llvm dev - Feb 2015 - [LLVMdev] [PATCH 2/2 v3] add visibility hidden to tls entry points

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de>
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 11:58:06 schrieb Sedat Dilek:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at
gmx.de> wrote:
>> > Avoid redefined symbol errors in clang. Based on a suggestion from
>> > Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> in
>> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19778.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de>
>> > ---
>> > v2: - no change
>> > v3: - include util directory in Makefile.am in order to avoid
relative
>> >
>> >       include paths,
>> >
>> >     - make tls entry points array const
>>
>> I adapted this patch as v4 to fit mesa v10.4.4, but it fails (see
>> log-file in attached tarball).
>
> the configure output says that visibility is not supported by your clang.
> Interestingly, it is supported here (also clang 3.6 from yesterday). What
does
> config.log say about it?
>
Unfortunately, I have killed the build-dir and trying the patch from FreeBSD.
I will rebuild and send you my config.log.

Attached is my build-script for my llvm-toolchain.

- Sedat -
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: build_llvm-toolchain.sh
Type: application/x-sh
Size: 1355 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150217/cb4858ac/attachment.sh>

Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 12:42:00 schrieb Sedat
Dilek:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de>
wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 11:58:06 schrieb Sedat Dilek:
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at
gmx.de> wrote:
> >> > Avoid redefined symbol errors in clang. Based on a suggestion
from
> >> > Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at
gmail.com> in
> >> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19778.
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de>
> >> > ---
> >> > v2: - no change
> >> > v3: - include util directory in Makefile.am in order to avoid
relative
> >> > 
> >> >       include paths,
> >> >     
> >> >     - make tls entry points array const
> >> 
> >> I adapted this patch as v4 to fit mesa v10.4.4, but it fails (see
> >> log-file in attached tarball).
> > 
> > the configure output says that visibility is not supported by your
clang.
> > Interestingly, it is supported here (also clang 3.6 from yesterday).
What
> > does config.log say about it?
> 
> Unfortunately, I have killed the build-dir and trying the patch from
> FreeBSD. I will rebuild and send you my config.log.
> 
> Attached is my build-script for my llvm-toolchain.
mmh, no compiler-rt?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150217/7b48b7f2/attachment.sig>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de>
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 12:42:00 schrieb Sedat Dilek:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at
gmx.de> wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 17. Februar 2015, 11:58:06 schrieb Sedat Dilek:
>> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Marc Dietrich <marvin24
at gmx.de> wrote:
>> >> > Avoid redefined symbol errors in clang. Based on a
suggestion from
>> >> > Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at
gmail.com> in
>> >> > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19778.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Marc Dietrich <marvin24 at gmx.de>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > v2: - no change
>> >> > v3: - include util directory in Makefile.am in order to
avoid relative
>> >> >
>> >> >       include paths,
>> >> >
>> >> >     - make tls entry points array const
>> >>
>> >> I adapted this patch as v4 to fit mesa v10.4.4, but it fails
(see
>> >> log-file in attached tarball).
>> >
>> > the configure output says that visibility is not supported by your
clang.
>> > Interestingly, it is supported here (also clang 3.6 from
yesterday). What
>> > does config.log say about it?
>>
>> Unfortunately, I have killed the build-dir and trying the patch from
>> FreeBSD. I will rebuild and send you my config.log.
>>
>> Attached is my build-script for my llvm-toolchain.
>
> mmh, no compiler-rt?
NO.
Can you explain why do I need it?

- Sedat -