Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "bichara".
2004 Jan 22
2
ETSI PRI ISDN Signalling
Hi All,
I've bought a R2Adapter to convert R2Digital to ISDN. I am trying to
config E100P card but D-Channel is down. I know R2Adapter uses ETSI ISDN
Protocol so I tried unsucessfully setup switchtype to EuroISDN. Any clue?
Daniel
2004 Aug 22
1
Pulse dialed digit recognization
Hi,
I am using * to guide my callers throught my company's support menu. But
I have problem when the caller has a "pulse dial" telephony. Could *
detect digits dialed on pulse telephones?
Daniel
2004 Jan 25
3
looking for iax termination
Hi,
I am looking for voip termination all over the world especially based on IAX or SIP.
Regards.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040124/25e16736/attachment.htm
2004 Jan 04
2
Two E100P boards - could not load zaptel module - Channel 63 - no such device
Hi,
I have two E100P boards connected to my PC. I wish to setup two
E1-ISDN-PRI lines, the first SPAN with 15 channels and the second one
with 30 channels. When I try to load zaptel modules, I get an error message:
"Loading zaptel framework:
Loading zaptel hardware modules: wct1xxp wcusb
Running ztcfg: ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 63: No such device"
Follows my zaptel.conf:
2004 Jan 10
2
E100P - Error 500
Hi,
I am running * with E100P board. At least every our I got an Error 500
message and ISDN-PRI restarts:
Jan 10 12:53:02 WARNING[98311]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5758
(zt_pri_error): PRI:
Read on 27 failed: Unknown error 500
Jan 10 12:54:27 WARNING[98311]: File chan_zap.c, Line 5758
(zt_pri_error): PRI:
Read on 27 failed: Unknown error 500
Jan 10 13:33:01 WARNING[98311]: File chan_zap.c, Line
2004 Jan 13
11
Best Linux Distribution
Hi
my question is:
which is the best distribution to work with asterisk?
thanks
mark
2003 Dec 19
1
E100P connected to Cisco
Hi All,
I wish to connect * to a Cisco using a E100P board.
When I load the driver I got this error message:
-bash-2.05b# modprobe wct1xxp
ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: Function not implemented (38)
/lib/modules/2.4.21-SAX/misc/wct1xxp.o: post-install wct1xxp failed
/lib/modules/2.4.21-SAX/misc/wct1xxp.o: insmod wct1xxp failed
Follows Cisco configuration:
isdn switch-type primary-qsig
2003 Dec 22
1
ISDN-PRI - WCT1XXP error
Hi,
I am trying to set up * and ISDN-PRI (channels 1 - 15) using E100
boards. I installed zaptel and libpri. When I execute modprobe -r
wct1xxp I get an error message:
ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: Function not implemented (38)
/lib/modules/2.4.21-SAX/misc/wct1xxp.o: post-install wct1xxp failed
/lib/modules/2.4.21-SAX/misc/wct1xxp.o: insmod wct1xxp failed
Follows my /etc/zaptel.conf:
2004 Jan 12
1
CAS Idle definition bits ?
Hi,
Could some one explain what are the 4 bits we should define after cas
setup (zapata.com) ("CAS Signalling requires idle definition in the form
':xxxx' "?
Thanks in advance,
Daniel
2004 Apr 15
1
Unable to process inband DTMF
Hi All,
Since I updated my * (CVS 2004-03-24), daily, I am getting a strange
message just before a segmentation fault: "Unable to process inband DTMF
on 2 frames".
What could it be? Should it cause seg.faults?
Daniel
2004 Jan 10
0
E1 - E100P connected to Cisco - problem - HELP
...;
<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midPine.LNX.4.44.0401080057200.1268-100000@server2.tcw.telecomplete.net">
<pre wrap="">Steve
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Daniel Bichara wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
I am trying to connect * E100P directly to Cisco using an ATM circuit.
The ATM circuit is ok (I can connect to Ciscos). I do not understando
too much about Cisco syntax, please help me.
######...
2004 Jan 12
1
E100P - connected to Cisco
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Hi,<br>
<br>
have any one sucessfully connected E100P to Cisco? I am