search for: arm11

...4.x CPU: X86 I have been able to build llvm. I could not find anywhere in the build or documentation that my build of llvm can produce an ARM binary.In the config.log I could see it detected an X86 CPU which is correct since I am using in fact an X86 host CPU. I would like to know how to build an ARM11 binary from a c-source code. It would be great if I can get all the necessary steps to producing an ARM11 binary. Moreover My native CPU system is an X86 not an arm. What I want to test is whether I can use the llvm to compile my C-programs to produce ARM11 binaries which I would transfer into my...

...4.x CPU: X86 I have been able to build llvm. I could not find anywhere in the build or documentation that my build of llvm can produce an ARM binary.In the config.log I could see it detected an X86 CPU which is correct since I am using in fact an X86 host CPU. I would like to know how to build an ARM11 binary from a c-source code. It would be great if I can get all the necessary steps to producing an ARM11 binary. Moreover My native CPU system is an X86 not an arm. What I want to test is whether I can use the llvm to compile my C-programs to produce ARM11 binaries which I would transfer into my...

...e 2 systems that I can volunteer. - Cortex-A8 I have bunch of devices but they are only good for target testing. - Cortex-Mx ARMv7M I have myriad of boards that I use for target testing, the problem is that they can only run very small testcases. - Assorted ARMv4, ARMv5 and ARMv6 architecture or ARM11, ARM9 and ARM7 processors. Usable for host testing are the Marvell Armada/Kirkwood based Plug Computers, easy to get and I can volunteer 1. Just my 32-bits. Pawel

Hi, I have been reading about llvm and clang and vmkit, and must say: great work guys. So when i got my raspberry pi, and having read that llvm is better at arm than gcc, i compiled llvm on the pi. The pi has a soc with armv6 (i don't know what that means exactly though). The pi is not fast and llvm with clang compilation took 22 h, but worked. hurrah. Then i compiled llvm/clang with itself

Hi, I am trying to build llvm-2.1 and llvm-gcc4 but running into build errors and not getting the code base compiled successfully since quite a few time. My host OS: Linux(Debian-Ubuntu) My Host processor: i686 My target processor: Arm11/Arm9 Languages support needed: c, c++ host compiler version: gcc 4.0.1 I am getting errors while compiling LLVM and llvm-gcc both: The LLVM build error is copy pasted below: llvm[2]: ======= Finished Linking Release Executable llvm-dis (without symbols) make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/amitsingh/...

What about ARM target ? I mean iPhone/iPod Touch has an ARM11 with a FPE and a VFPE. Does llvm-gcc 2.2 generates better code for them ? I'm a bit disappointed about the llvm-gcc 2.0 I tried for my iPod Touch as I saw it generated ARM code not very optimically : r7(apparently used like a frame pointer even when -fomit-frame-pointer is given) largely o...

The Nokia N800 is an OMAP 2420 which is an ARM11. If you want an OMAP 3530 today, I think the cheapest route is the Beagleboard. deep On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > Bob Wilson wrote: >> On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >>> Hmm.  Well, my motivation is that I...

...ry sad, that they have discontinued their MIPS backend years ago, and only Alpha, and backends for the ugly x86. In terms of research, the most necessary backends are the following (personal opinion). 1. MIPS R3000, R4400, R10000 2. SPARC V7 to V9 (very close to no. 1) 3. PowerPC 4. ARM7, ARM9, ARM11 5. Alphas, but since the Alpha has very low sales in Europe, and talking from my point of view it is not that necessary. If a backend is to be used you have to do at least the following: do_gen ... with option -target_lib <my_target> do_raga ... this does the register allocation do_fin ......

...mit Singh wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to build llvm-2.1 and llvm-gcc4 but running into build > errors and not getting the code base compiled successfully since > quite a few time. > > My host OS: Linux(Debian-Ubuntu) > My Host processor: i686 > My target processor: Arm11/Arm9 > Languages support needed: c, c++ > host compiler version: gcc 4.0.1 > I am getting errors while compiling LLVM and llvm-gcc both: > > The LLVM build error is copy pasted below: > llvm[2]: ======= Finished Linking Release Executable llvm-dis > (without symbols) > mak...

Bob Wilson wrote: > On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >> Hmm. Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >> has the >> Cortex-A8). It's not going to arrive here for a couple more months, >> I think. >> When it does finally arrive, I want to be able to immediately begin >> work on >> replacing the Linux that

Sandeep Patel wrote: > The Nokia N800 is an OMAP 2420 which is an ARM11. > > If you want an OMAP 3530 today, I think the cheapest route is the Beagleboard. Yeah, I see that now, about the N800. About the BeagleBoard, if you're going after an equivalent # of peripherals (screen and keyboard are things I wanted) then, really, I think that the Pandora is chea...

...s("v6z", "v6zk", "v6kz") Index: unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp =================================================================== --- unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (revision 257090) +++ unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (working copy) @@ -851,6 +851,10 @@ EXPECT_EQ("arm1136jf-s", Triple.getARMCPUForArch()); } { + llvm::Triple Triple("armv6l-unknown-eabi"); + EXPECT_EQ("arm1136jf-s", Triple.getARMCPUForArch()); + } + { llvm::Triple Triple("armv6j-unknown-eabi"); EXPECT_EQ("arm1136jf-s", Triple.getAR...

...p 20 # store back to original location. Notice 16+4=20 LLVM represents the above as something like: (set a, (add (add a,b), 123) -- Øyvind Harboe Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer

...t; It's probably best to produce the binaries on a Cortex-A9 (Panda ES), since they're the most common target and the binaries work quite well on A15s. We still support Cortex-A8 platforms, and one of the most widely deployed ARM platforms for us at the moment is the Raspberry Pi, which is ARM11. I have one sitting on my desk doing nothing at the moment, which could probably be hooked up to the network and used for LLVM builds, although a clean build will probably take about 24 hours on it. David

...erspective) is > that it doesn't have an MMU, so any "real" operating system > environment will be far more artificial than we'd like, and probably > very low down on qemu's list of priorities to boot. > > Testing a Thumb1 CPU with an MMU (I'm sure there are ARM11* CPUs with > MMU but before Thumb2, but would need to dig into which is closest to > v6m) would cover *most* issues, but obviously not the ways in which > Cortex-M0 is closer to v7 than v6. Why not test on real hardware? https://developer.mbed.org/platforms/DipCortex-M0/ cheers, --renat...

Hello, I'll start a voip project, but i don't know which DSP is more indicate for the project. Any one can help me??? Which processor is more indicate for speex use ??? Thank you!! Rafael V. Gon?alves

Dear Speex developers I am going to port Speex on LPC2368 I tested Speex encoding and the mesurments shows ~40ms cpu time for one frame Do you know who ported speex to NXP or other 32bit platform? Best Regards Zohar fox -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20081105/8261e962/attachment.htm

On 12/16/14 3:53 AM, Kristof Beyls wrote: > I've been wondering too about how to get better ARM v6m compile-and-execute > testing going. > > As you say Jon, the non-execution-based regression tests are surprisingly > good at catching issues; but they're no full substitute for executing the > code produced by the backend for a reasonably-sized test suite. > > If

...d test case, that would be awesome, but the patch is correct as-is even if not. > > -Jim > > On Jul 2, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Matt Fischer <mattfischer84 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've been playing around with using LLVM on one of our projects, which >> runs on an arm1176jzf-s processor. When compiling for Thumb, a couple >> of the generated assembly files end up with a 'ror.w' instruction, >> which is a Thumb2 instruction. Since arm1176jzf-s doesn't support >> Thumb2, the assembler then turns around and barfs on it. >> >&...

Hi all, I need a periodic timer running at ideally at 125 microseconds and at least 500 microseconds. I''ve just found the VCPUOP_set_periodic_timer, however there is a comment saying "periods less than one millisecond may not be supported". I will be running on an x64 machine. Is this supported? If not, is there any alternate means of generating a fast interrupt? Regards.