Displaying 20 results from an estimated 64 matches for "bureaucraci".
Did you mean:
bureaucracy
2007 Mar 28
3
New Introduction
Hi all,
I''ve just rewritten the Puppet introduction from scratch:
https://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetIntroduction
I think it''s better, but I''m not convinced it''s a whole heckuva lot
better.
Comments are very much appreciated, especially if you can recommend a
better approach to the document. I tried to organize it how I have
been giving
2002 Dec 09
3
RSync on Netware
Hello,
I have ported rsync 2.5.5 to Netware and would like to, at least, contribute the binary so that people can download it. It says on the website to use the bug tracking system to do this, but since that isn't working, I thought I would try this. Thanks for any help or direction.
Lee
2023 Mar 10
1
DCs & subnets
> On 10. Mar 2023, at 17.20, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> Can I ask, why are you still using a version of Samba that went EOL 8 years ago ?
>
> I am trying to understand why people do not want to update something that usually has big changes between series.
>
> Rowland
In this case I?m not the original admin who installed it and once
2014 Jul 30
1
CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 92, Issue 8
https://www.facebook.com/notes/paul-a-noecker/cents-bureaucracy-is-annoying-me/10152246289775172
I don't think a real name is exactly going to define the users merit.
I've seen plenty of people be a major POS in real life under their own
name. Exactly what i'm getting at the document's don't mean anything,
the name means nothing. It's just inviting lunatics to my
2007 Jul 28
5
the large dataset problem
Dear useRs,
I recently began a job at a very large and heavily bureaucratic organization. We're setting up a research office and statistical analysis will form the backbone of our work. We'll be working with large datasets such the SIPP as well as our own administrative data.
Due to the bureaucracy, it will take some time to get the licenses for proprietary software like Stata. Right
2007 Feb 21
9
Facter environment variables being ignored in puppet?
Facter has the feature that it will turn any environment variable
named FACTER_* into a fact. I can do this on the commandline
no problem, but when I attempt this in puppet it seems to ignore
that parts.
Is anyone else seeing this? (Is this expected behavior?) I don''t
see a ticket or a mail thread on it - though my searching powers
have been weak the last couple of weeks...
Thanks,
2005 Jan 07
2
[LLVMdev] Oversight group for LLVM
Hello everyone,
The LLVM project has evolved significantly since our first public
release in Oct. 2003. Most importantly, we've gained many new users
and several active contributors, and we want to encourage and support
them and attract more. At the same time, the software itself has
undergone some significant changes and improvements, and been ported to
new platforms. We expect that
2007 Oct 18
3
Managehome not working in User type in Linux OS
I am using the user type function as below to create and manage user
accounts in RHEL, CentOS, Ubuntu, FreeBSD & BSD,
I have only tried on RHEL, CentOS it works fine for user creation, but
not managing homedirectory.
I ran puppetd -test in Ubuntu it showed the below message in debug mode
Ubuntu(Debian), don''t create homedirectory unless -m arg is passed.
[0;34mdebug:
2024 May 16
1
R for the US Air Force
Hey Doug,
R is not a product that is provided by a company or any vendor that can be
procured through a vendor e.g. something on a GSA schedule.
Seems like you're caught in the bureaucracy hell hole. I used to help the
USAF, and other DoD members use R when I was at RStudio (now Posit).
I recommend you find someone in your organization who is doing Data
Science. They'll likely have
2024 Feb 09
2
Authentication using federated identity
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 1:18?PM Chris Rapier <rapier at psc.edu> wrote:
>
> I know that there are some methods to use federated identities (e.g.
> OAuth2) with SSH authentication but, from what I've seen, they largely
> seem clunky and require users to interact with web browsers to get one
> time tokens. Which is sort of acceptable for occasional logins but
> doesn't
2015 Oct 13
5
Should I worry about test failures in a release?
Going from 3.6 to 3.7 would almost certainly break binary compatibility
between .bc files. You may be able to get away with it for some particular
use-cases (but in that case, it's by luck, not by design).
I'm not enough "part of the community" to say if there are rules about what
can and can't change between certain levels of releases, but my general
understanding is that
2005 Oct 05
5
Voicemailmain automatic extension detection?
Is there a way I can have "voice mail check" calls coming from my internal
users automatically get to the right extension, without having the user
enter their extension?
I'm thinking that I could have the local SPA boxes translate, or have
each user live in a context where the extension in question exists
uniquely per user, but both of these seem kludgey.
Thanks in advance for
2009 Mar 07
5
The pros and cons of a wiki AppDB
2009/3/7 Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio at earthlink.net>:
> I can think of one possible benefit. There are a lot of apps without maintainers, and there might be users of those apps who would be willing take a few minutes to post bits of useful information in a wiki, but don't want the responsibility of being a maintainer. Sure, they could just post info in a comment, but user comments are
2016 May 09
2
GSoC: Weighting Schemes
Hi Vivek,
I saw your comments on IRC, as noted by olly :
*<olly> vivekp: (if you check the logs) - you want: ./trec_index config*
*<olly> you want to run the compiled binary (no ".cc") not the source
file...*
But i guess you are not able to compile the setup. I can write steps and
send across how to compile and sample files from config.
Most of the files in config are
2024 Feb 09
1
Authentication using federated identity
Practically speaking, most popular IAM and SSO solutions offer OIDC SAML
tokens but do not offer Kerberos tickets.? OpenID Connect is a standard
which itself is based on RFC6749 (OAuth2). This provides a compelling
reason to support it in addition to Kerberos.? I'll also note that OIDC
tokens are easy to validate without a bidirectional trust relationship
between the IdP and RP.
SSH
2024 May 16
1
[Non-DoD Source] Re: R for the US Air Force
You described it well; I?m afraid that?s what it is. They want documents of an organization that doesn?t fit the description, and only then will they test it.
That sounds great. I?ll reach out to Jeremy and see if he can help me get the IDs the USAF wants. It sounds like Joshua predates my time here. That?s a really good idea.
Thanks very much!
Doug
From: Josiah Parry
2005 Jan 08
0
[LLVMdev] Oversight group for LLVM
Hi OG,
I think it first of all would be nice, if we could supplement this group
with a discussion list on this topic. The reason for this isn't to ad more
bureacracy, but to present public ideas and visions to a broader forum and I
belive in that the more elaboration within a broader forum the better the
ideas will get and the more people will get committed to start and finish
the task.
2007 Oct 29
12
Reports in Puppet
Hi,
I wanted to configure reporting in puppet. I came across the
below links which says what needs to be added in config file to enable
reports.
But I was wondering how I view the visual report/graphs do I need to
create my own script.
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ReportReference#rrdgraph
http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/ReportsAndReporting
--
Deepak
2015 Aug 05
2
[LLVMdev] Cc llvmdev: Re: llvm bpf debug info. Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event
Hi, Alexei
On 2015/7/30 1:13, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 7/29/15 2:38 AM, He Kuang wrote:
>> Hi, Alexei
>>
>> On 2015/7/28 10:18, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>> On 7/25/15 3:04 AM, He Kuang wrote:
>>>> I noticed that for 64-bit elf format, the reloc sections have
>>>> 'Addend' in the entry, but there's no 'Addend' info
2005 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Oversight group for LLVM
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Henrik Bach wrote:
> I think it first of all would be nice, if we could supplement this group with
> a discussion list on this topic. The reason for this isn't to ad more
> bureacracy, but to present public ideas and visions to a broader forum and I
> belive in that the more elaboration within a broader forum the better the
> ideas will get and the more