Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-04 08:59 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
Hi Tom, I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. Can you pleas take care of this? In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? Thanks. Regards, - Sedat - [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920
Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-06 10:13 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi Tom, > > I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. > Can you pleas take care of this? > > In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. > Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920Today, I see tarballs were uploaded to [1]. - Sedat - [1] http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/
Brian Cain via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-07 04:50 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
Hmm, the clang+llvm-3.7.1-x86_64-sles11.3-linux-gnu.tar.xz tarball I uploaded doesn't seem to have made it on to this releases dir. I'm still a bit new to the process, is there a step that I skipped? On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. > > Can you pleas take care of this? > > > > In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. > > Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > - Sedat - > > > > [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920 > > Today, I see tarballs were uploaded to [1]. > > - Sedat - > > [1] http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/ > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-- -Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160106/24e7692c/attachment.html>
Antoine Pitrou via llvm-dev
2016-Jan-07 13:56 UTC
[llvm-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -final has been tagged.
Is there a reason why the docs at http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/docs/index.html don't work? (404 here) Regards Antoine. On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:13:01 +0100 Sedat Dilek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > I followed a bit the mailing-list but still see no LLVM v3.7.1 tarballs. > > Can you pleas take care of this? > > > > In case of that i386 breakage do a new v3.7.2 release, please. > > Not sure if this has impact on x86_64 (AMD64)? > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > - Sedat - > > > > [1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25920 > > Today, I see tarballs were uploaded to [1]. > > - Sedat - > > [1] http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.1/ > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev