search for: loooong

...ond silence at the beginning of a call). Something I've noticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this loooong tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only 1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggish computer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7...

...ytecode and then passed it to opt tool and then linked all bytecode files to single bytecode using llvm-ld, i used lli tool to run this single bytecode file and noticed the following output > real 6m33.786s > user 5m12.612s > sys 1m1.205s > > why is lli taking such a loooong time to execute this particular piece of code.?? Something's wrong on your machine or something. I did the same (but using llvm-gcc for the .ll files). Using a debug build of current ToT I got this: [ghostwheel:~/Desktop] echristo% time ~/builds/build-llvm-64bit/Debug/bin/lli foo.bc.bc 0.21...

...t seem to be a way to determine the absolute peak bandwidth VBR will output. I thought getting the bitrate just after setting the vbr quality was the maximum, but this seems to be just a good guess of the average. .. Unfortunately, and a bit unexpectedly, the same is true for ABR. If you have a loooong period of silence in the beginning, st->vbr_quality will slowly increase. If you then have lots of talking, st->vbr_quality decreases very very slowly as st->abr_count is now very high. The end result is that the target bitrate is exceeded quite drastically over short time periods. As...

Okay, I'm a super super-dee-duper newbster. Aaaaand I'm on a MacBook. Aaaaand I'm running Leopard (10.5.8). So I've used Wine before a loooong time ago for some things, but nothing big. And now I want to play Gunz (from ijji.com). I got everything downloaded (the reactor) and then it tells me something about "Gecko" needing to be installed. I get everything all installed and check "Launch Ijji Reactor" box on the final...

...e[10] - d$open[9] fails. I just get an answer of "numeric(0) Index: numeric(0)". My guess is that xts is breaking because the two items in my equation have different time stamps. However, the actual data is correct, and the xts matrix looks correct. Note: It works if I do things the loooong way around. as.numeric(d$close[10]) - as.numeric( d$open[9] ) But, that is horrendously slow. Suggestions? -- Noah Silverman, C.Phil UCLA Department of Statistics 8117 Math Sciences Building Los Angeles, CA 90095 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...1905 > > On the just released 8.1 > # cat /etc/centos-release > CentOS Linux release 8.1.1911 (Core) > > # lsb_release -r > Release: 8.1.1911 > > This is acceptable in my opinion from a final user point of view > > I'm not sure but possibly the origin of the loooong discussion thread was > this one from Karanbir, if interested: > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/010444.html Let's just say this: We are ALWAYS going to officially call the releases: 'CentOS 8 (1911)' and 'CentOS 7 (1908)' We are going to do...

I have a very simple setup on a Solaris 8 server, running Samba 3.0.1 (see smb.conf below). A desktop PC running Windows 98 (SE?) happily connects to and prints to my one shared printer, but an XP Pro laptop takes a loooong time to install the local driver and then just says "Access denied, unable to connect". I already told it to use a client driver and disabled spoolss. Here's my smb.cnf file: ----------Start of smb.conf------------ [global] workgroup = jwu netbiosname = pvd-dat-60 security = sha...

...ndom disconnections. So long as Tripp-Lite is not sharing their code with us, I think this will remain a mystery. At some point they are going to *have* to either update their Linux binaries, or drop them altogether. The specific distributions that they support with their proprietary software is loooong out of date. Perhaps at that point they will open source the code? Also there seems to be some speculation (or perhaps you know for a fact) that the Tripp Lite actually includes a serial to USB converter inside of the device. I have a stockpile of these awaiting deployment. Maybe I will open on...

...d then linked all bytecode files to single >> bytecode using llvm-ld, i used lli tool to run this single bytecode >> file and noticed the following output >> real 6m33.786s >> user 5m12.612s >> sys 1m1.205s >> >> why is lli taking such a loooong time to execute this particular >> piece of code.?? > > Something's wrong on your machine or something. I did the same (but > using llvm-gcc for the .ll files). Using a debug build of current > ToT I got this: > > [ghostwheel:~/Desktop] echristo% time ~/builds/bui...

Hello I have a couple of questions, Hope someone here can help answer them. I am using acts_as_ferret on a model Item with around 10 million rows. I use Item.rebuild_index at the ruby console to build the index. It seems to run for at least 48 hours when building. My questions are: 1) How do you know when the indexing is over and complete? 2) How can you confirm that ALL records in the table

...expect just some tens of megabyte needed to be transfered. I have the following command line: rsync -av --no-whole-file --inplace source destination. Is that ok ? Any suggestions ? I skipped the check with the hash values before the transfer because creating a hash value from a 400GB file takes loooong. But the man pages mentione that nevertheless AFTER the transfer a hash value is created on both sides to check that the files are equal. Is it possible to switch the after-transfer check off ? I have SLES 12 SP3 and rsync 3.1.0 Thanks. Bernd -- Bernd Lentes Systemadministration Institut fü...

On 17/01/20 8:06 am, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 1/16/20 6:49 AM, Peter wrote: >> On 16/01/20 4:14 am, Brian Stinson wrote: >>> Release for CentOS Linux 8 (1911) >>> >>> We are pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 8. >> >> CentOS 8 was released in September 2019.? Don't you mean 8.1? > No, they mean CentOS 8 (1911).? This

...as the >> documentation goes, seems to refer to the shared FS rather than any >> places where tdb files live. > If MooseFS does not even survive -rw without asking for mmap coherence, > just don't use it for Samba. This will eat your data for breakfast. > Gluster was there loooong ago, and they fixed it before becoming a > viable storage solution for Samba. > > Volker MooseFS does not ask for mmap coherence. It has inconsistent results on a plain -rw test. I think the chaps over there are interested in gaining some input from your considerable experience. If they...

...more negative) AICc value than the untransformed data with link=log. Is it valid to run the GLM with log(x+1) transformed data if link=identity? Or am I violating some kind of assumption about the model? I really appreciate any advice or thoughts! It seems as if my go-to statistician has taken a loooong break and any help would be greatly valued! -Emily Bellush QTGR@IUP.EDU Indiana University of Pennsylvania [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...using >>>> llvm-ld, i used lli tool to run this single bytecode file and noticed the >>>> following output >>>> real 6m33.786s >>>> user 5m12.612s >>>> sys 1m1.205s >>>> >>>> why is lli taking such a loooong time to execute this particular piece >>>> of code.?? >>>> >>> >>> Something's wrong on your machine or something. I did the same (but using >>> llvm-gcc for the .ll files). Using a debug build of current ToT I got this: >>> >>&...

...de files to single bytecode using >>> llvm-ld, i used lli tool to run this single bytecode file and noticed the >>> following output >>> real 6m33.786s >>> user 5m12.612s >>> sys 1m1.205s >>> >>> why is lli taking such a loooong time to execute this particular piece of >>> code.?? >>> >> >> Something's wrong on your machine or something. I did the same (but using >> llvm-gcc for the .ll files). Using a debug build of current ToT I got this: >> >> [ghostwheel:~/Desktop] e...

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 2910 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/19990608/1b2f9b97/attachment.bat

On Jan 7, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Steve Ballantyne <steve.ballantyne at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to get to the root of the problem though. I may tweak > the code a bit and see if I can get better results. Although you are > right about the broken pipe. If the device is "unplugging" ... not > much you can do to fix that other than to just ignore it. Although this

...release 8.0.1905 (Core) # lsb_release -r Release: 8.0.1905 On the just released 8.1 # cat /etc/centos-release CentOS Linux release 8.1.1911 (Core) # lsb_release -r Release: 8.1.1911 This is acceptable in my opinion from a final user point of view I'm not sure but possibly the origin of the loooong discussion thread was this one from Karanbir, if interested: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/010444.html HIH, Gianluca

...needed to be transfered. > > I have the following command line: > rsync -av --no-whole-file --inplace source destination. > > Is that ok ? Any suggestions ? > > I skipped the check with the hash values before the transfer because creating a hash value from a 400GB file takes loooong. > But the man pages mentione that nevertheless AFTER the transfer a hash value is created on both sides to check that the files are equal. > Is it possible to switch the after-transfer check off ? > > I have SLES 12 SP3 and rsync 3.1.0 > > Thanks. > > Bernd > -- ~*...