search for: llvm2.9

I had llvm 2.9 installed on ununtu. I tried to build clang but got following error. I have llvm 2.9 and clang is latest version ( I don't know, I got from svn). I am wondering is it because of version problem ? Does clang work with 2.9 llvm ? llvm[3]: Compiling ClangASTNodesEmitter.cpp for Debug build In file included from

Chen, see http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#pf_12 ...Takumi ps. Excuse me, PE+ (aka pep) means "Executable file format for WIndows x64". 2011/5/16 陈晓宇 <xychen0921 at gmail.com>: > The stack trace: > > Starting program: > C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\home\xchen\llvm-obj\lib\Target\CellSPU/../.. > /../Debug/bin/tblgen.exe -I

I was building llvm2.9 using MinGW64 on windows, msys was 32 bit so I specified --host option for a cross compiling. Following are my configure options: ../llvm2.9/configure --prefix=/home/AutoESL/llvm-obj --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --disable-multilib The error: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/AutoESL/llvm-obj/lib/VMCore' make[1]: ***

Hello I am new to LLVM and would like to cross-compile LLVM 2.9 on x86 (Ubuntu) to ARM using Code Sourcery LIte toolchain for ARM EABI (2011.03-41). This is the command I used to configure: ./configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=arm-none-linux-gnueabi --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi followed by: make -C llvm.2.9 ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0 I encountered the following errors: configure:error:

Chen, 2011/5/13 陈晓宇 <xychen0921 at gmail.com>: > ../llvm2.9/configure --prefix=/home/AutoESL/llvm-obj >                             --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 >                             --disable-multilib Please try with "--build=x86_64-w64-mingw32", not "--host". If you would still have any troubles, make sure your x86_64-w64-g++.exe can generate correct

Hi All,   Further exploring the problem I could find that, there is a address offset calculation problem, with the GEP bitcast handling code in instruction combining. Below is table which shows address offset calculation for the struct elements (described earlier).   Type Variable Actual Size(in bytes) pass fail llvm2.9 Address(pass) Size-pass (in bytes) Address (fail) Size -fail (in bytes) with

With reference to the previous query, I think, i miscalculated the offset, just recalculating. 1. without instruction combining coupling member variable, is at:   %struct._FRAME_DATA* %2, i32 0, i32 5   where "%2" is defined as:   %arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i16* %Data, i32 1024, !dbg !446   %2 = bitcast i16* %arrayidx3 to %struct._FRAME_DATA*, !dbg !446 i.e. at 5 offset in

Hi all I had build llvm 2.8 on my Linux system, when i run "opt -version " command , it shows llvm2.8. I want replace llvm 2.8 with 2.9, i used "rpm -qa llvm" and "make unistall" and  "make clean" and then build llvm 2.9 but when run "opt -version" i get llvm 2.8 yet. and when want use "opt" i get error. how can i replace llvm 2.8 with

Hi, I'm having problems compiling llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9 (from [1]). I need to use this version because I am trying to use KLEE (see [3]) which needs these versions. I am compiling on Arch Linux using gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20120505 (prerelease) the output of `gcc -v` can be found at http://pastebin.com/8j2m3wzD I have tried the following 1. Extracted llvm-2.9 (from [2]) 2. Applied a patch (adds

Dear All, I'm using LLVM2.9 for profiling basic block frequency. I'm using following commands. rdpatel55 at ubuntu:~$ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -O0 -c -o adpcm.bc adpcm.c rdpatel55 at ubuntu:~$ llvm-gcc -emit-llvm -O0 -c -o rawcaudio.bc rawcaudio.c rdpatel55 at ubuntu:~$ llvm-link -o main.bc rawcaudio.bc adpcm.bc rdpatel55 at ubuntu:~$ opt -q -f -insert-edge-profiling -o main.inst main.bc

I think, finally, I want to conclude on this.   The problem I see is that if I comment the case for "simplificaiton of bitcast to gep of original struct in instruction combining", wherein there is a case for if the offset by which GEP moves the pointer is non-zero.   If I disable this code, then structure elements size, I get is

Hello, (cc:llvmdev Keeping on the list to get more eyes on the problem and for archival purposes). Configure will be re-run, yes. LLVM includes some tools which need to be built for the host, even when cross compiling (e.g., tblgen). In a cross-build, these are built in the BuiltTools directory and that's where you're seeing configure being re-run. >From the below snippet it appears

Hi Pankaj, are you testing this on valid bitcode? The bitcode you sent me did not pass the verifier, i.e. was not valid. Optimizers can be expected to do strange and wrong things if passed invalid bitcode. That is not a bug in LLVM: it is user error if a user doesn't use valid bitcode. Ciao, Duncan. > I think, finally, I want to conclude on this. > The problem I see is that if I

Esentially, I'm working on a translator someone started building for llvm2.9 that translates an optimized .lln file to another intermediate language, and I'm porting it to 3.1. There is a new intrinsic that pops up in our test cases' lln files that never used to, llvm.lifetime.start. I looked up the description: "The 'llvm.lifetime.start' intrinsic specifies the start of

Hi All,   While collecting type information for "anonymous types", I had below observation.   For the example with anonymous types, given below struct test {   struct {     union {       Char a[4];     };   };   struct {     int b;     char c;   }; };   LLVM 2.6 defines the types as %struct.anon1 = type { %union.anon0} %struct.anon2 = type { i32, i8} %struct.test = type {

This fixes a bug in SmallVectorImpl<>::insert, which were not behaving correctly on inserting an empty range into an empty vector: #include <llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h> #include <cassert> int main() { llvm::SmallVector<int, 1> v, w; llvm::SmallVector<int, 1>::iterator it = v.insert(v.end(), w.begin(), w.end()); assert(it == v.end()); } The insert function(s)

Hi Everybody, I'm working a project which requires assembly code for mips1 architecture for simulation purpose. I checked the latest LLVM3.2 version and found that the backend has been removed. I tried to replace the MIPS backed in LLVM3.2 by the old one in LLVM2.9 (which contains mips1) and adjust some routines to get the backend compiled. However, when llc is used to generate the assembly,

Hi All,   I was searching for, extracting information about 'typedefed struct types' from 'module'. I have 'struct' typedefed in a .h file. I try to use this structure instance inside a function.   My .ll file rightly defines this type in the beginning so that it can be used later. (for example below) %struct.DEBLOCK_UNIT = type { i8*, i8*, i8*, i8, i32, i32,

> No idea what exactly you want to achieve, but let me try. > > First, you might need a function doing the instrument. Say, > > void HowManyTimeThisFunctionGetCalled(); > > Then you can insert a call to the function above while creating > a LLVM function [1]. In that way, every time that LLVM function > get called the function doing the instrument will be called.

Hi, I am using Path Profiling to path profile a C code. I'm using this commands: $ llvm-gcc -c -emit-llvm file.c -o file.bc $ opt --insert-hotpath-profiling file.bc -o file.ins.bc $ llc -march=x86 file.ins.bc -o file.ins.s $ gcc -I llvm2.9/runtime/PathProfling.c -I llvm2.9/runtime/CommonProfiling.c $ ./a.out This will give me path profile of of program in 'llvmpro.out' to decode