search for: bt

Hi, I have this code here and try to use sapply code.  But I got error message that I don't really understand to correct. bt   <- c(24.96874, 19.67861, 23.51001, 19.86868); round(bt,2) alp  <- c(2.724234, 3.914649, 3.229146, 3.120719); round(alp,2) bt_alp <- data.frame(bt,alp) sapply(bt_alp, function(bt,alp) ((bt_m/bt)^alp), bt_m = min(bt)) > sapply(bt_alp, function(bt,alp) ((bt_m/bt)^alp), bt_m = min(bt))...

Hello everyone, I have a function here that I wrote but doesn't seem to work quite right. Attached is the code. In the calib funcion under the for loop Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i+1] returns NA's for everything after years 1983 and 1984. However the code works when it reads Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i]. I don't quite understand why since it should be calculating all of the necessary inputs prior to calculating Bt...

Hi r-users, I have this code here : dt   <- winter_pos_sum bt   <- c(24.96874, 19.67861, 23.51001, 19.86868); round(bt,2) alp  <- c(2.724234, 3.914649, 3.229146, 3.120719); round(alp,2) bt_min  <- min(bt) ; bt_min p       <- alp_sum    ; p t  <- 50 t1 <- t+1             #first get the sum over the eigenvalues for a particular power i gam...

Hello everyone, I have a function here that I wrote but doesn't seem to work quite right. Attached is the code. In the calib funcion under the for loop Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i+1] returns NA's for everything after years 1983 and 1984. However the code works when it reads Bt[i+2]<-(1-m)*Bt[i+1]+Rt[i]*Rerr-Ct[i]. I don't quite understand why since it should be calculating all of the necessary inputs prior to calculating Bt...

Below is an example of using backtrace() obtained from man backtrace and the test results: $ gcc bt.c -o bt-gcc $ ./bt-gcc 4 backtrace() returned 4 addresses ./bt-gcc() [0x4007e3] ./bt-gcc() [0x400874] ./bt-gcc() [0x40089b] ./bt-gcc() [0x400894] $ llvm-gcc bt.c -o bt-llvm-gcc $ ./bt-llvm-gcc 4 backtrace() returned 4 addresses ./bt-llvm-...

Hi All BT are providing a SIP gateway for PSTN through the BT communicator with Yahoo Messenger, I have done an ethereal trace and found that the BT Communicator side of the software is using SIP, so in theory I could add more PSTN lines to Asterisk for BT using SIP, but I am having problems deciphering...

...tch.names(clabs, names(xi)) : names do not match previous names Error. I've found other people discussing this error, but they don't seem to match my situation, and the strange thing is that changing the order of the data frames that I'm merging can remove the error. For example: bt <- merge(assessmentb, assessmentb2, by=("caseid"), all=TRUE) bt <- merge(bt, tbassessment2, by=("caseid"), all=TRUE) bt <- merge(bt, tbarms2, by=("caseid"), all=TRUE) bt <- merge(bt, tbstudydetail, by=("caseid"), all=TRUE) But if I change it...

A client used to use BT isdn30 and ported the numbers to telewest several years ago. Now, the client moved to adept telecom. I *think* adept resells BT products. We got new numbers from adept (bt?) and the old pbx on the telewest lines forwards the calls to the new numbers. On the adept line I got a digium card in an opte...

...device (0002 -> 0003) ipmi_si 0000:09:00.4: PCI INT C -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 ipmi_si: Adding PCI-specified kcs state machine ipmi_si 0000:09:00.7: enable device (0000 -> 0003) ipmi_si 0000:09:00.7: PCI INT D -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 ipmi_si: Adding PCI-specified bt state machine ipmi_si: Trying PCI-specified kcs state machine at mem address 0x90841000, slave address 0x0 irq 16 IRQ 16/ipmi_si: IRQF_DISABLED is not guaranteed on shared IRQs Using irq 16 ipmi: Found new BMC (man_id: 0x00003f, prod_id: 0x0003, dev_id: 0x20) IPMI kcs interface initialized ipmi_...

Hi James, We've indeed passed the appropriate (and even excessive) flags to the appropriate pipeline parts, that is: llvm-gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointers -g $in -emit-llvm -S -o $name.ll llc --disable-fp-elim $name.ll -o $name.S g++ -fno-omit-frame-pointers -c $name.S , but that didn't work Alex On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:40 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote:

Hi Alexander, while I can reproduce the problem with your example, inspection of the assembler shows that the frame pointer is being correctly set up in each function. So I don't think the problem is due to frame pointer elimination. Ciao, Duncan.

Hi Alexander, I took a look at how backtrace works and it doesn't use the frame pointer at all, instead it uses dwarf unwind tables. So to make it work using llc you need to do as follows: $ llc -unwind-tables bt.ll -o bt.S $ gcc -o bt-llc bt.S $ ./bt-llc 4 backtrace() returned 4 addresses ./bt-llc() [0x4007aa] ./bt-llc() [0x400856] ./bt-llc() [0x40087c] ./bt-llc() [0x400875] Ciao, Duncan.

I suspect that this is because the mask in your example is the result of a variable shift, which (a) has it’s own performance and flags hazards pre-SHLX and (b) requires additional µops to do with TEST. I expect that ICC is putting a dummy TEST or XOR ahead of the BT to break the false flags dependency, as well. If the mask were constant, I expect ICC would generate TEST instead (but I don’t have it handy to check). – Steve > On Jan 23, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote: > > If 'bt' is a perf sin, icc d...

Hi, I have a TrixBox install with a Sangoma A200 and 4 FXO ports, there are 3 BT lines connected directly to these ports. One of the lines has BT FeatureLine Compact and this is the line I am having problems with, the other 2 lines are working perfectly, detecting CID, answering incoming calls and placing external calls via SIP devices. I am receiving a error log entry: chan...

I suppose this is rather an informative e-mail than a question. However if people had similar experiences or could comment what the differences are in other countries or with business analog lines, it would be interesting. It took me a week until a BT engineer was sent to my home home, since BT tech support was unable to provide information about the problem. Problem: Calling party controls how long the line will stay open once it is connected. Example: When asterisk box receives a call, it answers, perhaps takes a voice message and issues han...

Hi, The following patch adds ioprio to blktrace. Explanation: As you know, I/O schedulers such as cfq use io_contexts of current tasks to schedule block I/O. But recently, some are suggesting to use more appropriate io_contexts obtained by, for example, doing io-tracking, making struct bio have io_context member, etc. I thought adding ioprio to blktrace output might be helpful. Implementation: 1. I used req_get_ioprio() and [new]bio_get_ioprio() to get ioprio. Currently bio_get_ioprio just returns current->io_context-...

...rying to get the Snom 190's and soon to arrive 3com 3102's to use the function keys and for the life of me I can't work it out from the conversations on the archive what I am going exactly wrong here? The snom 190 with function keys is extension 690, the other extension (691) is just a BT102 so it doesn't have any function keys to program. When extension 691 is dialing out, or receives a call I want it to just tell the snom190 on ext 690 so the light shows up. (Soon as I got it going here I have a live system I will be setting it up on). Thank you to anyone in advance for the...

Hi all I'm using sangoma a200 cards in the UK and have the ongoing, often noted problem of disconnect supervision with BT POTS lines. Just noticed this post on http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/UK+Asterisk+Details stating that potentially someone's got a solution : "TDM400P &amp; Not Detecting Hangups: Got a TDM400P installed and having problems with Asterisk not detecting hangups? Using BT? If so, c...

My daughter has a BT account, with a BT supplied single-port router. I'd like to replace it with a standard router, but the settings appear to be totally hidden. If anyone reading uses BT, could you please tell me where to find the info? Maybe off-list, to save bandwidth for others/ Thanks Anne

...number changes but nothing I can do sets the outgoing caller id. We're using the same version of idefisk and the same version of asterisk (1.2.4-bri stuffed). I found a wiki which said that the DDI numbers we want as caller IDs need to be flagged as allowed CallerID number - this is done by BT - but BT do not seem to understand this. Also our old local exchange was a System X but the new one is System Y. Anyone any ideas on this? Paul