search for: gamespi

Borderlands DVD Gamespy & DLC1 not working w/ patch 1.0.1, 1.1.0 & 1.2.0 This is kind of odd. I've installed Borderlands multiple times with no problems. I've played Borderlands to the very end of the game and to Playthrough 2 without any problems. The problem I'm facing is that Borderlands does not recognise the patch. This causes the game to not work with Multiplayer under

Ive made a couple of posts in the past about this game in which I was running multiple servers under 20031212 and after that each wine version seemed to keep a second and third server from running correctly. They would lock up and when I hit the X button the "Not Responding, Close Anyway" dialog would pop up. Well it turns out that something that wine did made ethernet port checking

Hi Jean-Marc, We needed to use a release version of the SDK because this part of production code for our Sony implementations. I'm not sure how stable that branch is. Is the encoding and decoding already stable? In other words, what is not stable about that branch? Thanks, --------------------------- Saad Nader Middleware Engineer Powered By Gamespy, IGN -----Original Message----- From:

Hello, I'm Saad from Gamespy who makes use of the Library for Voice over IP on the PS3. We would like to contribute back some code that added/modified to compile and run on Sony's Playstation 3. What would be the process to do this? Thanks, --------------------------- Saad Nader Middleware Engineer Powered By Gamespy, IGN -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi Jean-Marc, Jim, Saad has been keeping me in the loop on your recent discussions. Since all of our testing has been against 1.0.5, based on that being the last non-beta version, that's the particular scope of the task that Saad is working on right now. I like what I'm reading about as far as encoder/decoder quality improvements e.g. in the 1.2 betas, and am going to push for

Please correct me if I am wrong, Jean-Marc, but I do not think that any patches are getting applied to 1.0.5 anyway. Also, if you expect a patch to be applied, you will need to provide the changes as a patch, not as a modified copy of the source tree. The 1.2 branch includes a mechanism for private memory allocation from a static buffer. You provide a usermisc.h file that replaces the

Joost Schuur wrote: > My primary concern is the use of the word 'unstable' on the current > download page for 1.2b2. One of our major devloper partners in > particular saw that reference and opted to use 1.0.5 on their PS3 title, > which is why we based our work for them on 1.0.5. The kind of commercial > game developers that are our customers aren't going to have the

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex-1.0.5.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 641376 bytes Desc: speex-1.0.5.zip Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20071022/2447cf50/speex-1.0.5-0001.bin

Saad Nader wrote: > We needed to use a release version of the SDK because this part of > production code for our Sony implementations. I'm not sure how stable > that branch is. Is the encoding and decoding already stable? In other > words, what is not stable about that branch? It's listed as "unstable" in the sense of "I might change the API" and that is

Greetings, Yet another strange pattern of traffic is being halted at the shorewall firewall, but I have no idea what this is. IANA shows the ports unassigned, and a net search yields only some of the same questions - what is this port? There are two machines as SOURCE, on the same class C network, adjacent, even, sending one connect attempt to TCP port 32230 every five minutes. I''m

hi. i joined the list a week ago. i'm using speexlib as the codec for GameSpy's new voice SDK [for voice chat for video games]. everything works well. kudos. i'd like to make a contribution to the codebase. i am bothered by the spew of warnings ( about 300 ) from my compiler. i typically frown on warnings anywhere in my codebase. COMPILER: Visual C++ .NET 2003 version 7.1.3088

Joost Schuur wrote: > Saad has been keeping me in the loop on your recent discussions. > Since all of our testing has been against 1.0.5, based on that being the > last non-beta version, that's the particular scope of the task that Saad > is working on right now. I'm just saying it's useless to do any work on 1.0.5. It is inferior to the latest beta in all aspects,