felker III <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
>> Steve Lhomme <steve.lhomme@free.fr>, Cyrius
<suiryc@yahoo.com>,
>> Moritz Bunkus <moritz@bunkus.org>, spyder@wiesneronline.net,
>> Ludovic 'BlackSun' Vialle <blacksun@corecodec.com>,
>> betaboy@corecodec.com
>>Subject: Re: Ogg Vorbis tracks in QT files
>>References: <1047571362.3e70aba2384fe@imp.free.fr>
>> <Pine.LNX.4.50.0303131743110.6971-100000@purple.cs.nott.ac.uk>
>> <20030314060705.GB27429@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
>>In-Reply-To: <20030314060705.GB27429@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>X-Sender: 320071164149-0001@t-dialin.net
>>
>>D Richard Felker III wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:26:21PM +0000, Mark Hills wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I tried to bind the 'OggS' 4CC to the vorbis codec
in mov.c, but it
>>>>>doesn't seem to like it... anyway, in QuickTime AFAIK
the vorbis track
>>>>>is embeded in an Ogg container... so we have those
alternatives:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>The example you give from Cinerlerra is the only time I've
ever seen
>>>>Vorbis audio as a track in a .mov file. And if it's already
put in an Ogg
>>>>container, then I'd argue that that's not really the
right way to go about
>>>>things.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Cinelerra is total broken crap. This is NOT the proper way to put
>>>vorbis audio in a movie. Instead, you should just put a raw vorbis
>>>stream there for audio, no ogg nonsense. The ogg container format is
>>>horrible enough by itself without trying to put it inside yet
another
>>>ugly container (quicktime).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The Ogg container provides sync and seeking to a set of packets,
>>>>regardless of codec. I'm not familiar with .mov files, but
presumably they
>>>>provide similar features. You can encode and decode Vorbis audio
without
>>>>any need for the Ogg container if you're that way inclined.
So I don't see
>>>>why there's any need for Ogg to be involved in this case.
Unless anyone
>>>>could explain otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Because the author is a stupid and lame. Same reason why none of his
>>>software compiles right from source... Speaking of which, he
doesn't
>>>understand the GPL since he makes you click a stupid
"AGREE" thing
>>>before downloading source.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On a separate note, what do people think of the idea of using
the Ogg
>>>>container to store Vorbis audio and some kind of libavcodec
supported
>>>>video format? Whether the xiph.org crew would approve until they
get their
>>>>Tarkin codec going, and whether MPlayer support or otherwise
would follow
>>>>is anyone's guess, but it seems like a reasonable idea.
Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>It's been done and it works, but it's not good. The ogg
container is
>>>just a horrible design. Read all the mplayer-dev-eng archives
>>>regarding "new container format"/MPCF for lots of
discussion on the
>>>matter. Soon the draft for our new spec will be complete and then we
>>>can store (wonderful) vorbis audio without the (crappy) ogg
container,
>>>as standalone audio files or in movie files.
>>>Rich
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Felker, whats your problem ? I can normally smell a wanker if i meet
>>one, even in the internet. I have no idea why my sensors were failing on
>>you in first instance, probably because you are hiding your stupid and
>>immatured insulting behind technical argumentation. In the end
you're
>>nothing but a poor, socially handicapped person, unable for normal
>>communication and hiding behind the anonymity of the internet. Somebody
>>pay this guy a psychologist, he needs one desperately.
>>
>>You feel this mailing list is your 'private area' and you can
insult
>>people and their work here at will ? Well, this ML has a public archive
>>accessible via HTTP, and everybody can subscribe to it and read your
>>comments, so this thinking is complete BS.
>>
>>Core developer or not, i fail to understand how the other developers of
>>both the FFMPEG and the mplayer projects can tolerate your behaviour.
>>You are throwing mud on the projects you are contributing to when
>>behaving like this, and that means their work is put into the dirt and
>>miscredited also.
>>
>>I am copying this email to the Vorbis user list, and i sincerely hope
>>some brave Xiph zealot people living in the States succeeds to find out
>>your real life adress and has a word with you about the very necessary
>>respect for Monty's work. We also had our doubts if Ogg is a good
>>container design for video handling, thats why we started our project,
>>but we will wait until Monty will present the final Ogg Theora specs
>>before we make any comments, and for sure we would not even think of
>>using a similar language as you are doing constantly. Its unfair to
>>judge Ogg's capabilities from OGM, as this project admittedly was a
>>quick hack IMHO, made from a 'stupid DirectShow kiddie' , to use
your
>>very own words, and thus very Windows centric.
>>
>>Its a pitty i wont be in the States before April, i really loved to be
>>together with some Xiph people when they are talking to you,
>>contributing some good old, handmade Bavarian arguments. You should
>>learn, and hopefully soon, that it can be painful to insult other people
>>and their work .... in a real life !!!!
>>
>>no regards
>>
>>Christian
>>
>>
>>
>>P.S. Explanation for Xiph people : He has been doing the very same with
>> other projects on the mplayer-dev-eng ML, and repeatedly, most notably
>>without even having understood the basics of the specs in most cases.
>>Sorry for the ranting on a public mailing list, but enough is enough.
>>
>>P.P.S. And please, dont swob their new MPCF ( MPlayer Container Format )
>>with our old MCF project, they have nothing in common and its mere
>>coincidence that both sound similar.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>Subject:
>>Re: Ogg Vorbis tracks in QT files
>>From:
>>Christian HJ Wiesner <chris@wiesneronline.net>
>>Date:
>>Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:14:26 +0100
>>To:
>>ffmpeg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, vorbis@xiph.org
>>
>>
>>D Richard Felker III wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:26:21PM +0000, Mark Hills wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I tried to bind the 'OggS' 4CC to the vorbis codec
in mov.c, but it
>>>>>doesn't seem to like it... anyway, in QuickTime AFAIK
the vorbis track
>>>>>is embeded in an Ogg container... so we have those
alternatives:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>The example you give from Cinerlerra is the only time I've
ever seen
>>>>Vorbis audio as a track in a .mov file. And if it's already
put in
>>>>an Ogg
>>>>container, then I'd argue that that's not really the
right way to go
>>>>about
>>>>things.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Cinelerra is total broken crap. This is NOT the proper way to put
>>>vorbis audio in a movie. Instead, you should just put a raw vorbis
>>>stream there for audio, no ogg nonsense. The ogg container format is
>>>horrible enough by itself without trying to put it inside yet
another
>>>ugly container (quicktime).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The Ogg container provides sync and seeking to a set of packets,
>>>>regardless of codec. I'm not familiar with .mov files, but
>>>>presumably they
>>>>provide similar features. You can encode and decode Vorbis audio
>>>>without
>>>>any need for the Ogg container if you're that way inclined.
So I
>>>>don't see
>>>>why there's any need for Ogg to be involved in this case.
Unless anyone
>>>>could explain otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Because the author is a stupid and lame. Same reason why none of his
>>>software compiles right from source... Speaking of which, he
doesn't
>>>understand the GPL since he makes you click a stupid
"AGREE" thing
>>>before downloading source.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On a separate note, what do people think of the idea of using
the Ogg
>>>>container to store Vorbis audio and some kind of libavcodec
supported
>>>>video format? Whether the xiph.org crew would approve until they
get
>>>>their
>>>>Tarkin codec going, and whether MPlayer support or otherwise
would
>>>>follow
>>>>is anyone's guess, but it seems like a reasonable idea.
Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>It's been done and it works, but it's not good. The ogg
container is
>>>just a horrible design. Read all the mplayer-dev-eng archives
>>>regarding "new container format"/MPCF for lots of
discussion on the
>>>matter. Soon the draft for our new spec will be complete and then we
>>>can store (wonderful) vorbis audio without the (crappy) ogg
container,
>>>as standalone audio files or in movie files.
>>>Rich
>>>
>>>
>>Felker, whats your problem ? I can normally smell a wanker if i meet
>>one, even in the internet. I have no idea why my sensors were failing on
>>you in first instance, probably because you are hiding your stupid and
>>immatured insulting behind technical argumentation. In the end
you're
>>nothing but a poor, socially handicapped person, unable for normal
>>communication and hiding behind the anonymity of the internet.
>>Somebody pay this guy a psychologist, he needs one desperately.
>>
>>You feel this mailing list is your 'private area' and you can
insult
>>people and their work here at will ? Well, this ML has a public archive
>>accessible via HTTP, and everybody can subscribe to it and read your
>>comments, so this thinking is complete BS.
>>
>>Core developer or not, i fail to understand how the other developers of
>>both the FFMPEG and the mplayer projects can tolerate your behaviour.
>>You are throwing mud on the projects you are contributing to when
>>behaving like this, and that means their work is put into the dirt and
>>miscredited also.
>>
>>I am copying this email to the Vorbis user list, and i sincerely hope
>>some brave Xiph zealot people living in the States succeeds to find
>>out your real life adress and has a word with you about the very
>>necessary
>>respect for Monty's work. We also had our doubts if Ogg is a good
>>container design for video handling, thats why we started our project,
>>but we will wait until Monty will present the final Ogg Theora specs
>>before we make any comments, and for sure we would not even think of
>>using a similar language as you are doing constantly. Its unfair to
>>judge Ogg's capabilities from OGM, as this project admittedly was a
>>quick hack IMHO, made from a 'stupid DirectShow kiddie' , to use
your
>>very own words, and thus very Windows centric.
>>
>>Its a pitty i wont be in the States before April, i really loved to be
>>together with some Xiph people when they are talking to you,
>>contributing some good old, handmade Bavarian arguments. You should
>>learn, and hopefully soon, that it can be painful to insult other
>>people and their work .... in a real life !!!!
>>
>>no regards
>>
>>Christian
>>
>>
>>
>>P.S. Explanation for Xiph people : He has been doing the very same
>>with other projects on the mplayer-dev-eng ML, and repeatedly, most
>>notably without even having understood the basics of the specs in most
>>cases. Sorry for the ranting on a public mailing list, but enough is
>>enough.
>>
>>P.P.S. And please, dont swob their new MPCF ( MPlayer Container Format
>>) with our old MCF project, they have nothing in common and its mere
>>coincidence that both sound similar.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subject:
> Re: Please confirm your message
> From:
> Christian HJ Wiesner <chris@wiesneronline.net>
> Date:
> Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:17:40 +0100
> To:
> vorbis@xiph.org
>
>
>
>
> vorbis@xiph.org wrote:
>
>> Hello, this is the mailing list anti-spam filter at Xiph.Org. We
>> need you to confirm your e-mail message with the subject of "Re:
Ogg
>> Vorbis tracks in QT files".
>>
>> Please send a message to the following address, or simply use your
>> mailer's "Reply" feature.
>>
>> vorbis+confirm+1047633300.22723.3e382f@xiph.org
>>
>> Rather than allow only list subscribers to post to Xiph.Org mailing
>> lists, we've set up a whitelist system by which anyone can post,
but
>> the first message from an unknown email address must be confirmed to
>> verify that's it's not email from a spam robot. Your
confirmation
>> reply will add this email address to our whitelist, and allow you to
>> post freely to Xiph.Org mailing lists from the confirmed address.
>>
>> [ This notice was generated by TMDA/0.68 (http://tmda.net/),
>> an automated junk-mail reduction system. ]
>>
>> --- Enclosed is a copy of your message.
>>
>> Return-Path: <chris@wiesneronline.net>
>> X-Original-To: vorbis@xiph.org
>> Delivered-To: vorbis@xiph.org
>> Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com
>> [194.25.134.83])
>> by motherfish-II.xiph.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3180F532A66
>> for <vorbis@xiph.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 04:14:58 -0500 (EST)
>> Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de by
>> mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18tlH6-0003Bd-0M; Fri, 14
>> Mar 2003 10:14:48 +0100
>> Received: from smtprelay.wiesneronline.net
>> (320071164149-0001@[80.145.210.104]) by fmrl04.sul.t-online.com
>> with esmtp id 18tlGz-1OKFvsC; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:14:41 +0100
>> Received: from Spooler by smtprelay.wiesneronline.net (Mercury/32
>> v3.32) ID
>> MO00003B; 14 Mar 03 10:15:59 +0100
>> Received: from spooler by wiesneronline.net (Mercury/32 v3.32);
>> 14 Mar 03 10:15:45 +0100
>> Received: from wiesneronline.net (217.229.163.97) by
>> smtp.wiesneronline.net
>> (Mercury/32 v3.32) with ESMTP ID MG00003A; 14 Mar 03 10:15:43
>> +0100
>> Message-ID: <3E719D72.5070501@wiesneronline.net>
>> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:14:26 +0100
>> From: Christian HJ Wiesner <chris@wiesneronline.net>
>> Reply-To: chris@wiesneronline.net
>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
>> rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210
>> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> To: ffmpeg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, vorbis@xiph.org
>> Cc: D Richard Felker III <dalias@aerifal.cx>,
>> Steve Lhomme <steve.lhomme@free.fr>, Cyrius
<suiryc@yahoo.com>,
>> Moritz Bunkus <moritz@bunkus.org>, spyder@wiesneronline.net,
>> Ludovic 'BlackSun' Vialle <blacksun@corecodec.com>,
>> betaboy@corecodec.com
>> Subject: Re: Ogg Vorbis tracks in QT files
>> References: <1047571362.3e70aba2384fe@imp.free.fr>
>>
<Pine.LNX.4.50.0303131743110.6971-100000@purple.cs.nott.ac.uk>
>> <20030314060705.GB27429@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
>> In-Reply-To: <20030314060705.GB27429@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> X-Sender: 320071164149-0001@t-dialin.net
>>
>> D Richard Felker III wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:26:21PM +0000, Mark Hills wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> I tried to bind the 'OggS' 4CC to the vorbis codec
in mov.c, but
>>>>> it doesn't seem to like it... anyway, in QuickTime
AFAIK the
>>>>> vorbis track
>>>>> is embeded in an Ogg container... so we have those
alternatives:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The example you give from Cinerlerra is the only time I've
ever seen
>>>> Vorbis audio as a track in a .mov file. And if it's already
put in
>>>> an Ogg
>>>> container, then I'd argue that that's not really the
right way to
>>>> go about
>>>> things.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Cinelerra is total broken crap. This is NOT the proper way to put
>>> vorbis audio in a movie. Instead, you should just put a raw vorbis
>>> stream there for audio, no ogg nonsense. The ogg container format
is
>>> horrible enough by itself without trying to put it inside yet
another
>>> ugly container (quicktime).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> The Ogg container provides sync and seeking to a set of
packets,
>>>> regardless of codec. I'm not familiar with .mov files, but
>>>> presumably they
>>>> provide similar features. You can encode and decode Vorbis
audio
>>>> without
>>>> any need for the Ogg container if you're that way inclined.
So I
>>>> don't see
>>>> why there's any need for Ogg to be involved in this case.
Unless
>>>> anyone
>>>> could explain otherwise.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Because the author is a stupid and lame. Same reason why none of
his
>>> software compiles right from source... Speaking of which, he
doesn't
>>> understand the GPL since he makes you click a stupid
"AGREE" thing
>>> before downloading source.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On a separate note, what do people think of the idea of using
the Ogg
>>>> container to store Vorbis audio and some kind of libavcodec
supported
>>>> video format? Whether the xiph.org crew would approve until
they
>>>> get their
>>>> Tarkin codec going, and whether MPlayer support or otherwise
would
>>>> follow
>>>> is anyone's guess, but it seems like a reasonable idea.
Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's been done and it works, but it's not good. The ogg
container is
>>> just a horrible design. Read all the mplayer-dev-eng archives
>>> regarding "new container format"/MPCF for lots of
discussion on the
>>> matter. Soon the draft for our new spec will be complete and then
we
>>> can store (wonderful) vorbis audio without the (crappy) ogg
container,
>>> as standalone audio files or in movie files.
>>> Rich
>>>
>>
>>
>> Felker, whats your problem ? I can normally smell a wanker if i meet
>> one, even in the internet. I have no idea why my sensors were failing
on
>> you in first instance, probably because you are hiding your stupid and
>> immatured insulting behind technical argumentation. In the end
you're
>> nothing but a poor, socially handicapped person, unable for normal
>> communication and hiding behind the anonymity of the internet.
>> Somebody pay this guy a psychologist, he needs one desperately.
>>
>> You feel this mailing list is your 'private area' and you can
insult
>> people and their work here at will ? Well, this ML has a public archive
>> accessible via HTTP, and everybody can subscribe to it and read your
>> comments, so this thinking is complete BS.
>>
>> Core developer or not, i fail to understand how the other developers of
>> both the FFMPEG and the mplayer projects can tolerate your behaviour.
>> You are throwing mud on the projects you are contributing to when
>> behaving like this, and that means their work is put into the dirt
>> and miscredited also.
>>
>> I am copying this email to the Vorbis user list, and i sincerely hope
>> some brave Xiph zealot people living in the States succeeds to find
>> out your real life adress and has a word with you about the very
>> necessary
>> respect for Monty's work. We also had our doubts if Ogg is a good
>> container design for video handling, thats why we started our
>> project, but we will wait until Monty will present the final Ogg
>> Theora specs before we make any comments, and for sure we would not
>> even think of using a similar language as you are doing constantly.
>> Its unfair to judge Ogg's capabilities from OGM, as this project
>> admittedly was a quick hack IMHO, made from a 'stupid DirectShow
>> kiddie' , to use your very own words, and thus very Windows
centric.
>>
>> Its a pitty i wont be in the States before April, i really loved to be
>> together with some Xiph people when they are talking to you,
>> contributing some good old, handmade Bavarian arguments. You should
>> learn, and hopefully soon, that it can be painful to insult other
>> people and their work .... in a real life !!!!
>>
>> no regards
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
>> P.S. Explanation for Xiph people : He has been doing the very same
>> with other projects on the mplayer-dev-eng ML, and repeatedly, most
>> notably without even having understood the basics of the specs in
>> most cases. Sorry for the ranting on a public mailing list, but
>> enough is enough.
>>
>> P.P.S. And please, dont swob their new MPCF ( MPlayer Container
>> Format ) with our old MCF project, they have nothing in common and
>> its mere coincidence that both sound similar.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Subject:
>> Re: Ogg Vorbis tracks in QT files
>> From:
>> Christian HJ Wiesner <chris@wiesneronline.net>
>> Date:
>> Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:14:26 +0100
>> To:
>> ffmpeg-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, vorbis@xiph.org
>>
>>
>> D Richard Felker III wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:26:21PM +0000, Mark Hills wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I tried to bind the 'OggS' 4CC to the vorbis codec
in mov.c, but
>>>>> it doesn't seem to like it... anyway, in QuickTime
AFAIK the
>>>>> vorbis track
>>>>> is embeded in an Ogg container... so we have those
alternatives:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The example you give from Cinerlerra is the only time I've
ever seen
>>>> Vorbis audio as a track in a .mov file. And if it's already
put in
>>>> an Ogg
>>>> container, then I'd argue that that's not really the
right way to
>>>> go about
>>>> things.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cinelerra is total broken crap. This is NOT the proper way to put
>>> vorbis audio in a movie. Instead, you should just put a raw vorbis
>>> stream there for audio, no ogg nonsense. The ogg container format
is
>>> horrible enough by itself without trying to put it inside yet
another
>>> ugly container (quicktime).
>>>
>>>> The Ogg container provides sync and seeking to a set of
packets,
>>>> regardless of codec. I'm not familiar with .mov files, but
>>>> presumably they
>>>> provide similar features. You can encode and decode Vorbis
audio
>>>> without
>>>> any need for the Ogg container if you're that way inclined.
So I
>>>> don't see
>>>> why there's any need for Ogg to be involved in this case.
Unless
>>>> anyone
>>>> could explain otherwise.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Because the author is a stupid and lame. Same reason why none of
his
>>> software compiles right from source... Speaking of which, he
doesn't
>>> understand the GPL since he makes you click a stupid
"AGREE" thing
>>> before downloading source.
>>>
>>>> On a separate note, what do people think of the idea of using
the Ogg
>>>> container to store Vorbis audio and some kind of libavcodec
supported
>>>> video format? Whether the xiph.org crew would approve until
they
>>>> get their
>>>> Tarkin codec going, and whether MPlayer support or otherwise
would
>>>> follow
>>>> is anyone's guess, but it seems like a reasonable idea.
Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's been done and it works, but it's not good. The ogg
container is
>>> just a horrible design. Read all the mplayer-dev-eng archives
>>> regarding "new container format"/MPCF for lots of
discussion on the
>>> matter. Soon the draft for our new spec will be complete and then
we
>>> can store (wonderful) vorbis audio without the (crappy) ogg
container,
>>> as standalone audio files or in movie files.
>>> Rich
>>
>>
>>
>> Felker, whats your problem ? I can normally smell a wanker if i meet
>> one, even in the internet. I have no idea why my sensors were failing
on
>> you in first instance, probably because you are hiding your stupid and
>> immatured insulting behind technical argumentation. In the end
you're
>> nothing but a poor, socially handicapped person, unable for normal
>> communication and hiding behind the anonymity of the internet.
>> Somebody pay this guy a psychologist, he needs one desperately.
>>
>> You feel this mailing list is your 'private area' and you can
insult
>> people and their work here at will ? Well, this ML has a public archive
>> accessible via HTTP, and everybody can subscribe to it and read your
>> comments, so this thinking is complete BS.
>>
>> Core developer or not, i fail to understand how the other developers of
>> both the FFMPEG and the mplayer projects can tolerate your behaviour.
>> You are throwing mud on the projects you are contributing to when
>> behaving like this, and that means their work is put into the dirt
>> and miscredited also.
>>
>> I am copying this email to the Vorbis user list, and i sincerely hope
>> some brave Xiph zealot people living in the States succeeds to find
>> out your real life adress and has a word with you about the very
>> necessary
>> respect for Monty's work. We also had our doubts if Ogg is a good
>> container design for video handling, thats why we started our
>> project, but we will wait until Monty will present the final Ogg
>> Theora specs before we make any comments, and for sure we would not
>> even think of using a similar language as you are doing constantly.
>> Its unfair to judge Ogg's capabilities from OGM, as this project
>> admittedly was a quick hack IMHO, made from a 'stupid DirectShow
>> kiddie' , to use your very own words, and thus very Windows
centric.
>>
>> Its a pitty i wont be in the States before April, i really loved to be
>> together with some Xiph people when they are talking to you,
>> contributing some good old, handmade Bavarian arguments. You should
>> learn, and hopefully soon, that it can be painful to insult other
>> people and their work .... in a real life !!!!
>>
>> no regards
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>>
>> P.S. Explanation for Xiph people : He has been doing the very same
>> with other projects on the mplayer-dev-eng ML, and repeatedly, most
>> notably without even having understood the basics of the specs in
>> most cases. Sorry for the ranting on a public mailing list, but
>> enough is enough.
>>
>> P.P.S. And please, dont swob their new MPCF ( MPlayer Container
>> Format ) with our old MCF project, they have nothing in common and
>> its mere coincidence that both sound similar.
>>
>
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'vorbis-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.