While trying to apply the low-latency kernel patches to our RHv9 Linux 2.4.20-31.9, the patches would not apply. In comparing one of the first patch files (lowlatency.h) to that already on the system, it would appear the low latency patches were already applied by RH. The original RHv9 file (lowlatency.h) even had the patch author's name/credit in it. Does anyone know whether RH made an effort to incorporate the patches, and if so, about what kernel version? Rich
Rich Adamson wrote:> While trying to apply the low-latency kernel patches to our RHv9 > Linux 2.4.20-31.9, the patches would not apply. In comparing one > of the first patch files (lowlatency.h) to that already on the system, > it would appear the low latency patches were already applied by RH. > > The original RHv9 file (lowlatency.h) even had the patch author's > name/credit in it. > > Does anyone know whether RH made an effort to incorporate the patches, > and if so, about what kernel version?Redhat kernel's, like most Linux distro vendors, contain around 200 patches over the vanilla tree, including O(1) scheduler, VM system patches and the lowlatency patch. You can find out the exaqct version etc by downloading the kernel SRPM that include the list of patches. Gilad
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Changing NICE value for * will it help?
- Opinions on renice or turning off swap or ramdis k as swap?
- WARNING: at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:921 __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x6b9/0x9a0 [btrfs]()
- X11 drive is missing; wine 0.9.53
- How do I match a "D"? (Was: RE: In-band disc onn ect problem (legacy PBX) - asterisk doesn't hear the touchtone?)