search for: epel8

...e <https://www.nomachine.com/>. It's free and so much better than x2go it's hard to even compare the two. It is ?free? only for noncommercial use. It isn?t open source. https://www.nomachine.com/faq If you want to try something else, take a look at xpra (http://xpra.org/). It?s in EPEL8. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>

What would you recommend: ansible is in EPEL8 and ConfigSIG. For the latter I do not see any sources in git.centos.org. Where they come from? I wonder with which repository I should use (long term)? dnf not checking gpg signature sounds scary: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.9.13/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.9.rst#security-fixes -- L...

...r previous versions (6 & 7). Something has changed? 4) EPEL. I know that EPEL is a Fedora SIG but I use several packages from EPEL. There is a place to see what packages will be included in EPEL? For example, I tried to install audacious from epel but got errors for missing deps. Seems that EPEL8 is released but not ready. There is a ETA for this? 5) It's my impression or there are less packages in this release? 6) Why cockpit installed by default? 7) Why repo PowerTools was created? What is the main purpose? 8) Why NetworkManager is the default method to configure interfaces? I know...

It seems that glances is not in EPEL for CentOS 8. Is that coming at some point, or has it been deprecated in favor of some other tool?

Dear R-core, I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. Thanks. [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27322...

...Luke in case there is more to it) - pd > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Dear R-core, > > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. > Thanks. > > [1] https://nvd.nist.g...

...is more to it) | | - pd | | > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: | > | > Dear R-core, | > | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem | > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if | > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits | > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. | > Thanks. | > | > [1] https:...

...| > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > | > > | > Dear R-core, > | > > | > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's > Bugzilla. We > | > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no > problem > | > there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if > | > there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the > commits > | > that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. > | > Tha...

...thing has changed? > 4) EPEL. I know that EPEL is a Fedora SIG but I use several packages > from EPEL. There is a place to see what packages will be included in > EPEL? For example, I tried to install audacious from epel but got > errors > for missing deps. Seems that EPEL8 is released but not ready. There is > a > ETA for this? > 5) It's my impression or there are less packages in this release? > 6) Why cockpit installed by default? > 7) Why repo PowerTools was created? What is the main purpose? > 8) Why NetworkManager is the...

...lp on this. > > >> 4) EPEL. I know that EPEL is a Fedora SIG but I use several packages >> from EPEL. There is a place to see what packages will be included in >> EPEL? For example, I tried to install audacious from epel but got errors >> for missing deps. Seems that EPEL8 is released but not ready. There is a >> ETA for this? > > EPEL is a volunteer project and there is no ETA because it is up to > the volunteers time and effort to build things. > >> 5) It's my impression or there are less packages in this release? > > You are pr...

It seems that in the context of EL8 the tool RepoView that creates static HTML pages out of a yum repository is obsolet because of the missing yum python modules (EL8 comes with dnf). Further more it seems also be abandoned [*] and I do not expect to appear in EPEL8. Does someone uses a similar tool to generate browseable repo HTML pages? [*] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675886 -- Thanks, LF

...he packager know that the software is needed and also to see if they have time to support another branch. I don't see the tool being deprecated in Fedora so it should be possible. As a Halloween present I have added it to my temp repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smooge/not-yet-in-epel8/packages/. These packages are as is. -- Stephen J Smoogen.

Hi I've been using conky in conjunction with gcalcli on Scientific Linux 7 to display google calendar data on screen. In CentOS 8, I have set up the gcalcli part, but I can't find a conky rpm. Is anyone working on creating this for CentOS 8? There appears to be an rpm for fedora 28 onwards, but there are dependency issues. Can anyone help? -- Cheers Bill

...(6 & 7). Something has changed? 4) EPEL. I know that EPEL is a Fedora SIG but I use several packages from EPEL. There is a place to see what packages will be included in EPEL? For example, I tried to install audacious from epel but got errors for missing deps. Seems that EPEL8 is released but not ready. There is a ETA for this? 5) It's my impression or there are less packages in this release? 6) Why cockpit installed by default? 7) Why repo PowerTools was created? What is the main purpose? 8) Why NetworkManager is the default method to configure...

Are there any repos that would have perl-Curses for CentOS 8? It was always available in epel but not anymore. Thanks, Mike

On 03/09/2020 20:51, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > What would you recommend: ansible is in EPEL8 and ConfigSIG. > For the latter I do not see any sources in git.centos.org. > Where they come from? > > I wonder with which repository I should use (long term)? > > dnf not checking gpg signature sounds scary: > > https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.9.13/changelogs...

I have installed x2goserver on a Centos8 server. Yesterday, after the installation I was able to connect by means of x2go. Today I get the following error ( /var/log/messages) /usr/bin/x2gostartagent[2677]: no free display number available, cannot start new session. Has anyone had the same problem? Thanks. Bye Stefano

...m/>. It's free and so much better than x2go it's hard to even compare the two. > > It is ?free? only for noncommercial use. It isn?t open source. > > https://www.nomachine.com/faq > > If you want to try something else, take a look at xpra (http://xpra.org/). It?s in EPEL8. > Thank you, Jonathan, that may help me. I had to say no to one of my users who asked to install nomachine for him. We are university, i.e., not individual (aka home) users. But xpra sounds better than what I told my user to use (vncserver, vncviewer over ssh). Valeri > -- > Jonathan...

...his for the request for help on this. > 4) EPEL. I know that EPEL is a Fedora SIG but I use several packages > from EPEL. There is a place to see what packages will be included in > EPEL? For example, I tried to install audacious from epel but got errors > for missing deps. Seems that EPEL8 is released but not ready. There is a > ETA for this? EPEL is a volunteer project and there is no ETA because it is up to the volunteers time and effort to build things. > 5) It's my impression or there are less packages in this release? You are probably looking for packages in PowerTo...

...> 4) EPEL. I know that EPEL is a Fedora SIG but I use several packages > from EPEL. There is a place to see what packages will be included in > EPEL? For example, I tried to install audacious from epel but got > errors > for missing deps. Seems that EPEL8 is released but not ready. There is > a > ETA for this? > 5) It's my impression or there are less packages in this release? > 6) Why cockpit installed by default? > 7) Why repo PowerTools was created? What is the main purpose? > 8) W...