search for: als

my list al is as below: al=list(c(2,3),5,7) > al [[1]] [1] 2 3 [[2]] [1] 5 [[3]] [1] 7 and I check the second component, its element is 5, then I remove this, now my al is: al[[2]][al[[2]]!=5]->al[[2]] > al [[1]] [1] 2 3 [[2]] numeric(0) [[3]] [1] 7 The Question is, how I can get the new list without the second component, that is : > alwanted [[1]] [1] 2 3 [[2]] [1] 7 Thank

Hi I searched in the list and only found questions without answers e.g. http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/19955.html : Is there a way to get the same results with lme as with aov with Error()? Can anybody reproduce the following results with lme: id<-c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5)

I'm trying to see how the x86 backend deals with the relationship between AL, AH and AX, but I can't get it to generate any code that would expose an interesting scenario. For example, I wrote this piece: typedef struct { char x, y; } struct_t; struct_t z; struct_t foo(char *p) { struct_t s; s.x = *p++; s.y = *p; z =...

Hello list, this is the communication between an Aastra 5000 PBX and Asterisk, where the Aastra makes a call to Asterisk. For some reason, Asterisk responds with 401-Unauthorized and I don't know why. Calls go well with Panasonic PBX, Avaya PBX, Alcatel-Lucent PBX but NOT with this Aastra. A1.A1.A1.A1 = IP-address Asterisk PBX AS.AS.AS.AS = IP-address Aastra PBX Aastra PBX makes a call

...07 12 AL 2009 16 AL 2010 15 FL 2006 63 FL 2007 14 FL 2007 25 FL 2009 64 FL 2009 47 FL 2010 48 NY 2003 50 NY 2004 51 NY 2006 57 NY 2007 62 NY 2007 36 NY 2009 87 NY 2009 96 NY 2010 91 NY 2010 59 NY 2010 80"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) There are three states, I wan tto select states taht do ahve records in all year. Example, xtabs(Y~stat+year, tdat) This gave me the following stat 2003 2004 2006 2007 2009 2010 AL 38 21 20 12 16 15 FL 0 0 63 39 111 48 NY 50 51 57 98 183 230 Fl state...

Dear R community, I am trying to create a matrix of permutations of a vector: bands <- c("AL", "B", "DB", "DG", "G", "K", "LB", "LG", "MG", "O", "P", "PI", "PK", "PU", "R", "V", "W", "Y") Each permutation must be 4

...--------------------------------- Note that I do not know how to get a separate T0 fit for each Type/Tissue, so I have created a column TypeTissue that has a unique designator for each Type/Tissue combination. Nevertheless, I *think* this is doing what I want. Given my limited stats training, I also like the fact that the Corr b/w aL and aN is very low. Moving on, the second model I would like to fit assumes that the population of aN and aL values across the set of Tissues differ between Types. I have tried a number of different syntaxes, but I can't seem to get the output I was e...

...lto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of >Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev >Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 8:04 AM >To: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >Subject: [llvm-dev] Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend > >I'm trying to see how the x86 backend deals with the relationship >between AL, AH and AX, but I can't get it to generate any code that >would expose an interesting scenario. > >For example, I wrote this piece: > >typedef struct { > char x, y; >} struct_t; > >struct_t z; > >struct_t foo(char *p) { &gt...

...llvm.org] On Behalf Of > >Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev > >Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 8:04 AM > >To: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > >Subject: [llvm-dev] Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend > > > >I'm trying to see how the x86 backend deals with the relationship > >between AL, AH and AX, but I can't get it to generate any code that > >would expose an interesting scenario. > > > >For example, I wrote this piece: > > > >typedef struct { > > char x, y; > >} struct_t; > > > &g...

Hello, I'm trying to do some non-linear regression with 2 cell types and 4 tissue type treatments using selfStart models Following Ritz and Streibig (2009), I wrote the following routines: ##Selfstart expDecayAndConstantInflowModel <- function(Tb0, time, aL, aN, T0){ exp(-time*aL)*(T0*aL+(-1+exp(time * aL))*Tb0 * aN)/aL } expDecayAndConstantInflowModelInit <- function(mCall, LHS,

Dear Listmember. I try to migrate from my current courier-mta setup fo postfix dovecot setup. I use the following scirpt to filter to the destination mailbox. ### /var/vmail/none.at/al/sieve/lists.sieve require ["fileinto", "subaddress", "envelope" ]; if envelope :detail "to" "pdnsusers" { fileinto "Lists.pdnsusers"; } ###

Hi! After more work on the oplock_break problem, I've found the following in my tcpdump-smb logging. It seems that when ost5 (pid=26339 in the logs that follow) requests access to the oplocked file comm.inf from ost6 (pid=5872) the oplock_break failes (this is NOT isolated to any one or two systems on our network, just using these two as an example, and the server reports no dropped packets

...FL 2007 25 > FL 2009 64 > FL 2009 47 > FL 2010 48 > NY 2003 50 > NY 2004 51 > NY 2006 57 > NY 2007 62 > NY 2007 36 > NY 2009 87 > NY 2009 96 > NY 2010 91 > NY 2010 59 > NY 2010 80"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) > > There are three states, I wan tto select states taht do ahve records in all > year. > Example, > xtabs(Y~stat+year, tdat) > This gave me the following > > stat 2003 2004 2006 2007 2009 2010 > AL 38 21 20 12 16 15 > FL 0 0 63 39 111...

Then let me shift focus from performance to size. With either optsize or minsize, the output is still the same. As per the subject, I'm not really interested in the quality of the final code, but in the way that the x86 target deals with the structural relationship between these registers. Specifically, I'd like to see if it would generate implicit defs/uses for AX on defs/uses of AH/AL. I looked in the X86 sources and I didn't find code that would make me certain, but I'm not too familiar with that backend....

Hi! Been having the same problem with oplocks for a while and have been trying to figure out what's going wrong. The FAQ says that we may have a networking (hardware?) problem, but according to the Linux box's ifconfig results, we have had no errors and no dropped packets on the internal network. I am able to reproduce the error pretty much at will on our network, and it is not isolated

Hi all, I have a problem with an observer. I have a simple observer... class ActivityObserver < ActiveRecord::Observer observe Customer def after_create(model) bind_params(model) @al.action = "create" @al.save logger "#{model.id} : created" end private def bind_params(model) @al = ActivityLog.new @al.user_id = User.current.id

...;> NY 2007 62 >> NY 2007 36 >> NY 2009 87 >> NY 2009 96 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=2009%C2%A0+%C2%A0+96+%0D%0ANY&entry=gmail&source=g> >> NY 2010 91 >> NY 2010 59 >> NY 2010 80"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) >> >> There are three states, I wan tto select states taht do ahve records in >> all >> year. >> Example, >> xtabs(Y~stat+year, tdat) >> This gave me the following >> >> stat 2003 2004 2006 2007 2009 2010 >> AL 38 21 20 12...

Dear R-list Suppose I have a data set stored in hmet, for which I did get confidence limit on a linear regression as shown below. My question is how I can subset only data points which are within the confidence limit. Thank you. Keun-Hyung --------------------------------------------------------------- Al=rnorm(100, 3) Cd=rnorm(100, 0.2) hmet=data.frame(Al=Al, Cd=Cd) plot(Al,

Hi Krzysztof, > On May 24, 2016, at 8:03 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to see how the x86 backend deals with the relationship between AL, AH and AX, but I can't get it to generate any code that would expose an interesting scenario. > > For example, I wrote this piece: > > typedef struct { > char x, y; > } struct_t; > > struct_t z; > > struct_t foo(char *p) { &gt...

...v <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Then let me shift focus from performance to size. With either optsize or minsize, the output is still the same. > > As per the subject, I'm not really interested in the quality of the final code, but in the way that the x86 target deals with the structural relationship between these registers. Specifically, I'd like to see if it would generate implicit defs/uses for AX on defs/uses of AH/AL. I looked in the X86 sources and I didn't find code that would make me certain, but I'm not too familiar with that backend. Hav...