search for: dilek

...he tool tc-build from ClangBuiltLinux project. With "llvm-10.0.1-rc1" Git tag I was able to setup a llvm-toolchain consisting of the projects "clang" and "lld". A Linux v5.7-rc6 was successfully built. $ cat /proc/version Linux version 5.7.0-rc6-2-amd64-clang (sedat.dilek at gmail.com@iniza) (ClangBuiltLinux clang version 10.0.1 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f79cd71e145c6fd005ba4dd1238128dfa0dc2cb6), LLD 10.0.1 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f79cd71e145c6fd005ba4dd1238128dfa0dc2cb6)) #2~bullseye+dileks1 SMP 2020-05-20 I remember when I used official...

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: >> Patch 1 adds a check for the compilers visibility macro to configure.ac. >> Patch 2 avoids redefined symbol errors in clang of the tls entry points. >>...

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:12 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:53 PM Nathan Chancellor > <natechancellor at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > When building with Clang + -Wtautological-compare and > > CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK unset: > > > > Hi Nathan, >...

Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> --- CMakeLists.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index ed7aeb026f5d..60fe427e456e 100644 --- a/CMakeLists.txt +++ b/CMakeLists.txt @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ set(LLVM_VERSION_PATCH 0) set(LLVM_VERSION_SU...

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Chris Bieneman <cbieneman at apple.com> wrote: >> [ brutal-snip ] >> ... >>> [ TODO#S: Before doing...

...ommit f7e30f01a9e2 ("cpumask: Add helper cpumask_available()") added cpumask_available to fix warnings of this nature. Use that here so that clang does not warn regardless of CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK's value. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/982 Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor at gmail.com> --- arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c index 109325d77b3e..43fd19b3f118 100644 --- a/arc...

Hmm, the clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-sles11.3-linux-gnu.tar.xz tarball I uploaded doesn't seem to have made it on to this releases dir. I'm still a bit new to the process, is there a step that I skipped? On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. > > Can you pleas take care of this?...

LGTM. -Chris > On Feb 27, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> > --- > CMakeLists.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt > index ed7aeb026f5d..60fe427e456e 100644...

Am Montag, 16. Februar 2015, 12:42:19 schrieb Sedat Dilek: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: > > Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 18:20:12 schrieb Dimitry Andric: > >> On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:...

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 27 June 2016 at 07:00, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> Building with CMake sets the version-string correct whereas using >> autotools as build-system does not. > > Hi Sedat, > > This was reported earlier and it's unfortunate, but we don't support > autotools build any more. T...

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:12 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: > > On 05/20/2020 09:53 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 5:06 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 05/19/2020 09:05 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >>> Hi Tom, > >>> > >>> thanks and congrats for LLVM 10.0.1-rc1 release. > >>>...

Hi Tom, I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. Can you pleas take care of this? In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? Thanks. Regards, - Sedat - [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> sorry, but I cannot see any tarballs shipped in [2]? >> Forgot to upload? >> >> Would like to give this pre-release a try on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system. > > They're not ready yet. It takes a few days after we tag a rel...

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmai...

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 12:42:00 schrieb Sedat Dilek: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: >> > Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 11:58:06 schrieb Sedat Dilek: >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de> wrote: >> >> > Avoid red...

On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 10/02/15 13:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 09 Feb 2015, at 18:52, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>...

[ Original posting see [1] ] >From [1]: ... Added: llvm/tags/RELEASE_380/rc3/ (props changed) - copied from r261685, llvm/branches/release_38/ ... The LLVM Git repositories have no "rc3" tag in "release_38" branch (as an example llvm.git#release_38 see [2]). Who is responsible for that or maybe better... can you activate the responsible(s)? Helpful is to add

...ement yesterday he pointed out that he would upload source tarballs as soon as possible: > > "I'll get the source tarballs and docs published as soon as possible, and binaries as they become available" > > Thanks, > Tobias > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 3:25 PM Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> first of all, congrats for the 8.0.0-rc1 pre-release. >> >> I have seen that this version was tagged yesterday. >> >> Can you provide pre-release source tarballs? >> Or did y...

...might not correspond (by contents) to any other revision in the repository. The only way to somehow emulate svn tags on git is to create a separate branch on each tag, however, this is very redundant provided that we're already having a release branch. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: >> [ Original posting see [1] ] >> >> From [1]: >> ... >> Added: >> llvm/tags/RELEASE_380/rc3/ (props changed) >> -...

Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 18:20:12 schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 11 Feb 2015, at 11:16, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10/02/15 13:17, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >>> On 09 Feb 2015, at 18:52, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > &g...