search for: carrier

Initial handshake sounds fine, but asterisks dies before receive of the fax. Here is the log : Changed from phase 0 to 1 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow ca...

...is what shows up in my 'debug' log. Any ideas, Please pass them along. Thanks! John Mar 28 16:15:26 VERBOSE[5868] logger.c: [app_rxfax.so] => (Trivial FAX Receive Application) Mar 28 16:15:45 DEBUG[26457] app_rxfax.c: Got hangup Mar 28 16:21:27 DEBUG[26612] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier up Mar 28 16:21:27 DEBUG[26612] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier down Mar 28 16:21:27 DEBUG[26612] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier up Mar 28 16:21:27 DEBUG[26612] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier down Mar 28 16:21:29 DEBUG[26612] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier up Mar 28 16:21:29 DEBUG[26612] app_rxfax.c...

...bject: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp/rxfax terminates > > asterisk > > > > > > Initial handshake sounds fine, but asterisks dies > > before receive of the fax. Here is the log : > > > > > > > > Changed from phase 0 to 1 > > > > Slow carrier up > > > > Slow carrier down > > > > Slow carrier up > > > > Slow carrier down > > > > Slow carrier up > > > > Slow carrier down > > > > Slow carrier up > > > > Slow carrier down > > > >...

...goes through (very rare in testing) 2.) The fax loops indefinitely like this: Feb 19 11:46:04 DEBUG[5089]: chan_zap.c:4059 zt_read: DTMF digit: f on Zap/1-1 Feb 19 11:46:04 DEBUG[5089]: chan_zap.c:4101 zt_read: Fax already handled Feb 19 11:46:07 DEBUG[5089]: app_rxfax.c:70 span_message: FLOW HDLC carrier up Feb 19 11:46:07 DEBUG[5089]: app_rxfax.c:70 span_message: FLOW HDLC carrier down Feb 19 11:46:07 DEBUG[5089]: app_rxfax.c:70 span_message: FLOW HDLC carrier up Feb 19 11:46:07 DEBUG[5089]: app_rxfax.c:70 span_message: FLOW HDLC carrier down Feb 19 11:46:07 DEBUG[5089]: app_rxfax.c:70 span_messag...

...K Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 R8x15.4lines/mm OK Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 >>> DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01 HDLC underflow in state 9 Changed from phase 4 to 3 Slow carrier up <<< TSI: 43 31 37 31 31 36 35 34 35 34 38 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "xxxx" <<< DCS: 83 00 86 90 00 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding O...

...exited non-zero on 'Zap/1-1' -- Executing SetVar("Zap/1-1", "FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk-fax/1110134598.7.tif") in new stack -- Executing RxFAX("Zap/1-1", "/var/spool/asterisk-fax/1110134598.7.tif") in new stack Changed from phase 0 to 1 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Start...

...rong... - Mandrake 9.2 - libtiff3-3.5.7-11mdk I have add Header from your FTP but the result is this error.. Can you give me your opinion? Thanks in advance Dimitri -------- -- Executing RxFAX("Zap/35-1", "/home/user/testfax.tif") in new stack Changed from phase 0 to 1 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Start receiving document Changed from phase 1 to 4 Sending ident >>> CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 DIS: Preferred octets: 256 Can receive fax Supported data signal...

...ith one empty page in front of it. It seems the empty page is only one scanline long. I am using asterisk CVS head of 2004-06-01 and spandsp-0.0.1k. A logfile from the console is attached below. May I kindly ask you to have a quick look at it? Many thanks, Jan Changed from phase 0 to 1 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Start receiving document Changed from phase 1 to 4 Sending ident >>> CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20...

...length: A4 (297mm) > Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 > R8x15.4lines/mm OK > Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 > >>> DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01 > HDLC underflow in state 9 > Changed from phase 4 to 3 > Slow carrier up > <<< TSI: 43 31 37 31 31 36 35 34 35 34 38 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 > TSI without final frame tag > Remote fax gave TSI as: "xxxx" > <<< DCS: 83 00 86 90 00 > DCS with final frame tag > In state 9 > DCS: > Can receive fax > Selected da...

...callerid=0x80ff2e0 "56167761", action=1) at pbx.c:1173 #9 0x8063189 in ast_pbx_run (c=0x8360000) at pbx.c:1657 #10 0x8069009 in pbx_thread (data=0x8360000) at pbx.c:1882 #11 0x2815124c in _thread_start () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4 #12 0x0 in ?? () Log from asterisk : Slow carrier up <<< TSI: 43 30 36 37 37 36 31 36 35 20 35 34 2b 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "+45 56167760" <<< DCS: 83 00 46 20 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600b...

...cuting Wait("Zap/19-1", "5") in new stack -- Redirecting Zap/19-1 to fax extension == Spawn extension (fxo, fax, 0) exited non-zero on 'Zap/19-1' -- Executing RxFAX("Zap/19-1", "/tmp/faxfile.tiff") in new stack Changed from phase 0 to 1 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Start receiving document Changed from phase 1 to 4 Sending ident >>> CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 DIS: Preferred octets: 256 Can receive fax Supported data signal...

.../1-1", "FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk-fax/1143287622.0.tif") in new stack Mar 25 13:53:46 VERBOSE[17501] logger.c: -- Executing RxFAX("Zap/1-1", "/var/spool/asterisk-fax/1143287622.0.tif|debug") in new stack Mar 25 13:53:46 DEBUG[17501] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier up Mar 25 13:53:46 DEBUG[17501] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier down Mar 25 13:53:47 DEBUG[17501] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier up Mar 25 13:53:47 DEBUG[17501] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier down Mar 25 13:53:47 DEBUG[17501] app_rxfax.c: FLOW HDLC carrier up Mar 25 13:53:47 DEBUG[17501] app_rxfax.c...

...no > Real-time Internet fax: no > Can receive fax > Data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps > R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK > Scan line length: 215mm > Recording length: A4 (297mm) > Minimum scan line time: 0ms > Get at V.29 > Changed from phase 3 to 5 > Fast carrier up > Fast carrier down > Changed from phase 5 to 4 > 0 bad bits in trainability test > Start rx document - compression 1 > Start rx page > >>> CFR: 84 > HDLC underflow in state 5 > Post trainability > Changed from phase 4 to 5 > Fast carrier up > Fast carri...

Hi all, After a long time having no time, I have finally done some fresh work on my software fax machine. I have replaced the original carrier tracking with something more robust. I have also added 4800, and 2400 bits per second modes, and cleaned up a few bugs in areas like superfine mode operation. I apologise for this update taking so long. At ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp you will find a new version of the software. You will...

Hi, Several people have reported problems sending faxes from spandsp-0.0.1k to Canon FAX machines. A spandsp user had the same problem with another make of FAX machine, and traced the problem to a bug in the file t30.c of spandsp. Line 542 says s->t4.rx_file[0] where it should say s->t4.tx_file[0]. This fixes his problem, and I suspect it will also fix the Canon fax machine problem.

I have one table(profiles) where each row has many rows in another table(carriers). If I write profile.carriers I get a collection containing all carriers that belong to the current profile. My question is: how do I sort the collection profile.carriers? I would like to sort it on one of the columns (found in the table carriers). Can I override some method in the carrier mo...

...achine which is used a lot all the time and never has problems, I tried the tpc.int and the fax comes thro fine. Hmm so what is that telling me? The office fax really does send dozens of faxes per day with no failures Looking at the debug output of the two, heres the ey differences: "Slow carrier up Slow carrier down" - prior to start receiving, altho slow carrier up is shown in both a couple times once transmission begins. The good one goes into 'start rx document' but the bad one seems to keep trying to train.. i have put a diff in below .. is there anything useful here?...

....323 not. In our first test, we started to connect Asterisk to an Cisco IOS-Gatekeeper with the "chan_oh323" (version 0.6.5). We successfully tested in/egress calls without any problems. But when we started to connect our Asterisk with the Gatekeeper (Siemens Surpass) of an big german Carrier we noticed some strange problems we couldn`t solve until right now. The registration with the gatekeeper is successful. But every from and to our PBX will be cleared/rejected by an Q.931 cause. Our system-layout looks like: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 aka "sarge" with Kernel 2.6.12, i386 Ast...

...on CVS Head txfax talking to 0.0.2 pre18 on v1.0.9 stable rxfax. Doesn't matter though as the last debug entry is always the same (T4 timeout in state 4) ***** TXFAX Debug ***** -- Executing TxFAX("Zap/1-1", "/tmp/11236686843.tif|caller|debug") in new stack Slow carrier up Urgent handler Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up <<< DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18 DIS with final frame tag In state 10 DIS: Prefer 256 octet blocks Can receive fax Suppor...

Hello- I am currently testing with a carrier that seems to be having some trouble around toll-free (800 number) access. While a problem, its the resulting behavior that I'm finding disconcerting. When I dial an 800#, I get the following response: -- Executing Macro("SIP/2700-e10b", "carrier-out|18005558355|70|r&quot...