search for: gilad

----- Forwarded message from Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> ----- From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> Organization: Codefidence ltd. A name you can trust. To: Linux-IL <linux-il@linux.org.il> Subject: [Announcement] Asterisk-IL mailing list X-Bogosity: Unsure [50.0%] X-listar-version: Listar v0.12...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [mailto:gilad@codefidence.com] > I'm prbably stupid, but wont this do what you want? > > > exten => 1,1,Goto(bye,s,1) No, because I wanted to match on "D", not "1". Anyway, I figured it out. The extension was working, but Background() ignores...

Redhat 9 is running 100% cpu usage. I had a couple boxes doing this. upgraded to Fedora and its ok.

BR C.

Hello, I use Asterisk 1.0.2 on a RedHat Enterprise Server 3.0 (Kernel 2.4.21) and i experienced that the memory consumption of the asterisk-process started by the init.d-script raises continously. Now, after 3 hours of operation (on our testing-system we have 30 concurrent connections to another asterisk box using IAX2 and GSM codec) there is already 66MB allocated. I think this could be ok, but

...at 7:26 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Hi, > > The Speex AEC is simply not designed to deal with non-linear echo, as is the case when clipping of AGCs are involved. Make sure all your path is linear or forget about the Speex AEC. > > Jean-Marc > > On 11-01-03 11:31 AM, Omer Gilad wrote: >> Hi, >> I couldn't find a discussion that specifically addresses this, so here >> it is. >> >> I'm using Speex AEC in my mobile VoIP application to cancel speaker >> echo. The used version is 1.2rc1 from the website, and I'm compiling >&g...

> -----Original Message----- > From: David Brodbeck [mailto:DavidB@mail.interclean.com] > Okay, the problem appears to be that I'm tone deaf. ;) > > I finally thought to turn on debugging on the channel. The > PBX is sending > "D", not "*". The programmer of the previous voice mail system (whose > configuration I was cribbing from) seems to have

At time to time somebody is trying "their luck" and send me most likely a junk fax on my voice line. During normal working hours is not a problem I just pickup the line and hangup the call but after-hours my voice mailbox is intercepting the call and recording those "beeps" (waisting my CPU cycles). Is there a way to block call / issue hangup command if the incoming call is a

...ons in other ways, and solves the problem in a safe manner. A patch to the rules file is attached. Please advise if this solution makes sense, and whether it can be incorporated into the standard distribution of nut. (Note: I'm not subscribed to nut-upsdev, so please reply-all) Many thanks. Gilad -------------- next part -------------- --- 70-nut-usbups.rules 2007-09-20 17:24:41.000000000 -0700 +++ 71-nut-usbups-gilad-20070926.rules 2007-09-28 16:16:18.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ # udev rules for the NUT USB drivers -SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="nut-usbups_rules_end...

Hi everyone, This is off topic and is for GS technical support really but it seems that there are a lot of Budge Tone 100/101/102 users out there. I've got a Budge Tone-100 (101 - without the extra 10base ethernet connetion?) here. I changed the configuration through its web based interface and I clicked the reboot link. But then something went wrong and ever since then it doesn't

For an office that is using VoIP phones to connect to Asterisk, is gigabit ethernet really necessary for the Asterisk box to connect to the switch? I know that I won't even approach the limits of 100 Mbps, but would gigabit help with latency / collisions when several calls are underway? The fact is, anything going outside the office will be over a data T1, so intuition tells me that 100

I have 4 gig in my * box. I'm tuning for performance and I'd like to ask opinions: 1. asterisk -p == renice -20 ?? 2. I've turned off swap with no apparent ill effects. Can anyone commment on long term effects with moderate load (say, 30 SIP phones / 2-3K calls /day) 3. Can anyone comment on using ramdisk as swap and whether this is a good idea or bad idea? I'm using 2.6

Hi, I couldn't find a discussion that specifically addresses this, so here it is. I'm using Speex AEC in my mobile VoIP application to cancel speaker echo. The used version is 1.2rc1 from the website, and I'm compiling with fixed-point. On most occasions, the AEC works very well and cancels most of the echo (combined with the preprocessor). On some devices, where the microphone signal

Hi all, How do I add an asterisk representing a significant difference to a barplot? Cheers, Gil [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

from voip-info wiki Asterisk automatic daily restart To automatically restart Asterisk you can add something like this to cron # Restart Asterisk PBX once a day to prevent any problems from piling up 10 7 * * * root /usr/sbin/asterisk -rx "restart now" >/dev/null 2>&1 or 10 7 * * * root /usr/sbin/asterisk -r -x "restart gracefully" >/dev/null 2>&1

By default asterisk (on my system) runs with NICE value "0" like most of the programs. Will the performance improve if I assign NICE value of let say -5 or -10 to asterisk? To my understanding it should as the priority will be higher than most other programs (it might even solve some echo problem). Am I right? How to start asterisk with priority let say -5? If I start the main process

Hi, The Speex AEC is simply not designed to deal with non-linear echo, as is the case when clipping of AGCs are involved. Make sure all your path is linear or forget about the Speex AEC. Jean-Marc On 11-01-03 11:31 AM, Omer Gilad wrote: > Hi, > I couldn't find a discussion that specifically addresses this, so here > it is. > > I'm using Speex AEC in my mobile VoIP application to cancel speaker > echo. The used version is 1.2rc1 from the website, and I'm compiling > with fixed-point. > On...

...= 30.8 us # qperf 192.168.10.160 rc_bi_bw rc_bi_bw: bw = 1.71 GB/sec The second result is bi directional, Gen4 on PCI-E V2 should get quite a lot better. Rob -----Original Message----- From: Jan Ruffing [mailto:ruffing@motama.com] Sent: 11 December 2008 16:18 To: Robert Dunkley Cc: Gilad Shainer; general@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Infiniband performance Robert Dunkley wrote: > The newer gen4 20Gb cards get about 14-15Gbit/sec because of their better lower latency processing and support for higher bandwidth PCI-E 2.0 (PCI-E is not 100% efficient so a 20Gbit...

While trying to apply the low-latency kernel patches to our RHv9 Linux 2.4.20-31.9, the patches would not apply. In comparing one of the first patch files (lowlatency.h) to that already on the system, it would appear the low latency patches were already applied by RH. The original RHv9 file (lowlatency.h) even had the patch author's name/credit in it. Does anyone know whether RH made an

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.8 - Release Date: 1/3/2005