search for: accuse

On Thu, January 14, 2016 11:46 am, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Timo Sch??ler wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 01/14/2016 05:34 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Michael H wrote: >>>> Probably worth a read... >>>> >>>> http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.1p2 >>>>

before I accuse somebody to "overbill" I would like you to calculate with me: Rate: 0.0189 for calling Taiwan via NuFone Duration: 930 seconds Lets vote for the answers: 0.7269 or 0.2929 ??? bye Ronald Wiplinger

...dia.org/wiki/Sui_generis_database_right). Referring to Clang source to ascertain certain facts wouldn't necessarily put any requirement on the licensing of the code you later produce. However for safety many might prefer not to look at the source so that any incidental similarities can't be accused of being due to copying code directly. If you're worried about this, asking a community member to use the Clang source to write a short document on the details you require might be a way forward. Alex

Hello James, About the warning, I only accept it and try to create a new attribute/class. However, when I put all the parameters (name, OID, syntax...), the system accuses that the server is unable to proceed. Do you know if Samba's schema is closed, that cannot be modified? Lucas On 11/1/2016 11:18 AM, Lukz Ferris via samba wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I'm trying to create new attributes/classes in Samba AD using Windows RSAT tools, per...

Daniel, nobody has accused you of reinventing the wheel. You give up too easily. If you want to develop a standard, it takes a lot of discussion and input - and it takes diplomacy. Attacking people and attacking the community will not be helpful. You have asked for feedback - feedback has been given. Now it's time to t...

...com >> Please, don't advertize Kaspersky here, especially when we are talking >> about trust. He is KGB guy (is, not was; the only way they retire from >> KGB, CIA, MI-5, and others is dead, feet first dead). >> >> Valeri > I am not advertising, so please do not accuse anyone of this! > Just citing evidence that infiltration of spyware and malware > is far more sophisticated than anyone knew. Sorry if it sounded like that: didn't mean it to sound like accusation... I'm not native English speaker, you know ;-) Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++...

Greetings all, This has come up a few times, and I would like to resume the effort to establish an LLVM code of conduct. First and foremost, many thanks to Philip Reames who sat down with me several months ago and worked through a number of suggestions that I've tried to incorporate into an updated patch with the draft text: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741 I think his updates plus a few

...o both) requires one to pre-bin the distributions. Is there a library function (either built-in or in a package) that acts more like the ks.test() function, in that one can simply pass the two distributions and have it do the necessary binning as well as the actual statistical test? (Yes, you can accuse me of laziness: I just don't fancy trying to figure out a routine that would make sure that there more than 5 samples in each of the expected bins before applying the chi-squared test. It seems too much like re-inventing an elementary wheel that must have been invented by someone else.)

Hi David/Galina, FYI, I found one big reason why self-hosting bots fail long after the offending commit is tested: dirty builds. In a dirty build (no make clean), when a file X is changed that breaks file Y, the bot will only accuse the failure when file Y is changed, too, so that stage1 with modified X will compile file Y, and break. At hindsight, it's obvious. But I hadn't connected the dots before... :/ I'm moving all my self-hosting bots to clean builds and will be relying solely on ccache to make stage1 fast...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Fielding [mailto:paul@fielding.ca] > Frankly, I agree. If you don't like the question, feel it's > lame or dumb, > or don't like that someone hasn't done their research, then > delete the message. Well, sometimes that works. But I've been on a lot of lists where newbies who thought they were being ignored

...; Epistle* for Android. I am not trying to implement this cool little light language into an app I am developing; maybe someday. I signed up because I thought I might get some MarkDown use tips. *I have learned nothing from this list.* I have witnessed a lot of bitching (which I guess you could accuse me of now) and in-fighting. Adults acting like children. I just read a long post about how "no one is listening to me...." Waah. Waah. Probably going to unsubscribe; so far all of these emails have just been DELETE, DELETE, DELETE. I hope to gather some useful knowledge on this little...

...er_IP_Address)" as the Network Drive description, for example: share on 'Our Samba Server' (K:) I've had a look through man smb.conf but cannot find anything. Thank you to those who replied. You all mentioned "server string". A couple of you went a little further and accused me of not "reading the xxxxxxx manual". Thank you for the reminder but I am well aware of the protocol for using bulletin boards, forums, mailing lists, etc. In fact I had already read the online Samba guide, and two sets of man pages, and I had already seen and tried "server string...

On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:54 pm, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 06/12/2015 02:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Fri, June 12, 2015 3:20 pm, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 6/12/2015 1:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>>> But the bottom line is the same: in both cases you are executing >>>> somebody's else code on your computer. >>> >>> your

...o.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: > Hi David/Galina, > > FYI, I found one big reason why self-hosting bots fail long after the > offending commit is tested: dirty builds. > > In a dirty build (no make clean), when a file X is changed that breaks > file Y, the bot will only accuse the failure when file Y is changed, > too, so that stage1 with modified X will compile file Y, and break. > > That sounds like a bug in the build system - do you have any examples of this? We should fix them. > > The build should be reliable - any case where a clean build produces...

...n,DC=MYDOMAIN Referral # ref: ldap: //interno.mastersonda.com.br/DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=MYDOMAIN Referral # ref: ldap: //interno.mastersonda.com.br/DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=MYDOMAIN # Returned 4 records # 1 entries # 3 referrals One important thing to previous email error edited the file in line where accuses the error I came /opt/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py +282 and commented the line (not sure if this and bad) # names.policyid = str (res7 [0] ["cn"]). replace ("{", ""). replace ("}", "") Thus the error entering...

Hi Galina, I have observed that some of my bots timeout for no apparent reason (no external load, no network mishaps, no issues), and when I go to check the buildslave process, I see that it has just being restarted. Do you know what could be causing this? Swap is untouched, plenty of disk left, CPUs a plenty. So, I'm contemplating the possibility that the master lost connectivity to it and

Hello everyone, I'm trying to create new attributes/classes in Samba AD using Windows RSAT tools, perhaps it always accuses that the server is unable to proceed. Now I even think if it is possible to create new attributes/classes in Samba. Someone can help me? Thanks, Lucas

After accusing someone of typing 'install.packages("weather")' instead of 'install.packages("webmaps")', I discovered that R-forge really is currently returning the wrong source tarball for packages after 'Repitools' in the alphabet. The data returned from available.package in install.packages goes out of sync at 'Repitools': RemoteREngine

...rt (I've also upgraded the necessary packages). I've used tune2fs to make the current ext2 partitions (incluind /) and changed fstab to reflect that. In order to test if everything is ok (this is a test machine) I've switched off with no shutdown. Except the / all other partitions accused a "journaling something at boot time". Since I can see the .journal I assume that it may be a explicit call to fsck.ext2 somewhere (/etc/rc.xxxx?) . Is this correct ? Does anyboy know where to change that ? Best Regards, Lx

Fellows, Someone has probably asked about it before, but I've just joinned this list. I'm having some trouble with Windows XP clients. Here's what's happening: some clients join the Samba Domain normally but, after the required boot (always required - it's a Windows machine), the machine refuses to logon to the domains accusing that the PDC could not be found; another